nutella wrote: ↑Tue Feb 21, 2023 2:23 pm
Golden wrote: ↑Tue Feb 21, 2023 2:17 pm
nutella wrote: ↑Tue Feb 21, 2023 1:28 pm
oh also the mac/golden back and forth was an
interesting read, i still have paranoia of golden as well, and michelle highlighted the below rask quote which i think is worth noting
Michelle wrote: ↑Tue Feb 21, 2023 6:44 am
Le petit poussin wrote: ↑Sat Feb 18, 2023 7:28 pm
nutella wrote: ↑Sat Feb 18, 2023 7:27 pm
@Alison if cape v, shoot scotty, if cape w, shoot radish?
cape v shoot golden imo
Genuine question: assuming I know that quote is out there, and I’m wolf, what do you think my reaction is to a proposed rask kill in wolfchat?
this is never a worthwhile argument ime. there's too many variables
No, I think there's value in the thought exercise. Because the assumption, I think, is 'golden would have been against it, but he would have been outvoted'.
Let me tell you what my response would be, then, since you're not keen on the thought experience.
I'd be fine with it. Rask didn't look committed to the read on me at all, and the reality of my Cape read is that I was damned to some people thinking I was wolf no matter what Cape flipped. It was either 'w/w pairing' or 'TMI'. No one was willing to listen and just take it as what it was - 'the case on Cape is shit'. Rask is just one of many people who don't have any experience of me who find it suspicious that I'll defend someone in that way. So my thoughts on that kill, I'm pretty sure, would be 'yeah, fine, whatever'. LPP made zero impression on me as a player on that day one.
Genuinely, did not know that post existed until people brought it up on day two. I mean, yes if I was a wolf, my teammates would have known. I'm just not sure why anyone would equate it to being reasonable motive for the kill.
(I'll add to that, I think that 'who did the person who just died suspect' is inherently bunk analysis, especially on day one.)