I love your last two points. Its certainly easy enough to say (PARAPHRASING), "well I see the case on Bea, sure, but I feel stronger about Rabbit." What he did was ignore the Bea situation entirely then come back to say (PARAPHRASING, AGAIN), "oh yea, I was suspicious of her all along too!" (Maybe even more so than Rabbit, but to vote her would have made me look bad?) What would make him look bad about voting a baddie OR at the very least mentioning his suspicion? I don't think he went to school the day his teammie taught "bus throwing." Not to mention, Bea was no where to be found during that lynch, so he may have felt uneasy about voting his teammie without her express okay.
His last post, where he says, sure I'll vote for the last 2/3 of Bea voters, who should we lynch Rab?
So lets look at the people who DID vote a baddie instead of me (who was suspicious of said baddie but declined to vote her or even mention her)? I don't even know who he was referring to, but since only Rabbit and -in hindsight- Bea were his suspects, why in the world would he be willing to simply pick 2/3 of the players and then just pick a name out of a hat OR even more ironically, be willing to trust Rabbit who in his last 50 post was his TOP SUSPECT???
