The Syndicate

Three hours later, I think it's safe to assume no one gets it.

Like the semantics joke.

Ricochet wrote: ↑Sun Jun 18, 2017 1:34 am Endphase was just feeeed
Of the chicken, seeeed
Nothing for me to reeead
Just my heart to bleed

I can't believe that you of all people would have the gall to complain that there's not enough information/discussion during any phase of this game. If that's what you're doing. That's what I interpret from you calling endphase chicken-feed.

My only criticism of you in this game has been that you were specifically restricting yourself to OMGUS suspicions. If you want to criticize the rest of us for not doing well enough, then start doing better yourself. Good night.

Ricochet wrote: ↑Sun Jun 18, 2017 1:34 am Now look what you have doooone
All my family is goooone

Oh yeah, that thing. I haven't seen Blue Velvet, but someone (RIP G-Man?) mentioned a roleclaim in this. Are you roleclaiming a daughter whose parents have both been killed in this game? It's right over my head, because I don't know the characters.

Epignosis wrote: ↑Sun Jun 18, 2017 12:43 am Please lynch me tomorrow so LC can learn something about himself.

I'm always open to some education! When do I vote?

Epignosis wrote: ↑Sun Jun 18, 2017 12:29 am

DharmaHelper wrote: ↑Sun Jun 18, 2017 12:28 am

Epignosis wrote: ↑Sun Jun 18, 2017 12:22 am And guess what? I'm going to lay low tomorrow.

I am in charge of an entire church service. Music, announcements, sermon! I'm doing it all. So you probably won't see me much tomorrow either.

I'm laying low. I volunteered to do all this to keep my bad role a secret.

"Let beer be for those who are perishing, wine for those who are in anguish! Let them drink and forget their poverty and remember their misery no more." -Proverbs 31:6-7

I guarantee you none of these church people have heard this one.

Well damn, I might just put aside my atheism for a night to party with... Mr Proverbs.

Epignosis wrote: ↑Sun Jun 18, 2017 12:15 am

Long Con wrote: ↑Sat Jun 17, 2017 11:55 pm

Quin wrote: ↑Sat Jun 17, 2017 11:51 pm Hey Epi, is LC your baddie teammate?

I wish!

Epignosis wrote: ↑Sat Jun 17, 2017 11:48 pm I am done interacting with LC. If people think he's got me pegged, they're fools. Other shit to do besides engage with someone who has never gotten me right a single time in the history of mafia.

The Epi doth protest too much, methinks!

And I got you exactly right in Mass Effect. We can debate the various alignments that we both could have been considered as, but that does not change the fact that you did exactly what I said you were going to do all along. I'll drop the mic on that shit right here.

Nope. I will fight you forever.

I was a guy who could pick his alignment.

You didn't get me exactly anything because I hadn't chosen a side, and I didn't do exactly what you said I would do. You said I would side with the Reapers and pretend to be a civilian. In fact, I sided with the Reapers and blatantly told everyone I sided with the Reapers.

You are so full of yourself thinking you got one over on me when you didn't.

But you say whatever you need to say to make people think you have my number.

I have never even brought it up dude. You're the one who brought Mass Effect into the conversation. I don't want to "make people think" anything. I'm just trying to lynch a baddie, and you are that baddie.

@Host:

a) What is Public Ranking Voting?

b) What is mutiny?

DharmaHelper wrote: ↑Sat Jun 17, 2017 11:54 pm Personally I think one or two of my posts in this game have been the funniest on the site period.

Don't listen to that sourpuss. I always appreciate your humour and your presence in a game.

Quin wrote: ↑Sat Jun 17, 2017 11:51 pm Hey Epi, is LC your baddie teammate?

I wish!

Epignosis wrote: ↑Sat Jun 17, 2017 11:48 pm I am done interacting with LC. If people think he's got me pegged, they're fools. Other shit to do besides engage with someone who has never gotten me right a single time in the history of mafia.

The Epi doth protest too much, methinks!

And I got you exactly right in Mass Effect. We can debate the various alignments that we both could have been considered as, but that does not change the fact that you did exactly what I said you were going to do all along. I'll drop the mic on that shit right here.

DharmaHelper wrote: ↑Sat Jun 17, 2017 11:35 pm tfw ur bad n u call out epi but he bad n u both r like wat

Exactly! Almost.

Epignosis wrote: ↑Sat Jun 17, 2017 11:33 pm

Long Con wrote: ↑Sat Jun 17, 2017 11:32 pm

Epignosis wrote: ↑Sat Jun 17, 2017 11:27 pm So far, every single time Long Con has come against me, he was evil.

Like when?

Every single time.

Cool, you've got the rolleyes under control, it's taken care of. Thanks!

Epignosis wrote: ↑Sat Jun 17, 2017 11:27 pm So far, every single time Long Con has come against me, he was evil.

Like when?

DharmaHelper wrote: ↑Sat Jun 17, 2017 8:36 pm Phase 2 is tomorrow

How do you know?

Epignosis wrote: ↑Sat Jun 17, 2017 10:27 pm Long Con- Can you think of one instance in which you were good and you called me out for being bad?

Mass Effect. Since I was playing with a genuine desire to hunt baddies, there was literally no difference between that, and my Civvie game.

Epignosis wrote: ↑Sat Jun 17, 2017 8:24 pm I fail to see how this is a Mafia game. I don't know what I'm going or what I'm looking for. Thanks INH.

It solidifies my suspicion of LC. If I don't know what I'm looking for, he sure as hell doesn't.

Anyway, I'm going to work. An Epignosis vote is one of the best votes you can do, it sucks to see self-voters and careless voters ruling the roost. Good luck!

Long Con wrote: ↑Sat Jun 17, 2017 4:29 pmtimmer... can't nail it down, I'm going to have a quick reread of your posts.

Ok, good reread. You spent almost all of Day 1 focusing on my LMS mistake. Otherwise, mostly you've been looking at G-Man. What do you think of Llama? Or DharmaHelper, or Speedchuck?

Yeah people... shower!

I think G would be less likely to self-vote as a baddie. He wouldn't want to let down his team.

nutella looks good to me. I don't think her vote on Epi is exactly where a teammate would vote. And if Epi were good and nut were bad, I think she would steer clear of the Civ-Civ fight.

Llama is being sketchy/lazy, which is a bit annoying, and not really helpful. I feel like he has been 90% Rico-focused. Also, he was one of Sloonei's only suspicions.

Dyslexicon could be bad, I don't really know her well enough to judge. I have the feeling she's difficult to read even for those who know her very well.

Spacedaisy, no read yet.

timmer... can't nail it down, I'm going to have a quick reread of your posts.

The third time? I think you have me confused with someone else.

Epignosis wrote: ↑Sat Jun 17, 2017 3:23 pm I'm going to play Mega Man 3.

Original NES? You know the second-controller superjump trick?

Ricochet wrote: ↑Sat Jun 17, 2017 2:08 pmLong Con is wol-fieee
Eager to lynch meee
Just on poli-cyyy
Which is just stinky

That is not an accurate portrayal of my stance. I am not eager to policy lynch you, Rico.

Epignosis wrote: ↑Sat Jun 17, 2017 1:55 pm As of Day 2, Long Con, you were wrong about me. You are making stuff up. I chose to join the bad team after Day 3. By Day 2, when you kept calling me nervous, I hadn't made up my mind, and had no reason to be nervous. I would have joined the civilians had one more Reaper been lynched by Day 3. It is inaccurate to say you were right about me on Day 2, because I hadn't yet chosen a side.

Then I must be psychic I guess.

I don't see how I phoned in Mass Effect unless you mean after Day 3 when I had chosen the Reapers and had fun channeling my inner SHODAN. If that's the parallel you are drawing, then I don't know what to tell you. During Day 2, I was playing my ass off.

You misunderstand again. When I said you're phoning it in because you're playing like Mass Effect, I didn't mean that you were phoning it in during Mass Efect. I meant you're phoning it in now because you're doing the same tells as in Mass Effect. I don't want to imply that you phoned it in during Mass Effect, you played a fine game during Mass Effect.

Epignosis wrote: ↑Sat Jun 17, 2017 1:08 pm

Long Con wrote: ↑Sat Jun 17, 2017 11:42 am

Epignosis wrote: ↑Sat Jun 17, 2017 8:22 amI don't think you think I'm bad. You're nibbling. You're not making any real effort of pursuit. You're not voting for me today. You're not trying to get other people to vote for me today. Your treatment of me reminds me of Mass Effect when a) you weren't a civilian, and b) you nibbled ("You got nervous").

Thanks for bringing up Mass Effect. It's cute the way you want to try and angle what happened there, but let me clarify... in Mass Effect: a) I was genuinely hunting baddies, and b) you were a baddie.

Let's compare.
Mass Effect Epignosis:

Epignosis wrote: ↑Mon Apr 10, 2017 10:42 am Long Con believes in killing his own teammates.

Blue Velvet Epignosis:

Epignosis wrote: ↑Mon Jun 12, 2017 10:29 pmLong Con had his own team kill him once.

Obvious parallels. Attempt to discredit your accuser as a method of avoiding suspicion. This is a proven Epignosis baddie tactic. How else can you discredit your accusers? Maybe rolling your eyes at them?

Mass Effect Epignosis:

Epignosis wrote: ↑Wed Apr 05, 2017 11:03 pmLong Con's reaction to my initial Vega claim (and being nervous ) makes me most suspicious of him.

Epignosis wrote: ↑Wed Apr 05, 2017 2:44 pm In Turf Wars I had to keep reminding my team that their job was to get civilians lynched, not each other.

Blue Velvet Epignosis:

Epignosis wrote: ↑Sat Jun 17, 2017 10:06 am
Then you asked me a question about Dyslexicon.

Then you ask me a question about Ricochet.

Maybe this post is accusing Dyslexicon and defending Ricochet.

Just like in Mass Effect, you are getting nervous because I am questioning you. You try to hide it behind condescending bluster and bravado, but your tells give you away (" "), and your meta seals the point.

You are bad, you're phoning it in, and you got caught. I understand that's not something you're wired to accept, but it's happening. I couldn't close the deal in Mass Effect, and you ended up winning as a baddie just like I was screaming you would the whole time. I don't have a lot of faith that the other players will see it this time, because you're historically really good at the manipulative talk to avoid your own lynch. But I saw through it then, and I see through it now.

You need a new shtick. Vote Epignosis

That's very compelling evidence against me.

Except I was not bad in Mass Effect. I was a neutral independent at the time you said I was nervous. I was never nervous, and I certainly wasn't nervous because of you. I was the one holding the cards Day 2. I used my fake claim brilliantly to draw accusations from someone who tried to kill me and assumed I was the bulletproof guy on the other team. It worked. I regard my Day 2 Mass Effect play to be one of the best things I ever accomplished. I was not nervous then, and I'm not nervous now. You are making things up.

I'm "making up" that you're nervous? How can I do that? I am observing your behaviour, and making conclusions based on it. I understand why you'd want to position it as "making it up" in everyone's minds, but we both know that's not an honest way to describe this kind of analysis.

And I understand you want to see your history in a certain way. The fact is, I was 100% right about you. You chose to join the bad team - as I said numerous times, it was by far the most likely choice for you since Day 0 began. It's not that you're predictable or something, it was just the best choice for your own survival and win. That was easy for me to see, and it was easy for you to see. Obviously, since it's what you did. So don't give me a bunch of crap about how you were "neutral independent", because we both know you were bad from the get-go, with a plan B of joining the Civs if your team ended up getting slaughtered early.

I'm not bad here either.

Actually, I'm pretty damn sure that you are.

Nor am I phoning it in. I am participating as I am able.

I understand that you're "participating as able". That's fine. I don't contest your real-life busy time. You're phoning it in because you're doing it the same as you did in Mass Effect. You're phoning it in because you're not being careful about your tells.

Again, you're making shit up about me because you have nothing on me. Just like you did in Mass Effect.

And I am right about you. Just like in Mass Effect.

To prove how delusional you are, and that you believe bullshit, let's examine an easily verifiable claim you just made.

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Fri May 19, 2017 4:31 pm Since the latter portion of this game was lost in the madness, the winners were Cerberus-aligned:

gfishfunk, Jackofhearts2005, and nutella.

Huh. I don't see the name "Epignosis" there in the host's recap among the winners.

Yeah, you're right, I mixed up who won that game. I just glanced at the blue host-post in passing and saw 'Epignosis' and 'Reapers' and my mind made it the victory endgame post (which was actually lost to the void).

Thankfully, that had no real bearing on my case against you. Win or lose, you were bad.

Epignosis wrote: ↑Sat Jun 17, 2017 1:10 pm

Long Con wrote: ↑Sat Jun 17, 2017 11:46 am Also, this is so WEEEEEEEAAAK that you should be ashamed to even try it.

Epignosis wrote: ↑Sat Jun 17, 2017 10:06 am
Maybe this post is accusing Dyslexicon and defending Ricochet.

Epignosis wrote: ↑Fri Jun 16, 2017 9:09 pm

nutella wrote: ↑Fri Jun 16, 2017 8:31 pm @Dys hope everything's ok

I'm sorta tempted to vote for Rico because I'm pretty damn sick of the annoyingness, but Epi's pushing me to reconsider since I don't really think Rico necessarily looks like/is behaving like a baddie. Like, he could be "hiding behind" the singsong bullshit and the no-u pattern, but I don't have a particularly strong reason to think that. But the more he's getting pushed on it and remaining stubborn, the more I'm doubting his innocence... idk. WIFOM and all that jazz. If I can't make up my mind on Rico I might join DH in voting for G-Man -- the points there don't feel like much but it's more than I have on anyone else.

I'm "pushing" you?

Come on, man, that's your proof that you've done other things this game? Like I said. Phoning it in.

Where did I say this was proof that I've been busy? Jesus dude.

It was a question I asked nutella, one in which I am still awaiting a response, because she used a much stronger verb than I would have expected given I only ask a question about why people were voting Ricochet. I wasn't "pushing" anybody to do anything. I want to know why she said I was.

But spin things how you want. Apparently my questioning of nutella is supposed to prove I've been busy.

I think you misread that.

Well, G, my vote is going to Epi, not you. Here's why.

...and this is actually off-topic, but I noticed it at the end of Mass Effect, and I also want to know the answer:

Epignosis wrote: ↑Sat May 20, 2017 8:31 am I meant to ask because I didn't see: Who was the failed kill attempt against Night 1?

Also, this is so WEEEEEEEAAAK that you should be ashamed to even try it.

Epignosis wrote: ↑Sat Jun 17, 2017 10:06 am
Maybe this post is accusing Dyslexicon and defending Ricochet.

Epignosis wrote: ↑Fri Jun 16, 2017 9:09 pm

nutella wrote: ↑Fri Jun 16, 2017 8:31 pm @Dys hope everything's ok

I'm sorta tempted to vote for Rico because I'm pretty damn sick of the annoyingness, but Epi's pushing me to reconsider since I don't really think Rico necessarily looks like/is behaving like a baddie. Like, he could be "hiding behind" the singsong bullshit and the no-u pattern, but I don't have a particularly strong reason to think that. But the more he's getting pushed on it and remaining stubborn, the more I'm doubting his innocence... idk. WIFOM and all that jazz. If I can't make up my mind on Rico I might join DH in voting for G-Man -- the points there don't feel like much but it's more than I have on anyone else.

I'm "pushing" you?

Come on, man, that's your proof that you've done other things this game? Like I said. Phoning it in.

Epignosis wrote: ↑Sat Jun 17, 2017 8:22 amI don't think you think I'm bad. You're nibbling. You're not making any real effort of pursuit. You're not voting for me today. You're not trying to get other people to vote for me today. Your treatment of me reminds me of Mass Effect when a) you weren't a civilian, and b) you nibbled ("You got nervous").

Thanks for bringing up Mass Effect. It's cute the way you want to try and angle what happened there, but let me clarify... in Mass Effect: a) I was genuinely hunting baddies, and b) you were a baddie.

Let's compare.
Mass Effect Epignosis:

Epignosis wrote: ↑Mon Apr 10, 2017 10:42 am Long Con believes in killing his own teammates.

Blue Velvet Epignosis:

Epignosis wrote: ↑Mon Jun 12, 2017 10:29 pmLong Con had his own team kill him once.

Obvious parallels. Attempt to discredit your accuser as a method of avoiding suspicion. This is a proven Epignosis baddie tactic. How else can you discredit your accusers? Maybe rolling your eyes at them?

Mass Effect Epignosis:

Epignosis wrote: ↑Wed Apr 05, 2017 11:03 pmLong Con's reaction to my initial Vega claim (and being nervous ) makes me most suspicious of him.

Epignosis wrote: ↑Wed Apr 05, 2017 2:44 pm In Turf Wars I had to keep reminding my team that their job was to get civilians lynched, not each other.

Blue Velvet Epignosis:

Epignosis wrote: ↑Sat Jun 17, 2017 10:06 am
Then you asked me a question about Dyslexicon.

Then you ask me a question about Ricochet.

Maybe this post is accusing Dyslexicon and defending Ricochet.

Just like in Mass Effect, you are getting nervous because I am questioning you. You try to hide it behind condescending bluster and bravado, but your tells give you away (" "), and your meta seals the point.

You are bad, you're phoning it in, and you got caught. I understand that's not something you're wired to accept, but it's happening. I couldn't close the deal in Mass Effect, and you ended up winning as a baddie just like I was screaming you would the whole time. I don't have a lot of faith that the other players will see it this time, because you're historically really good at the manipulative talk to avoid your own lynch. But I saw through it then, and I see through it now.

You need a new shtick. Vote Epignosis

Stop trying to control the conversation. I addressed you because I looked at your ISO and found it lacking in player opinions. And now, instead of giving some player opinions like I asked, you're trying to steer the conversation away from that. I'm not interested in discussing times in the past when you might have laid low. You're doing it now, that's the concern.

Looks like Rico is going to be lynched. You think he's Civ? 'Cause your efforts to save him have been pretty lacklustre - who should we lynch instead? Dyslexicon? Long Con?

No, I'm asking you questions because all you're doing is accusing Dizzy and defending Rico, and laying low.

Epignosis. You have pretty much only focused on Dyslexicon as a suspicion. How does Dizzy's imminent replacement affect your opinion, and who else do you think is bad?

DharmaHelper wrote: ↑Fri Jun 16, 2017 4:03 pm

DharmaHelper wrote: ↑Fri Jun 16, 2017 4:01 pm Mkay kill Rico.

And Sloonei earns a ping for defending Rico's shenanigans.

Actually, I was thinking about that. It could equally apply to anyone defending anyone, but the fact is that the baddies know who is Civ, and it's a common enough practice to defend a known Civ who is under fire.

Sloonei did justify his defense of Rico, but was it from a genuine place?

DharmaHelper wrote: ↑Fri Jun 16, 2017 2:47 pm Also you donk, nobody would PM you for Mutiny. You have to PM INH.

Ya man.

DharmaHelper wrote: ↑Fri Jun 16, 2017 11:06 am I like LC's posts so far, I think he is a civvie.

I'd rather hear about who's a baddie.

sprityo's death

As I noted on Day 1:

Long Con wrote: ↑Wed Jun 14, 2017 11:36 amSprityo - Content-light. He kinda wants to lynch Rico and I think maybe he suspects Llama?

That was the most individually threatening thing I could find in sprit's ISO. So Llama gets a slight uptick of suspicion due to sprityo's death. The Rico-bloodthirst is common enough that it would be weirder if he didn't want to lynch him.

I think it was probably more about this:

sprityo wrote: ↑Wed Jun 14, 2017 8:20 pm once day 2 rolls around, ill reveal my "startling revelation" of this past day and night

... and you may have been wondering what I did to deserve this:

sprityo wrote: ↑Thu Jun 15, 2017 12:44 am LC jumped then gun and it's no longer relevant



It was more personally astonishing than anything anyways. so dont get too worked up about it

... I don't really know. Well, I DO know, but it doesn't make sense to me. I had sent him this PM:

Long Con wrote:Wed Jun 14, 2017 11:35 pm Subject: Blue Velvet Mafia {NIGHT 1}

sprityo wrote: ↑Wed Jun 14, 2017 8:20 pm once day 2 rolls around, ill reveal my "startling revelation" of this past day and night

Hey, if you want to PM me this revelation, I will not open it unless you die. It will stay in your Outbox, as "information insurance", and if you live through the night, you can just delete it without me ever seeing it. BUT, if you die, then I can bring it to the thread.

You can even tell someone else that I have this. Then, you don't have to worry that I'm bad, and will mess with the info.

In fact, you could also work the same deal with another player. PM them, they do not open it, except to verify that I go through with it in the event of your death.

Or maybe I'm just too paranoid. I think that's pretty solid though.

So I "jumped the gun" somehow. I don't really get it.

DharmaHelper wrote: ↑Thu Jun 15, 2017 8:27 pm

Sloonei wrote: ↑Thu Jun 15, 2017 8:26 pm

DharmaHelper wrote: ↑Thu Jun 15, 2017 8:23 pm

Sloonei wrote: ↑Mon Jun 12, 2017 12:14 am I'm interested in the public vote as a scum hunting mechanism.

Did you ever make something of this, Sloonei?

No.

Could you?

So... what does it mean to vote someone for protection? You think they're Civ? You just want them to make it further?

DharmaHelper and speedchuck voted for nutella to be protected last night. Contrast that to Sloonei's instant vote on nutella today. I'd like to hear you gentlemen talk that out a little.

G-Man and Long Con both voted DH for protection. I gave my reason, but I haven't looked back to remind myself of G-Man's. I want vote-order to be part of our polls again as well. I'd like to easily be able to see who voted for someone when it was clear S~V~S was winning, if that happened. You know, that kind of thing.

Sprityo self-voted. Kind of tragic.

Timmer, Spacedaisy, and Epignosis voted S~V~S, and Epi cast the "deciding" vote. Given that I think Epi is bad, I would say that makes S~V~S look a little better, because I don't see why a baddie would vote to protect a teammate in this situation. The situation being that baddies don't need protecting because they're the ones killing.

S~V~S, nutella, Llama, Rico, Sloonei all voted one-offs.

Ok, Sloonei, I have tried to set the stage for using this as a scum-hunting mechanism. Perhaps some of your ideas on that front will be easier to process no?

Dyslexicon wrote: ↑Fri Jun 16, 2017 7:27 am Serious question - Flips don't show alignment and role? How am I supposed to make sense of this game? Is this normal? o.o

Let's get through one more lynch and see, sounds like Wilgy was a special case.

Sloonei wrote: ↑Thu Jun 15, 2017 7:24 pm Voting nutella to start the day.

Sounds like a delicious part of a balanced breakfast.

First two to PM are selected?

I don't know what this mutiny entails. I'm going to sit back and watch. I don't doubt DH has already done it.

speedchuck wrote: ↑Thu Jun 15, 2017 11:55 am

Ricochet wrote: ↑Thu Jun 15, 2017 11:45 am Lynch as invec-tiiiive
Don' sound produc-tiiiive
Why not try to fiiiind
Real baddies to grind

We are being obstructeeeed
Cause your speech is corrupteeeed
And you might be a baddiiieeee
But you're being too cattyyyyyy

So I have a solutiiiooooon
How about executiiioooonn??

Top drawer, good sir.... top drawer!

If I don't see some suspicions from Poppy that are not OMGUS/No U, then I will vote to lynch. Annoying is one thing, but annoying and wilfully unproductive... that's an ear of a different flavour.

Voted DH for protection to help him on his quest to reach Phase 2. Voted "Everyone Has 2 Votes On Day 2" because that's fun-cool.

DharmaHelper wrote: ↑Thu Jun 15, 2017 12:36 am

Long Con wrote: ↑Thu Jun 15, 2017 12:10 am RIP Wilgy!

Spacedaisy, thellama73, speedchuck, DharmaHelper... you all have voted for mutiny.

What do you think will happen? It sounds interesting, but mutiny is generally a negative kind of thing.

I know what all the other poll options will do. Mutiny is fun and mysterious and it's mutiny for 2. Twice as fun and mysterious.

Mutiny. Mutiny requires someone in charge. You remove them from being in charge, and you take charge. I agree it sounds fun. But gimme something you think it could mean.

sprityo wrote: ↑Thu Jun 15, 2017 12:44 amLC jumped then gun and it's no longer relevant

:o I was just trying to help. I thought it was a cool plan.

nutella wrote: ↑Thu Jun 15, 2017 1:43 amVoting LC for protection because I believe he's civ.

Thanks, nut!

RIP Wilgy!

Spacedaisy, thellama73, speedchuck, DharmaHelper... you all have voted for mutiny.

What do you think will happen? It sounds interesting, but mutiny is generally a negative kind of thing.

I haven't had any BTSC contact with Wilgy.

Wilgy, what's going on? Something you wanna share?

Wheelin' and dealin'!

DharmaHelper wrote: ↑Wed Jun 14, 2017 12:41 pm

Long Con wrote: ↑Wed Jun 14, 2017 12:40 pm

DharmaHelper wrote: ↑Wed Jun 14, 2017 12:36 pm Today's one of the few days of the year I end up feeling ill or sick, so there's that. I have I suppose very little patience today so its a good thing I have already voted and done my due diligence for Day 1.


Who wants my vote for Night 1's protection-that-really-isnt-a-protection-because-only-a-doofus-would-try-to-kill-someone-with-a-public-protection.

It think we should vote for you to get it. You said you really want to live to Day 2, so I'm fine with granting that request.

Phase two, but thank you.

Ah... like an INH-phase that could last a few days.

DharmaHelper wrote: ↑Wed Jun 14, 2017 12:36 pm Today's one of the few days of the year I end up feeling ill or sick, so there's that. I have I suppose very little patience today so its a good thing I have already voted and done my due diligence for Day 1.


Who wants my vote for Night 1's protection-that-really-isnt-a-protection-because-only-a-doofus-would-try-to-kill-someone-with-a-public-protection.

It think we should vote for you to get it. You said you really want to live to Day 2, so I'm fine with granting that request.

Ok, I just ISO'ed everyone, while it's still easy enough for a lazy guy.

Dharmahelper - circled around with mostly quips and jokes until he zeroed in on nutella. I like his points on nutella.
DrWilgy - total jokes. I know it's Wilgy, but if he wants to make it all jokes, those jokes should start getting meatier with content. 5 posts right now.
Dyslexicon - No idea. Pass.
Epignosis - My opinions regarding Epi's behaviour during Dealgate are already known.
G-Man - A little light on the usable content, just a smidge. I thought this post was wishy-washy.
Long Con - Does this guy have a brother? Back off, ladies - he's taken!
Nutella - Not a bad response to DH's case. I was surprised she had three votes earlier.
Ricochet - I don't know why this schtick stirs such anger in me. I'm trying to control it and give Rico a chance.
S~V~S - Dove right in, good content.
Sloonei - No real criticisms of Sloon's posts, my suspiciometer needle didn't move
Spacedaisy - a little invisible for my liking. Writing a prescription for more content.
Speedchuck - He's a good boy. Goooood boooy! Why not try to call him?
Sprityo - Content-light. He kinda wants to lynch Rico and I think maybe he suspects Llama?
TheLlama73 - Pretty low-laying, just a bit of Rico action. Not very impressive. Now he's the one with three votes.
Timmer - Solid contributor. One of my greenest reads.