A Mafia of Unfortunate Events [END GAME]

[Long Con]

Vote spread is consistent and bueno. What are the cases for DDL, LC, Sprityo and Sig?

Also didn't we already off Sprit? What did New Sprityo do to warrant lynch 2?

I'd like to say, for the record, that there IS no case against me.

[Soneji]

Why is Golden on Soneji? What's the deal there?

He thinks my vote for Zebra was strange, even though he chalked it up to sympathy for JoH which makes me question why he thinks that makes me scum.

Good to see discussion picking up, some hard lines being drawn which is great going into next day phase.

[sprityo]

Yo Sprit, why should I not vote for you?

I replaced into Glorfs spot and the only person currently voting me with an actual opinion is Sig since he believes his meta knowledge of Glorf placing out coupled with the sub par playstyle of glorf on day 0/ day 1 means that the role is mafia, but that isn't the case

[Long Con]

Vote spread is consistent and bueno. What are the cases for DDL, LC, Sprityo and Sig?

Also didn't we already off Sprit? What did New Sprityo do to warrant lynch 2?

The sprit thing is about a Glorf meta read (who he replaced)... nothing against him for his own posting.

[DrWilgy]

Vote spread is consistent and bueno. What are the cases for DDL, LC, Sprityo and Sig?

Also didn't we already off Sprit? What did New Sprityo do to warrant lynch 2?

I'd like to say, for the record, that there IS no case against me.

Why do you have 2 votes then?

Link- Sprit, your you reviewed Glorf's content? Do you agree or disagree with things glorf has said?

[sprityo]

Hold that thought, I gotta re check it

[Long Con]

Vote spread is consistent and bueno. What are the cases for DDL, LC, Sprityo and Sig?

Also didn't we already off Sprit? What did New Sprityo do to warrant lynch 2?

I'd like to say, for the record, that there IS no case against me.

Why do you have 2 votes then?

Gut.

[insertnamehere]

THE CASE AGAINST LONG CON

I am willing to vote sprityo, LC, or DDL of those three names.

DDL is, let's say, a kind of incendiary guy.

I agree with the initial idea behind DDL's case against LC. LC has latched onto a few things DDL said that admittedly don't make complete sense, but are just used to augment the core of his rhetoric. LC took those things, and now is trying to completely invalidate DDL's case, regardless of the good points he made about LC.

LC was blendy and noncommital as hell, up until DDL posted a case on him. LC then dedicated himself to poking holes in that case, and trying to lynch DDL, who is an easy-ass target at this point due to how he racked up the votes on D1.

It's not genuine.

It's not real baddie-hunting.

It's an OMGUS, despite how many discrediting adjectives LC uses to describe DDL's case.

[DrWilgy]

Vote spread is consistent and bueno. What are the cases for DDL, LC, Sprityo and Sig?

Also didn't we already off Sprit? What did New Sprityo do to warrant lynch 2?

I'd like to say, for the record, that there IS no case against me.

Why do you have 2 votes then?

Gut.

Do you have thoughts on the 2 players gut reading you? Do you GTH them good or bad?

Link- Lol ty INH

[insertnamehere]

I'd also like to see LC's GTH read of me at this point.

[Soneji]

Vote spread is consistent and bueno. What are the cases for DDL, LC, Sprityo and Sig?

Also didn't we already off Sprit? What did New Sprityo do to warrant lynch 2?

I'd like to say, for the record, that there IS no case against me.

You're certainly the best person to ask when it comes to the validity of cases against you.


Don't start some CFD on a poster with zero interactions people. There has been much more content by which to judge and take info from out of those currently on the board. A vig kill would be the superior route for soup.

[insertnamehere]

Vote spread is consistent and bueno. What are the cases for DDL, LC, Sprityo and Sig?

Also didn't we already off Sprit? What did New Sprityo do to warrant lynch 2?

I'd like to say, for the record, that there IS no case against me.

You're certainly the best person to ask when it comes to the validity of cases against you.


Don't start some CFD on a poster with zero interactions people. There has been much more content by which to judge and take info from out of those currently on the board. A vig kill would be the superior route for soup.

AMEN

[Jackofhearts2005]

What is a GTH and a CFD?

[Epignosis]

THE CASE AGAINST LONG CON

I am willing to vote sprityo, LC, or DDL of those three names.

DDL is, let's say, a kind of incendiary guy.

I agree with the initial idea behind DDL's case against LC. LC has latched onto a few things DDL said that admittedly don't make complete sense, but are just used to augment the core of his rhetoric. LC took those things, and now is trying to completely invalidate DDL's case, regardless of the good points he made about LC.

LC was blendy and noncommital as hell, up until DDL posted a case on him. LC then dedicated himself to poking holes in that case, and trying to lynch DDL, who is an easy-ass target at this point due to how he racked up the votes on D1.

It's not genuine.

It's not real baddie-hunting.

It's an OMGUS, despite how many discrediting adjectives LC uses to describe DDL's case.

I defended you in the last game. Hadn't you wished people would have listened to me then?

I say LC is good. Am I wrong or are we Mafia teammates?

[Epignosis]

What is a GTH and a CFD?

Go to Hell and Can't Fucking Deal

[Jackofhearts2005]

THE CASE AGAINST LONG CON

I am willing to vote sprityo, LC, or DDL of those three names.

DDL is, let's say, a kind of incendiary guy.

I agree with the initial idea behind DDL's case against LC. LC has latched onto a few things DDL said that admittedly don't make complete sense, but are just used to augment the core of his rhetoric. LC took those things, and now is trying to completely invalidate DDL's case, regardless of the good points he made about LC.

LC was blendy and noncommital as hell, up until DDL posted a case on him. LC then dedicated himself to poking holes in that case, and trying to lynch DDL, who is an easy-ass target at this point due to how he racked up the votes on D1.

It's not genuine.

It's not real baddie-hunting.

It's an OMGUS, despite how many discrediting adjectives LC uses to describe DDL's case.

I defended you in the last game. Hadn't you wished people would have listened to me then?

I say LC is good. Am I wrong or are we Mafia teammates?

I am willing to vote sprityo, LC, or DDL of those three names.

[DrWilgy]

What is a GTH and a CFD?

Gun to head read. "If I had a gun to your head would you say this player is good or bad?"

Chinese Fire Drill. The act of quickly forming a wagon on someone near EOD that results in their lynching.

[insertnamehere]

THE CASE AGAINST LONG CON

I am willing to vote sprityo, LC, or DDL of those three names.

DDL is, let's say, a kind of incendiary guy.

I agree with the initial idea behind DDL's case against LC. LC has latched onto a few things DDL said that admittedly don't make complete sense, but are just used to augment the core of his rhetoric. LC took those things, and now is trying to completely invalidate DDL's case, regardless of the good points he made about LC.

LC was blendy and noncommital as hell, up until DDL posted a case on him. LC then dedicated himself to poking holes in that case, and trying to lynch DDL, who is an easy-ass target at this point due to how he racked up the votes on D1.

It's not genuine.

It's not real baddie-hunting.

It's an OMGUS, despite how many discrediting adjectives LC uses to describe DDL's case.

I defended you in the last game. Hadn't you wished people would have listened to me then?

I say LC is good. Am I wrong or are we Mafia teammates?

You defended me in vague satirical post-rock song titles, that convinced literally no one because YOU DIDN'T ELABORATE ON YOUR READS.

I'm not gonna go against both my brain and my gut just because you tell me to, Epi.

[sprityo]

@DrWilgy Glorfindel has little content and all excuse day 1, I guess to embrace what he had stated in Mad Max where he wouldnt say his alignment (which im still not entirely sure why) and then he doesnt vote on purpose since he doesnt like the lynch options (DDL and SprityoV1).

Theres nothing TO agree upon besides the fact that I didnt like my own lynch and im about to read over the former and LC now that i have my laptop. Im also taking into account why others are choosing sides to see if it makes sense.

[insertnamehere]

[DrWilgy]

INH going in.

Thank you Sprityo. You will not receive my vote today. I think it would be in bad taste.

[Long Con]

THE CASE AGAINST LONG CON

I am willing to vote sprityo, LC, or DDL of those three names.

DDL is, let's say, a kind of incendiary guy.

I agree with the initial idea behind DDL's case against LC. LC has latched onto a few things DDL said that admittedly don't make complete sense, but are just used to augment the core of his rhetoric. LC took those things, and now is trying to completely invalidate DDL's case, regardless of the good points he made about LC.

LC was blendy and noncommital as hell, up until DDL posted a case on him. LC then dedicated himself to poking holes in that case, and trying to lynch DDL, who is an easy-ass target at this point due to how he racked up the votes on D1.

It's not genuine.

It's not real baddie-hunting.

It's an OMGUS, despite how many discrediting adjectives LC uses to describe DDL's case.

Then there is truly no defense against someone who builds a case against you that is shored up with inaccuracies, misrepresentation, and "things that admittedly don't make sense". In your world, this is a great way for a baddie to take a Civ down and get away with it.

So, the case against me is that I'm "blendy and non-committal", and that I believe DDL is intentionally twisting the facts to make me look worse.

[Long Con]

LOL, how's this for "blendy and noncommittal": my GTH on INH is that he's an Indy.

[DrWilgy]

LC give me that GTH on DDL and INH.

Who would you have me vote for LC?

Link- How about ddl?

[Long Con]

THE CASE AGAINST LONG CON

I am willing to vote sprityo, LC, or DDL of those three names.

DDL is, let's say, a kind of incendiary guy...

Why is Epi's quote in this?

[Long Con]

LC give me that GTH on DDL and INH.

Who would you have me vote for LC?

Link- How about ddl?

I have already voted for DDL. You don't need a gun, I already say he's bad. Vote for him.

[Jackofhearts2005]

The "amount of jokes to amount of people declaring me scum/voting for me" ratio is surprisingly high, here.

[Soneji]

What is a GTH and a CFD?

Gun to head read. "If I had a gun to your head would you say this player is good or bad?"

Chinese Fire Drill. The act of quickly forming a wagon on someone near EOD that results in their lynching.

An example of a GTH would be that GTH, I would say Epi is scum as he is putting forth the idea that his cards display what he is saying they do and that we should trust in them lest we want to face the consequences but won't flip them over for us to see.

[Epignosis]

THE CASE AGAINST LONG CON

I am willing to vote sprityo, LC, or DDL of those three names.

DDL is, let's say, a kind of incendiary guy.

I agree with the initial idea behind DDL's case against LC. LC has latched onto a few things DDL said that admittedly don't make complete sense, but are just used to augment the core of his rhetoric. LC took those things, and now is trying to completely invalidate DDL's case, regardless of the good points he made about LC.

LC was blendy and noncommital as hell, up until DDL posted a case on him. LC then dedicated himself to poking holes in that case, and trying to lynch DDL, who is an easy-ass target at this point due to how he racked up the votes on D1.

It's not genuine.

It's not real baddie-hunting.

It's an OMGUS, despite how many discrediting adjectives LC uses to describe DDL's case.

I defended you in the last game. Hadn't you wished people would have listened to me then?

I say LC is good. Am I wrong or are we Mafia teammates?

I am willing to vote sprityo, LC, or DDL of those three names.

[DrWilgy]

LC give me that GTH on DDL and INH.

Who would you have me vote for LC?

Link- How about ddl?

I have already voted for DDL. You don't need a gun, I already say he's bad. Vote for him.

Can you link me to your case?

[Epignosis]

THE CASE AGAINST LONG CON

I am willing to vote sprityo, LC, or DDL of those three names.

DDL is, let's say, a kind of incendiary guy.

I agree with the initial idea behind DDL's case against LC. LC has latched onto a few things DDL said that admittedly don't make complete sense, but are just used to augment the core of his rhetoric. LC took those things, and now is trying to completely invalidate DDL's case, regardless of the good points he made about LC.

LC was blendy and noncommital as hell, up until DDL posted a case on him. LC then dedicated himself to poking holes in that case, and trying to lynch DDL, who is an easy-ass target at this point due to how he racked up the votes on D1.

It's not genuine.

It's not real baddie-hunting.

It's an OMGUS, despite how many discrediting adjectives LC uses to describe DDL's case.

I defended you in the last game. Hadn't you wished people would have listened to me then?

I say LC is good. Am I wrong or are we Mafia teammates?

You defended me in vague satirical post-rock song titles, that convinced literally no one because YOU DIDN'T ELABORATE ON YOUR READS.

I'm not gonna go against both my brain and my gut just because you tell me to, Epi.

So...no parallels then? Huh. Imagine that.

[Long Con]

LC give me that GTH on DDL and INH.

Who would you have me vote for LC?

Link- How about ddl?

I have already voted for DDL. You don't need a gun, I already say he's bad. Vote for him.

Can you link me to your case?

I will link you to the summaryI did for MP an hour or so ago.

[Long Con]

THE CASE AGAINST LONG CON

I am willing to vote sprityo, LC, or DDL of those three names.

DDL is, let's say, a kind of incendiary guy.

I agree with the initial idea behind DDL's case against LC. LC has latched onto a few things DDL said that admittedly don't make complete sense, but are just used to augment the core of his rhetoric. LC took those things, and now is trying to completely invalidate DDL's case, regardless of the good points he made about LC.

LC was blendy and noncommital as hell, up until DDL posted a case on him. LC then dedicated himself to poking holes in that case, and trying to lynch DDL, who is an easy-ass target at this point due to how he racked up the votes on D1.

It's not genuine.

It's not real baddie-hunting.

It's an OMGUS, despite how many discrediting adjectives LC uses to describe DDL's case.

I defended you in the last game. Hadn't you wished people would have listened to me then?

I say LC is good. Am I wrong or are we Mafia teammates?

I am willing to vote sprityo, LC, or DDL of those three names.

I was a little surprised to see you list me as a vote possibility of yours after clearly believing I'm Civ. Can you explain?

[Long Con]

The "amount of jokes to amount of people declaring me scum/voting for me" ratio is surprisingly high, here.

I'm a little lost on your meaning - you mean that people make more jokes the more they are accused?

[insertnamehere]

THE CASE AGAINST LONG CON

I am willing to vote sprityo, LC, or DDL of those three names.

DDL is, let's say, a kind of incendiary guy.

I agree with the initial idea behind DDL's case against LC. LC has latched onto a few things DDL said that admittedly don't make complete sense, but are just used to augment the core of his rhetoric. LC took those things, and now is trying to completely invalidate DDL's case, regardless of the good points he made about LC.

LC was blendy and noncommital as hell, up until DDL posted a case on him. LC then dedicated himself to poking holes in that case, and trying to lynch DDL, who is an easy-ass target at this point due to how he racked up the votes on D1.

It's not genuine.

It's not real baddie-hunting.

It's an OMGUS, despite how many discrediting adjectives LC uses to describe DDL's case.

Then there is truly no defense against someone who builds a case against you that is shored up with inaccuracies, misrepresentation, and "things that admittedly don't make sense". In your world, this is a great way for a baddie to take a Civ down and get away with it.

So, the case against me is that I'm "blendy and non-committal", and that I believe DDL is intentionally twisting the facts to make me look worse.

You were accused of being blendy, non-commital, and not doing any real baddie hunting.

Instead of, I dunno, doing actual baddie hunting, you just continually attack the guy who brought it up in the first place.

The guy, in this case, also being the biggest and easiest target due to his posting style and how D1 barely ended without him being lynching.

You're taking the path of least resistance by going after DDL. If you would've actually proved me wrong by trying to work on other cases and reads, I wouldn't be pushing your lynch right now.

I wasn't impressed with your efforts after N1. I put some pressure on you to step up and baddie hunt. Then you turned around and did the easiest thing possible, and tried to dress it up as baddie hunting by speaking of everything DDL did in the most condescending and judgemental way that you could.

You're the one misrepresenting things by posting nonsense like this:

Vote spread is consistent and bueno. What are the cases for DDL, LC, Sprityo and Sig?

Also didn't we already off Sprit? What did New Sprityo do to warrant lynch 2?

I'd like to say, for the record, that there IS no case against me.

Why do you have 2 votes then?

Gut.

Sincerely going after baddies, ain't what you're doing here.

[Jackofhearts2005]

@Epi

It seems scummy to me to say that you think someone is town but refuse to say why. If you are right, you get to say "I told you so" and if you are wrong you can say "Eh, it was gut. I was 60% sold on him."

Plus, like INH said, this type of statement convinces nobody.

But what do I know? Every time I take a stance, someone tells me I'm getting someone's meta wrong.

[insertnamehere]

THE CASE AGAINST LONG CON

I am willing to vote sprityo, LC, or DDL of those three names.

DDL is, let's say, a kind of incendiary guy.

I agree with the initial idea behind DDL's case against LC. LC has latched onto a few things DDL said that admittedly don't make complete sense, but are just used to augment the core of his rhetoric. LC took those things, and now is trying to completely invalidate DDL's case, regardless of the good points he made about LC.

LC was blendy and noncommital as hell, up until DDL posted a case on him. LC then dedicated himself to poking holes in that case, and trying to lynch DDL, who is an easy-ass target at this point due to how he racked up the votes on D1.

It's not genuine.

It's not real baddie-hunting.

It's an OMGUS, despite how many discrediting adjectives LC uses to describe DDL's case.

I defended you in the last game. Hadn't you wished people would have listened to me then?

I say LC is good. Am I wrong or are we Mafia teammates?

You defended me in vague satirical post-rock song titles, that convinced literally no one because YOU DIDN'T ELABORATE ON YOUR READS.

I'm not gonna go against both my brain and my gut just because you tell me to, Epi.

So...no parallels then? Huh. Imagine that.

the parallel is you being intentionally obstinate and blindly expecting people to follow you, then being mock scandalized by the results.

[Epignosis]

THE CASE AGAINST LONG CON

I am willing to vote sprityo, LC, or DDL of those three names.

DDL is, let's say, a kind of incendiary guy.

I agree with the initial idea behind DDL's case against LC. LC has latched onto a few things DDL said that admittedly don't make complete sense, but are just used to augment the core of his rhetoric. LC took those things, and now is trying to completely invalidate DDL's case, regardless of the good points he made about LC.

LC was blendy and noncommital as hell, up until DDL posted a case on him. LC then dedicated himself to poking holes in that case, and trying to lynch DDL, who is an easy-ass target at this point due to how he racked up the votes on D1.

It's not genuine.

It's not real baddie-hunting.

It's an OMGUS, despite how many discrediting adjectives LC uses to describe DDL's case.

I defended you in the last game. Hadn't you wished people would have listened to me then?

I say LC is good. Am I wrong or are we Mafia teammates?

I am willing to vote sprityo, LC, or DDL of those three names.

I was a little surprised to see you list me as a vote possibility of yours after clearly believing I'm Civ. Can you explain?

I already mentioned this. You said:

I tell you what.

Better yet, yes. Let's lynch Long Con. Let's do this thing again where I say someone is good and they are. I like that game.

Right on man! Let's turn this thing up to 11 and ride the frikkin' dragon!

[Epignosis]

That wasn't sarcasm.

[Jackofhearts2005]

The "amount of jokes to amount of people declaring me scum/voting for me" ratio is surprisingly high, here.

I'm a little lost on your meaning - you mean that people make more jokes the more they are accused?

I mean that there's more jokes when people are accused than I would expect.

But I suppose some of that comes from being from a home site that expects claims when accusations get somewhat serious (and somewhat serious is a much higher threshold than here). That can't happen here so...idk what I expect when you come close to getting lynched, especially early.

[Epignosis]

@Epi

It seems scummy to me to say that you think someone is town but refuse to say why. If you are right, you get to say "I told you so" and if you are wrong you can say "Eh, it was gut. I was 60% sold on him."

Plus, like INH said, this type of statement convinces nobody.

But what do I know? Every time I take a stance, someone tells me I'm getting someone's meta wrong.

Well here's a tip.

I don't play by gut.

[insertnamehere]

THE CASE AGAINST LONG CON

I am willing to vote sprityo, LC, or DDL of those three names.

DDL is, let's say, a kind of incendiary guy...

Why is Epi's quote in this?

That post started as a plea to Epi, then morphed into a general case as the hyperbolic linkis flooded in, and my thoughts on you kept pouring out.

[insertnamehere]

LOL, how's this for "blendy and noncommittal": my GTH on INH is that he's an Indy.

I wish I was. Those guys are probably the ones who are lying back and doing nothing. The proverbial soups of the world.

If I was Indy, why would I care about getting you lynched?

[Long Con]

THE CASE AGAINST LONG CON

I am willing to vote sprityo, LC, or DDL of those three names.

DDL is, let's say, a kind of incendiary guy.

I agree with the initial idea behind DDL's case against LC. LC has latched onto a few things DDL said that admittedly don't make complete sense, but are just used to augment the core of his rhetoric. LC took those things, and now is trying to completely invalidate DDL's case, regardless of the good points he made about LC.

LC was blendy and noncommital as hell, up until DDL posted a case on him. LC then dedicated himself to poking holes in that case, and trying to lynch DDL, who is an easy-ass target at this point due to how he racked up the votes on D1.

It's not genuine.

It's not real baddie-hunting.

It's an OMGUS, despite how many discrediting adjectives LC uses to describe DDL's case.

Then there is truly no defense against someone who builds a case against you that is shored up with inaccuracies, misrepresentation, and "things that admittedly don't make sense". In your world, this is a great way for a baddie to take a Civ down and get away with it.

So, the case against me is that I'm "blendy and non-committal", and that I believe DDL is intentionally twisting the facts to make me look worse.

You were accused of being blendy, non-commital, and not doing any real baddie hunting.

Instead of, I dunno, doing actual baddie hunting, you just continually attack the guy who brought it up in the first place.

The guy, in this case, also being the biggest and easiest target due to his posting style and how D1 barely ended without him being lynching.

You're taking the path of least resistance by going after DDL. If you would've actually proved me wrong by trying to work on other cases and reads, I wouldn't be pushing your lynch right now.

I wasn't impressed with your efforts after N1. I put some pressure on you to step up and baddie hunt. Then you turned around and did the easiest thing possible, and tried to dress it up as baddie hunting by speaking of everything DDL did in the most condescending and judgemental way that you could.

You're the one misrepresenting things by posting nonsense like this:

Vote spread is consistent and bueno. What are the cases for DDL, LC, Sprityo and Sig?

Also didn't we already off Sprit? What did New Sprityo do to warrant lynch 2?

I'd like to say, for the record, that there IS no case against me.

Why do you have 2 votes then?

Gut.

Sincerely going after baddies, ain't what you're doing here.

You just need to get to know me better, my friend. I play more passionately when it's about me.

Metalmarsh and Spacedaisy were both dancing with suspicion of me based on PURE gut. It's not nonsense.

[sig]

I willsay, however, I won't be voting for Sig. I feel his vote is justified, albeit wrong.

[Long Con]

LOL, how's this for "blendy and noncommittal": my GTH on INH is that he's an Indy.

I wish I was. Those guys are probably the ones who are lying back and doing nothing. The proverbial soups of the world.

If I was Indy, why would I care about getting you lynched?

Because you believe I'm bad... and that's a good look for anyone. I try to lynch baddies when I'm Indy. At least for most of the game.

[Soneji]

THE CASE AGAINST LONG CON

I am willing to vote sprityo, LC, or DDL of those three names.

DDL is, let's say, a kind of incendiary guy.

I agree with the initial idea behind DDL's case against LC. LC has latched onto a few things DDL said that admittedly don't make complete sense, but are just used to augment the core of his rhetoric. LC took those things, and now is trying to completely invalidate DDL's case, regardless of the good points he made about LC.

LC was blendy and noncommital as hell, up until DDL posted a case on him. LC then dedicated himself to poking holes in that case, and trying to lynch DDL, who is an easy-ass target at this point due to how he racked up the votes on D1.

It's not genuine.

It's not real baddie-hunting.

It's an OMGUS, despite how many discrediting adjectives LC uses to describe DDL's case.

Then there is truly no defense against someone who builds a case against you that is shored up with inaccuracies, misrepresentation, and "things that admittedly don't make sense". In your world, this is a great way for a baddie to take a Civ down and get away with it.

So, the case against me is that I'm "blendy and non-committal", and that I believe DDL is intentionally twisting the facts to make me look worse.

The defense is to point out what you consider to be twisting of the truth then let othere decide if they agree. Tunneling hard on someone for a reason that you as a biased party can't without great difficulty be dissuaded from is a bad idea. Focus your efforts elsewhere. That you have done little else this day phase then argue about DDL twisting your words isn't a good look.

The case against you is that D1 you had no strong reads then jumped on the spirityo wagon, D2 you went full OMGUS on DDL. You're not contributing anything to the game outside of supposedly uninformed or biased votes.

[sprityo]

I willsay, however, I won't be voting for Sig. I feel his vote is justified, albeit wrong.

What? are you confused on that i believe where you are coming from but you arent right in this instance?

[Long Con]

I already mentioned this. You said:

I tell you what.

Better yet, yes. Let's lynch Long Con. Let's do this thing again where I say someone is good and they are. I like that game.

Right on man! Let's turn this thing up to 11 and ride the frikkin' dragon!

Right, right... I've had a few drinks, forgot about that.

[DrWilgy]

Thank you LC.

General consensus. Do we think more baddies are openly discussing or hiding in the background?