
Search found 205 matches
Return to “Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]”
- Fri Jul 31, 2020 11:54 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 54135
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
Really, it just makes you fit right in on this site.
We like you!

- Fri Jul 31, 2020 11:21 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 54135
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
Oh please, I've embarrassed myself ten times worse more than once. Ask anyone.tutuu wrote: ↑Fri Jul 31, 2020 11:06 pm im too ashamed to play again on thesyndicate, im not stable enough for mafia and not smart enough too. im sorry for wasting everyones time and robbing multiple ppls chances of having fun. i feel frightened at the thought of leaving another community yet again like ive done so much times already bcuz i know self-isolation can be harmful but my sense of justice tells me this is right. i cant help but feel id just be a bother for everyone and id rather not be a bother. sorry

- Fri Jul 31, 2020 9:35 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 54135
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME wrote: ↑Fri Jul 31, 2020 9:29 pmSo our initial plan after KZA went MIA was for me to bus KZA, radishes to have a terrible reaction (the first two parts weren’t actually explicitly planned, just myself and radishes playing off each other), then bob would shoot radishes the next day to exit the POE. Overnight bob said he’d have to replace out, so the plan changed to radishes shooting bob to exit the POE (this was our first mistake btw, I should’ve guessed there would be town KP based on the day vig ability and having a block/JK). Then radishes got vigged and bob got red checked, so that left me to shoot bob and try to carry from there.

But that seriously sounds like a Heath Ledger Joker kind of plan.

- Fri Jul 31, 2020 8:53 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 54135
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
Whoa whoa whoa, flag on the play! You don't get to complain that your teammates died when you killed two of them. Also, you didn't have a good role, you had three and a half good roles.NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME wrote: ↑Fri Jul 31, 2020 8:38 pm I mean
I had a good role, sure, but I also had my whole team murdered over a 25 hour span and our entire plan disappear in smoke...not to mention a fuck ton of townies who were being super townie. I don’t think it’s particularly fair to say I had it easy or that I coasted or whatever, FMPOV this was a fairly hard game that I was very close to losing at a bunch of points![]()
That said, you played amazingly as always, I don't think you are ever easy to pick out as scum.
By the way, what roles did all those dead guys have? Also who was radishes trying to kill on night one?
- Fri Jul 31, 2020 8:30 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 54135
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
What is anni?
- Fri Jul 31, 2020 8:15 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 54135
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
Would be interesting to see a less capable player take on the ultimate role. Too easy for someone of Nanook's caliber though. 

- Fri Jul 31, 2020 8:07 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 54135
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Fri Jul 31, 2020 7:19 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 54135
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
From my point of view, you had pretty much the best role I've ever seen, and we're lock town for the whole game. How could you lose?
- Fri Jul 31, 2020 7:03 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 54135
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
I guess my vote counts for nothing. Easiest win you've ever had?NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME wrote: ↑Fri Jul 31, 2020 6:07 pmMafia win condition was to reach parity with the town—meaning you didn’t count for parity purposes, so the game was over when f3 was reached with you alive.
- Fri Jul 31, 2020 11:39 am
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 54135
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
That doesn't answer my question, Mr Kek.
- Fri Jul 31, 2020 11:27 am
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 54135
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
Hey why did the game end?
- Thu Jul 30, 2020 2:15 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 54135
- Thu Jul 30, 2020 12:07 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 54135
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 6]
Meeeeeee! [VOTE: Amy] aubergine
I really just think Amy's the last wolf.
Convince me to unvote, if that's what should happen.

- Thu Jul 30, 2020 11:54 am
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 54135
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 6]
If playing nice and waiting means I leave for an hour and come back to a hammer vote and I missed it, I'm going to be really upset.
- Thu Jul 30, 2020 11:52 am
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 54135
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 6]
Jesus, I'm talking about an alternate timeline where I thought about bluffing at attempting a modkill suicide. I think we're conversationally safe here.

I said I'm townsiding. This is me trying to townside, I'll wait for more opinions.
- Thu Jul 30, 2020 11:34 am
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 54135
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 6]
Also I should add that I won't be removed from play if I am involved with a Mafia chop. I still have to survive, my vote would still be there if we get down to 1v1v1. I'm hoping it's just Amy. That's what I believe right now.
Can I vote her yet?

Can I vote her yet?

- Thu Jul 30, 2020 11:30 am
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 54135
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 6]
If I were dead anyway by yeet, then dead is dead and there's no helping me. I would much rather take myself out of the equation by my own hand in order to shove your faces into your own cowardice, and make you choose a wolf to chop.
And anyway, it wasn't supposed to end with my modkill, it was supposed to end with you guys realizing that trying to chop me wouldn't help you, and putting back on the big boy pants and trying to yeet Mafia.
- Thu Jul 30, 2020 11:21 am
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 54135
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 6]
Again, that's not accurate. I survived the N1 kill, not you.
The education is thus: I'm still 3p, still townsiding.
My plan, until rabbit imploded, was going to be getting myself modkilled, while presenting the reality that you'd still have to yeet someone after I was gone, all to ease you into the idea that a No Lynch was a better idea than yeeting a 3p Friendly like me. That would have been a better solution than me dead, which helps nothing.Hally wrote: ↑Thu Jul 30, 2020 8:11 am i’m going to be frank and say i am heavily leaning towards voting amy
the alternative is that i entertain worlds in which either
- tutuu has fake claimed cop, outed a partner D2 after two of her teammates have already been killed and been blindingly villagery the whole game even independent of her claim
- nanook is a wolf dayvig who used his kill on outed mafia after two teammates already died (both of whom he pushed for hard) instead of dayviging the claimed cop or the claimed redirector or anyone else
- lc is a wolf who set up this fake 3P claim from the very beginning of the game and snap fake claimed that he ate the N1 kill before i ever said anything
i don’t think i can realistically entertain these words enough to bet the game on them
the simplest world by far is that amy is the last wolf and lc is 3P as he claims (or mafia with amy)
if this isn’t the case, it means either nanook just murdered his whole team with his bare hands as quickly as possible (which i don’t believe) or tutuu outed a third teammate after two already died when she totally didn’t need to (which i also don’t believe)
if we had actually been able to yeet lc last day like i wanted and iaafr had not gotten himself modkilled, we would actually have the numbers right now for me to feel confident just voting amy. it would be 4 town and 1 wolf instead of 3 town, 1 wolf, and 1 unknown. it’s extremely unfortunate we are in this position and it was entirely avoidable
Just please don't hammer without me!Hally wrote: ↑Thu Jul 30, 2020 8:23 am i won’t be voting any time soon
i’d like lc to check in and confirm i’m not w/w with him
then the only worlds will be
1) amy solo wolf, lc 3P
2) amy wolf, lc wolf
3) tutuu wolf, nanook wolf, lc 3P
4) tutuu wolf, lc wolf
lc checking in and no hammer should confirm a wolf within amy/tutuu, correct?
- Thu Jul 30, 2020 11:15 am
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 54135
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 6]
Hi dudes!
- Wed Jul 29, 2020 11:40 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 54135
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 6]
Sorry, that's really not my thing. I believe in the infinite capacity to deceive. I believe a wolf can be the towniest-looking player in the game, and vice-versa, because I've seen it happen so many times.Hally wrote: ↑Wed Jul 29, 2020 11:33 pmno
read the thread and town case radishes
show everyone why he was a villager. if he was in fact a villager, it should be easy to convince people of that using his posts that exist in the game
if you can do that, you can push me as a wolf. until that happens, you have zero reason not to accept that we live in a wolf!radishes world
i’m tired of this bs where we pretend nothing in the thread exists except claims and things that are readily apparent somehow aren’t
it is readily apparent that radishes was a wolf
But my opinion means little to you, and that's fine. You don't have to prove yourself to me. I just have an issue with someone saying that something is "locked" or "100%" when some skilled and planned deception could be involved.
- Wed Jul 29, 2020 11:29 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 54135
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 6]
I've bussed a teammate hard that early. It's a great strategy.Hally wrote: ↑Wed Jul 29, 2020 11:27 pmread my interactions with radishes in the thread on D1Long Con wrote: ↑Wed Jul 29, 2020 11:23 pmI like these points, but why the "CANNOT" again? Town-nut kills wolf-Radish, and his quick-thinking teammate Hally concocts a redirect scheme to clear herself? What's the logic that refutes that possibility?Hally wrote: ↑Wed Jul 29, 2020 11:16 pm i would like to point out that nut’s flip and role point STRONGLY to a wolf!radishes world
nut said her ability is that she has an 80% chance to hit if she tries to kill a wolf versus 30% chance to hit if she’s a villager
so just the fact that she hit on radishes indicates wolf!radishes strongly
another thing pointing to wolf radishes is that nut was town vig. we know this now. nanook is also claiming to be town and is a dayvig
the world where lc and i are not aligned and i redirect townvig!radishes to lc and break his vest is significantly less likely because of the presence of at least one other town vig. of course wolf!me could have tried to kill lc directly and radishes could have been town, but why would wolf!me, who was squarely in the poe N1, shoot someone else in the poe? that would just be dumb
these two things together should put us squarely in the wolf!radishes world. there is actually no reason to doubt that because of all the unlikely things that had to happen to allow radishes to be town this game, both from a play standpoint and mechanically
i CANNOT be w/w with radishes and i refuse to humor anyone saying that i am or could be. no i can’t be. the fact that we live in a wolf!radishes world should clear me to everyone. i am obviously not a wolf
look at how hard i pushed him and he pushed me
then come back and tell me we can be w/w. you can’t
I'm not leading the charge against you, Hally, but that kind of appeal does little for me. Anyone can say anything and do anything in the thread.
- Wed Jul 29, 2020 11:27 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 54135
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 6]
... because you cleared yourself. No one has asked for a Nanook check, it hasn't even been brought up. Would it make sense for town-tutuu to check town-Nanook after that? Who would support that on a cleared Nanook?NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME wrote: ↑Wed Jul 29, 2020 11:25 pmWhy would you not?? I’d always have a partner faking a cop claim “check” me, why wouldn’t youLong Con wrote: ↑Wed Jul 29, 2020 11:24 pmWhy? You've been considered cleared since you killed bob, haven't you?NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME wrote: ↑Wed Jul 29, 2020 11:22 pm If me and tutu were partners she would’ve “checked” me by now kek
- Wed Jul 29, 2020 11:25 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 54135
- Wed Jul 29, 2020 11:24 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 54135
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 6]
Why? You've been considered cleared since you killed bob, haven't you?NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME wrote: ↑Wed Jul 29, 2020 11:22 pm If me and tutu were partners she would’ve “checked” me by now kek
- Wed Jul 29, 2020 11:23 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 54135
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 6]
I like these points, but why the "CANNOT" again? Town-nut kills wolf-Radish, and his quick-thinking teammate Hally concocts a redirect scheme to clear herself? What's the logic that refutes that possibility?Hally wrote: ↑Wed Jul 29, 2020 11:16 pm i would like to point out that nut’s flip and role point STRONGLY to a wolf!radishes world
nut said her ability is that she has an 80% chance to hit if she tries to kill a wolf versus 30% chance to hit if she’s a villager
so just the fact that she hit on radishes indicates wolf!radishes strongly
another thing pointing to wolf radishes is that nut was town vig. we know this now. nanook is also claiming to be town and is a dayvig
the world where lc and i are not aligned and i redirect townvig!radishes to lc and break his vest is significantly less likely because of the presence of at least one other town vig. of course wolf!me could have tried to kill lc directly and radishes could have been town, but why would wolf!me, who was squarely in the poe N1, shoot someone else in the poe? that would just be dumb
these two things together should put us squarely in the wolf!radishes world. there is actually no reason to doubt that because of all the unlikely things that had to happen to allow radishes to be town this game, both from a play standpoint and mechanically
i CANNOT be w/w with radishes and i refuse to humor anyone saying that i am or could be. no i can’t be. the fact that we live in a wolf!radishes world should clear me to everyone. i am obviously not a wolf
- Wed Jul 29, 2020 11:14 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 54135
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 6]
Solo wolf makes no sense, but if you were m/m with tutuu then she's not really a cop. That was one of Amy's worlds, and I don't know if sarcasm defeats that idea.NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME wrote: ↑Wed Jul 29, 2020 10:57 pm Sorry, solo mafia godfather roleblocker with a silent day shot I didn’t use on the claimed cop
We need tutuu's info before continuing.
- Wed Jul 29, 2020 10:16 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 54135
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [NIGHT 5]
I do want to put that mafia daykill in my next game as a claim deterrent now.
- Wed Jul 29, 2020 10:12 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 54135
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [NIGHT 5]
Both good points, thanks guys.Amy wrote: ↑Wed Jul 29, 2020 10:07 pm i have effectively a greenpeek on nanook, in that he claimed italy as his country and i have a result confirming that he shares either country or school with me (i'm italian/classical)
26/30 i counted my posts
idk when the cap's lifting because idk when day ends lol
- Wed Jul 29, 2020 10:02 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 54135
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [NIGHT 5]
The only mech claim that Nanook has is that he daykilled bob, right?
I just want to be the one to say, why couldn't the wolf team have one daykill to use? Bob was redchecked - that's an opportunity.
I just want to be the one to say, why couldn't the wolf team have one daykill to use? Bob was redchecked - that's an opportunity.
- Wed Jul 29, 2020 9:33 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 54135
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [NIGHT 5]
I really thought the night actions would be all in by now and we'd have a nice, tight 9pm changeover. I'm fine with that plan tutuu, but I don't know how long we have until the deadline, and it might be late to be changing things.
- Wed Jul 29, 2020 4:08 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 54135
- Wed Jul 29, 2020 3:26 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 54135
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [NIGHT 5]
Targeting me has an 80% chance of failing.
- Wed Jul 29, 2020 2:41 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 54135
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [NIGHT 5]
Hally, what's your best theory as to why tutuu couldn't role check you last night? Sorry if you've already said
- Wed Jul 29, 2020 2:21 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 54135
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [NIGHT 5]
Halle, what if the scum decide not to kill? Do we Yeet Amy then?
- Wed Jul 29, 2020 2:19 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 54135
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [NIGHT 5]
I would much, much rather look at Nanook at the end of the game and say, "Well, well, well, looks like it was good to trust me, and we both won, just like I fucking said." than to say, "Ho ho ho, you were right all along, never trust long con!"
Believe it.
Believe it.
- Wed Jul 29, 2020 2:16 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 54135
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [NIGHT 5]
Also, when I asked my math question, I didn't realize that the rabbit mod kill had ended the day, I thought we were still a few hours from Lynch. Silly LC.
- Wed Jul 29, 2020 2:15 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 54135
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [NIGHT 5]
If the opportunity came up for me to knowingly win with the mafia, I don't see any incentive to take it. I've enjoyed being on this wild ride with the town, and frankly if Hally is Mafia then they probably tried to kill me night one, so no love lost there.
- Wed Jul 29, 2020 2:09 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 54135
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [NIGHT 5]
First of all, you don't need to suck up to me or anything, I intend to Lynch Mafia as I always have. I agree that lynching me is what the mafia want.
You said that I implied that I could win with the mafia. That isn't quite accurate. If I don't win by lynching one more Mafia, I don't know what happens next. I think there will be some change. Maybe I'll become a serial killer. I really don't know, and I really don't think we need to find out.
Second of all, just a small thing, but the world you presented where you survive a night kill on night one requires an extra kill, because I sure as hell did take one in the vest. Count on it.
Third, did the mathematics change when rabbit died, and now lynching a third-party player isn't the best way to go? That would be really cool.
You said that I implied that I could win with the mafia. That isn't quite accurate. If I don't win by lynching one more Mafia, I don't know what happens next. I think there will be some change. Maybe I'll become a serial killer. I really don't know, and I really don't think we need to find out.
Second of all, just a small thing, but the world you presented where you survive a night kill on night one requires an extra kill, because I sure as hell did take one in the vest. Count on it.
Third, did the mathematics change when rabbit died, and now lynching a third-party player isn't the best way to go? That would be really cool.
- Wed Jul 29, 2020 10:11 am
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 54135
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 5]
If you all are looking for a safe lynch and you're too scared to pull the trigger on a possible wolf, then why not just vote No Lynch and keep me around for voting power?
It's pretty clear that the vibe around me is that you believe my claim, and lynching me is seen as a way to *not* kill a villager.
If I were daykilled right now, would you vote No Lynch or would you lynch someone?
It's pretty clear that the vibe around me is that you believe my claim, and lynching me is seen as a way to *not* kill a villager.
If I were daykilled right now, would you vote No Lynch or would you lynch someone?
- Wed Jul 29, 2020 12:59 am
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 54135
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 5]
If that's your POE, then it'e either Amy is the last wolf, or it's both of them. If Hally is a wolf, then Radishes is not a wolf, then Amy is a wolf. Barring Godfather-style false clears.
In both those worlds, Amy is a wolf. The game is SO mechanically narrowed down, this isn't the time to be lynching a neutral, Town-friendly role. Come on, rabbit, let's lynch a wolf instead! I'm on your side, I want to lynch wolves, I need to lynch wolves, I am not a threat or a win con necessity for you!!
In both those worlds, Amy is a wolf. The game is SO mechanically narrowed down, this isn't the time to be lynching a neutral, Town-friendly role. Come on, rabbit, let's lynch a wolf instead! I'm on your side, I want to lynch wolves, I need to lynch wolves, I am not a threat or a win con necessity for you!!
- Wed Jul 29, 2020 12:55 am
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 54135
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 0]
I gathered together my evidence of true roleclaim.
Spoiler: show
- Wed Jul 29, 2020 12:54 am
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 54135
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 5]
Isn't the best evidence against Hally that tutuu's check failed on her? How does that happen? One idea is a roleblocker, but really, what evidence have we seen before tonight that there's a roleblocker in play? I was thinking that a Hally-Amy team would work with Hally as redirecter and Amy as roleblocker, but I feel like we would have seen some evidence of blocked roles?
So how did tutuu's check get blocked? Hally could just be Ascetic.
So how did tutuu's check get blocked? Hally could just be Ascetic.
- Wed Jul 29, 2020 12:43 am
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 54135
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 5]
I think a planned roleplay would have played out much more smoothly, and the way things did play out objectively point to it being real, and not contrived.iaafr wrote: ↑Wed Jul 29, 2020 12:28 amare you asking me to not give you the respect that you couldve come up with and roleplayed a town->3p role after seeing a scum role + the rules? are you saying youd never actually come up with that as a fakeclaim as scum, in a game where scum pretty much need to come up with ostensibly nonscum versions of their roles?
- Wed Jul 29, 2020 12:41 am
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 54135
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 5]
I am fine with an Amy lynch, I did say when I followed tutuu's vote that I was surprised she thought Hally was the better choice.
- Tue Jul 28, 2020 11:09 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 54135
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 5]
Fair enough, tutuu's case was pretty impassioned, and the level that I feel she is convinced does affect my opinion. She used up all her posts for it, which incidentally, is pretty townish - like, a scum would maybe hold back more just in case, to adapt to the thread,
I don't have any proof of non-alliance with Amy specifically. I think the strength of my claim lies in the history of my game. I feel that an objective look at my progression, both what I said intentionally and things I did reactively - plus what is and isn't in the Rules - should lead you to being comfortable trusting that I'm not mafia.
I don't have any proof of non-alliance with Amy specifically. I think the strength of my claim lies in the history of my game. I feel that an objective look at my progression, both what I said intentionally and things I did reactively - plus what is and isn't in the Rules - should lead you to being comfortable trusting that I'm not mafia.
- Tue Jul 28, 2020 10:10 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 54135
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 5]
Actually cancel that last post, I'd most likely just block Hally's power.
- Tue Jul 28, 2020 9:58 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 54135
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 5]
Not to mention, I am useful. You don't want to yeet Hally? Well then she's a redirector, since you trust her so much, get her to redirect your least trusted person on to me. I'll absorb that night kill like it ain't no thang.
- Tue Jul 28, 2020 9:44 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 54135
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 5]
Pretty NAI for me if you know me, I'm not he most energetic player.
Doesn't change the fact that yeeting me in order to get more info that is, in part, coming to you from scum AND YOU KNOW THIS. And then base your game off the tainted info as you've likely been doing all along.
That is an obvious losing strategy. What my claim does is narrow down the POE. Why are you so reluctant to pull the trigger?
I don't have anything to say beyond what tutuu's posts have already made very clear. I can't recall if anyone else read them at this point. We need to lynch in Hally and/or Amy, and tutuu made it clear what logic is being used to come to that conclusion.
- Tue Jul 28, 2020 9:12 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 54135
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 5]
I honestly don't know if I can or not, and what if I could? I'm still, like I have been all game, Town siding. I revealed all the information I could about my role in order to help the town make decisions.
- Tue Jul 28, 2020 9:06 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 54135
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 5]
I'm sorry, I'm just flabbergasted at your point of view here, I'm asking you to win together and you're telling me you'd rather lose together, that's what I'm seeing and I don't get it.