Now on to chaindeath's vote he feels that Droopy has defended himself poorly. However chaindeath gives you brownie points for being an active participant in the forums. Forced or not, it's good to see you talking. (he wishes for no word twisting here, and would like to request earnestly that this not be thought "Oh, well, he doesn't post all that much either." Its not that he don't want to post, he just is not as quick on picking up some of the nuance of this game )
Chaindeath is mixing tenses here, as well as subjects. If Droopy defended HIMSELF poorly, chaindeath should give HIM (not you) brownie points.
SVS would like to give chaindeath brownie points, as speaking in the third person is not so easy as it appears to be at a glance.
DharmaHelper wrote:Maybe I'm just put off by how incredibly agressive you've been all game, but I am hesitant to trust anything you say as genuine in nature. You seem to be very strong arm-ish, which I usually associate with baddies.
Dunno, as I said I'm not quite willing to buy into the impending Droopwagon, probably exclusively because you seem so determined to get people on board.
When it comes to Kate, I associate a strong and forward game with being a civ. You can call it aggression if you like, but whatever you call it, I don't see her doing it as a baddie. She is more cautious when bad, by far.
Were I get on the Droopwagon, though, it would be based on his own posts and statements, not based on whether or not someone else suports it.
The fact that you are willing to discount some very provocative statements totally based on who thinks he is bad this early in the game sounds like you could be trying for a save to me, and I know that you can be a very bold baddie.
I am probably going to vote for Vomp, though. He was second on the collective suspish-o-meter on Day One, then on Day Two, you would think he would have been an easy lynch and that Beas team would have pushed him as a viable alternative, but they didn't. That gets a tilt of the head from me, maybe even the crick of an eyebrow.
So considering that he has been garnering suspicion all game, and the fact that a fairly large baddie team tried for Rabbit rather than Vomp makes me feel less than good about him, especially after he started the Rabbit run.
I am going to reread Day One later. In all the talk of benefits from voting a certain way, maybe something concrete can be distilled out of it. I am not sure what function Vomp is fulfilling, but i am becoming more sure his quirky behavior has a point to it, a reason behind it.
Mr. Droopy Cash wrote:
--I'll admit I had some suspicion of Bea but I couldn't come outright and say bea was bad. Rabbit-you're on the offense all the time from what I can see. That led me more towards to you being bad than Bea. Since Bea WAS bad, maybe that just means you're badder?
Boomslang wrote:I'm not sure why the low poster thing is such a big deal. Directing suspicion and conversation, thereby turning people away from you, seems to be more advantageous to the bads.
It can be hard for baddies to have real suspicions, so they often fade back. But i happen to agree with you, being out there can be advantageous to a baddie.
But the low poster conversation here is not about the low posters themselves~ when baddies have suspicion on them, they often try to turn the conversation to "low posters" in order to take the suspicion off of themselves~ in a quiet thread or a thread without suspicions, low posters often get lynched for not participating and becasue people suspect them, of being "blendy", or fading back. So for me, when there are real suspicions in the thread, turning to low posters seems like something a baddie would do since most people would rather lynch someone for suspicions, rather than for low participation.
So Droopy bringing up low posters when his name has been mentioned as possibly being someone trying to save Bea seems kind of suspect
BoatsBoatsBoats wrote:Droopy's actions seem odd, but at the same time, maybe he just doesn't have that much of an idea of what he's doing, as it's been said before.
But the point is that he's doing typical mafia things without having the knowledge base to know of such things.
yeah, my mouth literally fell open when he said he wanted to look at low posters, lol
triceratopzeuhl wrote:I feel like if vomps had teammates/btsc, they would tell him not to do most of the things he has done this game. I also feel, however, that most of his actions/posts have no logical civ explanation
I also still feel like SVS's uncharacteristic "big deal" was weird. If we knew which team Lorab had been on, that would probably make me feel more strongly about the whole shebang. I just don't know right now.
You must not know me very well if you think that was uncharacteristic. Having had two unusual kills, getting people to talk about it can sometimes help find the killers~
You've been in every game of mafia I've played and never done that before
so
If i am not mistaken, I was bad in two of them, and an indi in one,
triceratopzeuhl wrote:I feel like if vomps had teammates/btsc, they would tell him not to do most of the things he has done this game. I also feel, however, that most of his actions/posts have no logical civ explanation
I also still feel like SVS's uncharacteristic "big deal" was weird. If we knew which team Lorab had been on, that would probably make me feel more strongly about the whole shebang. I just don't know right now.
You must not know me very well if you think that was uncharacteristic. Having had two unusual kills, getting people to talk about it can sometimes help find the killers~
Mr. Droopy Cash wrote:So I'm pretty sure I have a 0% chance at being in the Top 3 of the Event but I shall continue to post when necessary (and possible) as to avoid being Sock-Killed.
We need to get some of these non-posters out of the way...I'm getting bored with them.
Interesting~ it's Droopys first game, his name get mentioned and he starts talking low posters
Flyin High wrote:
Since bea was a baddie, there's a chance her teammates may have tried to save her by adding votes onto rabbit in yesterday's lynch. Based on timing, I plan to take a closer look at Captain Bunny Killer and Boomslang. Also chaindeath and Mr. Droopy.
Since FH has Boomslang voting for Rabbit when he voted for Bea, I am going to remove him from this list for me, and say I would like to look at the Captain, chaindeath & Droopy as well.
Oh thats awesome Epi The blue crayon does look bitten.
In a previous game of Socks, he had a role that chose an album that played and had various effects. I wonder if there is a similar mechanic at play here? Initially i was wondering it this had anything to do with Damo Suzukis shrooms, but an album seems more promising~
BoatsBoatsBoats wrote:Interesting episode with Truth and rabbit.
Yeah, I am still not sure what to make of it. First glance at roles did not tell me much. I seriously doubt Rabbit was her teammate~ they would have put up a third candidate. So the "Supercrush" thing is weird, in any case I don't know that it would be role related (unless a role can put two people together, maybe?). There are all those secrets, though. So the whole thing is weird, lol~
RIPIYWG, BIH if you were not. I did not have much of a feel for Axxon, he appeared to be silenced yesterday, and was not overly chatty prior to that. Illy was, very much so. Perhaps she touched a nerve? I will reread her and see what if anything is there. So Axxon seems an odd target (unless we have a Low Poster killer), and Illy not so much.
Yay BIH Brown Eyeball <3 Bea
RIPIYWG Lorab, but I hope you weren't~
Feel Better ReyRey
Interesting, had Bea been able to defend, her defenses would have been valid, as Devin was killed by Ziltoid, and Faraday by the Duo of Destruction. The Residents haven't killed yet.
rabbit8 wrote:Bea, you naughty little...............
DharmaHelper wrote:RE: The Lynch post, Yay for getting a baddie, though I think Rabbit is still likely one as well.
Squizloid killing LoRab was unexpected, as I was expecting some Non-voter justice given the "To Be Continued" part that was in MP's post briefly. But LoRab voted, so the day kill doesn't have anything to do with nonvoters...
Ahhhhhhhh............................................. no you're wrong.
But we will be finding a FEW of beas teammates in my voters, for sure.
Captain Bunny Killer wrote:Ugh Torn again. I was suspicious of SVS at first too, but not becuase it looked like she was upset about a killed teammate (I think someone said that). It just seemed odd how surprised she was over the strange NK, like it was a little for show. But since I don't know hardly anyone here, I thought I would see what others thought of it. I don't know.
But DH made some interesting observations about rabbit. Of course, that would be going off of what someone else claims is normal for rabbit.
Idid not think anyone killed Faraday Day One, so something else happened. Maybe someone might imply they knew what happened.
Based on her responses I think Bea may have known. So voting for Bea
Linki @ Rabbit~ yeah so I figured when I read a bit further~
triceratopzeuhl wrote:There are a whole bunch of reasons, I assume, with roles as varied & secretive as the ones this game, that an NK could have ended up on DFaraday, whether he was their target or not. If we assume he was the intended kill target, then you'd think SVS would be glad they - frankly - wasted their kill on somebody who has barely participated so far, instead of killing somebody who is actually here and posting. Therefore, the assumption is that she has some other reason to not want DFaraday dead, otherwise why write 3 paragraphs about it? Only a baddie would be upset by the baddies playing poorly.
Linki - Bea, I'm literally going to bed right now & like I said I'm not home in time for the poll's end. Look at what time it ends at today.
Faraday had more posts than many, he was not "barely participating". I am not upset by "baddies playing poorly", a death that surprises me instead of making me roll my eyes is baddies playing well, IMO. Another thing i was trying to do is to get the people who knew him to get talking about why someone would kill Devin as well. This is what civvies do, try to figure out WHY someone was killed cause it makes it easier to figure out WHO killed them.
I am not upset at all, I am confused by what happened and trying to make sense out of it, or at least, what sense can be made in this context. Also shaking the tree a bit. This involves saying something very overt, and seeing who is upset by it, lol.
So not sure what to think of these votes.
And I make three paragraph posts about the weather, I'm chatty
The Truth wrote:I reprint you understand what I'm submergence to unexaggerated. Bill the Lizard vote goes agnosticism SVS as well because she's toga faldstool strange machinal Dormouse insanity.
This may be the funniest post I've ever read...on purpose or not!
Yeah, I don't so much think so as it put a second vote on me for making an observation and trying to get talk going on what may have happened the other night.
S~V~S wrote:No, I am not talking about grudge play. I am talking about Faradays basic mildness and blendiness. But no, I am not aware of anyone who does that who is playing this game.
I don't ever remember him ever being NKed Night one. It seems an odd choice, especially in light of his posts, which were mild and blendy. I tried and tried to see who may have felt threatened by him, and I am at a loss. Seeing him NKed kinda shocked me, tbh.
Maybe you are right and it really was random~
Your thoughts on the NK ping me a bit tbh....it's almost as if you are offended that someone killed your partner or something? I could be totally wrong, but I don't think I've ever seen you make such a post after someone is NK'd.
I remember a game where DH made a post about the night kill choice being an odd one and he was totally bad in that game....so your post comes off to me as being familiar with DFs death....meaning he was either your partner or you were involved in killing him.
I dunno....it just seems off to me.
yeah, just like everything I do seems off to you lol.
You know that when i am bad, I am the coldest bus-chucking bitch on the block, lol. If Faraday was my bad teammate, I would not be crying over him in the thread.
If Spongebob did not educate you, DH and i could not be more different. I know Faraday very well, I admire his game immensely, we are like Mafia yin/yang. He almost NEVER gets NKed early, only later when the game is at the role deduction phase. He gets lynched a lot as a civ, but not NKed like this. So I don't think he was NKed by anyone from "our" sphere of influence. But he did not say anything that would lead me to believe the PA people got him either.
So I am trying to figure out what happened to him. A direct read of the roles does not tell me~ it likely is a secret. I was hoping to see if anyone mentioned my interest, but blew it off. Surprised you didn't see that. One of those people could be the killer, IMO.
And i see a few did , on a quick skim, I have to reread, I have been crazy busy at work, and haven't had much time to read threads during the day.
Or, and I'm just spittballing here, you are laying the groundwork to lynch someone becasue you think (but don't really think) they killed DF, who you actually killed.
Nah, I didn't kill him, you big spitballer you~ Faraday generally thinks I'm good, just like I tend to think he is, lol.
S~V~S wrote:No, I am not talking about grudge play. I am talking about Faradays basic mildness and blendiness. But no, I am not aware of anyone who does that who is playing this game.
I don't ever remember him ever being NKed Night one. It seems an odd choice, especially in light of his posts, which were mild and blendy. I tried and tried to see who may have felt threatened by him, and I am at a loss. Seeing him NKed kinda shocked me, tbh.
Maybe you are right and it really was random~
Your thoughts on the NK ping me a bit tbh....it's almost as if you are offended that someone killed your partner or something? I could be totally wrong, but I don't think I've ever seen you make such a post after someone is NK'd.
I remember a game where DH made a post about the night kill choice being an odd one and he was totally bad in that game....so your post comes off to me as being familiar with DFs death....meaning he was either your partner or you were involved in killing him.
I dunno....it just seems off to me.
yeah, just like everything I do seems off to you lol.
You know that when i am bad, I am the coldest bus-chucking bitch on the block, lol. If Faraday was my bad teammate, I would not be crying over him in the thread.
If Spongebob did not educate you, DH and i could not be more different. I know Faraday very well, I admire his game immensely, we are like Mafia yin/yang. He almost NEVER gets NKed early, only later when the game is at the role deduction phase. He gets lynched a lot as a civ, but not NKed like this. So I don't think he was NKed by anyone from "our" sphere of influence. But he did not say anything that would lead me to believe the PA people got him either.
So I am trying to figure out what happened to him. A direct read of the roles does not tell me~ it likely is a secret. I was hoping to see if anyone mentioned my interest, but blew it off. Surprised you didn't see that. One of those people could be the killer, IMO.
And i see a few did , on a quick skim, I have to reread, I have been crazy busy at work, and haven't had much time to read threads during the day.
No, I am not talking about grudge play. I am talking about Faradays basic mildness and blendiness. But no, I am not aware of anyone who does that who is playing this game.
I don't ever remember him ever being NKed Night one. It seems an odd choice, especially in light of his posts, which were mild and blendy. I tried and tried to see who may have felt threatened by him, and I am at a loss. Seeing him NKed kinda shocked me, tbh.
Illyria wrote:Vomp, I hope you are not offended by me asking. I really don't mean to be insulting.
Dang BWT!
I'm not offended at all, I'm often a misunderstood genius.
Excellent.
I swear with so many people I have not gotten a handle on who is sarcastic, who is misunderstood, etc.
I am both sarcastic AND misunderstood, but you already knew that
OK, I just went back and I am kinda puzzled~ maybe one of you saw something I did not.
I can't figure out why someone would kill Faraday Night One. It makes no sense to me. The only person he seemed to suspect was Leech, who was a civ. He is always slow to bring his suspicions to the table, and very measured in doing so, and fairly easy to frame if you are bad, so baddies don't kill him often. I can't think of one reason anyone would kill Faraday, I read all of his posts like 5 times, and I am at a loss. He wasn't even a low poster.
TBH, I don't see a compelling reason to kill Devin either, but I don't know him well enough to gauge how threatening he may be to someone who DOES know him.
Leech wrote:I'd like to thank Sock for getting me interested in Steve Reich just by giving me the role. So far this is my favorite piece...
Glad you enjoy his music! Definitely listen to Music for 18 Musicians; that is my favorite album of his for sure. He really is such an important figure in the history of contemporary/20th century composing.
That's one of many things I love about hosting mafia games is exposing other people to awesome music/TV shows/video games/etc. that perhaps they hadn't been fully knowledgeable of before. Of course, there's the fantastic flipside of being the one exposed to new items as well while playing a mafia game. I actually started watching Futurama at the insistence of one Mr. Droopy Cash and because of the recent Futurama game over at RM, for just one example.
Yeah it's really cool, because first I was hoping to get someone I already knew about like Mike Patton but instead I got another artist I can say I'm becoming a fan of.
Being Damo Suzuki in a game totally turned me on to Can
OR it might be an attempt to split the vote of the potential Leech voters and attempting a lynch on a third party? Both baddie teams are so BIG, 5 players each.
Captain Bunny Killer wrote:I agree that if Leech looks suspicious, so does Vompatti. I may just vote Vompatti, because I still don't like the idea of voting Leech. I don't know.
But you just said that the association with Leech is what makes Vomp look suspicious. So...if you don't like the idea of voting for Leech, why would you like the idea of voting for Vomp, who is suspicious to you due to his association with...Leech?
I am going to vote for Leech, this thread is making me paranoid, lol, and I should be out of it
*Votes Leech*
I was planning on probably voting for Leech, but that post from Vomp kinda makes me nervous. Like the over the topness of it is an attempt to frame Leech. Or an attempt to make us THINK that.
Benthayer15 wrote:S~V~S,
I know we're just getting acquainted, but the last thing you could do to gain my trust is to tell someone else to vote for me. Besides, I voted for you and you know it. Trying to get the attention away from you? That's interesting. I can only imagine what you must be hiding.
I am not trying to tell him to vote for you, I am asking him, within the context of the vote he did make, to explain why he did NOT vote for you who had less posts than the person he DID vote for for being a low poster. And no, I did not know you voted for me lol.
And once you get to know me, you will know I thrive on attention.
Mr. Droopy Cash wrote:
S~V~S wrote:
Mr. Droopy Cash wrote:
Mr. Droopy Cash wrote:This is my only shot to post/vote today. I don't feel that there's anything logical to go on but I need to make a decision.
*sits at computer screen for 10 minutes waiting for idea to pop into head*
I mentioned The Truth in an earlier post, and unless I've missed something, I haven't seen them post at all. Therefore, I vote to lynch The Truth. My apologies if you did post before this vote. (Now I have to double-check!)
I withdraw this statement. The Truth did post fairly early on Day 1. I'm glad I checked...my vote changes to BoatsBoatsBoats with no Day 1 posts thus far.
Interesting vote Droopy~ Benthayer had no posts on any days, why didn't you vote for him?
Linki, until just now lol
I'm not keeping track of everyone who posts...I just looked through the list of names to see if any of them stood out as unfamiliar. After going through the list, I thought I remembered benthayer posting...but you're right (I didn't go through all the Day 0 posts again to see who did and didn't post). If I would've known I'd still be home atm, I wouldn't have voted then. But Boats still hasn't posted so I don't really regret my decision...yet. lol
Yes, but you actually read their posts as well, being as you knew when they were made. I am not ready to vote for you over this, but this has really gotten my eye. Big time.
Mr. Droopy Cash wrote:This is my only shot to post/vote today. I don't feel that there's anything logical to go on but I need to make a decision.
*sits at computer screen for 10 minutes waiting for idea to pop into head*
I mentioned The Truth in an earlier post, and unless I've missed something, I haven't seen them post at all. Therefore, I vote to lynch The Truth. My apologies if you did post before this vote. (Now I have to double-check!)
I withdraw this statement. The Truth did post fairly early on Day 1. I'm glad I checked...my vote changes to BoatsBoatsBoats with no Day 1 posts thus far.
Interesting vote Droopy~ Benthayer had no posts on any days, why didn't you vote for him?
Yeah, trying to find suspicions is not "causing trouble" IMO. It's a civvies responsibility.
And it seems to me that Leech may have been distancing a tad, putting out some damage control for Vomp. If Leech is lynched and flips bad, I might look that way~
Kate wrote:You are either 1. Voting a known civvie or 2. Voting a baddie, I assume you will say you are doing the former, thus my quesion, why would you vote for someone you are certain is a civvie (assuming that is your stance)?
You're spinning this because "voting a known civvie" carries a bad connotation and "voting for yourself", what I did, doesn't. At all. The reason why is because when you self-vote, you don't make a case for why anyone else should make the same vote, and thus you're not trying to get the civvie lynched. The purpose of self-voting is to just VOTE, when you have no other suspicions. Not only do I find a randomizer not the better option, to me it's a more suspicious action. Two baddies on the same team can claim to use a randomizer and "coincidentally" end up with the same player who's not on their team or a civvie, getting him or her lynched.
I feel like you consciously believe that it's not a suspicious move (after all, a lot of people admitted to considering it (and doing it) themselves after my action became a hot topic), which sparks my suspicions for you. Add that to the fact that there was a good space between my post and yours and no one else found it suspicious enough to say so. You were the first to speak bad about it, and by doing so you created a freak chain of spotlight which sparked other people's suspicions because if I'm not mistaken your "suspicions" of me (that is, again, if you actually find my move suspicious) was the first stated suspicion of anyone there was. Baddie move? I won't make that conclusion this early but it seems very strange to me.
I think you are twisting a bit here yourself, my friend. The "connotation" is not the issue, the reality is the issue. In my experience baddies worry more about "connotation" and how things look and sound, and less about how they actually are.
And TBH the person known for doing it, Jason Maher, has gotten himself lynched for it on at least one occasion. He did it in every game to avoid having to make a reasoned Day One vote in games he played as a baddie. He was basically setting himself up for a free ride on Day One when he was bad, it was clever. But it was a baddie move nevertheless, even when he did it in games he played as a civvie. And viewing it as such is understandable.
Because the end result of a self vote if it does not garner you suspicion is that you did not have to make a vote you needed to explain. And this seems premeditated, which, like worrying about "connotations", seems kinda bad to my eye.
Someone said this defense made them feel better about you. Sadly, it made me feel worse.
Linki @ Kate~ Yeah, I just reread them, and I did not see anything in there. I read the civvies too just to be sure, and if there is a rational role based reason to self vote as a civvie, I am not sure what it is, especially not having had a Night yet.
Is DP in the house? Nice to see Damo as a civ in this game
• Damo Suzuki – This crazed singer has a personal bag of mushrooms he can tap into every night. Others might consider him an expert on the matter of such substances, but he is really too inarticulate most of the time to even consider the thought himself. He can grab one mushroom at random out of his bag every night to use on himself or on another player of his choice. Unbeknownst to Damo, there may be a few other random non-mushroom items in that bag as well. (Secrets)
Illyria wrote:
Really? We need some suspicious and eye smileys please!
The eye is here.
Haha! I totally thought this was the beginning of some event. "The eye"
LOLOL me too
OK, a few pages behind in my reread. I was thinking "benefit of the doubt" re Leech until the "Damage Control Unit" as I believe Illy called it, came in. Now, not so sure. He was a quirky and whimsical player (as was Vomp, really) and I could totally see him self voting for the reasons he said. I was a bit more at his assertion that perhaps MP was LIMITING us to 3 posts, so he was gonna stop talking.
But too many people seem to have too much speculative knowledge based on secrets which are...secret. I have to reread the baddie roles to see if the secret in question is as obvious as some seem to imply it may be.
Perhaps the last few pages will clarify for me. But at this point, while I would not love voting for Leech (I really looked forward to playing a game with him again), I would consider it.
I find myself kind of in your camp, Devin. That whole "Residents" thing totally deterred me from Pluto. Did any of the Pluto voters also play Avant 1?
I have to catch up here today, I am woefully behind. Three games and a rough week at work (all the weird crap the people in our branches hide under their desks all year cause they don't know WTF to do with it HAS to get submitted by 12/31, so the first week of the year I, literally, have a desk full of misery) have led me to fall behind in two of three games, and this is one of them.
Leech wrote:You may notice that Sock stated that three separate posts and three on-topic sentences are the criteria to avoid punishment. That could be interpreted to mean that having too much is just as bad as having not enough, which is the kind of trick I could see Sock pulling. Based on that conclusion, I wil now refrain from any more on-topic posts, indirectly meaning that I have to vote this early on, in this very post; so I will now cast the first vote, for myself.
No way no how would any host try to limit posting. I would not interpret his posting requirement that way.
Leech, I really want to hear from you, regardless of this post.
Also reading back, I am not all that suspish of anyone for wanting to make their posts up front. For people who post alot like me, it's not an issue. For quieter players, not wanting to get a punishment is not out of line.
I saw MP kill 9 non-voters in one post (he says it was a mechanic, but I know he was pretty pissed off at the non voters before that, lol). So when MP says "punishment", anyone who has been hosted by him should jump to and give him 20 (or whatever it is he wants).
Reading back, I came across:
Boomslang wrote:
LoRab wrote:Thanks, LT!!
Boomslang wrote:Heading to the Earth portal seemed like an awfully dangerous choice. Getting closer to the last known location of a being who can destroy planets with fists alone? Whoever voted for that seems... less than trustworthy.
Can you show me exactly what in the post following the vote that makes it seem like it was a bad choice? Otherwise, just speculation...like the vote itself. Any reason why you want people to focus on the earth voters?
MovingPictures07 wrote:
As the ship subsequently traveled through the portal, a weird vacuum-like sound could be heard by everyone in the ship, but it seemed to have no effect on any of them.
Maybe I'm still just speculating, but I don't like that vacuum sound. It SEEMED to have no effect, but is anything really as it seems in this game? Whatever it was, it sounded inside the ship, as no sound can travel in space itself. Therefore, something had an effect in our safe haven of Captain Spectacular's vessel.
I have to agree with Boomslang about the sound, I have reread the post more than once (and plan to do so a few more times, lol) and feel that, like the "resident" in the poll about Pluto, it isn't random word choice. So I do not necessarily suspect the Earth voters for that vote, but I am worried about that sound, too.
insertnamehere wrote:On the mysterious humming noise, it could just be a story device to indicate that we had passed through, like in the video game Portal. In Portal, when you go through a eponymous portal, there's a little noise. This is all Wild Mass Guessing, but isn't that what mafia basically is?
Yeah it is mass guessing (nice way of putting it, actually), but there is very little randomness about MP at all, so I am always a tad paranoid about his wording. He is a precise man, he does not throw random words about willy nilly.
Ha ha this made me think of the "mysterious ticking noise" video which always make me laugh~
Epignosis wrote:Ah! Very convincing fangs you have!
One other question (since LT is here): How does one know if a post has been edited? I understand the importance of not editing posts, but how can one tell? I edit posts all the time in Gladiators, but there's never an indication that anything was editing.
Only the game host can edit the posts in the game threads.
Yeah, Epi, at PA we did have to post the votes, and keep tallies. A site many of us have played at called STV played that way, too.
But yeah, voting without posting is called a "drive by" by some, and is viewed as a potential sneak attack of sorts.
Interesting watching the interactions between groups and traditions; is there an anthropologist in the house?
Um, vague results are unsurprising, I half expected 1/3 of us to go to one reality, 1/3 to another and 1/3 to yet a third. So the results we had are rather nice, if somewhat vague. Which is kinda scary, in a totally different way.
Forced or not, it's good to see you talking. (he wishes for no word twisting here, and would like to request earnestly that this not be thought "Oh, well, he doesn't post all that much either." Its not that he don't want to post, he just is not as quick on picking up some of the nuance of this game
