Search found 167 matches

by tedxtr
Thu Apr 02, 2020 10:20 am
Forum: Previous Sit Downs
Topic: Assassin's Creed Mafia (OVER!)
Replies: 3856
Views: 95488

Re: Assassin's Creed Mafia (D1)

leetic wrote: Thu Apr 02, 2020 10:00 am
tedxtr wrote: Thu Apr 02, 2020 6:16 am Let’s maj leetic
Since I cased you, could you at least have the decency to case me? Your current case stinks
I'm sorry if you're town and I know it sucks not having a case to attack and defend yourself, but I won't. Feel free to tear that one apart if it stinks.

There's no world where you believe in your scum read on me as a town here.

You could focus on other people instead of begging me to give you the shot at escaping a lynch. If you're town, you should expand your focus, because you might die, and so may I, that's why I left the reads.

That's why I'm not moved by you at all. You'd rather drag me into shit, rather than giving reads, and I read that as preserving spew on your buddies.
by tedxtr
Thu Apr 02, 2020 6:16 am
Forum: Previous Sit Downs
Topic: Assassin's Creed Mafia (OVER!)
Replies: 3856
Views: 95488

Re: Assassin's Creed Mafia (D1)

Let’s maj leetic
by tedxtr
Thu Apr 02, 2020 3:02 am
Forum: Previous Sit Downs
Topic: Assassin's Creed Mafia (OVER!)
Replies: 3856
Views: 95488

Re: Assassin's Creed Mafia (D1)

The non-associative reads would be like...

{Sloonei, ts, FG, Dragomir}
{MacDougall}
{TurnipHead,TSP}
===============
{Long Con,speedchuck}
===============
{Master Radishes} (?)
{leetic, Epignosis}
by tedxtr
Thu Apr 02, 2020 2:43 am
Forum: Previous Sit Downs
Topic: Assassin's Creed Mafia (OVER!)
Replies: 3856
Views: 95488

Re: Assassin's Creed Mafia (D1)

tedxtr wrote: Thu Apr 02, 2020 2:42 am @leetic didn't Epi's switch onto Leetic cause any reaction in your brain? He asked you about why he's town, you asserted that he is, why is that you didn't feel the need to point it out his unfounded switch at all?
onto LC*
by tedxtr
Thu Apr 02, 2020 2:42 am
Forum: Previous Sit Downs
Topic: Assassin's Creed Mafia (OVER!)
Replies: 3856
Views: 95488

Re: Assassin's Creed Mafia (D1)

[mention]leetic[/mention] didn't Epi's switch onto Leetic cause any reaction in your brain? He asked you about why he's town, you asserted that he is, why is that you didn't feel the need to point it out his unfounded switch at all?
by tedxtr
Thu Apr 02, 2020 2:38 am
Forum: Previous Sit Downs
Topic: Assassin's Creed Mafia (OVER!)
Replies: 3856
Views: 95488

Re: Assassin's Creed Mafia (D1)

Dragomir wrote: Thu Apr 02, 2020 2:35 am
Sloonei wrote: Tue Mar 31, 2020 8:49 pm
leetic wrote: Tue Mar 31, 2020 8:46 pm For my feelings on the matter, while stranger things have happened, even when I pulled off the "argue with scumbuddy D1 about something pointless for distancing", I didn't do it for nearly as long. Sloonei and Mikey were quite dedicated in their argument, so I find it doubtful that they are w/w
yeah ted and I did it last game but it only went on for about 6 posts total, and that was enough to seal the win in the end. It’d be pointless to drag an act like that out over several pages.
Why shouldn't you? If it can make ppl think you're not wolf(which I assume would be the goal), then you wouldn't drag it out right? Do you believe that you accomplish that with much fewer posts?
It's generally against a wolf's nature to go on ranting for 3 pages. It gets very tiresome at some point. You won't and don't want to convince your wolf partner that you are wolf, because he already knows it.

That's why anti-spews are sudden and often related to a specific set of posts, maybe at EoD when one wolf is getting lynched. If you're a wolf, your word is truth, and stating the truth only takes a single line. If you're a town, you don't know the other person is a town, thus, it takes 3 pages of conflict before you lean one way or the other.
by tedxtr
Thu Apr 02, 2020 2:26 am
Forum: Previous Sit Downs
Topic: Assassin's Creed Mafia (OVER!)
Replies: 3856
Views: 95488

Re: Assassin's Creed Mafia (D1)

Image
by tedxtr
Thu Apr 02, 2020 2:25 am
Forum: Previous Sit Downs
Topic: Assassin's Creed Mafia (OVER!)
Replies: 3856
Views: 95488

Re: Assassin's Creed Mafia (D1)

I think Sloonei - FG - TS - Dragomir is a reliable enough town core. I may be too careful when saying Mac wouldn't fit this core, he probably would, but I still feel like being careful for whatever reason. Some of his actions left some questions in my mind that I can't really erase, and his association with leetic and his posturing around the wagon may have a factor in this.

That leaves TH / Epi / Leetic / speedchuck / TSP / LC / Radishes

TH -

Admittedly, this might be a spite suspicion, but I think it's warranted. Having no thoughts of your own on page 22 and making a sheep vote is absolutely horrendous.

I don't like his ts push because it seems to be misinterpreting him, irony being, what's easier than pushing someone for making a suspicion on someone else for discussing mechanics. Feels like a surface read to make and it's kind of skipping the whole gist of the argument for no real reason, it's diminishing it.

I just came back from reading ts' argument with Sloonei because I skipped it at first, and I see nothing that TH is seeing with this post :
Turnip Head wrote: Tue Mar 31, 2020 7:52 am
ts account wrote: Tue Mar 31, 2020 3:15 am
Dragomir wrote: Tue Mar 31, 2020 3:09 am I could use the same logic against you. You have only played a fraction of the amount of mafia games that exist so you can't truly know that mechanical talk is widely considered a scumtell. It might have been from the games you've played but not the many others have.

So basically, trying to say that mechanical talk is a scumtell is bullshit. It's not a universal opinion. I want you to explain to me what really makes mechanical talk a bad thing.
There exists somewhere a big imaginary book of mafia. When players are good enough, they get a chance to write a chapter of the book. In some footnotes, you will find clear references to mechanical discussion being a scumtell. I do not know what to tell you beyond this. I am not the one who decides what are and aren't considered scumtells, though I do have a few scumtells of my own that I have not seen other players share.

Generally, scum (moreso bad scum than good scum) will struggle to generate content. This is the closest thing you can get to objective in mafia- sort by postcount will almost always win more games than any individual player's reads, it has been tested. As a result of this, scum (moreso bad scum than good scum) will latch onto low-hanging talking points. In mystery games especially, mechanical discussion is inevitable from any alignment, but scum (moreso bad scum than good scum) are happy to engage in this discourse, as it means they don't have to provide fake content.

Happy?
You could argue in a post-modern mafia setting that going after someone for mechanics talk is the new low hanging fruit. I don't think your suspicion of sloonei for this looks particularly genuine. It's an easy suspicion to fake early and you haven't really let it go, like you're afraid what it would look like if you backed down here
And it's really not what Mikey was suspecting sloonei for? Again, the "diminishing important aspects" point. It feels like he didn't even read the on-going thing, just skipped to the end, saw Sloonei look a lot better than Mikey, and gave the read, because it's a safe spot to sit on. I don't like how TH is taking a convoluted suspicion coming from Mikey on Sloonei and describing it in the scummiest way possible, while also misrepresenting his entire push, ergo, he called Mikey out for pushing sloonei, when :

a) Sloonei was the one that pressed Mikey on his early suspicion and the one to have even beat the bush in the hopes of achieving something out of Mikey's early suspicion.
b) Mikey didn't scum read Sloonei in their argument for that reason

Despite this, the following of his ISO is not even like leaning me one way or the other, it's just making me think "What even is his game plan as scum if he is one"? And it makes me question whether he gave a half-assed read as a town here. I guess I liked that he switched his PoV to Sloonei scum instead of mikey, that kind of left me clueless, which probably means he's town?

I might as well do this, in the grand scheme of things, I don't believe that this is a scum slot if leetic is one.

Epi -

Much like the reasoning I initially had on TH to be scum, this is kind of the same, he also scum reads ts for "inflating his post count" which seems like probably one of the laziest reads I could've ever seen. I don't believe that a town would actually believe this. Someone's either scum or town for performing an action, if you found it performative, then call it that, not "he's just inflating his post count". It's taking a rather "I could give less of a fuck about what's going on between Sloonei and ts right now" read which feels against the grain with the general feeling of the thread. A lot of people were suspecting one party from the debate, this suspects one of them but for weak reasoning.
Epignosis wrote: Tue Mar 31, 2020 11:57 pm
Sloonei wrote: Tue Mar 31, 2020 11:52 pm
Epignosis wrote: Tue Mar 31, 2020 11:46 pm
Sloonei wrote: Tue Mar 31, 2020 11:44 pm
Epignosis wrote: Tue Mar 31, 2020 11:34 pm
Sloonei wrote: Tue Mar 31, 2020 10:46 pm
Epignosis wrote: Tue Mar 31, 2020 10:34 pm [VOTE: tsaccount] aubergine
My concerns about ts have not been addressed, but I am now having a harder time reading his utter frustration with me as anything but genuine.
My vote stands. Convince me otherwise.
Why does your vote stand where it stands? Is this a social distancing thing?
I'll make this real simple for you. Ready?

I think ts is
Spoiler: show
mafia
If I were to ask why, would you give me a satisfying answer?
I don't know the answer to that. What would satisfy you? I've already said I think ts is engaging in bullshit discussion about mechanics and people who talk about mechanics. ts looks nervous. Like someone who bit off more than he can chew and is trying to make himself out to be the big fish regardless.
*bolded* - already explained
italic - this is both wrong and scummy, it's painting ts as scum for a lot more than Epi was initially comfortable giving reasoning for. i feel like it's a huge twist of what ts looked like at the time.

Overall, this would be a solid scum buddy for leetic. All of his votes are posturing on leetic's counterwagons , and for shit reasons as well. Epi had a town lean on Long Con, asked leetic why he should vote him, leetic said he shouldn't, and then, after voting me and maintaining my peak votes, he posts this :
Epignosis wrote: Wed Apr 01, 2020 8:50 pm
Long Con wrote: Wed Apr 01, 2020 4:45 pm
Turnip Head wrote: Tue Mar 31, 2020 5:57 pm LC playing scummy on purpose is not his civ MO
This is just blatantly not true. It's something I have done many times in the past, mostly due to the "you-die-you-don't-win" rule we used to go by around here... when you have to survive to win, you learn to not look TOO Civvish. I still hold the lessons dear to my heart, because dying sucks either way, and if you want to survive the night, the baddies have to believe you can be lynched.
This is true.

[VOTE: Long Con] aubergine

There is no reason you should have to explain this to Turnip Head. TH was around during that time.
Long con : 4 votes with this vote at the time. He sits on this for a while, then he switches to...Whom, might you ask?
Epignosis wrote: Wed Apr 01, 2020 10:43 pm [VOTE: ted] aubergine
Oh gee I wonder. Why? No reason to ask as the reasoning may prolly be "voted to see the poll" or "wagons".

Then baby yoda starts raging and kicking and looking town and where does Epi land next?
Epignosis wrote: Wed Apr 01, 2020 11:09 pm [VOTE: TH] aubergine

Just to keep it even while I slumber.
Wait, is that a 3 votes wagon?

Epi is posturing to have a reason to vote on any of me / th / longcon in order to save leetic. If leetic flips scum, this is the next lynch 10/10 times.

Leetic -

Scum lord

speedchuck -

Tbh his ISO left me uninspired and his last post with the readslist is like "Yeah so we lost ted as a lynching option, I'm gonna put LC at null and keep TH scum as those are two viable wagons"

I get that the last 2 people (except for leetic) are being analysed based on pre-flip. Individually, I really have no idea what speedchuck is, could be anything. He does read more...tense? I guess?

TSP -
TonyStarkPrime wrote: Mon Mar 30, 2020 11:31 pm
Long Con wrote: Mon Mar 30, 2020 10:45 pm
leetic wrote: Mon Mar 30, 2020 10:22 pm Usually much more has happened by now. This feels weird.

Right now, [VOTE: Sloonei] aubergine. He is usually one of the more active people who tries to get stuff going, but right now his only contributions have been setup speculation. I'm not really seeing him trying to get any meaningful discussion going so I have to be suspicious.
I would also say the same about JaggedJimmyJay, but he's Schrödinger's player right now. I'll join you on the Sloonei vote, he has three posts and they're all about an issue that's above his pay grade as a player. In A World Asunder, town Sloonei opened Day 1 with two town reads and a vote on a suspect. [VOTE: sloonei] aubergine
This is perhaps worse than the Leetic but it’s heart is in the right place
I actually really liked his LC comment. I kind of feel bad for saying this as it will be exploited by him, but generally, I feel like me and TSP have kind of the same outlook on the game. Our reads are somewhat similar, at least from my PoV, and each time we were both town (or I was scum and he was town but it was multiball). I resonated with it, I think it's actually the correct take. Its heart does feel in the right place. I wholeheartedly agree with that post.

I can also follow through the Drago read, although I think it's taking it a step further. That's fine as I think it's more likely town indicative out of TSP, but I am stating that I don't agree with the read itself, but with TSP's reasoning for calling it out.

I also liked his FG comment, although I think she gave him a reasonable reply back (from what I remember) and it seemed that it didn't shake him at all, I wanna know why.

I think TSP's town actually.

Now, for spew analysis that could go wrong but I don't think it is
TonyStarkPrime wrote: Wed Apr 01, 2020 9:23 pm
Epignosis wrote: Wed Apr 01, 2020 4:22 pm TonyStarkPrime has twelve posts and and I count only one opinion that is expressed without hedging language.
I’ve been taking the maybes and perhapses out of my emails today. It’s an overall problem.
I think a wolf Epi used this more to shade FG than defend TSP, and if he were a wolf with TSP, I don't think he'd consciously move his cursor on the submit button, because he'd second-guess himself into how bad it would turn out to look.

LC -

I'm already getting tired of this, this is absolutely not a wolf with leetic if leetic is a wolf.

As for the individual read...

Listen, the fucking pointing system, please never do that again if you're town. It's easy to bait scum reads on you (more so done by town!). It's already enough if you go over your reasoning for leaning leetic one way or the other, this just feels artificial and people will most certainly not appeal and/or will be suspicious of how you view one thing , your point is clearly done to emphasize on a scum lean and you give him 0 points for it. I don't think there's any reward in doing it. It makes it very hard for me to get a read on you this way.

Yeah I have no clue, I hope leetic flips wolf so I can call this town.

Master Radishes -

Going to start by saying I retained one Sloonei quote that kind of mirrored my thought on MR, I don't think that he feels scum this game. He doesn't feel like in GoC. It's really hard to describe it as you couldn't resonate to my thoughts anyway and I can't really put them out for you, because I had a whole another perception than the townies in GoC because I was scum.

Liked the Sloonei read.

Hindsight, I remember liking this read that he made on me:
Master Radishes wrote: Tue Mar 31, 2020 5:16 am It's early days still, but Ted is popping out to me as someone to ISO. Everytime I read his post I'm thinking along the lines of 'Can a scum make that? ...Sure'.

I'm supposed to be working right now (from home, so it's easy for me to get distracted), but next time I take a break I'll do a proper ISO.
I take it MR is some sort of English teacher or something, as his cases very much revolve around wording and such. His whole case on me went from the premise I was scum, which is why I am suspecting people that are still on me, because :
Master Radishes wrote: Tue Mar 31, 2020 7:10 am Okay, here are a couple posts from Ted that pinged me:

Disclaimer: it's early D1 etc etc.
tedxtr wrote: Tue Mar 31, 2020 1:56 am
Sloonei wrote: Tue Mar 31, 2020 1:46 am @tedxtr what is your read on sloonei?
Yeah I was gonna get to that, I think you're town and I'm trying to wrap my head around the mess.
This is a cop out to talking about the (at the time) ongoing Sloonei-TS debate. 'Trying to wrap my head around the mess' comes across to me as a scum uncertain how to slip into the predominant conversation.
tedxtr wrote: Tue Mar 31, 2020 1:59 am If ts account is [NSM] Mikey I don't remember him being this jumpy actually.

linki : I liked how you reacted to ts account's push on you, particularly one post somewhere. I guess you handled the callout pretty well, it's maybe something to do with how bad the votes on you were that deceives me into it, but idrc for now, you're sloonei.

(Quote chain that I cut)
A light shading on TS (who I assume is Mikey), followed by a rather qualified reason for TRing Sloonei. Again, just reads as someone who is hesitant to lay down solid reads.
tedxtr wrote: Tue Mar 31, 2020 2:51 am I kind of want the Sloonei and ts shit to stop, there's already information to infer stuff from and quite frankly I think they're both town.
For one thing, it had definitely petered out by this point. But mainly, it has the tone of a scum who is trying to appear frustrated, e.g. 'quite frankly' and such phrasing.


The rest of his ISO is uninspiring. Mostly null posts that don't really indicate alignment either way, and nothing that looks townie enough to overrule my suspicions. Some of the other posts that don't sit well with me include a minor mechanics comments, a seemingly random and unexplained vote on Leetic ('this feels good for now', really?), and some weird commentary on a Mac who had barely entered the thread at that point. Even his entrance posts look a bit questionable under this light, but admittedly by this point I may be tunneling a bit.


Ted sits at the bottom of my list at the moment. I don't normally vote this early into the game, but hey, sometimes it's fun to switch things up. [VOTE: tedextr] aubergine
This is a cop out to talking about the (at the time) ongoing Sloonei-TS debate. 'Trying to wrap my head around the mess' comes across to me as a scum uncertain how to slip into the predominant conversation.
NAI unless you go from the premise a scum probably posted it.
A light shading on TS (who I assume is Mikey), followed by a rather qualified reason for TRing Sloonei. Again, just reads as someone who is hesitant to lay down solid reads.
This point was literally refuted in his next point that he makes, and I found it baffling how "I think ts and sloonei are town" is reflective of a hesitant behaviour, but whatever.
For one thing, it had definitely petered out by this point. But mainly, it has the tone of a scum who is trying to appear frustrated, e.g. 'quite frankly' and such phrasing.
He decided to leave the previous argument in even though he literally commented on the post that refutes his argument, but okay.

I feel like I could've follow through enough with "A lot of his posts seem null", but these particular quotes are struggling to build a case out of thin air. It's perfectly reasonable to think "mate post something townie" but the timing of the casing as well as the reasons themselves when you preach that my posts are pretty null reads kind of desperate, which is why I kept pushing back people when they voted me for your case.

I thought I was going to town read you off this, but I just can't. There's a dark world where you're a town, but that would imply some fucked up reasoning that Occam's razor doesn't back me up on, such as "He wanted to try and catch the boogey man cuz I won GoC and he didn't have the chance to push me, so maybe that's why he wants to bury me early, maybe he's backing up a gut too early" but it's like, come on. You can't possibly go as hard as you did on me based on this.

I can't town lean him.
by tedxtr
Thu Apr 02, 2020 12:41 am
Forum: Previous Sit Downs
Topic: Assassin's Creed Mafia (OVER!)
Replies: 3856
Views: 95488

Re: Assassin's Creed Mafia (D1)

TonyStarkPrime wrote: Thu Apr 02, 2020 12:20 am Leetic is putting in real work here.
Ok
by tedxtr
Wed Apr 01, 2020 11:41 pm
Forum: Previous Sit Downs
Topic: Assassin's Creed Mafia (OVER!)
Replies: 3856
Views: 95488

Re: Assassin's Creed Mafia (D1)

Yeah I bet you do, I fucking bet
by tedxtr
Wed Apr 01, 2020 11:40 pm
Forum: Previous Sit Downs
Topic: Assassin's Creed Mafia (OVER!)
Replies: 3856
Views: 95488

Re: Assassin's Creed Mafia (D1)

Dragomir wrote: Wed Apr 01, 2020 11:37 pm
leetic wrote: Tue Mar 31, 2020 1:13 am
ts account wrote: Tue Mar 31, 2020 12:57 am
leetic wrote: Tue Mar 31, 2020 12:06 am
Y'know, this post is a bit weird. Mikey is calling out Sloonei for setup speculation, yet when you look at the first paragraph, that's exactly what he's doing here

Care to explain?
I would like to know from you. Are you worried about me pocketing you?
Mikey's behavior is weird, last game when he was town he wasn't going after the people doing setup speculation despite the fact that there was a lot going on. And what's with this business about pocketing, like of course I'm not going to discount the possibility of someone being scum just because they townread me. Now I'm voting Mikey for this reason.
Do you always just give a scum read, explain why, vote and then proceed to not actively get that person lynched? I know it was early in the DP but it's a pattern that I've seen you do. It sounds like you are more dependent on ppl agreeing with your assessment and joining the wagon. You don't seem like you actually want to get that player lynched.
This day phase has just started to look a lot more promising.
by tedxtr
Wed Apr 01, 2020 11:38 pm
Forum: Previous Sit Downs
Topic: Assassin's Creed Mafia (OVER!)
Replies: 3856
Views: 95488

Re: Assassin's Creed Mafia (D1)

Turnip Head wrote: Wed Apr 01, 2020 11:36 pm
tedxtr wrote: Wed Apr 01, 2020 11:25 pm Like this is fucking ludicrous, everyone but me is getting pushed, Long Con is pushed, TSP is pushed, Speedchuck is pushed, and I’m still being top wagon, TH is pushed

Fucking read the game state correctly, MY WAGON IS A PAGE 2 THING AND IT HAS NO NEW EVIDENCE TO SUPPORT IT
I'd like to read the game state correctly but I'm afraid you'll just yell at me

You've never been top wagon, you are overreacting
So me not being top wagon justifies your vote on me or what? Bro, what are you doing on my wagon
by tedxtr
Wed Apr 01, 2020 11:37 pm
Forum: Previous Sit Downs
Topic: Assassin's Creed Mafia (OVER!)
Replies: 3856
Views: 95488

Re: Assassin's Creed Mafia (D1)

I’ve always been top wagon
by tedxtr
Wed Apr 01, 2020 11:33 pm
Forum: Previous Sit Downs
Topic: Assassin's Creed Mafia (OVER!)
Replies: 3856
Views: 95488

Re: Assassin's Creed Mafia (D1)

Or rather, the case on me
by tedxtr
Wed Apr 01, 2020 11:33 pm
Forum: Previous Sit Downs
Topic: Assassin's Creed Mafia (OVER!)
Replies: 3856
Views: 95488

Re: Assassin's Creed Mafia (D1)

leetic wrote: Wed Apr 01, 2020 11:30 pm
Dragomir wrote: Wed Apr 01, 2020 11:24 pm
leetic wrote: Wed Apr 01, 2020 11:14 pm
Dragomir wrote: Wed Apr 01, 2020 11:07 pm
leetic wrote: Mon Mar 30, 2020 10:22 pm Usually much more has happened by now. This feels weird.

Right now, [VOTE: Sloonei] aubergine. He is usually one of the more active people who tries to get stuff going, but right now his only contributions have been setup speculation. I'm not really seeing him trying to get any meaningful discussion going so I have to be suspicious.
I have a question for you. Why didn't you consider talking about mechanics to be a "getting things going" action? It was the most pressing matter at the moment because their were 2 players that signed up and weren't added to the player list. It is of something to talk about you wouldn't say?

What in your mind constitutes as getting things going? There were less than 5 ppl online at that time, everybody was trying to get their first posts in. What did you expect of Sloonei to be capable of doing at that time? I believe that you were unreasonably coming after him for not contributing when his options were very limited.
Look at a game like this one. While there was some joking in the beginning, players were still putting reads on each other right off the bat. Five hours of absolutely nothing happening was unusual for here as far as I was concerned.

Mechanical talk isn't really a "getting things going" action because it tells you nothing about the alignment of the person doing it or other people.
I disagree with that statement.
1. In the next five pages, we had 2 players go after each other purely based on one of them doing mechanical talk. Sloonei doing mechanical talk was the driving force behind his and TS's interaction. Due to this, multiple ppl could get some reads on those two. So, you could say that mechanical can get things going in a game.

2. Mechanical talk can provide excellent reads and thoughts about the game in general. It allows you to find out who just talks about the mechanics as a way to contribute all phase long instead of anything else. You can end up clearing something confusing which could affect the read that you may have on a player. If a player can use mechanical talk to further their reads and ideas then they are contributing and mechanical talk has got things going.

Tell me what else that Sloonei could have done to get things going?
I mean, it was more Mikey scumreading Sloonei that got discussion going, but I digress. We really shouldn't be arguing about this considering it died ten pages ago.
My case died 20 pages ago, please state what you are doing on my wagon
by tedxtr
Wed Apr 01, 2020 11:32 pm
Forum: Previous Sit Downs
Topic: Assassin's Creed Mafia (OVER!)
Replies: 3856
Views: 95488

Re: Assassin's Creed Mafia (D1)

[VOTE: Leetic ] aubergine
by tedxtr
Wed Apr 01, 2020 11:28 pm
Forum: Previous Sit Downs
Topic: Assassin's Creed Mafia (OVER!)
Replies: 3856
Views: 95488

Re: Assassin's Creed Mafia (D1)

leetic wrote: Wed Apr 01, 2020 11:26 pm
tedxtr wrote: Wed Apr 01, 2020 11:25 pm Like this is fucking ludicrous, everyone but me is getting pushed, Long Con is pushed, TSP is pushed, Speedchuck is pushed, and I’m still being top wagon, TH is pushed

Fucking read the game state correctly, MY WAGON IS A PAGE 2 THING AND IT HAS NO NEW EVIDENCE TO SUPPORT IT
Have you read any of my posts?
Yeah I believe I’ve expressed my wolf read on you.
by tedxtr
Wed Apr 01, 2020 11:26 pm
Forum: Previous Sit Downs
Topic: Assassin's Creed Mafia (OVER!)
Replies: 3856
Views: 95488

Re: Assassin's Creed Mafia (D1)

And yet for 50 something hours I’ve managed to be the counterwagon to people like Leetic and Long Con and their wagons crumble and mine stays up although I’m the towniest motherfucker in this entire playerlist

And they’ve barely done anything
by tedxtr
Wed Apr 01, 2020 11:25 pm
Forum: Previous Sit Downs
Topic: Assassin's Creed Mafia (OVER!)
Replies: 3856
Views: 95488

Re: Assassin's Creed Mafia (D1)

Like this is fucking ludicrous, everyone but me is getting pushed, Long Con is pushed, TSP is pushed, Speedchuck is pushed, and I’m still being top wagon, TH is pushed

Fucking read the game state correctly, MY WAGON IS A PAGE 2 THING AND IT HAS NO NEW EVIDENCE TO SUPPORT IT
by tedxtr
Wed Apr 01, 2020 11:23 pm
Forum: Previous Sit Downs
Topic: Assassin's Creed Mafia (OVER!)
Replies: 3856
Views: 95488

Re: Assassin's Creed Mafia (D1)

leetic wrote: Wed Apr 01, 2020 11:21 pm
tedxtr wrote: Wed Apr 01, 2020 11:11 pm
MacDougall wrote: Wed Apr 01, 2020 11:09 pm
tedxtr wrote: Wed Apr 01, 2020 11:08 pm
Sloonei wrote: Wed Apr 01, 2020 10:04 pm I think we are a bit of a mess right now and the mafia team would be content to maintain the status quo. Turnip Head is a player who stands out as not rocking the boat. I don't know if that's fair to say. I am making this assessment with only one foot in the game.
I think wolves have little to no thread control and villagers are having a horrible day one.
This is such a weird thing to say at this point.
I don’t care.
If you don't care, why did you respond

I don't like this tone, it reads as uncooperative and not really engaging in the thread
I don’t care.
by tedxtr
Wed Apr 01, 2020 11:22 pm
Forum: Previous Sit Downs
Topic: Assassin's Creed Mafia (OVER!)
Replies: 3856
Views: 95488

Re: Assassin's Creed Mafia (D1)

MacDougall wrote: Wed Apr 01, 2020 11:16 pm
Dragomir wrote: Wed Apr 01, 2020 11:12 pm
MacDougall wrote: Wed Apr 01, 2020 11:09 pm
tedxtr wrote: Wed Apr 01, 2020 11:08 pm
Sloonei wrote: Wed Apr 01, 2020 10:04 pm I think we are a bit of a mess right now and the mafia team would be content to maintain the status quo. Turnip Head is a player who stands out as not rocking the boat. I don't know if that's fair to say. I am making this assessment with only one foot in the game.
I think wolves have little to no thread control and villagers are having a horrible day one.
This is such a weird thing to say at this point.
I agree with that statement from Ted. It's how things are appearing to be.
It's a really silly thing to bother saying as though it's somehow going to change matters. If you feel this way, pick a quest and go and do some analysis instead of getting stuck in live read hell. Solve someone. This "horrible day one" has more posts than mosts and that is usually when day ones nets a wolf flip, but only if civilians actually try.

I may appear like I am not trying, but I am. I am provoking as much content as I can from people in a way that they won't have time/capacity to fabricate well if they are scum. It is a wonderful way to lure out town peeks on people. I am serious about my FG and TS reads. I'm locking them town and not looking back.
What does having more posts have to do with a better village overall?

Information overload is a thing, and you’re using it to suspect and set up towns and ignoring dead weight that are sneaking right beneath you.
by tedxtr
Wed Apr 01, 2020 11:18 pm
Forum: Previous Sit Downs
Topic: Assassin's Creed Mafia (OVER!)
Replies: 3856
Views: 95488

Re: Assassin's Creed Mafia (D1)

You’re literally letting people get away for nothing.

Turnip didn’t do shit, now he’s voting a wagon that never crumbled in the span of 48 hours when I’ve had the towniest fucking breakdown and tone and posts, and he has no reasoning other than “radishes is there, Radishes goat!!!”

Leetic has done nothing but make surface level reads and his wagon faltered for no reason.

You’re chasing ghosts while scum are barely doing anything.
by tedxtr
Wed Apr 01, 2020 11:14 pm
Forum: Previous Sit Downs
Topic: Assassin's Creed Mafia (OVER!)
Replies: 3856
Views: 95488

Re: Assassin's Creed Mafia (D1)

Epignosis wrote: Wed Apr 01, 2020 10:50 pm
tedxtr wrote: Wed Apr 01, 2020 10:49 pm
Long Con wrote: Wed Apr 01, 2020 7:33 pm I don't understand anything anyone is saying about me. Normally I love being talked about, but you guys have some dark imaginations. How does FunnyGurl even have an expectation about how I play?
Not that hard when you are the one setting the bar for expectation level.
Why aren't you voting for LC?
That post of mine didn’t give me a reason to vote him. I was criticising his inquiry more.
by tedxtr
Wed Apr 01, 2020 11:11 pm
Forum: Previous Sit Downs
Topic: Assassin's Creed Mafia (OVER!)
Replies: 3856
Views: 95488

Re: Assassin's Creed Mafia (D1)

MacDougall wrote: Wed Apr 01, 2020 11:09 pm
tedxtr wrote: Wed Apr 01, 2020 11:08 pm
Sloonei wrote: Wed Apr 01, 2020 10:04 pm I think we are a bit of a mess right now and the mafia team would be content to maintain the status quo. Turnip Head is a player who stands out as not rocking the boat. I don't know if that's fair to say. I am making this assessment with only one foot in the game.
I think wolves have little to no thread control and villagers are having a horrible day one.
This is such a weird thing to say at this point.
I don’t care.
by tedxtr
Wed Apr 01, 2020 11:11 pm
Forum: Previous Sit Downs
Topic: Assassin's Creed Mafia (OVER!)
Replies: 3856
Views: 95488

Re: Assassin's Creed Mafia (D1)

Turnip Head wrote: Wed Apr 01, 2020 10:15 pm
Sloonei wrote: Wed Apr 01, 2020 10:08 pm
Turnip Head wrote: Wed Apr 01, 2020 10:07 pm As if the boat needs to be rocked further
steady the boat that is already rocking then.
That's my goal atm. What do you think of ted? I kinda like my vote. Master Radishes is also voting here and he seems like he's got his head on straight.
It’s page 22, you’re voting a wagon that peaked on a page 2 case and never moved on without having any reason to vote there, you can eat the noose.
by tedxtr
Wed Apr 01, 2020 11:08 pm
Forum: Previous Sit Downs
Topic: Assassin's Creed Mafia (OVER!)
Replies: 3856
Views: 95488

Re: Assassin's Creed Mafia (D1)

Sloonei wrote: Wed Apr 01, 2020 10:04 pm I think we are a bit of a mess right now and the mafia team would be content to maintain the status quo. Turnip Head is a player who stands out as not rocking the boat. I don't know if that's fair to say. I am making this assessment with only one foot in the game.
I think wolves have little to no thread control and villagers are having a horrible day one.
by tedxtr
Wed Apr 01, 2020 11:07 pm
Forum: Previous Sit Downs
Topic: Assassin's Creed Mafia (OVER!)
Replies: 3856
Views: 95488

Re: Assassin's Creed Mafia (D1)

Turnip Head wrote: Wed Apr 01, 2020 9:55 pm [VOTE: tedextr] aubergine

This wagon has the purest votes from my POV. The other wagons just look trigger happy
[v] Turnip Head [/v]
by tedxtr
Wed Apr 01, 2020 10:49 pm
Forum: Previous Sit Downs
Topic: Assassin's Creed Mafia (OVER!)
Replies: 3856
Views: 95488

Re: Assassin's Creed Mafia (D1)

Long Con wrote: Wed Apr 01, 2020 7:33 pm I don't understand anything anyone is saying about me. Normally I love being talked about, but you guys have some dark imaginations. How does FunnyGurl even have an expectation about how I play?
Not that hard when you are the one setting the bar for expectation level.
by tedxtr
Wed Apr 01, 2020 6:50 pm
Forum: Previous Sit Downs
Topic: Assassin's Creed Mafia (OVER!)
Replies: 3856
Views: 95488

Re: Assassin's Creed Mafia (D1)

Suprisingly enough, I think you might also be right on Epi.
by tedxtr
Wed Apr 01, 2020 6:48 pm
Forum: Previous Sit Downs
Topic: Assassin's Creed Mafia (OVER!)
Replies: 3856
Views: 95488

Re: Assassin's Creed Mafia (D1)

Funnygurl555 wrote: Wed Apr 01, 2020 6:41 pm what are yours atm ted?
Leetic is my most confident one

And I don’t know, I’ll look more in-depth tomorrow
by tedxtr
Wed Apr 01, 2020 5:59 pm
Forum: Previous Sit Downs
Topic: Assassin's Creed Mafia (OVER!)
Replies: 3856
Views: 95488

Re: Assassin's Creed Mafia (D1)

Funnygurl555 wrote: Wed Apr 01, 2020 5:56 pm
tedxtr wrote: Wed Apr 01, 2020 5:08 pm Whoever feels like working with baby yoda @ me because I've decided that's the healthy way for me to play mafia

I feel as though that's maybe 2 people at best but I'll take what there is and form a small cult or something
if you're willing
What are your scum reads and why?
by tedxtr
Wed Apr 01, 2020 5:13 pm
Forum: Previous Sit Downs
Topic: Assassin's Creed Mafia (OVER!)
Replies: 3856
Views: 95488

Re: Assassin's Creed Mafia (D1)

Sloonei wrote: Wed Apr 01, 2020 5:11 pm Let the record show that tedxtr currently appears to be implying that he will be killing me tonight.
You might very well think that, I couldn't possibly comment.
by tedxtr
Wed Apr 01, 2020 5:08 pm
Forum: Previous Sit Downs
Topic: Assassin's Creed Mafia (OVER!)
Replies: 3856
Views: 95488

Re: Assassin's Creed Mafia (D1)

Whoever feels like working with baby yoda @ me because I've decided that's the healthy way for me to play mafia

I feel as though that's maybe 2 people at best but I'll take what there is and form a small cult or something
by tedxtr
Wed Apr 01, 2020 5:06 pm
Forum: Previous Sit Downs
Topic: Assassin's Creed Mafia (OVER!)
Replies: 3856
Views: 95488

Re: Assassin's Creed Mafia (D1)

you'll know
by tedxtr
Wed Apr 01, 2020 5:04 pm
Forum: Previous Sit Downs
Topic: Assassin's Creed Mafia (OVER!)
Replies: 3856
Views: 95488

Re: Assassin's Creed Mafia (D1)

get vig'd mate

just wait for the night phase to come
by tedxtr
Wed Apr 01, 2020 5:01 pm
Forum: Previous Sit Downs
Topic: Assassin's Creed Mafia (OVER!)
Replies: 3856
Views: 95488

Re: Assassin's Creed Mafia (D1)

Sloonei wrote: Wed Apr 01, 2020 5:00 pm Turnip Head is town.
I'm having trouble seeing your world building. You have quite the townreads, what's the PoE?
by tedxtr
Wed Apr 01, 2020 4:45 pm
Forum: Previous Sit Downs
Topic: Assassin's Creed Mafia (OVER!)
Replies: 3856
Views: 95488

Re: Assassin's Creed Mafia (D1)

It's 12 am you're getting the rest tomorrow. Or some of it. I'm not doing this for all 13 players, I'm not insane.
by tedxtr
Wed Apr 01, 2020 4:42 pm
Forum: Previous Sit Downs
Topic: Assassin's Creed Mafia (OVER!)
Replies: 3856
Views: 95488

Re: Assassin's Creed Mafia (D1)

ts account -

I thought his entry was good. His Sloonei push reads as genuine and the angle he picked is very reasonable.
ts account wrote: Mon Mar 30, 2020 11:38 pm I have a soft mindmeld with leetic re: sloonei. However, I'm more suspicious of it because I do not think speculation of sloonei's nature is pro-town in any way. Since it is early enough in the game, this read is more of a town read on leetic than a condemnation of sloonei. I also want to point out TonyStarkPrime's callout of LongCon (and sloonei's somewhat, but Tony was not involved before this) which I think is not justified.

I can't make any more judgements until RVS is over, which is hopefully soon.

PS The submit and preview buttons are backwards.
This post is important for seeing how the read develops. Mikey (presumably) has a very slight suspicion on Sloonei. I think that this type of entry is town indicative. I'll walk you through the steps but bear with me for a bit.

Why is it town indicative? I feel as though if he were a wolf, he'd use that excuse to push harder on Sloonei. From this post, he does state a minor scum lean, but it's nothing "too damning" to use his words, it's just a little suspicion there. This is important, because, if you go through the development of Mikey's read on Sloonei, you can see it flows to the point of scum reading him, rather than it being the other way around, as in, he came into the thread with the intent of burying Sloonei in evidence, as this is a pretty easy angle to take as scum. I like the abstaining. Now, you're going to see how Sloonei is fanning Mikey's inner flame and his suspicion on Sloonei increases with each post, instead of it being a full-on, blastfuckery, guns blazing approach, where he corners Sloonei for his suggestion.
ts account wrote: Mon Mar 30, 2020 11:45 pm
Sloonei wrote: Mon Mar 30, 2020 11:40 pm To be clear: my entry posts were not intended as “mechanical speculation”, or at least that was not my primary mindset in making them. I was genuinely concerned that the host had made a mistake.
It's a problem, because you were framing it as a potential game mechanic, when I do not think discussion of that avenue is fruitful for town.
* It is debating with Sloonei and stating what the post meant and why he felt the need to point out the observation. It's re-stating one's belief.
Sloonei wrote: Mon Mar 30, 2020 11:47 pm
ts account wrote: Mon Mar 30, 2020 11:45 pm
Sloonei wrote: Mon Mar 30, 2020 11:40 pm To be clear: my entry posts were not intended as “mechanical speculation”, or at least that was not my primary mindset in making them. I was genuinely concerned that the host had made a mistake.
It's a problem, because you were framing it as a potential game mechanic, when I do not think discussion of that avenue is fruitful for town.
Why not?

I have no real investment in the topic as it is being framed. Again, I was trying to figure out whether or not the host messed up and the game would need to be restarted as a result of this.

But now this discussion exists, and you’ve said these things about it. So please explain what you mean.
* This post by Sloonei is starting to plant the seeds for a debate. It's questioning ts's reasoning.

Now, let's hop in Mikey's head for a second. The person that you scum read just refuted your argument, and is painting you out to be the bad guy. For a scum!Mikey world, this would be the pivotal point where his gears would shift onto going full on Sloonei. Instead, he maintains his emotional consistency, is a little sketched out by the comment, and then he asks this :
ts account wrote: Mon Mar 30, 2020 11:53 pm If you say this was not your intent, then what exactly did you mean by this? I can't interpret it as anything else.
Sloonei wrote: Mon Mar 30, 2020 7:30 pm
Sloonei wrote: Mon Mar 30, 2020 7:28 pm i'm genuinely unsure what's going on. We have two players who signed up for this game that aren't listed on the roster or the poll.
could there be a thematic reason for this? @ anyone who's familiar with the games? We waited a few extra days to get to exactly 15 players. I don't think it's likely that nanook would simply forget to include two people.
Now Mikey is actually discerning Sloonei's alignment and is confused at how Sloonei is handling the situation, thus, he wants to clarify Sloonei's standing on the matter. Sloonei just framed his actions as having a different intention, and Mikey is trying to see that, by clarifying it. He's not twisting Sloonei's words, he's not calling his scum, he's merely trying to discern his alignment.
ts account wrote: Mon Mar 30, 2020 11:58 pm
Sloonei wrote: Mon Mar 30, 2020 11:55 pm
The intention of the posts themselves was not to speculate about mechanics. That particular post was me realizing that it was probably not a host error, and a search for answers among the folks who knew the theme better than I do. I don’t actually give a shit what the speculative mechanics might be. I just care that the possibility for mechanics exists.

Now explain why my mindset is not indicative of an honest civilian.
Suppose you were given the information that a mechanic exists that removes the two players from the player list, they cannot be voted on or targeted with actions, and they cannot post.
Where do you go from there?

Funnygurl, please tell me you are not a wolf.
Again, re-stating his belief. He's saying why he made the initial comment. At no point is he calling Sloonei scum for it. You get the idea, I'll move on to where gears shift.

Note how he's also spreading his focus onto Funnygurl. Mikey had something on Sloonei to focus on, but it wasn't really a fruitful avenue, hence why he never really pushed it, Sloonei was the one that forced him to explain himself. Mikey isn't pissed at him for it, he's willing to debate. He was never really the one that went into this conversation with an end goal of achieving something out of it.
ts account wrote: Tue Mar 31, 2020 12:08 am
leetic wrote: Tue Mar 31, 2020 12:06 am Y'know, this post is a bit weird. Mikey is calling out Sloonei for setup speculation, yet when you look at the first paragraph, that's exactly what he's doing here

Care to explain?
It is a hypothetical pointing out just how useless it is to seek clarification on whatever is going on. If it turns out to be a game mechanic, it's not like we can use that to our advantage, so we should rather focus on generating content and interacting with each other.
And this post confirms my prior beliefs. It really wasn't a fruitful avenue and Mikey had no interest of engaging in it, because HE KNOWS THIS ISN'T A RELIABLE WAY OF SOLVING SLOONEI. If he wanted to look good while doing it, he would've done so easily, by doubling down, but this is a villager willing to explain his standing.

I really don't know what else to add to this, I think I've commented on this enough to the point where it might feel like it's IIOA to some people (information instead of analysis)

ts is town.
by tedxtr
Wed Apr 01, 2020 4:12 pm
Forum: Previous Sit Downs
Topic: Assassin's Creed Mafia (OVER!)
Replies: 3856
Views: 95488

Re: Assassin's Creed Mafia (D1)

Epignosis wrote: Wed Apr 01, 2020 4:11 pm
tedxtr wrote: Wed Apr 01, 2020 3:51 pm I'm also not pulling reads out of my ass for the sake of doing it.
Then why are you pulling reads out of your ass? :grin:
I strictly commented on what I found to be AI / whatever popped at me while doing catchups.

I can't actually tell if this is also snark.
by tedxtr
Wed Apr 01, 2020 4:03 pm
Forum: Previous Sit Downs
Topic: Assassin's Creed Mafia (OVER!)
Replies: 3856
Views: 95488

Re: Assassin's Creed Mafia (D1)

Well your way of enjoying the game is messing up my way of enjoying the game, but you're having that wall in 14 hours anyway, you win.
by tedxtr
Wed Apr 01, 2020 4:00 pm
Forum: Previous Sit Downs
Topic: Assassin's Creed Mafia (OVER!)
Replies: 3856
Views: 95488

Re: Assassin's Creed Mafia (D1)

Maybe you're not a wolf, but you're a wolf read to me.

^

linki : I don't know what that means.
by tedxtr
Wed Apr 01, 2020 3:59 pm
Forum: Previous Sit Downs
Topic: Assassin's Creed Mafia (OVER!)
Replies: 3856
Views: 95488

Re: Assassin's Creed Mafia (D1)

leetic wrote: Wed Apr 01, 2020 3:56 pm
tedxtr wrote: Wed Apr 01, 2020 2:21 pm Let me live to Day2, that’s when I shine, more towards late game. I’ll give a huge post with everyone listed. Ted talk thing.

I need the night for myself, I can’t both defend myself against cases and solve, you can’t possibly expect me to do that
Your defense has not been impressive thus far, seems like you are more pleading than trying to understand where your suspicion has been coming from.
The only accusation I got was from you and you're a wolf, of course I'm not going to argue against you.
by tedxtr
Wed Apr 01, 2020 3:58 pm
Forum: Previous Sit Downs
Topic: Assassin's Creed Mafia (OVER!)
Replies: 3856
Views: 95488

Re: Assassin's Creed Mafia (D1)

Have a proper debate like a real man, no need to make it personal by applying snark. You just lost any ounce of teamwork you had with me. I'm actually going to solve, but I am still frustrated.

Don't ever talk to me again this game. I don't want to work with you (that is, even if you're town).

All you need is a case, you don't need to put your balls on the table, it only makes you look like you don't actually believe in your case and feel the need to harass every post of mine and twist it in order to make your case better. You know that your reasoning isn't strong enough to force a wagon on me so you make petty comments like that.
by tedxtr
Wed Apr 01, 2020 3:51 pm
Forum: Previous Sit Downs
Topic: Assassin's Creed Mafia (OVER!)
Replies: 3856
Views: 95488

Re: Assassin's Creed Mafia (D1)

You know what, you're being a cock for no reason.

I don't care about this game anymore. Watch me not defend myself anymore and not solving either.

I've attempted to do both of those things for the sake of being town read. I wanted to change my meta. I have done catchups and given reads where I could.

I'm not going to play a game where my contribution isn't appreciated and undermined as a reason to push a confbiased bogus push.

I'm also not pulling reads out of my ass for the sake of doing it.
by tedxtr
Wed Apr 01, 2020 3:38 pm
Forum: Previous Sit Downs
Topic: Assassin's Creed Mafia (OVER!)
Replies: 3856
Views: 95488

Re: Assassin's Creed Mafia (D1)

ts account wrote: Wed Apr 01, 2020 3:35 pm Have you tried defending yourself by solving.
I have but I have to fight back points from page 2 apparently.
by tedxtr
Wed Apr 01, 2020 3:30 pm
Forum: Previous Sit Downs
Topic: Assassin's Creed Mafia (OVER!)
Replies: 3856
Views: 95488

Re: Assassin's Creed Mafia (D1)

Why are you voting Long Con instead of me or leetic??????
by tedxtr
Wed Apr 01, 2020 3:29 pm
Forum: Previous Sit Downs
Topic: Assassin's Creed Mafia (OVER!)
Replies: 3856
Views: 95488

Re: Assassin's Creed Mafia (D1)

Long Con wrote: Wed Apr 01, 2020 3:25 pm
tedxtr wrote: Wed Apr 01, 2020 3:24 pm Is EoD in 2 hours and 30 minutes?
No, it's tomorrow.
So like 26 hours and 30 minutes?
by tedxtr
Wed Apr 01, 2020 3:24 pm
Forum: Previous Sit Downs
Topic: Assassin's Creed Mafia (OVER!)
Replies: 3856
Views: 95488

Re: Assassin's Creed Mafia (D1)

Is EoD in 2 hours and 30 minutes?
by tedxtr
Wed Apr 01, 2020 3:22 pm
Forum: Previous Sit Downs
Topic: Assassin's Creed Mafia (OVER!)
Replies: 3856
Views: 95488

Re: Assassin's Creed Mafia (D1)

Dragomir can die, tomorrow though. I changed my read. I'll ISO him in-depth tonight, if I get to live.
by tedxtr
Wed Apr 01, 2020 3:21 pm
Forum: Previous Sit Downs
Topic: Assassin's Creed Mafia (OVER!)
Replies: 3856
Views: 95488

Re: Assassin's Creed Mafia (D1)

And you got that only from the votes???

Return to “Assassin's Creed Mafia (OVER!)”