The Syndicate

Long Con wrote:But there was no reason to vote anyone else at the time. You put in one suspect, and three trusteds. DAMN though, should have gone with Russ. I trusted him from an early post that felt genuine to me.

The one flaw in my plan was how nobody ever talks about new suspects.

Golden wrote:
DharmaHelper wrote:
Golden wrote:
DharmaHelper wrote:
Golden wrote:
DharmaHelper wrote:
-- Whether DH used any abilities in the two nights he was alive (and what and on whom)
4-Person poll thingy and protection on myself, I think.
You are to blame for my lynch?
In fairness, your vote was sketchy.
In fairness - you created a poll in which I was virtually a guaranteed lynch with no information except one sketchy vote...

And I was a cop.

My bad.

It was pretty funny, in a way. And somehow I still nearly managed to survive (thanks MM!)

And frankly, I don't think my presence would have been enough to catch russti.

My dumbass plan was to narrow the poll down to (what I thought) was an interesting pool of suspects in the hope that even though you were on the list, people would talk about and vote for the others

Golden wrote:
DharmaHelper wrote:
Golden wrote:
DharmaHelper wrote:
-- Whether DH used any abilities in the two nights he was alive (and what and on whom)
4-Person poll thingy and protection on myself, I think.
You are to blame for my lynch?
In fairness, your vote was sketchy.
In fairness - you created a poll in which I was virtually a guaranteed lynch with no information except one sketchy vote...

And I was a cop.

My bad.

Ricochet wrote:
DharmaHelper wrote:What was that shit I got sent?
Good shit.

I was gonna go ham on it until I got killed.

What was that shit I got sent?

Golden wrote:
DharmaHelper wrote:
-- Whether DH used any abilities in the two nights he was alive (and what and on whom)
4-Person poll thingy and protection on myself, I think.
You are to blame for my lynch?

In fairness, your vote was sketchy.

-- Whether DH used any abilities in the two nights he was alive (and what and on whom)

4-Person poll thingy and protection on myself, I think.

Did I win?

It took you folks that long to avenge me? Really?

Dat late night MS Paint Photoshop tho

Whats gonna happen

That should be in Dead Red Robin

MFW waiting for the lynch post:

Heh..."delicious".

The sound of silence

We share something special.

Epignosis wrote:
DharmaHelper wrote:
Epignosis wrote:Special thanks to my voice extras:

Simon
Abigail
Ephraim

Anybody ever played "Worms?" I swear that sounded like Worms to me.

Bravo to the help all the same.
"Daddy we're hungry... can we have lunch now?"

"Not yet! Daddy needs to make his video. Talk into the microphone like I showed you."

"Daddy please.."

"DO IT!"
Pff...It's always lunch around here with those...things.

The way my life is going, I'm kind of hoping Orville Redenbacher is actually God.

"Dad, Mom said popcorn isn't lunch."

"Yeah? WELL MOM ALSO TOLD L SHE WAS MAFIA!"

"What?"

Epignosis wrote:Special thanks to my voice extras:

Simon
Abigail
Ephraim

Anybody ever played "Worms?" I swear that sounded like Worms to me.

Bravo to the help all the same.

"Daddy we're hungry... can we have lunch now?"

"Not yet! Daddy needs to make his video. Talk into the microphone like I showed you."

"Daddy please.."

"DO IT!"

RIP El Okin.

El Okin. Lmao

RIPIYWG DH

Ricochet wrote:Also, DH was lynched.

Wait what no way

Me llamo supatown

Epignosis wrote:

It is now Day 5. You have 24 hours to lynch someone.

Hey everybody who didn't vote : Fuck you guys

EBWOP: That did not linki me, sorry.

espers wrote:cookie's vote is one I can't make sense of in the least, press her hard on that.

don't understand elohcin's vote, throwaway votes at this point seem like a way to try to skirt by on wifom and avoid meaningful vote analysis

don't understand G-man's vote, why'd he feel the need to protect dharma?

why does dh think ddl should be left alive if he's moloch?

Because Moloch can kill the Mafia.

I'm really good at flushing out mafia at least.

Epi you better give me the role I want for Arkham btw.

Rorschach better clean up.

Also I spelled that correctly first go around. Nice.

DDL is either Moloch or a Watchman. Either way I would let him alone till endgame.

If I die at least I played 1 Day legit :P

Shoulda kept my mouth shut I guess.

EBWOP: Espers/Cookie or Cookie/Eloh guys.

MovingPictures07 wrote:I think the remaining two mafia members very well may be some combination of:

Cookie and espers
Cookie and DDL
Cookie and Elohcin
DDL and Elohcin

Discuss.

G-Man wrote:I just got home 10 minutes ago. Didn't read back. Saw the poll with DH in the lead. I voted to protect him. I hope it worked. If it does, I hope it was worth it.

Bruh

Nice job beating Biblical mafia for Epi's least played game guys

If I'm lynched I'll fucking flip.

Participation scores may be the best idea I've ever had

LoRab is always the SK

Elohcin wrote:Okay, DH. You defend yourself well. And MP, I see what you are saying about ISOs.

Thanks. I've been around the block a few times :P

MovingPictures07 wrote:
Elohcin wrote:DH went through and listed who did/said what in his posts today. It was almost like he was just throwing the info out there to see who would say what and then it would be easy for him to jump on a suspicion and not be able to be blamed for it when the lynched person turns up civ. His "ISOs" did more of stating the facts of players' gameplay than giving his own opinion. I think this could be a baddie tactic. Does that explain it any better, MP?
Thanks for elaborating, Elo!

To provide context on what an ISO is, it's really just analysis of a player's content, typically with links (DH did not do this). It's not necessarily meant to state suspicions.

That said, I find it interesting you say it was more so stating facts than giving his own opinion. I remember him summarizing his read, in terms of alignment, after every single ISO.

Do you think DH seems likely to bandwagon onto others' suspicions, given he was the only one to vote for LoRab on Day 1 and the only one to vote for LC on Day 2 (someone fact check me on these)?

Tag out homie, I'm good.

DharmaHelper wrote:
Elohcin wrote:DH went through and listed who did/said what in his posts today. It was almost like he was just throwing the info out there to see who would say what and then it would be easy for him to jump on a suspicion and not be able to be blamed for it when the lynched person turns up civ. His "ISOs" did more of stating the facts of players' gameplay than giving his own opinion. I think this could be a baddie tactic. Does that explain it any better, MP?
Nope. I summarized what jumped out at me and then at the bottom drew conclusions based on that.

So.

Also, what you're saying makes no logical sense.

1) I went through and summarized who said what in my posts. -> Yes, I suppose you're right, I did that. As I promised I would, since I'd been behind up until today and needed to offer my thoughts.
2) Throwing info out in to the thread to see who would respond and how they would respond -> Welcome to mafia
3) Easy to jump onto a suspicion and not be able to be blamed for it. -> I'm confused how that would work. It would be my thoughts/summaries that the suspicions stemmed from, so how could I duck responsibility? Also, when have you known me to jump on anyone's suspicion? Shameful

4) More facts than opinions -> See "Conclusions" part in literally every one of my posts.

Elohcin wrote:DH went through and listed who did/said what in his posts today. It was almost like he was just throwing the info out there to see who would say what and then it would be easy for him to jump on a suspicion and not be able to be blamed for it when the lynched person turns up civ. His "ISOs" did more of stating the facts of players' gameplay than giving his own opinion. I think this could be a baddie tactic. Does that explain it any better, MP?

Nope. I summarized what jumped out at me and then at the bottom drew conclusions based on that.

So.

Dragon D. Luffy wrote:
MovingPictures07 wrote:
Dragon D. Luffy wrote:
MovingPictures07 wrote:You don't think DharmaHelper's behavior is consistent with what RL/posts he's provided? He did detail that he would be busy, then warned us he would have opinions on every player during Day 3. Yet you find him suspicious for delivering on his promise of contributing reads?
No. What I mean is that him posting ISOs hardly means anything about his alignment.
You don't think his baddie hunting is genuine?
Look, I gave a bunch of reasons why I thought he was mafia, right?

If after that, I am to analyse the baddie hunting, my opinion of it is that it doesn't mean anything. Him being more town/mafia doesn't change because of it. Actually, it made me suspect him a little more, given the double-OMGUS-inversion-of-the-burden-of proof-combo he made of me.

I'm not saying the baddie hunting on d3 looks genuine. I'm saying everything else looks non-genuine, and the baddie hunting doesn't improve that.

You're making up 60% of this.

Ricochet wrote:So after a post in which I call Eloh on suspects jumpiness, she literally jumps on DH based on DDL's read on him and switches from inquiring MP on his Cookie suss to thinking it could make sense.

with an Y.

Makes no sense Eloh.

Search found 100 matches