Oriental Avenue - $3
Illinois Avenue - $3
Virginia Avenue - $3
North Carolina Avenue - $3
Pennsylvania Avenue - $3
Kentucky Avenue - $3
FINALLY got home after a long day. Don't tell me I missed this again.

Moderator: Community Team
D'oh.Long Con wrote:I hope I didn't get the end time wrong.
I truly don't know.MovingPictures07 wrote:So Vermont is killing? Who is most likely to be the killer?
I don't either... Bah. I was hoping at least one kill would go away, but I guess it still could have, right?Black Rock wrote:I truly don't know.MovingPictures07 wrote:So Vermont is killing? Who is most likely to be the killer?
I would think so. I'm afraid to test it until I have some idea where I'm going to vote though.Black Rock wrote:Our votes are still changeable right?
I feel more comfortable with WW gone, he already killed me once. I guess Mafia wouldn't be Mafia without a NK.MovingPictures07 wrote:I don't either... Bah. I was hoping at least one kill would go away, but I guess it still could have, right?Black Rock wrote:I truly don't know.MovingPictures07 wrote:So Vermont is killing? Who is most likely to be the killer?
Yeah, I guess.Black Rock wrote:I feel more comfortable with WW gone, he already killed me once. I guess Mafia wouldn't be Mafia without a NK.MovingPictures07 wrote:I don't either... Bah. I was hoping at least one kill would go away, but I guess it still could have, right?Black Rock wrote:I truly don't know.MovingPictures07 wrote:So Vermont is killing? Who is most likely to be the killer?
Do you think lynching MM was a mistake? Oh wait, that was directed towards my second sentence. I imagine you shouldn't feel bummed, you are in the best place right now aren't you? Vermont doesn't need you dead.MovingPictures07 wrote:Yeah, I guess.Black Rock wrote:I feel more comfortable with WW gone, he already killed me once. I guess Mafia wouldn't be Mafia without a NK.MovingPictures07 wrote:I don't either... Bah. I was hoping at least one kill would go away, but I guess it still could have, right?Black Rock wrote:I truly don't know.MovingPictures07 wrote:So Vermont is killing? Who is most likely to be the killer?
No, lynching MM was definitely not a mistake.Black Rock wrote:Do you think lynching MM was a mistake? Oh wait, that was directed towards my second sentence. I imagine you shouldn't feel bummed, you are in the best place right now aren't you? Vermont doesn't need you dead.MovingPictures07 wrote:Yeah, I guess.Black Rock wrote:I feel more comfortable with WW gone, he already killed me once. I guess Mafia wouldn't be Mafia without a NK.MovingPictures07 wrote:I don't either... Bah. I was hoping at least one kill would go away, but I guess it still could have, right?Black Rock wrote:I truly don't know.MovingPictures07 wrote:So Vermont is killing? Who is most likely to be the killer?
I was just reviewing day 3, because I couldn't remember why we were so lucky with our lynches this game. I have to tip my hat to LC, he called MM way back then.
Long Con wrote:Indeed, I called him out from Day 1.. maybe Day 0.
Let this be another example for the ages of how a baddie expressed trust in a Civvie in order to gain trust back.
I think Vermont is hiding in a quieter player.MovingPictures07 wrote:No, lynching MM was definitely not a mistake.Black Rock wrote:Do you think lynching MM was a mistake? Oh wait, that was directed towards my second sentence. I imagine you shouldn't feel bummed, you are in the best place right now aren't you? Vermont doesn't need you dead.MovingPictures07 wrote:Yeah, I guess.Black Rock wrote:I feel more comfortable with WW gone, he already killed me once. I guess Mafia wouldn't be Mafia without a NK.MovingPictures07 wrote:I don't either... Bah. I was hoping at least one kill would go away, but I guess it still could have, right?Black Rock wrote:I truly don't know.MovingPictures07 wrote:So Vermont is killing? Who is most likely to be the killer?
I was just reviewing day 3, because I couldn't remember why we were so lucky with our lynches this game. I have to tip my hat to LC, he called MM way back then.
Well, what do you think? If we can't nail down Vermont, how do we decide who to lynch?
I know, right?Black Rock wrote:I feel like I have been talking to you all night in this game and Cars.
Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Wed Dec 16, 2020 7:33 pm Just how many days of "let's yeet them tomorrow" can a mafioso survive?
The answer: all of them, if you are a marmot.
Black Rock wrote:No.Metalmarsh89 wrote:Rezzie rezzie rezz please.
Why do you say that?HannaK wrote:RIP TH
Is there any evidence/reason why Vermont cant be LC, because that seems like the obvious Vermont candidate to me
Because TH was making a case against LC and how powerful he is (and thus we should lynch him) for days?MovingPictures07 wrote:Why do you say that?HannaK wrote:RIP TH
Is there any evidence/reason why Vermont cant be LC, because that seems like the obvious Vermont candidate to me
If you think TH was the most powerful (though I would argue that you are clearly wrong as he does not have the kill) who do you think is the most powerful now?Long Con wrote:I'm not Vermont. I would say Vermont killed TH because he was the most powerful with his hotels. Possibly a frame-up job, which makes me eye HannaK for bringing it up like this.
What makes you say that he was powerful? To my knowledge he was a pinkie and had only one hotel (if his claims about not having other teammates was true) and was the first player to almost go bankrupt in the game?Long Con wrote:I'm not Vermont. I would say Vermont killed TH because he was the most powerful with his hotels. Possibly a frame-up job, which makes me eye HannaK for bringing it up like this.
He also had Indiana Ave with a hotel.HannaK wrote:What makes you say that he was powerful? To my knowledge he was a pinkie and had only one hotel (if his claims about not having other teammates was true) and was the first player to almost go bankrupt in the game?Long Con wrote:I'm not Vermont. I would say Vermont killed TH because he was the most powerful with his hotels. Possibly a frame-up job, which makes me eye HannaK for bringing it up like this.
I will try to look back, but I am not sure I am willing to trust MM's assessment since he was a baddie and said other false things.Long Con wrote:He also had Indiana Ave with a hotel.HannaK wrote:What makes you say that he was powerful? To my knowledge he was a pinkie and had only one hotel (if his claims about not having other teammates was true) and was the first player to almost go bankrupt in the game?Long Con wrote:I'm not Vermont. I would say Vermont killed TH because he was the most powerful with his hotels. Possibly a frame-up job, which makes me eye HannaK for bringing it up like this.
And, fingersplints, Metalmarsh made it clear that Turnip Head had a teammate, surely something drawn from his knowledge as a Utility. We should look back and see who among the living had landed on a Utility, Turnip Head's teammate is among those people. I'm sure that TH would have traded all his properties and prizes to his teammate since he was so much in the spotlight, and had publicly bought a red hotel.
That's the person we need to lynch today.
with so few people left and the fact that TH who has repeatedly warned us about LC becoming too powerful is now dead i dunno, guess it makes sense to express a strong opinion for once.MovingPictures07 wrote:This smells fishy to me.
I think it's much more likely LC was aligned with Llama, making him a Green.
It's odd that Hanna, who has voiced little for most of the game beyond just going with the flow, would propose such a line of thinking.
^Also this makes me think there is a real possibility LC is blue and that his team is in the possession of the beatdown powerTurnip Head wrote: I guess we'll see if anyone inherits the kill. I don't know if I believe LC when he says he didn't bid on Beatdown. The reds spent a lot of money on houses, hotels, and Epi's Chance card, while the baby blues were frugal with their house purchases. These were the two established teams when Beatdown was put up for auction. Smart money says the blues at least tried to get the power.
But wait a minute.HannaK wrote:with so few people left and the fact that TH who has repeatedly warned us about LC becoming too powerful is now dead i dunno, guess it makes sense to express a strong opinion for once.MovingPictures07 wrote:This smells fishy to me.
I think it's much more likely LC was aligned with Llama, making him a Green.
It's odd that Hanna, who has voiced little for most of the game beyond just going with the flow, would propose such a line of thinking.
I wasn't sure back then about the whole llama / LC thing and I am not now so I would not say he's likely to be part of the greens
HannaK wrote:Okay I've been trying to wait around for BWT to come around and answer to the case that's been made but I gotta leave now and so far that case looks the most convincing to me, especially because if (and that already is an if) Long Con is in a set with Llama and another person, they dont have to be a mafia team and especially considering how strong the baddies are right now in terms of money and knowledge, I think lynching (potential) baddies is a priority to lynching potential indysets so I am gonna go ahead and vote for BWT.
HannaK wrote:As I see no point in randomly picking a low poster, I am gonna vote for llama who's evidence for suspicions I do not find convincing and I feel llama might be bad or at the very least potentially part of a LMS group (and considering there are so few baddies left the chances of lynching someone of a LMS group look much better imo)
I thought you were one of my main supporters of the LC/Llama connection.HannaK wrote:The only solid reasoning I have right now is that I find the case against LC convincing that he is very likely to be part of a LMS group and as a sole civvie, this is worrying me the most right now, but hey if someone has a really solid case against a player being mafia I am all earsMovingPictures07 wrote: LC and Llama's actions time and time again convince me that they're not acting in the civvies' best interests. They NO U me, Llama is willing to lynch just about anyone that isn't him or LC, and their posts have been full of behavior that fails to satisfy me as genuine.
You're still on about that thenMovingPictures07 wrote:This smells fishy to me.
I think it's much more likely LC was aligned with Llama, making him a Green.
It's odd that Hanna, who has voiced little for most of the game beyond just going with the flow, would propose such a line of thinking.
She has been fairly inactive, yet survived landing on the hotel.MovingPictures07 wrote:Why bea, splints?
I agree obviously that the Blues got the beatdown.HannaK wrote:^Also this makes me think there is a real possibility LC is blue and that his team is in the possession of the beatdown powerTurnip Head wrote: I guess we'll see if anyone inherits the kill. I don't know if I believe LC when he says he didn't bid on Beatdown. The reds spent a lot of money on houses, hotels, and Epi's Chance card, while the baby blues were frugal with their house purchases. These were the two established teams when Beatdown was put up for auction. Smart money says the blues at least tried to get the power.
Well, I thought maybe I was wrong about it, but upon reflection it really seems to make sense.fingersplints wrote:You're still on about that thenMovingPictures07 wrote:This smells fishy to me.
I think it's much more likely LC was aligned with Llama, making him a Green.
It's odd that Hanna, who has voiced little for most of the game beyond just going with the flow, would propose such a line of thinking.I do not think LC is a green, since I still disagree that he obviously had btsc with llama. I agree with Hanna that he is more likely on the team with the kill.
She has been fairly inactive, yet survived landing on the hotel.MovingPictures07 wrote:Why bea, splints?
I need to go back over her to see if I see a possible TH connection there. Him having traded off a bunch of stuff is making sense to me. Although, could he have traded off properties as well?
In the first post I say that they could be together but not necessarily soMovingPictures07 wrote:HannaK wrote:Okay I've been trying to wait around for BWT to come around and answer to the case that's been made but I gotta leave now and so far that case looks the most convincing to me, especially because if (and that already is an if) Long Con is in a set with Llama and another person, they dont have to be a mafia team and especially considering how strong the baddies are right now in terms of money and knowledge, I think lynching (potential) baddies is a priority to lynching potential indysets so I am gonna go ahead and vote for BWT.HannaK wrote:As I see no point in randomly picking a low poster, I am gonna vote for llama who's evidence for suspicions I do not find convincing and I feel llama might be bad or at the very least potentially part of a LMS group (and considering there are so few baddies left the chances of lynching someone of a LMS group look much better imo)I thought you were one of my main supporters of the LC/Llama connection.HannaK wrote:The only solid reasoning I have right now is that I find the case against LC convincing that he is very likely to be part of a LMS group and as a sole civvie, this is worrying me the most right now, but hey if someone has a really solid case against a player being mafia I am all earsMovingPictures07 wrote: LC and Llama's actions time and time again convince me that they're not acting in the civvies' best interests. They NO U me, Llama is willing to lynch just about anyone that isn't him or LC, and their posts have been full of behavior that fails to satisfy me as genuine.
"so much?" I agree with Hanna in regards to one thing. That LC isn't a green and is more likely in the group that has the kill. I will consider what you are saying that maybe it is her group with it. TH did go on for days about LC being the most powerful and then is killed. I do not have bts with Hanna.MovingPictures07 wrote:Well, I thought maybe I was wrong about it, but upon reflection it really seems to make sense.fingersplints wrote:You're still on about that thenMovingPictures07 wrote:This smells fishy to me.
I think it's much more likely LC was aligned with Llama, making him a Green.
It's odd that Hanna, who has voiced little for most of the game beyond just going with the flow, would propose such a line of thinking.I do not think LC is a green, since I still disagree that he obviously had btsc with llama. I agree with Hanna that he is more likely on the team with the kill.
She has been fairly inactive, yet survived landing on the hotel.MovingPictures07 wrote:Why bea, splints?
I need to go back over her to see if I see a possible TH connection there. Him having traded off a bunch of stuff is making sense to me. Although, could he have traded off properties as well?
Why do you agree with Hanna so much?
You both appear to be making some kind of power play.
Regarding bea, that's a good point. But didn't she say she won the $50 for every player power earlier?