

Return to “Harry Stephen Keeler [ENDGAME]”
I agree.DFaraday wrote:Thank you, Vomp. I kind of hope Vomp wins, he's the only one of you all who's making sense this game.Vompatti wrote:I'm voting for Bass k
That's a strange thought to have because the roles are randomized and there are generally less baddies than goodies.Black Rock wrote:Unless you are surprised because you thought for sure that player was bad.Vompatti wrote:I don't understand why it's common practice to act surprised when lynching a civ. Trying to make it look like an accident does NOT make it alright. In a righteous society anyone who lynches anyone would be categorically lynched.
I woudln't mind beating film directors if you know what I mean.thellama73 wrote:We just passed the Hobbit in post count, and only 60 more posts to beat Film Directors. Come on, guys!fingersplints wrote:So quiet.rezz and I will post loads
![]()
It's because I'm pretending to be silenced.Turnip Head wrote:Vompatti. lolDom wrote:has anyone else not posted?Turnip Head wrote:Elo hasn't posted at all Day 7. Could she be silenced?
I was merely alluding to that theory, which I'm sure is false.LizKeen wrote:I don't understand this post, unless you're saying TH IS the millionaire.Vompatti wrote:He should be thankful for all the votes I gave him.S~V~S wrote:Maybe he thinks you're bad, Sugar. It happens.Vompatti wrote:If Turnip Head is not bad, why did he vote for me?
I identify more as a horse now.S~V~S wrote:Oh Vomps, you're so awesome. I am gonna feel bad voting for you. I miss your Wombat, I hope you bring it back someday.Vompatti wrote:He should be thankful for all the votes I gave him.S~V~S wrote:Maybe he thinks you're bad, Sugar. It happens.Vompatti wrote:If Turnip Head is not bad, why did he vote for me?
He should be thankful for all the votes I gave him.S~V~S wrote:Maybe he thinks you're bad, Sugar. It happens.Vompatti wrote:If Turnip Head is not bad, why did he vote for me?
I don't follow along with games even when I am playing, yet I keep getting asked to play.Long Con wrote:What about the other players who DO care about winning? Players who are on your team? Seems like a really poor and selfish attitude to have. If this were a baseball team, and you were the guy that "didn't care about winning", so you do a funny dance while the ball is in play instead of trying to throw or catch it... your team would get pretty upset that you hurt their chances of winning, and they'd have a pretty darn valid point.Vompatti wrote:I don't care about winning, therefore I play the way I feel like playing regardless of my role.Long Con wrote:I just don't understand you, man. I want to. People were pushing for you to be our ambassador, to be our Champions Game nominee. I didn't understand if they were joking or not... maybe you have an impressive history of wins under your belt that I'm simply ignorant of, I can only go off the limited experience I've had with you. You seem to give purposely enigmatic answers to most questions. Help me out here, tell me what your angle is maybe?Vompatti wrote:Thanks for the overwhelming support.
Maybe you should just follow along with games and make non-player comments along the way instead of playing them?
I don't care about winning, therefore I play the way I feel like playing regardless of my role.Long Con wrote:I just don't understand you, man. I want to. People were pushing for you to be our ambassador, to be our Champions Game nominee. I didn't understand if they were joking or not... maybe you have an impressive history of wins under your belt that I'm simply ignorant of, I can only go off the limited experience I've had with you. You seem to give purposely enigmatic answers to most questions. Help me out here, tell me what your angle is maybe?Vompatti wrote:Thanks for the overwhelming support.
If more people sampled King Crimson the world would be a better place.Metalmarsh89 wrote:I would sample King Crimson if I wrote music.Vompatti wrote:I can't believe Kanye West sampled King Crimson!
No reason really.Long Con wrote:He does seem more focused than usual. Maybe he's the one who silenced TH.S~V~S wrote:Such voting consistency is UNLIKE him.Long Con wrote:Vomps' crime is being Vomps, right? Not contributing much, acting weird? Low posting?
Vomps, why the TH focus?
I didn't know he was silenced because I didn't read the thread. I only voted for him because I had a feeling MM had hard evidence that he's bad.fingersplints wrote:Did Vomps give a reason for his TH vote? I'm used to Vomps being kind of out there as a player, but I'm just a little surprised he would vote a silenced player without giving a reason. (Unless I missed the vote. There has been a lot going on)
I love that even after having removed that seemingly feminine quote about quilting I'm still being considered a gril.LizKeen wrote: As for Vompatti, well, this is the sum total of her posts this game: [--]
I believe you. *votes TH*Metalmarsh89 wrote:But here's the problem here, I am not bad.juliets wrote:I didn't expect to find all these votes for Metalmarsh this morning. I was worried I would have to find someone else to vote for even though I was most suspicious of him, but I think enough people have voted for MM that it's safe for me to vote him. I think he's bad this game.
Anyway, I've changed my mind. I've decided that I will still attempt to prove to the rest of you that TH is bad. I hope at least one person will read it.
krabbit8 wrote:Vompatti wrote:You're a conservative and I beg to differ.rabbit8 wrote:Black Rock wrote:FUCK! Poor dead me.
No. Necrophilia is gross.
Bow down to you Authoritarian overlord and commence with the begging.
You're a conservative and I beg to differ.rabbit8 wrote:Black Rock wrote:FUCK! Poor dead me.
No. Necrophilia is gross.
No I made it up!Metalmarsh89 wrote:Did you read that in a book?Vompatti wrote:MP is a confirmed civ.
I find it highly suspicious that you claim to know who has posted and who has not, as if you had browsed through every page of the thread (and for what purpose?).Turnip Head wrote:Metalmarsh89 has yet to post in this game. Is he aware that he's playing?