DrWilgy wrote: ↑Tue Mar 06, 2018 8:46 pm
Why did y'all try to kill me while I was in court?
This was Night 4. You're no longer in court. Dribble your big bad self to this court and play ball with us.
DrWilgy wrote: ↑Thu Mar 08, 2018 12:21 pm
Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Thu Mar 08, 2018 12:07 pm
I actually don't know why people were voting for Sig.
I know people were voting for Wilgy cause he was being Wilgy.
This brings me to a question. Who was voting me for being me? I'm somewhat unsettled by this.
One of 2 posts in Day 5. This is his only defense to votes against him- meeker than a 12 year old prepubescent boy about to ask a girl out.
DrWilgy wrote: ↑Fri Mar 09, 2018 6:51 pm
Jesus fuck. Y'all want Sig dead.
I'm voting Boomslang. Aubergine
I want to vote you twice as a policy lynch just for this vote and explanation (or lack thereof).
Let's break this down.
--------------------------------------
He's never mentioned suspecting sig or defending sig. Pretty much the only interaction with sig is this:
DrWilgy wrote: ↑Sun Mar 04, 2018 11:48 pm
@sig why would you vote for me? What caused the flip flop?
Which might as well be matzo, it's so bland.
Ok so he has no reason to not vote sig. His response in Post 1 of 2 in Day 5 was quoting this:
DrWilgy wrote: ↑Thu Mar 08, 2018 12:21 pm
Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Thu Mar 08, 2018 12:07 pm
I actually don't know why people were voting for Sig.
I know people were voting for Wilgy cause he was being Wilgy.
This brings me to a question. Who was voting me for being me? I'm somewhat unsettled by this.
He chose to respond to that quote where jack shrugs off the reasoning behind the general sig suspicion and chooses to answer the second question. But he says 'this brings me to a question.'
Uhhhh what is 'this?' in response to? So his meek defense (as I've already expressed) says we should look at people pushing the envelope on suggesting Wilgy's guilt based on meta, without offering names, and without any other solution. One would expect that he would then vote for one of those people pushing the envelope..
He's voted for Boom 2 straight cycles- so as to appear like a continuation vote- but here's the problem...
Wilgy posted 10 minutes before day end to poop a meaningless vote on Boomslang on Day 5. What did this accomplish?
-if sig is bad, Wilgy is his teammate 100%.
-he got a vote in to say he voted, ok
-Boom wasn't in any way linked to pushing wilgy for being wilgy, so there is no connection between his earlier post and this one
-he poses a front to push his 'craa@zy WiLgY' unpredictable meta again
Instead of possibly giving us that extra vote we may have needed to get a lynch (who knows how many we actually needed) he gives nonchalance. I don't care about his meta or whatever. Spacedaisy has her case on that. That's fine.
I'm more pissed that Wilgy popped in to say basically nothing and then put a nothing vote on Boom right before EoD when we
need consolidation. It's one thing if you don't agree with the choice of lynchee, but, again
Wilgy has not expressed any opinion on sig this game other than 'Jesus fuck, ya'll want sig dead.'