
Well played, baddies; and wicked fun game, boo!
Linki @ FH: I pushed Epi and Aces a couple of times. Hell, I brought up Epi literally right before I died and still nobody listened, lol.

Return to “Cards Against Humanity [GAME OVER]”
Just don't Google search what you're looking for in the meantime.S~V~S wrote:Well maybe someone can explain this to stupid old me in one syllable words tomorrow
It's actually quite lonely and burdensome most of the time...S~V~S wrote:I am not being willfully obtuse, but i bet it is nice being so freaking awesome.
Oh, agreed.Flyin' High wrote:The way I see it, everyone on the shortlist of possible PBers also voted for BWT so I don't think voting for BWT clears anyone of being that role.
Yes, a very noble defense of JJ.S~V~S wrote:Sorry to be such a fail today. I could see both sides of this John v Llama thing, or at least I could this AM. U have not had time to read and will not be home in time to do so. So I am gonna self vote, I do not feel confident in making any other vote.
Yeah, I remember the convo you're talking about. There was another instance where she was either discussing with FZ (Shawshank?) or K4J (WWE) how baddies would often pick off those who were more vocal during night periods, hence the LP tradition of "night-hiding". I think it was WWE, because I also remember Epi chiming in on the subject about how he likes to wait 'til just before the end of a night period to post.Dom wrote:Are you talking about how SVS brought up that it was taboo for baddies to purposefully kill other baddies? (Which I think was best illustrated in Dexter Mafia, where, if I remember correctly, there were 3 baddie teams-- all of which tried to force an end game. SVS also played an excellent baddie game, despite that most of the game was total bullshitMister Rearranger wrote:I only bring it up because SVS was making note of it in a previous game (either Shawshank or WWE, icr which).
It's a long night at work. I don't mind the discussion.) This was discussed in Shawshank.
K4J, at precisely 12:50 AM.Dom wrote:Sorry I've been so absent lately. I've been really busy at school and had some internet troubles today. I hate snow.
TBH, I don't really know where to start. I do think SVS's reaction to BWT seemed very insincere, IMO. But that's nothing much. :/ If anyone can remember who started the discussion on BWT, that might be helpful!
He prodded INH later about his vote for BWT as well.Aside from those I am concerned about BWT, because he said he wasn't worried about the vote as we had plenty of time (day 1) but yet he ended up randomizing (or self voting) and he just didn't seem to be taking things serious, as I'd expect a townie to. He reminded me of WWE where he gave up but that was so early on that he would have had no reason to want to give up, so either he just doesn't want to be a baddie or it has nothing to do with his alignment.
Then Epi for being so quiet (although I am wondering if this is still in character as far as the I don't care if you suspect me attitude & he just has two major levels, extra quiet and extra talkative), who I now feel better about, but don't know if he is just perhaps on an opposing scum team, so I am keeping that in mind. #pretendthisisallblue
Are you framing someone or are you the one being framed?kneel4justice wrote:I suspected him because of his Day 1 contradicting behavior as far as votes go.Flyin' High wrote:Why are you suspicious of BWT? I have him in the back of my mind as being suspicious, but need to read back to remember why. He's on my list of people to reread.kneel4justice wrote:Really? I would appreciate some reasoning because I myself suspect BWT and would like to know why others do.
He randomized after saying we had plenty of time to make a decision (when this is a speed game, at that).
I see I was wrong now, though.
MR what are you talking about?
Sturth!insertnamehere wrote:You want an explanation for a vote? You must be new around here...kneel4justice wrote:Really? I would appreciate some reasoning because I myself suspect BWT and would like to know why others do.insertnamehere wrote:I'm going to pretend I'm Vompatti, and not give a reason for my vote, k?
Ture?
k?
Ture?
k?
Ture?
k?
Ture?
k?
Ture?
k?
Ture?
k?
Ture?
k?
Ture?
k?
Ture?
k?
Ture?
k?
Otay then.kneel4justice wrote: Aside from those I am concerned about BWT, because he said he wasn't worried about the vote as we had plenty of time (day 1) but yet he ended up randomizing (or self voting) and he just didn't seem to be taking things serious, as I'd expect a townie to. He reminded me of WWE where he gave up but that was so early on that he would have had no reason to want to give up, so either he just doesn't want to be a baddie or it has nothing to do with his alignment.
Then Epi for being so quiet (although I am wondering if this is still in character as far as the I don't care if you suspect me attitude & he just has two major levels, extra quiet and extra talkative), who I now feel better about, but don't know if he is just perhaps on an opposing scum team, so I am keeping that in mind. [/color]
I think she made it pretty clear that she knew I was just cracking wise.Dom wrote:MR, you tried to manipulate Sorsha's posts when you implied she wasn't paying attention and thought JJ was still alive.
The 3 you picked are probably the 3 powers I would least like any baddie to have even a remote chance of getting.DharmaHelper wrote: 4, 8 and 14 because I think they're interesting
Yet it took you until now (multiple posts after your acknowledgement of FH's breakdown) to put your vote where your change of heart was?reywaS wrote:I'm voting llama. I wasn't thinking this was llama's baddie game based on just his posts, but after thinking and reading the game mechanic side of things...and of course FH's breakdown, it does seem quite likely that llama is a baddie.
I agree with you on the first two parts.Dom wrote: Rey: I don't know if this is his baddie game. He's being awfully silent, really. Even when he is posting, he isn't saying much. He's being extremely brief, so I'd love to hear more from him
Sorsha: I found her to be her typical over defensive self. I've seen her react more to less as a civvie. However, MR, the way you seemed to try and manipulate what she said about you and JJ make me raise an eyebrow upon rereading for your questions.
So you think jj might be bad?Sorsha wrote:I suspect him yes, but its mostly circumstantial.kneel4justice wrote:What exactly made you start suspecting Llama? Because I remember at first you said you didn't.Epignosis wrote:I vote llama again.
And do you still suspect BWT?
Linki, so does this mean you suspect DH?
After the day one lynch a couple of players (MR and jj) seemed to know that the lynch was a tie.... when nothing had been said in the thread about it being so. So I was thinking one or both of them had btsc with the player who made it a tie. DH being the card czar knew for sure it was a tie because he was the tie breaker (although he didn't say anything about it until 5 hours before the lynch ended) so he could have been the source of them knowing it was a tie (bts) also.
Hope this makes sense, I'm at work and really distracted.
Um, if he's the other possible role, then he'll still survive one more. But it will have to be dealt with sooner or later.Hedgeowl wrote:If we are right about his role than its becAuse he had a protection the first lynch. He should die this time unless some other shenanigans are pulled.kneel4justice wrote:Obviously, I think Llama is scum. But is there a reason that the lynches aren't going through that we have to solve before we lynch him or no?