Your last sentence is probably more accurate than i'd like to admit. The first two are not true.
It's up to others to decide if I'm trying to find an angle or actually giving good points about you.
Moderator: Community Team
Your last sentence is probably more accurate than i'd like to admit. The first two are not true.
I'm not sold. I've been shit myself because of work.
If we screw up once more, we're done.Epignosis wrote: ↑Mon Dec 18, 2023 12:28 amI'm not sold. I've been shit myself because of work.
I more interested in your relationship with DM here. That's the person I think that needs to be..."downsized" this round for anyone to have a fighting chance.
But I've been the person voting out two civilians my damn self. I'm merely trusting the Prime (track or not) and going from there. I have no positive reason to deviate from that at this stage.
But that's such an easy argument for a Wolf to make.
Isn't that true for any lynch? I don't see how that has anything to do with DarlingMonroe. Lynch any civilian, and civilians lose.Long Con wrote: ↑Mon Dec 18, 2023 12:30 amIf we screw up once more, we're done.Epignosis wrote: ↑Mon Dec 18, 2023 12:28 amI'm not sold. I've been shit myself because of work.
I more interested in your relationship with DM here. That's the person I think that needs to be..."downsized" this round for anyone to have a fighting chance.
I guess I was just vocalizing my turmoil.Epignosis wrote: ↑Mon Dec 18, 2023 12:33 amIsn't that true for any lynch? I don't see how that has anything to do with DarlingMonroe. Lynch any civilian, and civilians lose.Long Con wrote: ↑Mon Dec 18, 2023 12:30 amIf we screw up once more, we're done.Epignosis wrote: ↑Mon Dec 18, 2023 12:28 amI'm not sold. I've been shit myself because of work.
I more interested in your relationship with DM here. That's the person I think that needs to be..."downsized" this round for anyone to have a fighting chance.
Yeah, it's been done here from hosts from other places.
That's not even an argument. That's a fact, followed by what I'm doing, followed by why I'm doing it.Long Con wrote: ↑Mon Dec 18, 2023 12:33 amBut that's such an easy argument for a Wolf to make.
Semantics. You know what I mean, going with a posthumously proven Civ's opinion us very level 1 and above reproach.Epignosis wrote: ↑Mon Dec 18, 2023 12:35 amThat's not even an argument. That's a fact, followed by what I'm doing, followed by why I'm doing it.Long Con wrote: ↑Mon Dec 18, 2023 12:33 amBut that's such an easy argument for a Wolf to make.
I am aware of the vote count.
If I were bad, I'd post ten times and then shut the fuck up.
I don't know.
Been a long weekend.
Yes sir!
I mean, you are kinda starting to win me over as town LC. Because you're exactly right. It's two wolves of Epi/Robyn/Dr. WLong Con wrote: ↑Mon Dec 18, 2023 12:49 am Now that Epignosis is gone and will not respond. I will continue this line of thinking I was going on.
Maybe that 3 way tie is very revealing. I kind of hate this now, because it's looking like I'm trying to avoid the DM Lynch. Bear with me though, it's not like that.
Is it reasonable to think that a Wolf in a 3 way tie would just break the tie because the risk is not worth it?
But maybe DM wasn't online at the time. I haven't looked. I'm out in my workshop on my phone. So I'm not doing a bunch of tabs and ISO extra stuff.
They would just break the tie themselves.DarlingMonroe wrote: ↑Mon Dec 18, 2023 3:16 amwouldn't have my partner in that case alert me to break the tie?
Wasn't supposed to be dismissive, apologies.