The Syndicate

Bass_the_Clever wrote:i voted poosh if its good enough for the doctor to want to retire on its good enough for me.

I agree with this sentiment. Voting Poosh as well.

Chris wrote:LOL @ nobody thinks that MP engineered his "break down" and subsequent request to be lynched as reverse psychology.

Fuck it, I'm leaving my vote right where it is...

No I do not, because I know him and I know he is very stressed. I honestly don't think he is a team baddie at this point. It doesn't clear him from being an Indy such as the master, but I don't think he is a team baddie.

I am voting Enrique. I think this whole conversation today from him was designed to keep MP firmly the topic of conversation once Enrique flips bad. Everyone will pick apart who he vouched for, who he defended etc. I don't buy it. I know Alex too well to do so.

Regarding Dana, she has never read as anything but civ and I feel most confident trusting her over pretty much anyone else in this thread.

Also, I never role hinted.

Enrique wrote:No, you're just taking a cop out of any votes tomorrow. If I quit every time somebody gave me a baseless accusation this game, I'd have quit four times for every day phase.

I don't know MPs alignment for certain. I flip flop around on it to be honest. But I can vouch that what he is saying is true. He has an insane amount of stuff to finish by next Wednesday. He is not leaving the thread to cop out, he is leaving because it is too distracting at this moment. I do believe he is civ, judging from this. He has done it before and it was when he was a civ in Homestar. I could be wrong. But if he is bad, it won't help us to lynch him or he would not be asking for it. He would never handicap his own team. So voting MP is out IMO.

To those looking to lynch Dana I say, I really think this is a bad idea. I am firmly of the belief she is civ, as I have said before.

I will probably vote Enrique today, unless something else comes up to make me feel otherwise.

Running behind here, don't have a strong opinion on either one but I want to keep the votes close rather than spread, so I am casting my vote for Enrique. He is still down from Made by one, but whatever. I think either one being lynched coud be telling about some other player alignments.

Gotrees wrote:

zeek wrote:If we aim for a tie between a civ and a baddie, the civ will be lynched. No tie. I think its necessary to have a clear choice of 2 votes so its free from manipulation in that sense at least.

Potential outcomes:

CIV + CIV tie = One civ lynched, no baddies revealed, one person confirmed as civ. (worst-case)

CIV + BAD tie = One civ lynched, one baddie revealed.

BAD + BAD tie = One baddie lynched, one baddie revealed. (best-case)

So it's pretty much a gamble, but at least all of the options are better than just lynching a civ like we've been doing these past few nights. Even with option one, we lose a civ but one person is also confirmed as definitely a civ, unless I'm missing some way the baddies can manipulate that. (I suppose they would probably just lynch that confirmed civ the next night, but who knows.)

Anyway, judging by this last poll, I doubt we're all organized enough to go through with that, but if there's any possibility of it happening, I'd be willing to get behind the idea.

This is bad plan. Because I doubt the vote tally between the tied parties will be revealed. It would basically out someone. So let's say it is a Civ civ tie or a baddie baddie tie. They will likely randomly choose one, or both with die. So we will have no way to know if someone died because they had more votes, or because they were the randomly selected loser of the two. And if it is not a tie, we won't know the difference from if it were. Aiming for a tie seems like a great way to hand it to the baddies if you ask me.

zeek wrote:Forget this talk of ties, it will most likely end in the death of another civ.

^ This.

Also, I really don't want to be one of the parties in consideration because I am definitely civ and would start +1. But I don't exactly have control of that I suppose?

Roxy wrote:It really rallied and went crazy in the thread when Hedgeowl had the vote lead and I want to know why no one else is seeing this?

I saw it and it was why I moved my vote from DF to Hedge.

LMAO @ TH and Zeek.

Metalmarsh89 wrote:

S~V~S wrote:But this lynch will be illuminating, I think. More people have been non commital, and more people have been discussing who they DON'T think is bad than who they DO think is bad.

Sounds like we agree on something.

And can we be careful with the SD's thrown around? There's Space Daisy and Snow Dog, and I don't always know which is which.

Linki: let's not assume they followed you.

I agree!! Lol, call me Daisy and it will be much clearer You are talking about me.

Ok pic I leave my vote where it is, it will be useless. This spread vote makes it very likely we will lynch a civ. So based on this I am evaluating voting patterns. It looks like three votes were placed on Made AFTER Hedge got two. I am moving my vote to Hedge. I realize it is not absolute proof, but it looks like it might be a save and I don't want to spread my vote farther than I have so I am going to try and mKe my vote count.

zeek wrote:1. I don't know it was blocked, how the post was written it implied that it was something effecting Strax, not Elo, that stopped the kill.
2. I was wrong to do this as I thought it was a one time deal. I do not believe it is harmful to discuss who might be vanilla civ roles (which I thought Strax was now) because the baddies would want to go after power roles.

I understand where you were coming from now zeek. No harm no foul, every site has their own variation of the game I suppose.

zeek wrote:

Spacedaisy wrote:

zeek wrote:

Spacedaisy wrote:I did not role hint in my opinion and I am not by any means saying I am strax, that would be a power the Civs would not want to lose. Why on earth would anyone want to draw attention to that kind of thing if they did believe it to possibly be true??

Again, it was blocked. Strax's kill has been and failed. I don't think its irresponsible to discuss it now.

I just went back and read the role description. I don't understand this reasoning, where does it say strax only kills once? Why would strax being blocked make a difference? Am I missing something?

I presumed his power was one night kill. I'd never heard of a civ ninja before cause I've only played 4 games and hosted 1, so I searched online and I thought thats what it was. Is that not what a civ ninja is?

Unless specified that it is a limited kill power, a civ ninja generally has a nightly kill.

zeek wrote:

Spacedaisy wrote:I did not role hint in my opinion and I am not by any means saying I am strax, that would be a power the Civs would not want to lose. Why on earth would anyone want to draw attention to that kind of thing if they did believe it to possibly be true??

Again, it was blocked. Strax's kill has been and failed. I don't think its irresponsible to discuss it now.

I just went back and read the role description. I don't understand this reasoning, where does it say strax only kills once? Why would strax being blocked make a difference? Am I missing something?

Regardless, I am not strax.

Linki: thanks Keys! I got some meds to hopefully help, time will tell.

I did not role hint in my opinion and I am not by any means saying I am strax, that would be a power the Civs would not want to lose. Why on earth would anyone want to draw attention to that kind of thing if they did believe it to possibly be true??

Dom wrote:

Spacedaisy wrote:First let me say to MP, I really wish you would stop characterizing my listing my suspicions/thoughts as suspicion mongering. You are reading that into it. All I was doing was putting my thoughts out there, period. I wasn't looking to rally a lynch around anyone.

I am glad finally some others are seeing what I have been feeling about DFaraday. I am going to vote there for now. Because before the last lynch he was top of my list.

I apologize for not talking as much, been working over a lot this week and at the moment my head isstarting to hurt.

Daisy, please correct me if I'm wrong: your suspicion of DFaraday is based off him voting against him being a fan, right?

I don't understand this question. I am suspicious of him because his votes do not seem consistent to me with someone who I know to be pretty big fan of the show.

S~V~S wrote:Turnip Head~

Hedgeowl often sounds bad to me, so I am a poor judge of her. She has a tendency to say things that, on first glance, seem logical, but then when you reread them... she is a very good player, and for all her wordiness when she posts, she blends really, really well. She makes wall of text posts, so it is concerning that I recall little of substance of what she has said. I think Roxy made some good points, and Hedge is on my shortlist. Roxy is very, very good at pulling insights out of posts. She is on my "skulking around in the file room rereading list" for today.

Bass took a break for a while, and I was expecting to see a more involved game from him, but most of my experience is with Bass as a baddie, so this could be non-BTS Bass. Like Roxy, Bass is good at the sudden insight, and I had not thought much about his game specifically, but now I will reread him.

My short list, as zeek requested, is:

Daisy
Hedge
Metalmarsh

MM seems to have all opinions contrary to mine, which does not make him bad. But he seemed to be intentionally ignoring some things , and his posts just "feel" insincere to me.

My thought on Daisy have not changed. I think she was saved the other night. Her pre lynch psts were mainly buddying MP. I don't recal ever playing a game since they have been a couple where she was the bad one and he was a civ (I may have faulty recall here, but I can't think of one), so I would expect her to post as she has here were that the case. Her trying to pit he & I against each other (which is how I read her post, "Start arguing or you will seem suspicious". Then her response about not recalling WWE when I know for a fact that she & he have discussed topics specifically regarding how he reacts to me. And that game, where he & I were sending each other flame PMs when we were baddie teammates would be something that came up in any conversation he may have had regarding our dynamic. We were both pretty annoyed with each other in a reality way.

And thanks for the "Who Posted" list, in smaller games and on my computer, I tend to not need it, but on phone/tablet I am finding it makes like a zillion percent easier.

What?? You think I was buddying up to MP before the last lynch?? We were going after each other at that time.

Metalmarsh89 wrote:This day is kind of messy. There are so many votes scattered right now. I don't want to give yet another player just one vote (like Snow Dog or Space Daisy). Sorry if this post bothers you SVS, but this is how I feel right now.

Just looking at players currently with votes, I don't think Made or Dom should be lynched. I'm also not comfortable lynching LC, DF, or MP yet. I no longer looking to vote for Elo either because I feel better about her today, but that might be because I agree with her points on Dana. I am supportive of a Dana lynch which I will explain below, and am indifferent on Hedgeowl.

I would vote Dana because she is backing up a lot of people rather than actually voicing suspicions. So much defense or uncertainty, but nothing particularly strong or helpful, except for the decoding. She just doesn't seem like she wants to formulate a strong opinion of anyone. I'll make a list of the players she has talked about, starting at the beginning of Day 2.

• Made - She starts out with this post which seems like such a baddie thing to say. Made's behavior is odd, but because no one else was picking up on it, I won't get behind it either. I brought up this post earlier. Against just strange things to say that don't offer anything. It doesn't vibe with me. Here, she does voice a brief suspicion of Elo, emphasis on the brief.
  
  Epignosis - Here and here she calls Epi's playstyle weird. No commitment there though, not until after Epi was lynched and a confirmed civ. Here is where she finally says that she thought he was bad, after the fact.
  
  Space Daisy - Uncertainty here. She suspects the bandwagoning, but no players in specific.
  
  Snow Dog - Uncertainty here.
  
  Zeek - Support here.
  
  Enrique - Uncertainty here and later backed him up. MP makes a good point here, but didn't really pursue it.
  
  Chris - Support here.
  
  Elohcin - Uncertainty here with support for others.
  
  Gotrees - Uncertainty here.

She has been very, very active, but it's so odd for someone to be so active without bringing much. It's a more is less scenario. Ninja blooper on the other hand posts once a day, yet he does so with strong points and ideas and does it in a fraction of the space Dana does (or MP). But I think her activity has let her hide in plain sight. I think we should lynch Dana today.



Oh, and she didn't get my Rush allusion.

Linki: Snow Dog, what do you see in Hedgeowl? What questioning?

I disagree, I think Dana would not be the best option for a lynch today personally. She has come across very sincere to me and I believe her to be civ.[

quote="S~V~S"]And it is a good thing to consider. I know Epi was not popular, but he was a civvie. And I do think his lynch felt like Saving Miss Daisy.[/quote]

You couldn't be more wrong.

keys56000000000 wrote:Hey SVS~ and other Daisy detractors, I'm feeling the Daisy suspicion. I'm used to reading a whole lot more from her. Maybe she's changed her style since we played last, admittedly a long time ago, but maybe she is afraid her fiance MP might easily catch her in the act of mafiaing, and is playing very carefully.

I don't know really, but I'm more supportive of the lynch going that way than this lynchtrain on Hedge.

I'm quieter because I am working like crazy at the moment and because I am not feeling well. Been having dizzy spells. Migraines, sinus congestion. Meh. And you could not be more wrong about me or my intentions with MP. She have not played together in quite some time Keys, I play a much less engaged game anymore. And as far as MP, I am not afraid of him figuring me out I would like him to because then he would know it is a bad idea to lynch me. In fact he seems to have backed off already, so yeah.

First let me say to MP, I really wish you would stop characterizing my listing my suspicions/thoughts as suspicion mongering. You are reading that into it. All I was doing was putting my thoughts out there, period. I wasn't looking to rally a lynch around anyone.

I am glad finally some others are seeing what I have been feeling about DFaraday. I am going to vote there for now. Because before the last lynch he was top of my list.

I apologize for not talking as much, been working over a lot this week and at the moment my head isstarting to hurt.

Epignosis wrote:The "bitch" line was meant to be funny, spacedaisy. I meant no offense. "Famous last words," in a way.

I read your explanation, I apologize for being offended by something when I didn't understand what you meant. Shouldn't have jumped to conclusions. We're cool. Sorry for the way this played out.

Splints they are accepting votes until the post goes up I think.and also, about saying goodbye.

Epignosis wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:Shame about Epig's probable lynch. Hopefully he's bad, but I really doubt it. Why aren't you going to save yourself, Epig?

Because I'm not a bitch.

Wow. thanks man. On that note I don't care what happens. I'm going to bed.

Well my only possible shot at living is to vote Epi. Sorry man.

I already mentioned my slight suspicion of DF. I don't have a huge list of suspects to be honest, but I am not going to try to throw mud around hoping to save myself. It is what it is.

I just don't. Her posts read genuine to me

Elo's fly by vote did not sit well with me, but I don't find it out of character for her play style.

Epi has annoyed me with his approach, but other than being spectacularly wrong about Juliets, I have not seen any suspicion.

Enrique I have felt both way sat different times. Right now I have no feeling on him either way.

I don't think Dana is bad fwiw, even though her name doesn't start with an E.

I've already listed all of my thoughts.

And if you already somewhat suspected that person. Expressed some mild concern about them, and then came back to find they were leading your lynch. Wouldn't that vault that person to the top of your suspect list. I'm not bad Alex.

Oh for the love. Whatever

MovingPictures07 wrote:

Spacedaisy wrote:Really Alex? Come on. I say that I am mildly concerned by the fact you two are buddy buddy and I come back and find you have started to rally a lynch around me. What about that would I NOT find suspect?

Linki MP: because I may need to vote to save myself. I don't really WANT to die.

So you're essentially no u'ing me? How is it suspect? I clearly laid out all of my trains of thought throughout the game. Am I not allowed to suspect you?

Okay, fair (@ the linki).

Look, I'll consider the possibility that I'm wrong; in fact, I'm incredibly nervous. But I remain firm in that you are my top suspect at the moment and for what I believe to be good reasons.

How can this be a no u, when I was the first one to voice suspicion of you. I think technically, you are the one pulling a no u.

Really Alex? Come on. I say that I am mildly concerned by the fact you two are buddy buddy and I come back and find you have started to rally a lynch around me. What about that would I NOT find suspect?

Linki MP: because I may need to vote to save myself. I don't really WANT to die.

Lol,sorry Enrique. I appreciate your defense of me.

And I'm not bad.

I'm not allowed to reevaluate? When I defended you it was during Night 0!

MovingPictures07 wrote:

Spacedaisy wrote:A Seemer role would never try to be my role.

But you're role claiming (or at least hinting) right here.

Not my intention

I was asked if I was role claiming. I was saying no I did not role claim, why do I need to if I get lynched and my role is revealed. Logic will kick in at that point just fine. I don't need to role claim.

Linki, omg seriously you are ridiculous and stretching. I am a civ, and that will apparent. A Seemer role would never try to be my role.

Linki Enrique, that is NOT all to my explanation.

No, I have not role claimed. But if you lynch me you will know my role.

Just because I didn't say it earlier doesn't mean it hasn't been sitting in my mind for a bit.

Spacedaisy wrote:Well...

So can anyone give me some insight on these planets?

I have some thoughts on today, but I want to let them percolate a bit before I say anything.

You were the thoughts that were percolating. I didn't like the way you were jumping from person to person, like you were looking for the one that had the momentum to end in a lynch. And you became very agreeable once everyone backed off the Zeek situation. The only thing I will say is I asked you specifically about your thoughts on DF because I wanted to see if you would just agree to them. You didn't. So that is to your credit...

Linki: No Zeek, not mine. The biggest loss to the civs will be my vote. But when I flip, pay attention to what happened in this lynch. I think at least something will become clear.

S~V~S wrote:Yay decoding, I suck at decoding so glad we have people who do not.

I still am not sure why people want people to say whether or not they have info.

Daisy~ you ask if people did not read your explanation of your vote.

Actually, I was only asking that of the particular person who was either intentionally or unintentionally ignoring my explanation. I don't feel ignored in the thread, and I was not playing a wounded card or anything.

And yes I did read that. I was not speaking to your tone, but rather the fact that you two seem so buddy buddy. It is just mildly concerning. Not enough for me to fully suspect you guys but it certainly is different so yeah you are achieving different.

MovingPictures07 wrote:Actually, I'm starting to feel more comfortable in a Spacedaisy vote... the more I think about that post it just really bugs me. I'm switching to her for now.

I need to catch up on posts made since I last posted so I will do so shortly here.

I call bullshit. First off I didn't play WWE or if I did I died early because I don't remember it AT ALL. So whatever the two of you did there is irrelevant to conversation about MY alignment. Second of all, you are the kind of player who will intentionally change how you handle things to avoid being caught by repeating your behavior. You've done it before, more than once. Sometimes successfully, sometimes not. So why should your "meta" be any kind of defense for you. Yet almost every Mae I have seen you play as a civ with SVS you have at one point or another suspected her. And yes the fact you and she are buddy buddy does not sit well with me. I thought you might be civ at first, when everyone was on you about the zeek debacle. But then after you started to get people off your back then you were like, Enrique! Didn't stick. Maybe TH! Nah, not flying either. Wait...he did suspect SVS for like five,invites. Even summarized her in a post here. Next it's like ROX! But he backs off that as soon as she responds. Then Made. Not happening. Until finally he settled on Juliets. Which ended in her lynch.

And consider this, why would I as a Baddie want to rile up the person who could be my most credible supporter? It makes more sense for me to want to get him to trust me because people will trust his read of me more than just anyone. I said what I said because I was mildly worried he was pulling one over on me and now I am full blown suspicious of him with the responses he gave me. Plus if he was suspect of her earlier but had felt like he didn't end up feeling so suspicious after all, why didn't he just point that out when I brought it up? Go ahead and lynch me, you won't lose power wise and you might gain a brand new point of view on this situation.

I might be wrong about you. But I KNOW you are wrong about me.

Enrique wrote:Most of the votes at least I think were somewhat thought out. People voted Alzarius because they thought it was the safest, or nicest, even being pressured is a reason. I never saw any info about Azure other than "it's blue." I don't think it's fair nobody had any reason for voting like they did, when we were supposed to be looking for civvie benefits. If somebody voted for Azure and explained it as they didn't want to fall for zeek's manipulation, I would have taken that as a reason, but in reality all of the votes were random or throw aways. Nobody actually seemed to care about Azure, but they almost won anyway.

Did you even read my post explaining post vote why I chose azure? I'm just going to assume you are referring to others who voted Azure rather than me.

I personally find Dom's explanation perfectly plausible and don't see it as overly suspicious. I suppose it would be possible he did it because he voted the wrong thing instead of what would benefit him. Assuming he had info. I dunno. I haven't been all that pinged by Dom, I guess.

Don't let Epi get to you Enrique. He's always like this and honestly it makes me far less inclined to consider voting for you. If he wants to give some good case about why then I am willing to listen, but ordering us to do it on the grounds he is some mafia hunting genius just makes me want to ignore him. Plus I have not felt like the case against you was all that great.

Come to think of it,I have not felt moved by any of the cases. The only mild pings I have had are as follows:

When Made came in and said there was no difference between those two posts, when what I read clearly one seemed to say she was leaning towards suspecting Enrique and the other said she was not seeing the case at all. She was civ, so it isn't that she was his teammate so this seems less important, but it still strikes me as odd. Perhaps he was expecting her to flip civ and wanted some cred? I don't know, I am not sure how much I am looking at him right now since Juliet's flip.

When DFaraday placed his offhand night vote. I understand not over thinking a night poll. But I just can't see why a fan of the show would not really find anything interesting about the options, not say anything about them at all or even for a fan related reason to vote for one. Am I the only one who finds this vote weird?

I found it interesting that zeek seemed to not understand MPs attempt to get reactions and responses with his move at the beginning of the game, but now he admits to slow playing info because gauging reactions is important in Baddie hunting. I don't know how suspicious it is, because I am sure there was a defensive emotion involved in the first and they are certainly not the same tactic, but it is interesting to me all the same.

MovingPictures07 wrote:

DFaraday wrote:

Dom wrote: Please tell me what I have to "explain". I have explained what has been asked of me.

I'm wondering, if you just wanted to randomize and didn't actually care about the result, why you didn't just leave your vote on what you accidentally picked the first time. Since you had no disposition one way or another, it would be just as valid as whatever your randomizer said, right?

THIS. So this.

Now I'm gone.

You and I are both purists and you know it. I would be willing to bet if you had accidentally voted differently than your randomizer (if you were to use one) you would have corrected it. I would have too, it's probably why I find Dom's explanation plausible. I can see why others find it suspect, I just don't find it as much so.

Tell me MP, what are your thoughts on DFaraday?

Also, the lack of suspicion between SVS and MP is worrying, they almost always accuse each other in games. I am concerned by this.

Finally, the blind following of zeek worries me. He can say, why would I paint a target on my back like that? The reality is that we still have no idea what that option did. There is a good chance we may never publicly know. What does he stand to lose? He has campaigned for an option waving the civvie banner, but we have no proof of it. If he knew it would not be publicly revealed then not only has his public move gained him some civ cred (because why would a Baddie do something so bold? ) but it has also given him a positive result from winning the poll. I don't feel he is bad, I just think we need to be more wary about blindly believing him without any kind of sound basis for believing he is civ.

I did not have any info on the poll, fwiw.

Ok, that whole freaking night conversation went nutty after I voted. Which I don't think I commented on my planet vote so I will now. I don't know jack about Dr. Who. And no one had voted for Azure, so I thought, "what the heck, why not toss a vote there?" And I did. The end.

Now, as to my thoughts.... DFaraday's voting seemed weird. Why? Because I am fairly certain he is a big Dr. Who fan, so I can't see why he would have treated it in such an offhand manner. If I had been around to see that initial vote of his for Azure, I would have probably changed my vote based entirely upon that.

To zeek who bashed people for choosing Azure because they like the color blue... Come on man, if you know nothing about Dr. Who, you would be relying entirely on someone else's guidance for which option, which an possibly open you up to manipulation. So you can either choose randomly for whatever half ass reason you come up with (like I did) because you have no info and don't feel like trying to wrap your brain around the various Wikipedia descriptions of each planet, or you try to understand what the Whovians are saying about each one and hope you are not taking the advice of a Baddie. Six one way, half a dozen the other. If you don't like it and want to call me irresponsible, be my guest. Seems to be par for the course in this game.

I was surprised by the recently deceased. Not who I would have expected.

Bea, if I had a rum and coke right now I would totally drink to you because, you know, you're awesome and stuff. Even with a cactus stuck to your rear. And David, props to you for writing a post when you have to be up to be at work and three freaking o'clock in the morning. Love you guys!

Linki: BR which posts pinged you?

Well...

So can anyone give me some insight on these planets?

I have some thoughts on today, but I want to let them percolate a bit before I say anything.

I feel torn. The posts say clearly different ideas. But she could have just been changing her mind between the two posts, I don't know. Her tone and posts right me read genuine to me. But what strikes me as weird is Made trying to say the posts are the same. They are very different in my opinion. Not just in wording but in content.

I have to vote. I don't think my voting for Made is going to make any difference and I think if Juliet's does flip bad, I will be looking at Made next so I'm going to go ahead and vote Juliets.

*votes*

S~V~S wrote:Daisy, I was talking about Epi, not MP.

My post was actually in response to TH and the others who were seeming to be gearing up for an MP lynch

I honestly don't think I will be voting for MP, Enrique, or zeek. I, not sure who the heck I WILL be voting for though.

I disagree. While he can be a manic FEB, I am not seeing Baddie MP here. He can fool me, he has done it before, but I'm not seeing what I normally I see from Baddie MP. I am seeing MP who is completely stressed out though.

Canucklehead wrote:I've skimmed through in an attempt to catch up. Being in three games was a ridiculous choice on my part, but I am reallyreallyreally going to try not to totally bail on any games.....starting tomorrow.


Based on the last little round of insanity, my thoughts are as follows:
MP is doing too many drugs
Dana is speaking truth
Enrique has done nothing suspicious
Epi is bossy and strangely confident for Day 1 (though I get the impression that this type of confidence is really not all tht "strange" for Épi)

Un actualité not suspicieuse of Amy of the plâtres involucre in the récent brouhaha...I Will look élysée gère for m'y voté

Nope, this is just naturally how he is. Terrifying, isn't it?

Dom wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:

Roxy wrote:Why can I edit in this forum? is it bc I am hosting the other game?

That should not be why, no, the permissions are completely separate.

Let me look into this. I was pretty thorough in making sure I accounted for everything permissions-wise when instituting this shiny new subforum, but that doesn't mean something didn't fall through the cracks.

I can edit as well.

Made wrote:

Linki- ok this is just a petpeev, but people describing their own tells always makes me feel weird.

Did I miss where you talked more about this? Who are you talking?

S~V~S wrote:Don't clip quotes. It looks bad, tbh.

What constitutes clipping a quote?

It is likely due to the fact you are a mod and this is why the edit function appears for you. And the fact I accidentally edited this into your original post instead of quoting your original post testifies to this very fact! Sorry about that. I edited it back to the way it was and reposted this original thought.

Also, I voted for 9 and 10 because those are the only ones I have seen so far.

fingersplints wrote:Am I missing another post from SD?

Oh crap. Yes you are missing one because I accidentally hit edit instead of quote on on Dom's post!!!

Oh one more thing! I have not gotten any Baddie vibes from MP so far, though it is early. It doesn't usually take too long for his Baddie self to shine through when he is not civ. and I think this thing with Dana is just a case of misreading him because she is not used to his play style. He can be over the top sometimes.... Or pretty much all the time!