Epignosis wrote:Hedgeowl wrote:Didnt AP survive a lynch as well? So which role is he? Nice that you left out the roles that block and protect too. I am mostly assuredly not any of these roles, but go ahead and encourage someone to NK me again if you want to test these theories.
"Hey everyone, look over there!"
Hedgeowl wrote:
Linki - the bandwagoning begins. Nice job Epi, now K4j and bwt too. 2 of the 3 people I said I suspect. Convenient.
So which is it? Did I vote to save MP because I am Corp or an SK? Or possibly a gullible civ?
Easy, killer. There's no bandwagon. It's not even Daytime.
Anyway, I'll let your posts do the condemning. I don't need to add too much to them:
Hedgeowl wrote:Ok, I don't have much time right now, but I have decided to try a different tactic this game. I will be looking for baddies in the top posters instead of low posters. One if a baddie is lynched we get more info from said lynch than lynching a baddie low poster, and two I think it more likely given some of the players and style that there are baddies running part of this thread. (Three, it slows the thread down a bit getting rid of a few chatty mcchattersons)
The list of top 10 living posters:
Epignosis 119
Mongoose 118
kneel4justice 87
Mister Rearranger 85
S~V~S 85
Loulou26 77
MovingPictures07 61
Summer 59
FZ. 58
Devin the Omniscient 54
Bullzeye 51
One of you is getting my vote later today, but since I am still catching up, might take me a bit more time. Also, given my brief time with the ksiters this seems to be fairly normal for most of them, so gives me pause there as well. I will consider more today as the day progresses, but this is where I am currently thinking since I am not 100% following current in thread accusations without more catch-up.
Hedge,
Simon Peter never cast a net that wide. Eleven names. And without bothering with the content of anyone's posts, you go ahead and state that you're voting for one of these people. On Day 3, that ends up being me for- do forgive me-
a really lousy reason.
Hedgeowl wrote:I think it very likely that some of the main posters are bad. There are 9 baddies and an SK, so 1/3 of the game wants the 2/3 civs dead, dead, dead. Whether you like math or not that's pretty damn likely the chatty ones have baddies amongst them. Also, since they say the most, they direct the thoughts and feelings of the thread the most, so I am particularly wary currently of having my thoughts influenced by other's posts so much and how they may be influenced.
I don't understand this. Are people incapable of thinking for themselves? Are people so easily manipulated? While I appreciate the compliment (?), I am not Charles Xavier (though I sit about as much as he does). How ironic, then, is your vote for wrathofgod.
Hedgeowl wrote:
I really dont think trusting anyone in this game is a good idea and it's interesting how many people are indicating those they trust. Baddies will seem just as helpful as anyone, because they are just as motivated to lynch a baddie from the other team to get some civvie cred. Since others are creating lists I will do my best to contribute as well.
Hedge's list:
TRUST NO ONE

Hedgeowl wrote:I am trying to decide where to go from this last lynch. Obviously, a starting place is voters looking to "save" MP, myself included. Frankly, of the group of TH, Epi, K4j, Hedge, MP, and CBK the only person I was suspicious of was Epi and possibly K4J. The MP lynch illustrates the problem I was trying to get out by targeting top posters perfectly. The longer you spend in thread with someone, the more you can begin to trust them. The more time I spent reading MP's thoughts and his back and forth with K4J the more I trusted both of them. So this leave me in a bit of conundrum. I think of review of all of us and voting histories will be helpful, but honestly I think since MP had so many votes early on that at most one of his teammates voted WOG and the others probably voted other places. He worked very hard in thread to get enough votes on one candidate. So at this point I plan a reread of those folks as a starting place, but dont want to have tunnel vision there either.
You went from trusting no one to trusting MP in a fraction of a Day period.
Hedgeowl wrote:To clarify I will not be voting Epi today, because I also think it sucks to be lynched while insanified and its obviously not faked since our host informed us of the PM.
Why the hell not? You voted me on Day 3. You still suspect me after Day 4. What does being insane have to do with it? Either I'm good or I'm not.
Hedgeowl wrote:My slow reading of MR isnt making me feel better about him. He was really active early in the game and seems to have tapered off. Why is that?
However, as noted this will do nothing to save MP. Seems like Epi, MP (obvi), maybe K4j, and I are interested in not lynching MP currently. Is this correct?
I dont have a read on Sorsha that much, dont really want to vote Lizzy or Bass though.
I think Epi wpuld like to help save MP and then Go the F to Sleep.
I did not vote to save MP. I had not even voted at that point. MP had four votes. I voted for someone who had only one vote at the time. If I wanted to save MP, I would have voted for Lizzy, who had two votes. What I find most interesting is that some people wanted to vote for someone other than MP, but didn't want to vote for Lizzy
(like you).
++++
In summary, you have expressed suspicion of me, MR, Sorsha, Boomslang, Dom, S~V~S, Bass the Clever, kneel4justice, and Spacedaisy.
Yet, even with posting
more than once that
WOG would likely be a civilian, you chose to vote for that individual anyway. Someone with zero posts.
I think Jimmy Buffet once mentioned you in a song. Something about blowing you out by stepping on a pop top.
