Epignosis wrote:Not especially.

Return to “A Mafia of Unfortunate Events [END GAME]”
Epignosis wrote:Not especially.
Epignosis wrote:There's an apparent reason.insertnamehere wrote: If I said "there is no apparent reason for why Epi thinks LC is good," would you agree with that assessment?
I'm just not spelling it out.
You wanna tussle m8?Epignosis wrote:I no longer have a positive reason to believe Long Con is a civilian.
That isn't to say that I suspect him- it's just that my reason for standing in his corner yesterday is gone.
Take that as you will.
DDL, where are you getting the numbers in your head from? 2/6 of you won't catch up so let's ninja them?Dragon D. Luffy wrote:Wilgy, Golden, Marco, MP, Zebra, Sorsha
Imo, the vig should target those people first. In whatever order they prefer.
Nothing personal guys, but I doubt more than two of you will manage to catch up before the game is over.
You would.insertnamehere wrote:i'm honestly gonna feel bad if sprityo is lynched and flips civ.
I'm pretty sure I said that I did earlier.Long Con wrote:That's very cool of you. So you think Epi is a baddie?DrWilgy wrote:I'd like to vote Epi anyhow. I'm game for letting a coin decide.Long Con wrote:Then give me a fighting chance at a tie and vote elsewhere.DrWilgy wrote:I wish I had more time LC.Long Con wrote:Wilgy, I have been nothing but sincere. I am not a baddie, and despite INH's interpretation of my play as baddie-indicative, it is not.DrWilgy wrote:At the rate things are going I'd think my fave votes are Epi or LC.sprityo wrote:@DrWilgy, do you have any ideas on who you'd vote?
linki: yeah, but if we yknow, agree to help eachother outthen there wont be a chance of either me or LC getting lynched. as crappy as that sounds
Just kinda trust INH this time (which is abnormal).
I'd appreciate if you didn't vote for me.
At this moment I have no inclination to vote for him and even less to save you.
I'd like to vote Epi anyhow. I'm game for letting a coin decide.Long Con wrote:Then give me a fighting chance at a tie and vote elsewhere.DrWilgy wrote:I wish I had more time LC.Long Con wrote:Wilgy, I have been nothing but sincere. I am not a baddie, and despite INH's interpretation of my play as baddie-indicative, it is not.DrWilgy wrote:At the rate things are going I'd think my fave votes are Epi or LC.sprityo wrote:@DrWilgy, do you have any ideas on who you'd vote?
linki: yeah, but if we yknow, agree to help eachother outthen there wont be a chance of either me or LC getting lynched. as crappy as that sounds
Just kinda trust INH this time (which is abnormal).
I'd appreciate if you didn't vote for me.
At this moment I have no inclination to vote for him and even less to save you.
I wish I had more time LC.Long Con wrote:Wilgy, I have been nothing but sincere. I am not a baddie, and despite INH's interpretation of my play as baddie-indicative, it is not.DrWilgy wrote:At the rate things are going I'd think my fave votes are Epi or LC.sprityo wrote:@DrWilgy, do you have any ideas on who you'd vote?
linki: yeah, but if we yknow, agree to help eachother outthen there wont be a chance of either me or LC getting lynched. as crappy as that sounds
Just kinda trust INH this time (which is abnormal).
I'd appreciate if you didn't vote for me.
At the rate things are going I'd think my fave votes are Epi or LC.sprityo wrote:@DrWilgy, do you have any ideas on who you'd vote?
linki: yeah, but if we yknow, agree to help eachother outthen there wont be a chance of either me or LC getting lynched. as crappy as that sounds
No, but an Epi lynch would be illuminative of LC's. As I don't believe LC's interactions with Epi are fair to judge him for, Epi's interactions with LC would be.insertnamehere wrote:Do you agree that a LC lynch would be illuminative about Epi's alignment?DrWilgy wrote:I'm not asking who's good. Thank you for giving me a decent reason to think you are bad though.Epignosis wrote:No. I'm not offering you anything more. I think LC is good. Find your own damn reasons and make up your own minds.
I'm not asking who's good. Thank you for giving me a decent reason to think you are bad though.Epignosis wrote:No. I'm not offering you anything more. I think LC is good. Find your own damn reasons and make up your own minds.
Epi, you know damn well I don't know enough to make that call. Give me your opinion that's all I'm asking for.Epignosis wrote:I think you should vote for the person you think is bad.DrWilgy wrote:Who do you think I should vote for Epi and why?Epignosis wrote:All of the discussion right now is on LC. I say we drop it and move ELSIEwhere.
Jesus Christ.
It isn't bad, but I think it's run its course.DrWilgy wrote:Is the discussion involving LC a bad thing? why should we move elsewhere?
While I feel that I don't have enough information at this point to decidedly call him bad, your conviction makes me believe your case. I'm at this point trying to judge if you are wrong or not.insertnamehere wrote:I really don't, Wilgy.DrWilgy wrote:Don't like to them INHinsertnamehere wrote:better nonsensical than nonverbal.Epignosis wrote:INH's urge to get LC lynched leads me to believe INH is sincere in his nonsensical rampage. INH is good or independent. Maybe bad, given two teams, but I don't think that's the case.
at least that's what the doctors tell me.
What your stance of LC, Wilgy?
Hey, that kinda rhymed. I'm so clever.
Who do you think I should vote for Epi and why?Epignosis wrote:All of the discussion right now is on LC. I say we drop it and move ELSIEwhere.
Don't like to them INHinsertnamehere wrote:better nonsensical than nonverbal.Epignosis wrote:INH's urge to get LC lynched leads me to believe INH is sincere in his nonsensical rampage. INH is good or independent. Maybe bad, given two teams, but I don't think that's the case.
at least that's what the doctors tell me.
Can you link me to your case?Long Con wrote:I have already voted for DDL. You don't need a gun, I already say he's bad. Vote for him.DrWilgy wrote:LC give me that GTH on DDL and INH.
Who would you have me vote for LC?
Link- How about ddl?
Gun to head read. "If I had a gun to your head would you say this player is good or bad?"Jackofhearts2005 wrote:What is a GTH and a CFD?
Do you have thoughts on the 2 players gut reading you? Do you GTH them good or bad?Long Con wrote:Gut.DrWilgy wrote:Why do you have 2 votes then?Long Con wrote:I'd like to say, for the record, that there IS no case against me.DrWilgy wrote:Vote spread is consistent and bueno. What are the cases for DDL, LC, Sprityo and Sig?
Also didn't we already off Sprit? What did New Sprityo do to warrant lynch 2?
Why do you have 2 votes then?Long Con wrote:I'd like to say, for the record, that there IS no case against me.DrWilgy wrote:Vote spread is consistent and bueno. What are the cases for DDL, LC, Sprityo and Sig?
Also didn't we already off Sprit? What did New Sprityo do to warrant lynch 2?
I see... well as a doctor what I said goes.Jackofhearts2005 wrote:My home site generally doesn't allow self targeting docs, which I like.DrWilgy wrote:DuhJackofhearts2005 wrote:Can docs target themselves?
It does allow targetting the same player twice in a row (except for silencing), but I prefer the rule against doing that here.
DuhJackofhearts2005 wrote:Can docs target themselves?
Odd... I've only read yours and snow dog's as well...Metalmarsh89 wrote:I've only read my role and your role.Snow Dog wrote:Besides my role, I haven't read any of the other roles yet. This is true. I intend to fix this.