moving into a review on how players have attempted to interact with me to further foundations on this game.
Roxy wrote: ↑Tue Mar 07, 2023 11:53 am
Wilgy - hi. Yep you will always be hard for me to read but I feel pretty good about you so far. Your thoughts about Scrappy seem to be thought out but you do seem to be "sheeping" a bit more than normal this game. I also do not like the fact that you openly admit to not actually reading the full game. I am disappoint.
This is a good look for Rondo I think. Roxy was able to 1. Deduce that I had actually been critically thinking when it came to a stance on scrappy and 2. Provided in what little I gave to the thread an observation with reason thus not suggesting TMI being the reason for no.1.
Dennis wrote: ↑Tue Mar 07, 2023 12:09 pm
Wilgy was talking about " not feeling it" on N0, which I get but then he voted pretty quickly which felt pretty off
This one is interesting as Dennis doesn't feel to be critically thinking about my slot. It feels more so a shade with a made up reason.
Creature wrote: ↑Tue Mar 07, 2023 12:28 pm
DrWilgy wrote: ↑Tue Mar 07, 2023 12:22 pm
Creature wrote: ↑Tue Mar 07, 2023 12:16 pm
DrWilgy wrote: ↑Tue Mar 07, 2023 12:11 pm
I just want to take a moment to define how much of a pleasure it is to play Mafia with all of you.
Y'all the rest GOATS.
I would have more pleasure if y'all didn't make this game hard by not playing.
Oh, I'm definitely playing. Just trying something new.
A modified version of Wilgy I'd call this.
Critical Slank Wilgy 12%.
I've tried Ultra Flow Wilgy v.2.31 afew times now and I've not noticed positive results.
This may be more akin to GoC Wilgy if not the Wilgy you see who subs into games.
If you're NANOOK and you can push good reads, then that's alright. The issue is that slanking is a pretty easy thing for wolves to do and if everybody did the same then the game would be extremely difficult to play.
Encourages what is beleived to be town behavior without shading. What makes me think this is a good look for Creature is that they went out of their way to reference Nook. This at least shows effort in them trying to rationalize and compare my behavior with that of other examples.
falcon45ca wrote: ↑Tue Mar 07, 2023 2:02 pm
DrWilgy wrote: ↑Tue Mar 07, 2023 1:58 pm
falcon45ca wrote: ↑Tue Mar 07, 2023 1:47 pm
Kate wrote: ↑Tue Mar 07, 2023 1:35 pm
falcon45ca wrote: ↑Tue Mar 07, 2023 1:25 pm
Kate wrote: ↑Tue Mar 07, 2023 12:58 pm
DrWilgy wrote: ↑Tue Mar 07, 2023 12:48 pm
I've liked everything I've seen out of you this game. Can I sheep you as well?
Me? Or rox? If it's me, sure you do you doc.
Hmmmm...rather quick to accept a Wilgy pocket I see. Does this mean you're TR his slot?
No, just that he can do what he wants and I'm not gonna tell him what to do or not do. I have no read on wilgy currently.
You don't find it odd he's sheeping you...and while he says he likes everything you've posted, it's not like he's pointing out specific thoughts of yours he vibes with...and he's certainly capable of forming his own takes.
Why aren't you sus of how he's framing his sheep on your reads?
This is interesting. Are you finding my behavior or Kate's response to my behavior more
interesting?
Interesting is the wrong word, scummy is the one you're looking for.
TBD
falcon45ca wrote: ↑Tue Mar 07, 2023 1:48 pm
Def feels like a difference check between Wilgy & Kate
This interaction between Kate/Falcon and I seems genuine from Falcon and I'd basically call him locktown for this. Being able to analyze 1. Wilgy sheeping Kate implies potential TMI 2. Kate accepting the sheep implies potential TMI and 3. Realizing that we wouldn't behave this way on the same team is a VERY good look.
Neon wrote: ↑Wed Mar 08, 2023 4:17 am
sig wrote: ↑Wed Mar 08, 2023 1:35 am
I know Wilgy says he’s slanking and he has a history of being misvoted, but the longer he leaves his vote on me without any reasoning the more I want to vote him back.
That might be a OMGUS move though.
There are many good reasons to vote Wilgy... this is definitely not one of them
This is a rough one for Neon. (I wouldn't vote there this cycle because they are capped already, I feel that at least 1 cycle of actual interaction would be needed for me to justify.) This post shades and doesn't provide information on the shade. Not even a reference to another's observations upon me. IT at the same time defends me from Sig's specific observation which could be interpreted as wolf posturing.
And that's two pages of posts ctrl f Wilgy. Pages 3 and 4 after this commercial break.