OK, well. Timmer, I don't think you are necessarily bad, I just trust LT more than I trust you. Not to mention, there are two people who are cursed who already voted for MP and I think that is not a good thing. Again, I don't mean to imply you are bad, just that I have a feeling that those votes aren't doing what we want them to do...
Linki. OK, now I'm completely lost.
Andrew wrote: ↑Wed May 29, 2013 6:47 pm
I'm voting llama again because I think I heard him say something that looks like proof.
I think Timmer is saying that he is a fan of Adam Rosales on the Oakland A's. He always wears high socks, and he runs so fast (even when he hits a homerun) that the ump will always call him safe.
That makes me happy as the A's are a much better team to be a fan of than the Dodgers.
Epignosis wrote: ↑Fri Mar 08, 2019 3:10 pm
Really, this is all just a glamorous game- nothing more.
You know, tbh, if Spaghetti is Snake Mountain, that would be a better lynch anyway - because doesn't Snake Mountain kill tonight? And if he's teamies with Dom, and Dom is absent, we'd likely be safe from a NK tonight?
Is this making sense?
Epignosis wrote: ↑Fri Mar 08, 2019 3:10 pm
Really, this is all just a glamorous game- nothing more.
indiglo wrote:You know, tbh, if Spaghetti is Snake Mountain, that would be a better lynch anyway - because doesn't Snake Mountain kill tonight? And if he's teamies with Dom, and Dom is absent, we'd likely be safe from a NK tonight?
indiglo wrote:You know, tbh, if Spaghetti is Snake Mountain, that would be a better lynch anyway - because doesn't Snake Mountain kill tonight? And if he's teamies with Dom, and Dom is absent, we'd likely be safe from a NK tonight?
Is this making sense?
Yes, however it seems now that LT is a lot less sure of SE than she seemed before and Timmer seems a lot more sure. Which one do you think is right? Or maybe both are right and we should just go for the Snake Mountain baddie?
Andrew wrote: ↑Wed May 29, 2013 6:47 pm
I'm voting llama again because I think I heard him say something that looks like proof.
Kate wrote:
Maybe it is, however that is a game mechanic. The players who were assigned those roles can't be blamed for such. You cannot say the same for players who do not show up.
If someone doesn't show up (without a damn good reason), someone else should not be able to *for days ON END* send in that player(s) PMs. You know as well as I do, that causes people to look at the players who are actually playing and it makes it that much harder to find baddies.
You very well know it's not my decision to modkill or replace inactive players; I am not the host this game.
As a host, I understand that there are unfortunately sometimes times where modkills are necessary, but I respect Robert's feelings otherwise.
Ok, thanks everyone for working and trying so hard - especially you stinky people and those of you who have gone out on a limb here.
Here's what I'm thinking... I'm leaning for voting MoPi in this moment. We know there is lynch manipulation going on, and we don't all always know who is manipulating what - and so that likely influences how we vote. I think in this case, some of us may know more about what trickstery lynch manipulations will be going on this lynch than others of us. Hencewhy I'm leaning for voting MoPi and trusting Timmer.
Epignosis wrote: ↑Fri Mar 08, 2019 3:10 pm
Really, this is all just a glamorous game- nothing more.
Kate wrote:
Maybe it is, however that is a game mechanic. The players who were assigned those roles can't be blamed for such. You cannot say the same for players who do not show up.
If someone doesn't show up (without a damn good reason), someone else should not be able to *for days ON END* send in that player(s) PMs. You know as well as I do, that causes people to look at the players who are actually playing and it makes it that much harder to find baddies.
You very well know it's not my decision to modkill or replace inactive players; I am not the host this game.
As a host, I understand that there are unfortunately sometimes times where modkills are necessary, but I respect Robert's feelings otherwise.
I didn't suggest it was your decision.
And if Epi makes a decision, I respect it, I may disagree with it, but I will of course respect it.
Andrew wrote: ↑Wed May 29, 2013 6:47 pm
I'm voting llama again because I think I heard him say something that looks like proof.