Nah
That's assuming that post of Wilgy was a real case, which is not.
He posted the first reads of the game. Why would a wolf do that?
Moderator: Community Team
Nah
I did, I played the first version, then I played Sims 2 up to the Pets expansion pack. I stopped played as I found it kinda slow, I guess. I was definitely in the SimCity 'build it up as big and fast as possible just to destroy it' school, and I used to kill my Sims, too, lol. But i didn't want to kill the pets, so i had to keep everyone alive, which got kinda boring tbh.
I tend to dislike truisms like this since invariably someone uses it to build an entire game strategy and we're still yeeting people on day three based on the first obvs jokey day one wagon, rather than based on peoples posts and in game behavior.
Agree with the Michelle analysis I think her trying to get the game going was a good sign.S~V~S wrote: ↑Tue Feb 27, 2024 6:29 am So far it's mainly an NAI thread, I only get a clear feel from a few people.
In GOC, Brad was bad and Brad made no off the cuff reads, he never really discussed other players at all, he only reacted rather than putting his own thoughts out. Not seeing that here.
I've played with and against bad Michelle, and this Michelle seems more town Michelle. I don't know that she would risk making a provacative vote like that, even if it wasn't 100% serious, if she were bad.
Syn is out there throwing reads in a thread mostly OTing and joking around.
Linki @Brad, I tend to take Michelle at face value, so you could be right. I think she was just trying to start discussion. When i came in here I was like *groan* at over a page overnight, but 90% of it was fluff.
how does one commit a fallacy without making an argument?Syn wrote: ↑Tue Feb 27, 2024 1:18 amstatistics fallacy, this is a wolfDrWilgy wrote: ↑Tue Feb 27, 2024 12:30 amAbi is always due for a wolfin' but in terms of recency, Abi was just wolf.Long Con wrote: ↑Mon Feb 26, 2024 11:28 pmSounds like a plan. Abby is due for a wolfin', you think?
Has he posted? One could say that laying low on Day 1 conveys ill intent. Did Abigail show more ill intent by posting at all?
☆Princess Abigail☆ wrote: ↑Tue Feb 27, 2024 2:57 amNom nom nom feed me morefalcon45ca wrote: ↑Mon Feb 26, 2024 11:24 pm [VOTE: neon] aubergine
Someone tag Abi, and tell her she's been voted. Doesn't work on mobile for me
I didn't think Abbi was taking it very seriously at all. She... she ate their votes! And asked for more!!S~V~S wrote: ↑Tue Feb 27, 2024 6:17 amI tend to dislike truisms like this since invariably someone uses it to build an entire game strategy and we're still yeeting people on day three based on the first obvs jokey day one wagon, rather than based on peoples posts and in game behavior.
With only 12 players odds are OK that one of any random group of 4 is bad. Out of this group, meh. Town Wilgy could start a vote for silly reasons to gauge the reaction as town. Your vote seems specifically to start srs discussion, and I could see Falcon making a jokey vote as either alignment, so it's nai for him imo.
The only thing about it that catches me is Abbis reaction, and that Abbi isn't here right now (like literally right now, 5 AM eastern) taking this maybe a bit too seriously. But this is mostly reading into it on my part, so eh.
this is funny - fyi @everyoneEpignosis wrote: ↑Mon Feb 26, 2024 11:36 pmSul sul!Long Con wrote: ↑Mon Feb 26, 2024 11:27 pmDon't the vote tags tag people? Maybe I just dreamed that.falcon45ca wrote: ↑Mon Feb 26, 2024 11:24 pm [VOTE: neon] aubergine
Someone tag Abi, and tell her she's been voted. Doesn't work on mobile for me
@☆Princess Abigail☆
I had a dream about you last night.
Spoiler: show
What is bradna?
hahaha, the way you went about this really results in minimal data for you and I, but I'm curious as to what the others think.
I'm not sure I've seen W Michelle ever be this encouraging of progressing us through rvs, but someone else may have more experience with this than I.Lime Coke wrote: ↑Tue Feb 27, 2024 7:31 amAgree with the Michelle analysis I think her trying to get the game going was a good sign.S~V~S wrote: ↑Tue Feb 27, 2024 6:29 am So far it's mainly an NAI thread, I only get a clear feel from a few people.
In GOC, Brad was bad and Brad made no off the cuff reads, he never really discussed other players at all, he only reacted rather than putting his own thoughts out. Not seeing that here.
I've played with and against bad Michelle, and this Michelle seems more town Michelle. I don't know that she would risk making a provacative vote like that, even if it wasn't 100% serious, if she were bad.
Syn is out there throwing reads in a thread mostly OTing and joking around.
Linki @Brad, I tend to take Michelle at face value, so you could be right. I think she was just trying to start discussion. When i came in here I was like *groan* at over a page overnight, but 90% of it was fluff.
I'll tell by like the 2nd half of Day 1 or Day 2 if I could lock that read in.
But yeah immediate read says town.
Considering Michelle would fall within the 3 voters, and posted the argument, and presented the argument, do we not have opinions on Michelle?Roxy wrote: ↑Tue Feb 27, 2024 10:39 am Ok caught up---
Not interested in beating on and on about 3 voters and the voted - yah idc
I hunt by what is posted, how it is posted and presented.
I also dislike the use of: It's been awhile since they have been mafia--- if it is your strategy then ok but tbh it has never worked for me.
I will be looking at those that run with these ideals.
We have until tomorrow so I will post more when everyone has checked in -
Lime Coke, but then we have 2 LCs and that's more confusing sometimes by mistake.
Sure she seems so sweet and her avatar is precious but game wise I have diddly bc it is d 1. I appreciate her trying to stir convo but isn't that what we all are trying to do? That does not make her more or less towny as a baddie or town could be capable of stirring convo on D 1.DrWilgy wrote: ↑Tue Feb 27, 2024 10:43 amConsidering Michelle would fall within the 3 voters, and posted the argument, and presented the argument, do we not have opinions on Michelle?Roxy wrote: ↑Tue Feb 27, 2024 10:39 am Ok caught up---
Not interested in beating on and on about 3 voters and the voted - yah idc
I hunt by what is posted, how it is posted and presented.
I also dislike the use of: It's been awhile since they have been mafia--- if it is your strategy then ok but tbh it has never worked for me.
I will be looking at those that run with these ideals.
We have until tomorrow so I will post more when everyone has checked in -
I often find that pushing the game out of d1 nonsense into actual read territory to be generally pro town rather than wolf in nature.Roxy wrote: ↑Tue Feb 27, 2024 11:06 amSure she seems so sweet and her avatar is precious but game wise I have diddly bc it is d 1. I appreciate her trying to stir convo but isn't that what we all are trying to do? That does not make her more or less towny as a baddie or town could be capable of stirring convo on D 1.DrWilgy wrote: ↑Tue Feb 27, 2024 10:43 amConsidering Michelle would fall within the 3 voters, and posted the argument, and presented the argument, do we not have opinions on Michelle?Roxy wrote: ↑Tue Feb 27, 2024 10:39 am Ok caught up---
Not interested in beating on and on about 3 voters and the voted - yah idc
I hunt by what is posted, how it is posted and presented.
I also dislike the use of: It's been awhile since they have been mafia--- if it is your strategy then ok but tbh it has never worked for me.
I will be looking at those that run with these ideals.
We have until tomorrow so I will post more when everyone has checked in -
I am just not with a vote....
I’m usually the same, but as someone else said, then 2 LCs. I thought no I tried calling him Lime one game, but everyone else was calling him Brad from a past life
I know, it’s kinda why I was making the over analyze remark about my opinion.Long Con wrote: ↑Tue Feb 27, 2024 10:27 amI didn't think Abbi was taking it very seriously at all. She... she ate their votes! And asked for more!!S~V~S wrote: ↑Tue Feb 27, 2024 6:17 amI tend to dislike truisms like this since invariably someone uses it to build an entire game strategy and we're still yeeting people on day three based on the first obvs jokey day one wagon, rather than based on peoples posts and in game behavior.
With only 12 players odds are OK that one of any random group of 4 is bad. Out of this group, meh. Town Wilgy could start a vote for silly reasons to gauge the reaction as town. Your vote seems specifically to start srs discussion, and I could see Falcon making a jokey vote as either alignment, so it's nai for him imo.
The only thing about it that catches me is Abbis reaction, and that Abbi isn't here right now (like literally right now, 5 AM eastern) taking this maybe a bit too seriously. But this is mostly reading into it on my part, so eh.
It will eventually sink in (brad= Limey) it just hasn't yet
I concurMichelle wrote: ↑Tue Feb 27, 2024 11:11 am I love this game
I could catch up so fast ^^
Sig and Abi are very different players. Abi is usually a compulsive poster, both can have low activity from irl stuff and that's ok.
But Abi didn't have a real reaction at the votes on her. Eating them is not something to get more than
1. A careless attitude
2. Faking a careless attitude.
Of course, the wagon is more a meme now, since everyone knows it's not something happening by default.
I do appreciate the answers.
The thread feels towny, as it should, because town has 10 players.
to me I did expect something @☆Princess Abigail☆ but it was the lack of meme's I found eyebrow arch worthy.S~V~S wrote: ↑Tue Feb 27, 2024 11:28 amI know, it’s kinda why I was making the over analyze remark about my opinion.Long Con wrote: ↑Tue Feb 27, 2024 10:27 amI didn't think Abbi was taking it very seriously at all. She... she ate their votes! And asked for more!!S~V~S wrote: ↑Tue Feb 27, 2024 6:17 amI tend to dislike truisms like this since invariably someone uses it to build an entire game strategy and we're still yeeting people on day three based on the first obvs jokey day one wagon, rather than based on peoples posts and in game behavior.
With only 12 players odds are OK that one of any random group of 4 is bad. Out of this group, meh. Town Wilgy could start a vote for silly reasons to gauge the reaction as town. Your vote seems specifically to start srs discussion, and I could see Falcon making a jokey vote as either alignment, so it's nai for him imo.
The only thing about it that catches me is Abbis reaction, and that Abbi isn't here right now (like literally right now, 5 AM eastern) taking this maybe a bit too seriously. But this is mostly reading into it on my part, so eh.
I saw she had 3 votes and I was like woo hoo can’t wait to see what she had to say about THAT. But she shrugged it off. So I’m not sure what to think of that.
Maybe nothing.
I think more importantly is Roxy opening with questioning simlish that they didn't understand. There was a push to obtain data that would've been otherwise missing or could've been falsely assumed.
"Everyone has said why" what?Roxy wrote: ↑Tue Feb 27, 2024 11:35 amto me I did expect something @☆Princess Abigail☆ but it was the lack of meme's I found eyebrow arch worthy.S~V~S wrote: ↑Tue Feb 27, 2024 11:28 amI know, it’s kinda why I was making the over analyze remark about my opinion.Long Con wrote: ↑Tue Feb 27, 2024 10:27 amI didn't think Abbi was taking it very seriously at all. She... she ate their votes! And asked for more!!S~V~S wrote: ↑Tue Feb 27, 2024 6:17 amI tend to dislike truisms like this since invariably someone uses it to build an entire game strategy and we're still yeeting people on day three based on the first obvs jokey day one wagon, rather than based on peoples posts and in game behavior.
With only 12 players odds are OK that one of any random group of 4 is bad. Out of this group, meh. Town Wilgy could start a vote for silly reasons to gauge the reaction as town. Your vote seems specifically to start srs discussion, and I could see Falcon making a jokey vote as either alignment, so it's nai for him imo.
The only thing about it that catches me is Abbis reaction, and that Abbi isn't here right now (like literally right now, 5 AM eastern) taking this maybe a bit too seriously. But this is mostly reading into it on my part, so eh.
I saw she had 3 votes and I was like woo hoo can’t wait to see what she had to say about THAT. But she shrugged it off. So I’m not sure what to think of that.
Maybe nothing.
But it is early and now that everyone has said why perhaps they will change how they are approaching this game and I am unsure if that is better or worse for the town.