The Syndicate

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Fri Mar 16, 2018 9:17 am

Marmot wrote: ↑Fri Mar 16, 2018 2:46 am

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Fri Mar 16, 2018 2:34 am I’m so happy we got a lynch. I feel really accomplished, on par with actually lynching a baddie in most games.

Same.

What now?

We lynch you again.

Sloonei wrote: ↑Thu Mar 15, 2018 10:21 pm

Scotty wrote: ↑Thu Mar 15, 2018 10:14 pm

Sloonei wrote: ↑Thu Mar 15, 2018 9:31 pm I believe Phase 2 of CC-123 began once half the roles in the game had been used up.

Wouldn’t be a bad theory. By my count 13 roles have been relinquished, so we should be there by now

13/46 is less than 1/2

I can math I swearZ

Sloonei wrote: ↑Thu Mar 15, 2018 9:31 pm I believe Phase 2 of CC-123 began once half the roles in the game had been used up.

Wouldn’t be a bad theory. By my count 13 roles have been relinquished, so we should be there by now

LoRab wrote: ↑Thu Mar 15, 2018 9:06 pm @Scotty: When did the tribes merge in Survivor?

Day 5, but this game is much larger with more roles. I’d say it’s not unfathomable to believe merge would be past day 10 at least

Golden wrote:Scotty woke up. He realised that his hastily painted ‘vote marmot 2018’ had been resting on his face during the night and he now had “8102 ƚomɿɒM ɘƚoV” printed in blue on his left cheek.

I’m a party animal at heart

sig wrote: ↑Thu Mar 15, 2018 8:46 pm So glad we finally got a lynch, though I can only imagine the reactions in the other thread.

I was thinking they’d be up and up with the times once they saw SVS died

If we can’t get a lynch today than I’m gonna set my roof on fire

Kylemii wrote: ↑Thu Mar 15, 2018 4:14 pm

Marmot wrote: ↑Thu Mar 15, 2018 12:33 pm

Boomslang wrote: ↑Thu Mar 15, 2018 11:24 am

Kylemii wrote: ↑Wed Mar 14, 2018 2:57 pm hmu with some appropriately representative examples of marmot's gameplay as both civ and mafia, please

Most recent Marmot mafia victory was Mortal Kombat.
Most recent civ victory was Fiddler on the Roof.
Go wild!

Those were awful games on both sides. Make them go away.

do you have better examples? preferably some with iso links on the front page

Who else would you be voting for right now if not for this train?

Do you feel like his recent “defense” has made you see him in positive light?

Either Marmot is the button and something’s going to happen if he’s lynched or he’s mafia and like ok with that.

Sloonei wrote: ↑Wed Mar 14, 2018 2:18 pm we have two more members than they do. It shouldn't be hard.

You underestimate us. Bidoof has no strengths, only weaknesses.

Marmot wrote: ↑Wed Mar 14, 2018 11:35 am I read the last page and don't see an suspicion of me, just a bunch of votes and a need to "lynch someone".

Pray do tell why that person is me? I don't mind being recast, but I want a reason from every single person who cast their vote already. That means you @sig @Sloonei @LoRab @DrWilgy @Scotty.

And this is why you have votes,my 4 legged prairie dog.
I just explained why 2 posts above your response

DrWilgy wrote: ↑Wed Mar 14, 2018 10:14 am

Scotty wrote: ↑Wed Mar 14, 2018 12:15 amI am a fantastic cuddler.

But naw

You fuggin tease.

Let's see what happens if I Aubergine Marmot

Helpful in lynching Marmot, but not helpful for addressing that I don’t sense a strong sense of agency coming from your decisions in this game. Like, what do you actually think of sig?

Kylemii wrote: ↑Wed Mar 14, 2018 2:25 am plz catch me up on the marmot suspicion

1) Sloonei laid out a little case here: 2) it’s not like he’s done any defending of his position of given reason not to lynch him
3) we should stack votes on someone regardless, and he’s not a terrible candidate that people seem to disagree with
4)unless you do, in which case why, Bucko?

DrWilgy wrote: ↑Tue Mar 13, 2018 10:19 pm

Scotty wrote: ↑Tue Mar 13, 2018 2:03 pm

Scotty wrote: ↑Tue Mar 13, 2018 12:40 am

DrWilgy wrote: ↑Tue Mar 13, 2018 12:33 amSup.

So you’ve got nothing to say beside ‘sup’?

I don’t even know why I try.

Not really. Pretty sleepy. Will you cuddle with me Scotty?

I am a fantastic cuddler.

But naw

How did they get a lynch and a NK? I mean, I see SVS’ role could make someone else die, but like...what?

vote Marmot aubergine before things get hairy. And I don’t mean clumps of hair.

!!!!!!!!
I’m thoroughly confounded what is going on.

And holy shit that role tho. Sounds like some people might be dying the rest of the game from Pikachu tribe since something killed our resident Nurse Jackie

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Tue Mar 13, 2018 4:04 pm Perhaps the mafia kill is not carried out by a player or can cross beaches.

I agree with the theory that lynches and nightkills are opposite because that ensures equal tribe numbers (which is important why? Maybe this is a dumb theory) but if beaches are totally random, you could end up with no mafia on one side and a required kill on that side.

We should test out if the other tribe has any mafia left by lynching someone tomorrow.

Ya hear, Wilgy?

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Tue Mar 13, 2018 3:13 pm

Scotty wrote: ↑Mon Mar 12, 2018 11:28 pm So I'd still like to assume that by this point mafia are slowly picking off people that aren't on their team. I'm still under the impression that there are multiple mafia/killing teams. Which mean anyone that has been NK'd shouldn't earn any civvie points
That list is:
-nijuu
-me
-jack
-sig

But that also means that we shouldn't shy away from lynching those that haven't been killed yet. You see, if there is just one mafia team, they're spreading the killing around, and leveling the playing field. I'm actually shocked that nijuu, jack or myself haven't been fully killed yet. I'm not quite sure why that is, but i'm just munching on my carrot while I'm here and not asking too many questions about it.

Now if there are multiple mafia teams, leveling the playing field makes much more sense for mafia. Odds are, in multiple teams, that they kill on odd/even nights. Which means they're disadvantaged by limited opportunities and minority volume. So of course they're just going to eliminate lives slowly but methodically pick off those with 2 lives.

Watch, now that I say that, I'm gonna die tonight.

That makes two of us. Maybe it’s cause Bidoff.

*bidoof

[mention]LoRab[/mention] I still don’t see the benefit of mafia only targeting our tribe together and conversing about it. We know they (had) at least 1 mafia member over there.

If all the remaining mafia are over here, then...like...no wonder we’re getting nowhere

Golden wrote: ↑Tue Mar 13, 2018 3:03 pm

LoRab wrote: ↑Tue Mar 13, 2018 12:15 pm But Golden said it was completely random:

Golden wrote: ↑Tue Feb 27, 2018 1:23 am

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Tue Feb 27, 2018 1:12 am I feel like this is in the rules somewhere.

When you die and get a new role, we don’t know alignment may be different, yeah? That is, could it be an okay thing to get lynched as mafia?

Are roles assigned randomly as first and second roles? That is, could there be only one mafia in this tribe?

Anyone besides Marmot feel like self voting?

2nd roles are not assigned randomly. They were paired and the players received a pair at random.

As was noted in the second post of the thread, the split of players into tribes was random. There is no guarantee of any particular number or ratio of any alignment in the tribe.

That doesn't seem like a tricksy host answer, but I guess it could be.

There is no trick. I put all your names in a randomiser. The first half went to one beach, the next half to another.

It’s a trick! He’s a witch! Can’t believe everything the government tells us!!

(Thanks Golden)

Someone press the button. I bet it is closer to the ant-button in “Lost” and will combine the tribes.

Alternatively, a likely mechanic is that if the button dies in a player’s first role, it will also induce a merge.

Let’s merge. I’m ready. Or we’ll just lynch you because I’m feeling ruthless.

Scotty wrote: ↑Tue Mar 13, 2018 2:06 pm Someone just kill me. I don’t feel like I’m doing anything useful in this game besides regurgitating errant thoughts

That was my clone posting that, ive had a change of heart, don’t kill me, comma

Someone just kill me. I don’t feel like I’m doing anything useful in this game besides regurgitating errant thoughts

Scotty wrote: ↑Tue Mar 13, 2018 12:40 am

DrWilgy wrote: ↑Tue Mar 13, 2018 12:33 amSup.

So you’ve got nothing to say beside ‘sup’?

I don’t even know why I try.

LoRab wrote: ↑Tue Mar 13, 2018 12:15 pm But Golden said it was completely random:

Golden wrote: ↑Tue Feb 27, 2018 1:23 am

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Tue Feb 27, 2018 1:12 am I feel like this is in the rules somewhere.

When you die and get a new role, we don’t know alignment may be different, yeah? That is, could it be an okay thing to get lynched as mafia?

Are roles assigned randomly as first and second roles? That is, could there be only one mafia in this tribe?

Anyone besides Marmot feel like self voting?

2nd roles are not assigned randomly. They were paired and the players received a pair at random.

As was noted in the second post of the thread, the split of players into tribes was random. There is no guarantee of any particular number or ratio of any alignment in the tribe.

That doesn't seem like a tricksy host answer, but I guess it could be.

I guess there’s no real way of knowing. He could also have built in the mechanic that should a team not be assigned to both tribes, the 2nd role would come back eventually as another mafia member to balance it out.

Another thought: tribes are split randomly ok.
But then the mafia members on one side are placed in their own team and on the other side the other team.


Ah shit, were there any recruitment opportunities in the games of the past year?
Because I don’t wanna get into recruitment shit

LoRab wrote: ↑Tue Mar 13, 2018 12:03 pm

Scotty wrote: ↑Tue Mar 13, 2018 11:14 am

LoRab wrote: ↑Tue Mar 13, 2018 2:12 am

Scotty wrote: ↑Mon Mar 12, 2018 11:01 pm I would like to make a plea tomorrow that we put as many votes on one person to show those pikachu punks we can reach a decision.

Not to sound like an echo, but Marmot 2018 isn't the worst decision, if only because no one has outright objected to it (or anyone that I have noticed). It's not like he's in here defending himself.

No matter who gets killed tonight, can we all agree that we need to get a lynch across just to see if we can skip the whole NK phase entirely?

I don't disagree that we should attempt to lynch someone--especially since we have gained a numbers advantage (with the lynching of lc) since we last tried, so we might be able to.

But, what's your logic on skipping the nk phase? The theory, iirc from the other camp, that the mafia can only kill from the camp that didn't lynch? I think it's just as likely that the mafia(s) are choosing to kill from one camp--and, in large part, to do so in order to fuck with everyone and make it seem like that's what's happening since the theory was raised. Mainly from a game set up standpoint, it would seem like an odd dynamic to introduce.

The logic is that I find it less likely that teams can communicate across different beaches. For a team to collectively go “let’s just all kill people on one tribe” is a plan that has no merit. Why do this? To “fuck with everyone”? Naw. This here’s a game mechanic, and it makes sense if we consolidate. Rewards groupthink, which in this setting, is exactly what the tribes are.

So, with that theory, assuming 2 mafias (more than 2 would seem unbalanced)--one on each beach--the one that gets to kill is the one that didn't have a successful lynch on their beach? So is the name "Evil Evens" a misdirect? I was thinking that meant it was the mafia that kills on even nights (with the usual set up of multiple mafias, alternating nights). Also, Golden said more than once that the split of players between beaches was random--statistically, I'd think it more likely that there are members of any given mafia on both teams. I guess it's possible that they might not have cross-beach BTSC, but then from a set up perspective, it would seem unfair for a team to have to strategize without the ability to communicate. We already know there were 2 roles (of unknown allegiance) that had BTSC across tribes--so why wouldn't mafia be the same?

I honestly didn’t even think to correlate evil evens with even night kills. What was the odd equivalent in chicka? Obstinent Odds?

Regardless, I do think Golden would have split the teams so that at least 1 of each team is on each tribe. That would make the game so much harder to win for either team.

So if the theory that the team that doesn’t get a lynch in receives the NK is true, I’m assuming that at least one of each team is on this tribe, yes.
And I think it would balance out, assuming that tribes are only random insofar that there is at least one of each team on each tribe, that they don’t have cross-BTSC

[mention]LoRab[/mention] are you against voting for Marmot tomorrow?

LoRab wrote: ↑Tue Mar 13, 2018 2:12 am

Scotty wrote: ↑Mon Mar 12, 2018 11:01 pm I would like to make a plea tomorrow that we put as many votes on one person to show those pikachu punks we can reach a decision.

Not to sound like an echo, but Marmot 2018 isn't the worst decision, if only because no one has outright objected to it (or anyone that I have noticed). It's not like he's in here defending himself.

No matter who gets killed tonight, can we all agree that we need to get a lynch across just to see if we can skip the whole NK phase entirely?

I don't disagree that we should attempt to lynch someone--especially since we have gained a numbers advantage (with the lynching of lc) since we last tried, so we might be able to.

But, what's your logic on skipping the nk phase? The theory, iirc from the other camp, that the mafia can only kill from the camp that didn't lynch? I think it's just as likely that the mafia(s) are choosing to kill from one camp--and, in large part, to do so in order to fuck with everyone and make it seem like that's what's happening since the theory was raised. Mainly from a game set up standpoint, it would seem like an odd dynamic to introduce.

The logic is that I find it less likely that teams can communicate across different beaches. For a team to collectively go “let’s just all kill people on one tribe” is a plan that has no merit. Why do this? To “fuck with everyone”? Naw. This here’s a game mechanic, and it makes sense if we consolidate. Rewards groupthink, which in this setting, is exactly what the tribes are.

DrWilgy wrote: ↑Tue Mar 13, 2018 12:33 amSup.

I've got a bone to pick with the goodbad doctor:

Wilgy can be lynched after Marmot.

Thank you Mr. Speaker, you can have the podium again.

So I'd still like to assume that by this point mafia are slowly picking off people that aren't on their team. I'm still under the impression that there are multiple mafia/killing teams. Which mean anyone that has been NK'd shouldn't earn any civvie points
That list is:
-nijuu
-me
-jack
-sig

But that also means that we shouldn't shy away from lynching those that haven't been killed yet. You see, if there is just one mafia team, they're spreading the killing around, and leveling the playing field. I'm actually shocked that nijuu, jack or myself haven't been fully killed yet. I'm not quite sure why that is, but i'm just munching on my carrot while I'm here and not asking too many questions about it.

Now if there are multiple mafia teams, leveling the playing field makes much more sense for mafia. Odds are, in multiple teams, that they kill on odd/even nights. Which means they're disadvantaged by limited opportunities and minority volume. So of course they're just going to eliminate lives slowly but methodically pick off those with 2 lives.

Watch, now that I say that, I'm gonna die tonight.

Kylemii wrote: ↑Mon Mar 12, 2018 11:15 pm

Scotty wrote: ↑Mon Mar 12, 2018 11:07 pm

Kylemii wrote: ↑Sun Mar 11, 2018 2:17 am that's actually a really good point. we don't know the logistics of the Charlie Pace role. There could be a Desmond Hume role out there or something that could prevent cbob from dying today somehow.

it might be better to treat this lynch as normal just in case. there's no actual downside to doing so other than time cost.

Kylemii wrote: ↑Mon Mar 12, 2018 10:15 pm i missed another fucking vote today :[

we missed ya buddy. That's why it's not a bad idea to put your vote in early.

yeah I forgot, so many day ends are happening while I'm at work now and I'm used to voting near deadline

I don't blame you-

I'm just surprised that more people don't have a person in mind that they want lynched by Day 6- I mean here we are almost to Day 7 and we haven't lynched anyone. It's probably a conflict of play style, but if I know I'm not gonna be around by EoD (which is every weekday about an hour up until) I'm putting in a vote early, knowing I can still change it if I want. And if I don't..then at least I voted.

Kylemii wrote: ↑Mon Mar 12, 2018 11:05 pm I wonder if they actively chose to lynch cbob? or maybe he tried to fight against it since it wasn't an inevitability and that sketched people out.

I can't imagine being in his shoes, no matter the alignment:
-can't infodump
-can't defend against a host post

I think he just bites the bit and shoulders the lynch. I mean, there's only so much you can say 'well, what if i don't have to be lynched'

Now knowing he didn't have to be lynched and knowing that he knew that, I'd really love to break down his ISO.

But alas.

Kylemii wrote: ↑Sun Mar 11, 2018 2:17 am that's actually a really good point. we don't know the logistics of the Charlie Pace role. There could be a Desmond Hume role out there or something that could prevent cbob from dying today somehow.

it might be better to treat this lynch as normal just in case. there's no actual downside to doing so other than time cost.

Kylemii wrote: ↑Mon Mar 12, 2018 10:15 pm i missed another fucking vote today :[

we missed ya buddy. That's why it's not a bad idea to put your vote in early.

Kylemii wrote: ↑Mon Mar 12, 2018 11:02 pm

Scotty wrote: ↑Mon Mar 12, 2018 10:58 pmthere's a bunch of cats in the litterbox

what

I would like to make a plea tomorrow that we put as many votes on one person to show those pikachu punks we can reach a decision.

Not to sound like an echo, but Marmot 2018 isn't the worst decision, if only because no one has outright objected to it (or anyone that I have noticed). It's not like he's in here defending himself.

No matter who gets killed tonight, can we all agree that we need to get a lynch across just to see if we can skip the whole NK phase entirely?

Kylemii wrote: ↑Mon Mar 12, 2018 10:17 pm I don't get it, does that mean cbob being lynched was just a coincidence?

His role wording makes it sound like Pikachu had a bunch of consolidated votes on him today- more than 4, and that he didn't need to die. Now someone over there is cursed or some shit.

It also appears we probably could have lynched someone today had we the votes. Maybe. Who really knows though, since we've never had a lynch before.

We don't know if cbob is civ- that role sure sounded like the typical werewolf 'mayor' role that announces itself as civ early. But that would be too easy with this 2 role mechanism, wouldn't it? I'm glad the hosts didn't have a built-in definitive lynch either way today, even though once again there's a bunch of cats in the litterbox every single lynch over there.

nijuukyugou wrote: ↑Mon Mar 12, 2018 6:48 pm

Scotty wrote: ↑Mon Mar 12, 2018 6:09 pm All the cool stuff is happening over in Pikachu tribe. We’re more like Bidoof over here.

Seriously tho we’re all on fire. We are all bidoof.
Except for mafia. They squirtle

All the cool stuff is happening over in Pikachu tribe. We’re more like Bidoof over here.

Scotty wrote: ↑Mon Mar 12, 2018 3:35 pm

Sloonei wrote: ↑Mon Mar 12, 2018 3:28 pm

Scotty wrote: ↑Mon Mar 12, 2018 3:24 pm After reading Sloonei’s ISO of today, I can’t tell if he’s suspicious of anyone in this game.

Oh, and vote Marmot 2018 aubergine in case this whole cbob thing doesn’t pan out.

Lol we don’t even know if cbob is civ or not at this juncture

I'm suspicious of marmot. This is a good vote.

no shit Sherlock

Forgot the

Sloonei wrote: ↑Mon Mar 12, 2018 3:28 pm

Scotty wrote: ↑Mon Mar 12, 2018 3:24 pm After reading Sloonei’s ISO of today, I can’t tell if he’s suspicious of anyone in this game.

Oh, and vote Marmot 2018 aubergine in case this whole cbob thing doesn’t pan out.

Lol we don’t even know if cbob is civ or not at this juncture

I'm suspicious of marmot. This is a good vote.

no shit Sherlock

After reading Sloonei’s ISO of today, I can’t tell if he’s suspicious of anyone in this game.

Oh, and vote Marmot 2018 aubergine in case this whole cbob thing doesn’t pan out.

Lol we don’t even know if cbob is civ or not at this juncture

Oh ffs why is that happening whenever I use multiple quotes in a post now? I’d like to think I’m not tech-unsavvy, so what am I doing wrong?

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Mon Mar 12, 2018 12:25 pm How mad would Pikachu be if we didn't even try to find mafia and just let them have all the votes and then when questioned were like "Well, you guys seemed to be doing just fine on your own."

I won’t spill if you won’t

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Mon Mar 12, 2018 11:38 am I like Sloonei's Marmot case, here.

Spoiler: show

[quote=Sloonei post_id=420868 time=<a href="tel:1520791501">1520791501</a> user_id=405]
My first major concern with Marmot was that he was making empty prods of players to appear as a driving force in the game, but he never followed up on these prods at all. Here's a couple early examples:
[quote=Marmot post_id=414476 time=<a href="tel:1519579101">1519579101</a> user_id=288]
All of them.

Why do you have so many folks colored at such an early juncture in the game?

[quote=Marmot post_id=414638 time=<a href="tel:1519591575">1519591575</a> user_id=288]
[quote=sig post_id=414484 time=<a href="tel:1519581129">1519581129</a> user_id=411]
I do like that Sloonie is posting and trying to get people talking, but as of right now I just don't think there's much to talk about. However, I'd put him down as a light civ read.
[/quote]

What do you think will get people talking?
[/quote]
Followed two hours later with this:
[quote=Marmot post_id=414734 time=<a href="tel:1519598793">1519598793</a> user_id=288]
Haha, I forgot to come back and move my vote.
[/quote]And no visible attempt anywhere to do anything with the questions he had asked previously, giving me reason to doubt that he cared at all about his own line of investigation.


The first time I remember stating suspicion against him, and his response was to take cover behind his meta:
[quote=Marmot post_id=416848 time=<a href="tel:1520010883">1520010883</a> user_id=288]
[quote=Sloonei post_id=416845 time=<a href="tel:1520010374">1520010374</a> user_id=405]
@Marmot has not made a single post that I can't see coming from a mafia member. That's not a very good look. I also don't really know where he stands on anything. He just keeps self-voting and making small observations here and there.
[/quote]

Have you met me?

tries to motivate himself to play mafia, but this place smells like old shrimp
[/quote]Uninspiring.

Here's another collection of mid-game posts where he seems to be trying to check off the "Active participant" box without really producing much: Maybe it's unfair of me to label them as such, but these all feel like hollow prods to me. I don't see him doing much with the responses he gets and they don't feel particularly directed toward anything.

If there's a specific incident I take issue with, it was this small exchange the two of us had a few days ago (I've wrapped the whole thing in quote brackets for visual appeal):

[quote=Marmot post_id=415997 time=<a href="tel:1519837851">1519837851</a> user_id=288]
[quote=Sloonei post_id=415681 time=<a href="tel:1519765225">1519765225</a> user_id=405]
This is dumb. Stop suspecting me.

[VOTE: Sloonei] aubergine
[/quote]
Places a joking vote on me. Not furreal.

[quote=Marmot post_id=416015 time=<a href="tel:1519838916">1519838916</a> user_id=288]
[quote=Sloonei post_id=416011 time=<a href="tel:1519838605">1519838605</a> user_id=405]
[quote=Marmot post_id=415997 time=<a href="tel:1519837851">1519837851</a> user_id=288]
[quote=Sloonei post_id=415681 time=<a href="tel:1519765225">1519765225</a> user_id=405]
This is dumb. Stop suspecting me.
[/quote]

[VOTE: Sloonei] aubergine
[/quote]

Do you actually suspect me?
[/quote]



No. The above vote is a joke.
[/quote]I asked directly whether or not he actually suspected me. "No" was his answer. Marmot does not suspect me. Noted.
So I followed up:
[quote=Marmot post_id=416222 time=<a href="tel:1519856925">1519856925</a> user_id=288]
[quote=Sloonei post_id=416175 time=<a href="tel:1519853362">1519853362</a> user_id=405]
Marmot, you placed a joke vote on me and then removed it. This leads me to believe you think I'm town. Why?
[/quote]

Why would this lead you to believe that I think you're civilian.

This and that are not the same thing.
[/quote]I was lead to believe that you think I am civilian because you stated "no" when asked if you suspect me. Sure you can say I'm a null read. But I refuse to accept that at the juncture of the game in which this exchange took place, especially when I have ~142 posts. "No" suspicion for this player should indicate a town read, but Marmot won't commit to that stance. I'm really just trying to get him to follow up on the read he seemed to hint at earlier, but he refuses to do so.
[quote=Marmot post_id=416308 time=<a href="tel:1519864005">1519864005</a> user_id=288]
[quote=Sloonei post_id=416228 time=<a href="tel:1519857108">1519857108</a> user_id=405]
[quote=Marmot post_id=416222 time=<a href="tel:1519856925">1519856925</a> user_id=288]
[quote=Sloonei post_id=416175 time=<a href="tel:1519853362">1519853362</a> user_id=405]
Marmot, you placed a joke vote on me and then removed it. This leads me to believe you think I'm town. Why?
[/quote]

Why would this lead you to believe that I think you're civilian.

This and that are not the same thing.


Linki: Oops, got distracted by work. Meant to post this a while ago.
[/quote]

You had a chance to vote for me but did not. What is your read of me?
[/quote]

Currently, I think you're abstracting my vote for you into something bigger. I voted for you as a joke. That's it. I also don't understand what you mean by "I had a chance to vote for you". You're really reaching on this one.
[/quote]I don't think I was reaching seeing as I was directly responding to a read you had hinted at a few minutes earlier. This seems like the marmot trying to weasel out of a read.[/quote]

If I were to articulate my suspicion of Marmot in one word, it would be listless. It feels like he's going through the motions of being a townie, but without the direction or the emotion of a player who is genuinely trying to solve the game.

Vote Marmot, 2018.
[/quote][/spoiler]

But I'm not a fan of this.

[quote=Scotty post_id=420897 time=<a href="tel:1520794623">1520794623</a> user_id=410]
Ok.

To play devil’s advocate though, you also basically took cover under your meta for being a townie.

And wait a tic- how is it that Marmot is now your top scumread for a few days? I feel like you’ve flitted around from one candidate to another every day, and haven’t held any firm beliefs carried over after each lynch. Until Marmot.

And frankly, I’m not seeing it. He could be bad, yes. But what you’re saying about his posts can be attributed to many players on this tribe.

Why haven’t mafia tried to kill you yet? I mean they very well could have on N4, but if I were mafia I would have wanted to kill you in the 1st few cycles with how much you’ve been posting and infusing the thread.

But why haven’t you been NK’d yet?


[/quote]

Tell me about the many players who are going through the motions.

Name a player that the "why haven't you been NK'd yet" accusation does not apply to. The mafia has eliminated zero players.
[/quote]
I don’t feel like telling more of wallflowering people. They’re self explanatory.

And I’m specifically talking about Sloonei not being NK’d because, tbh, I think he’s been looking the towniest in terms of engagement with the thread. Next to you, I’d rank him pretty high on my town list. It just got me thinking is all.

Not that it matters today, but I’ll throw my vote on anyone with a good case tomorrow <provided I’m still alive>

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Mon Mar 12, 2018 11:10 am

sig wrote: ↑Sun Mar 11, 2018 1:28 am

LoRab wrote: ↑Sun Mar 11, 2018 1:21 am Looks like niju has been silenced. Not sure if powers go through the night of death, or if there is another silencer.

I also don't see a reason why we wouldn't try to lynch the same as last round. In fact, sig has seemed even more suspish since then. So, as aubergine and babaganoush are delicious, vote sig

That's super scummy. Lynch someone who's last life was an obvious civ even though he was nightkillled.

Obligatory "first roles being civ in previous games doesn't mean you are civ now or even civ yesterday."

Heck, the mafia is the Evil Evens, which wasn't even a mafia team in CC123 and LC's first role was Commander Shepherd, towniest of all Mass Effect townies.

Quit with this nonsense.

Good point

Sloonei wrote:I expected there to be another challenge today. I was gonna recommend we throw it to let one of their players have a look at our thread.

Why do you think that? We already have a lynch immunity of sorts built in to the game, which would disregard the last challenge if it were to be played today

juliets wrote: ↑Mon Mar 12, 2018 8:32 am Please note Day 6 will end at 6:02 pm eastern standard time today, Monday March 12th. We will delete the poll at that time.

So the poll is a placebo is what you’re saying

Sloonei wrote: ↑Mon Mar 12, 2018 12:24 am Do you have a case on LoRab? I have not seen one yet. She has been our least vocal tribe member, but I don't attribute this to her alignment one way or the other, and I do not blame her for it. It seems like she's just been busy. I am open to a case on her, but at this point I'm firmly reading her as town.

This place is empty today. I think everyone's just twiddling their thumbs waiting for colonialbob to die and to trigger whatever his death will trigger. Meh. This tribe desperately needs something to happen at this point. we've just been bystanders while the other tribe plays their game so far. I'm gonna continue voting for Marmot.

I expected there to be another challenge today. I was gonna recommend we throw it to let one of their players have a look at our thread.

“Firmly” reading her as town? Wow. I don’t know how you can pull that rabbit out of a hat.

My case is flimsy to be sure. But they all are pretty breezy, aren’t they?
She was busy with RL stuff early on, yes, but that’s over, and nothing changed in her play style. She’s patiently ignoring me which is fine, because I’m like that chihuahua that won’t stop jumping up trying to get attention. Annoying, but ignorable.

all I’m asking from her is to make some cases on people. You even said before you had your revelation that she’s hadn’t given anything you would consider to be town. So like...

Sloonei wrote: ↑Sun Mar 11, 2018 10:41 pm Why not lynch Marmot?

No reason. You seem as convinced that he’s bad as Daisy is that Wilgy is bad as I’m convinced that LoRab is bad.

Why not that wart on the back of my neck?

We have too many Stubborn Stevens on this team lol