The Syndicate

Scotty wrote:I would also add that in my opinion, KF didn't vote for MM, and if he did, it's SVS.

thellama73 wrote:

Made wrote: Voting Bloops

Pay more attention next time.

Spoiler: show

nijuukyugou wrote:I'm going to be busy as crap for the next 36 hours or so seeing the family, going to my brother's show, and setting up the cocktail party of my dreams (I might have nearly an hour tomorrow afternoon or realllllly late tonight to spare for checking/keeping up. Big might.) So, with that being said:

I have no doubt Epi drank 14 beers without being drunk. Silly, but not drunk. Nice thought process though. I like the hunting. Keep it up.

I've said it before and I'll say it again: I hate Days 1. To me, it's the same discussion of the same things (to vote or not to vote low posters, to vote or not to vote newbies, to randomize or not to randomize), although this one has been very amusing and has added discussion of those godforsaken rainbow lists for something newer. Point is, it never really helps me decide on who to vote for. (Did that sound bitter? I'm not trying to come off that way - it's just a bit of Blooper stream of consciousness.)

I don't want to vote for a stand-out, silly person today because a number of baddies like to keep to the shadows in the first parts of the game - say enough to contribute, but not enough to stand out. I think timmer fits the bill here. He's contributed, but nothing controversial, a bit playful at times to keep the mood light, and this post caught my eye:

timmer wrote:Hey all, so reading back, I've got decent vibes from SVS (the point about Epig maybe not being drunk is interesting), I'm not sure I understand voting for Long Con, so MM gets a bit of a from me, as it was pointed out that the reasoning was weak. Scotty seems to be not enjoying the attention he is getting... do people who know his play style well have an opinion on whether this indicates a certain alignment?

He's latching on to some easy pickings here - MM's weird vote (when is MM's vote not weird/"weak" Day 1? I'm surprised he didn't vote himself!), the whole drunk or not drunk matter (again, good thought process, but too easy to latch to), and pointing out Scotty's reaction to attention like he hasn't played with Scotty before (he has). I gots things to do, veggies to chop, and places to drive, so I'll put my vote there now. Let the accusations fly

Saberfish wrote:So what happens in the event there's a tie in the vote for the lynching?

nijuukyugou wrote:

Made wrote:

nijuukyugou wrote:Woooooooooooooo game! Still waiting on my ant farm keyboard

Brent and Trent are twins, and they both die. Let's go alphabetical.

Nah, this just read more enthusiastic than what i'm use to from Bloops tbh. I don't trust it.

Made, I've missed you so!

nijuukyugou wrote:Woooooooooooooo game! Still waiting on my ant farm keyboard

Brent and Trent are twins, and they both die. Let's go alphabetical.

thellama73 wrote:

Made wrote:Yo Host Llama, do we have to be alive to win?

That all depends on your role, doesn't it?

Epignosis wrote:This is why 48 hour days are a pointless joke. People seem to love them, but most don't use them. Makes no sense to me. It just invites the same six or seven people to say the same six or seven things six or seven different ways, and then when voting time comes, everybody else is all "oh noes! I have thirteen pages to catch up on!"

Epignosis wrote:Politicians?

DharmaHelper wrote:Delicious speculation

MovingPictures07 wrote:Alright, game-related question for everyone:

What do folks make of DH's vote for Epi? Does it say anything about alignment for you, however small?

I have to get back to being frisky with my PhD work, so I'll be back at some point, IDK when.

DharmaHelper wrote:

Roxy wrote:

Would you be willing to explain why the players you mentioned are exempt from your vote?

DharmaHelper wrote:I will be voting for Made from now on.

thellama73 wrote:I also want to say that you all seem to be having fun, and that makes me a happy llama.