The Avengers [Day 5]

[Simon]

What's everyone's opinions on yeeting a no-show for Day 1?

If we choose to play by that, then your options (so far anyway) would be motobot, Abigail Sophia, dunia, and lorab. Let me know if I am missing someone.

Also, I keep finding a lot of "intuition" and "gambler's fallacy". This tells me that some people are struggling to find anything useful to say. But then again, this is still just the beginning of the game, and I'm sure it can be hard to go off of something when there isn't much to go off to begin with.

But personally, intuition and gambler's fallacy are not something I usually go off of, especially at the start of something like this.

[Lime Coke]

@Lime Coke what's your take?

The only person I'm considering a no show is Dunya but I never want to yeet her when she hasn't had a chance to play the game.

[Long Con]

What's everyone's opinions on yeeting a no-show for Day 1?

If we choose to play by that, then your options (so far anyway) would be motobot, Abigail Sophia, dunia, and lorab. Let me know if I am missing someone.

Also, I keep finding a lot of "intuition" and "gambler's fallacy". This tells me that some people are struggling to find anything useful to say. But then again, this is still just the beginning of the game, and I'm sure it can be hard to go off of something when there isn't much to go off to begin with.

But personally, intuition and gambler's fallacy are not something I usually go off of, especially at the start of something like this.

Are they better or worse than nothing?

[Syn]

What do you mean by new Michelle? @Syn

PTSD flashbacks of Sims Mafia

[Syn]

But personally, intuition and gambler's fallacy are not something I usually go off of, especially at the start of something like this.

What else would you go off of on D1?

[Simon]

What's everyone's opinions on yeeting a no-show for Day 1?

If we choose to play by that, then your options (so far anyway) would be motobot, Abigail Sophia, dunia, and lorab. Let me know if I am missing someone.

Also, I keep finding a lot of "intuition" and "gambler's fallacy". This tells me that some people are struggling to find anything useful to say. But then again, this is still just the beginning of the game, and I'm sure it can be hard to go off of something when there isn't much to go off to begin with.

But personally, intuition and gambler's fallacy are not something I usually go off of, especially at the start of something like this.

Are they better or worse than nothing?

If it were me, then I would probably wait until the day 1 voting ends, then questions would be asked. I'm just not the person who would want to state the obvious, let alone joke around. I'm usually more serious than that.

[falcon45ca]

What's everyone's opinions on yeeting a no-show for Day 1?

If we choose to play by that, then your options (so far anyway) would be motobot, Abigail Sophia, dunia, and lorab. Let me know if I am missing someone.

Also, I keep finding a lot of "intuition" and "gambler's fallacy". This tells me that some people are struggling to find anything useful to say. But then again, this is still just the beginning of the game, and I'm sure it can be hard to go off of something when there isn't much to go off to begin with.

But personally, intuition and gambler's fallacy are not something I usually go off of, especially at the start of something like this.

By "a lot", do you mean the twice?




IIRC TonyPrime brought up the gamblers fallacy, and I brought up intuition...what other mentions of these terms did you see?

[Simon]

What's everyone's opinions on yeeting a no-show for Day 1?

If we choose to play by that, then your options (so far anyway) would be motobot, Abigail Sophia, dunia, and lorab. Let me know if I am missing someone.

Also, I keep finding a lot of "intuition" and "gambler's fallacy". This tells me that some people are struggling to find anything useful to say. But then again, this is still just the beginning of the game, and I'm sure it can be hard to go off of something when there isn't much to go off to begin with.

But personally, intuition and gambler's fallacy are not something I usually go off of, especially at the start of something like this.

By "a lot", do you mean the twice?






IIRC TonyPrime brought up the gamblers fallacy, and I brought up intuition...what other mentions of these terms did you see?

Yeah you're right, I kinda over exaggerated. But I previously mentioned that there wasn't a lot to go off of given the current position of this game thus far. So I didn't really find anything much of interest.

[Long Con]

What's everyone's opinions on yeeting a no-show for Day 1?

If we choose to play by that, then your options (so far anyway) would be motobot, Abigail Sophia, dunia, and lorab. Let me know if I am missing someone.

Also, I keep finding a lot of "intuition" and "gambler's fallacy". This tells me that some people are struggling to find anything useful to say. But then again, this is still just the beginning of the game, and I'm sure it can be hard to go off of something when there isn't much to go off to begin with.

But personally, intuition and gambler's fallacy are not something I usually go off of, especially at the start of something like this.

By "a lot", do you mean the twice?




IIRC TonyPrime brought up the gamblers fallacy, and I brought up intuition...what other mentions of these terms did you see?

I asked Tony what his intuition told him, and he gave a couple of answers to that. I took "a lot" to mean "general attitudes of which those things were an example".

This soft interrogation of Simon looks both pointless and predatory. [VOTE: falcon] aubergine

[Syn]

haha, yeah, falcon, what a dweeb, doing that to simon

i totally wasn't about to do the same thing

[Syn]

okay not that specifically but I was going to interrogate the intuition thing and what the alternative is in a low-content D1

[motobot]

Yeah, D1 I usually don't have anything to go off of other than gut feeling. Same applies here, so all I can do at the moment is vote and hope.

[motobot]

That being said. [VOTE: Long con] aubergine

[falcon45ca]

What's everyone's opinions on yeeting a no-show for Day 1?

If we choose to play by that, then your options (so far anyway) would be motobot, Abigail Sophia, dunia, and lorab. Let me know if I am missing someone.

Also, I keep finding a lot of "intuition" and "gambler's fallacy". This tells me that some people are struggling to find anything useful to say. But then again, this is still just the beginning of the game, and I'm sure it can be hard to go off of something when there isn't much to go off to begin with.

But personally, intuition and gambler's fallacy are not something I usually go off of, especially at the start of something like this.

By "a lot", do you mean the twice?




IIRC TonyPrime brought up the gamblers fallacy, and I brought up intuition...what other mentions of these terms did you see?

I asked Tony what his intuition told him, and he gave a couple of answers to that. I took "a lot" to mean "general attitudes of which those things were an example".

This soft interrogation of Simon looks both pointless and predatory. [VOTE: falcon] aubergine

You did so once, and only after I brought up intuition...and predatory of Simon eh?





Why is Simon Town?

[falcon45ca]

haha, yeah, falcon, what a dweeb, doing that to simon

i totally wasn't about to do the same thing

TR Syn, cuz I feel Maf Syn would leap at the chance to join a Town falcon wagon

[Long Con]

What's everyone's opinions on yeeting a no-show for Day 1?

If we choose to play by that, then your options (so far anyway) would be motobot, Abigail Sophia, dunia, and lorab. Let me know if I am missing someone.

Also, I keep finding a lot of "intuition" and "gambler's fallacy". This tells me that some people are struggling to find anything useful to say. But then again, this is still just the beginning of the game, and I'm sure it can be hard to go off of something when there isn't much to go off to begin with.

But personally, intuition and gambler's fallacy are not something I usually go off of, especially at the start of something like this.

By "a lot", do you mean the twice?




IIRC TonyPrime brought up the gamblers fallacy, and I brought up intuition...what other mentions of these terms did you see?

I asked Tony what his intuition told him, and he gave a couple of answers to that. I took "a lot" to mean "general attitudes of which those things were an example".

This soft interrogation of Simon looks both pointless and predatory. [VOTE: falcon] aubergine

You did so once, and only after I brought up intuition...and predatory of Simon eh?





Why is Simon Town?

What do you mean?

[falcon45ca]

What's everyone's opinions on yeeting a no-show for Day 1?

If we choose to play by that, then your options (so far anyway) would be motobot, Abigail Sophia, dunia, and lorab. Let me know if I am missing someone.

Also, I keep finding a lot of "intuition" and "gambler's fallacy". This tells me that some people are struggling to find anything useful to say. But then again, this is still just the beginning of the game, and I'm sure it can be hard to go off of something when there isn't much to go off to begin with.

But personally, intuition and gambler's fallacy are not something I usually go off of, especially at the start of something like this.

By "a lot", do you mean the twice?




IIRC TonyPrime brought up the gamblers fallacy, and I brought up intuition...what other mentions of these terms did you see?

I asked Tony what his intuition told him, and he gave a couple of answers to that. I took "a lot" to mean "general attitudes of which those things were an example".

This soft interrogation of Simon looks both pointless and predatory. [VOTE: falcon] aubergine

You did so once, and only after I brought up intuition...and predatory of Simon eh?





Why is Simon Town?

What do you mean?

You said I'm being predatory of Simon...which shouldn't matter if he's Maf, right?






So why is he town?

[Long Con]

What's everyone's opinions on yeeting a no-show for Day 1?

If we choose to play by that, then your options (so far anyway) would be motobot, Abigail Sophia, dunia, and lorab. Let me know if I am missing someone.

Also, I keep finding a lot of "intuition" and "gambler's fallacy". This tells me that some people are struggling to find anything useful to say. But then again, this is still just the beginning of the game, and I'm sure it can be hard to go off of something when there isn't much to go off to begin with.

But personally, intuition and gambler's fallacy are not something I usually go off of, especially at the start of something like this.

By "a lot", do you mean the twice?




IIRC TonyPrime brought up the gamblers fallacy, and I brought up intuition...what other mentions of these terms did you see?

I asked Tony what his intuition told him, and he gave a couple of answers to that. I took "a lot" to mean "general attitudes of which those things were an example".

This soft interrogation of Simon looks both pointless and predatory. [VOTE: falcon] aubergine

You did so once, and only after I brought up intuition...and predatory of Simon eh?





Why is Simon Town?

What do you mean?

You said I'm being predatory of Simon...which shouldn't matter if he's Maf, right?






So why is he town?

So, this limp-noodle "gotcha" is supposed to direct attantion away from you? Is that the idea here?

[falcon45ca]

If we choose to play by that, then your options (so far anyway) would be motobot, Abigail Sophia, dunia, and lorab. Let me know if I am missing someone.

Also, I keep finding a lot of "intuition" and "gambler's fallacy". This tells me that some people are struggling to find anything useful to say. But then again, this is still just the beginning of the game, and I'm sure it can be hard to go off of something when there isn't much to go off to begin with.

But personally, intuition and gambler's fallacy are not something I usually go off of, especially at the start of something like this.

By "a lot", do you mean the twice?




IIRC TonyPrime brought up the gamblers fallacy, and I brought up intuition...what other mentions of these terms did you see?

I asked Tony what his intuition told him, and he gave a couple of answers to that. I took "a lot" to mean "general attitudes of which those things were an example".

This soft interrogation of Simon looks both pointless and predatory. [VOTE: falcon] aubergine

You did so once, and only after I brought up intuition...and predatory of Simon eh?





Why is Simon Town?

What do you mean?

You said I'm being predatory of Simon...which shouldn't matter if he's Maf, right?






So why is he town?

So, this limp-noodle "gotcha" is supposed to direct attantion away from you? Is that the idea here?

No






My favorite part is how you characterize my question as a limp-noodle gotcha instead of just answering it

[falcon45ca]

[VOTE: longcon] aubergine

[LoRab]

Hey LoRab!

Why are you feb smiley if me?

And hi!

[LoRab]

What's everyone's opinions on yeeting a no-show for Day 1?

If we choose to play by that, then your options (so far anyway) would be motobot, Abigail Sophia, dunia, and lorab. Let me know if I am missing someone.

Also, I keep finding a lot of "intuition" and "gambler's fallacy". This tells me that some people are struggling to find anything useful to say. But then again, this is still just the beginning of the game, and I'm sure it can be hard to go off of something when there isn't much to go off to begin with.

But personally, intuition and gambler's fallacy are not something I usually go off of, especially at the start of something like this.

I definitely posted and voted in day 0!

[LoRab]

I ask this as an honest question: what is with the long con votes? I am super tired, so probably not thinking well, but I’m not getting those votes.

Or any others, really, other than several s*it’s and giggles votes.

[Long Con]

By "a lot", do you mean the twice?




IIRC TonyPrime brought up the gamblers fallacy, and I brought up intuition...what other mentions of these terms did you see?

I asked Tony what his intuition told him, and he gave a couple of answers to that. I took "a lot" to mean "general attitudes of which those things were an example".

This soft interrogation of Simon looks both pointless and predatory. [VOTE: falcon] aubergine

You did so once, and only after I brought up intuition...and predatory of Simon eh?





Why is Simon Town?

What do you mean?

You said I'm being predatory of Simon...which shouldn't matter if he's Maf, right?






So why is he town?

So, this limp-noodle "gotcha" is supposed to direct attantion away from you? Is that the idea here?

No






My favorite part is how you characterize my question as a limp-noodle gotcha instead of just answering it

[VOTE: longcon] aubergine

Is this seriously something you expect to pass the sniff check as "good logic"?

I can't be part of this conversation, not in the mood to entertain something this inane.

If my vote on you was a poke-vibe-check, you failed it bad, dude.

[Long Con]

Hey LoRab!

Why are you feb smiley if me?

And hi!

I thought I'd get it out of the way early this game. It is a direct reference to last game between us.

I ask this as an honest question: what is with the long con votes? I am super tired, so probably not thinking well, but I’m not getting those votes.

Or any others, really, other than several s*it’s and giggles votes.

Yeah, motobot hasn't really explained his yet. You can come to your own conclusion about falcon's, it's all right out there and recent.

[Syn]

[Long Con]

I ask this as an honest question: what is with the long con votes? I am super tired, so probably not thinking well, but I’m not getting those votes.

Or any others, really, other than several s*it’s and giggles votes.

OH lol I forgot about leetic's vote on me. I don't think we know why for that one either.

[Long Con]

I just thunk that typing words to convey your thoughts would be more proactive, in a game as quiet as this, than an emoji implying the existence of thoughts.

[Long Con]

That being said. [VOTE: Long con] aubergine

Hey moto, your gut feeling says I am bad?

[Long Con]

okay not that specifically but I was going to interrogate the intuition thing and what the alternative is in a low-content D1

Did you decide not to because:
a) falcon did it
b) I called him out negatively about it, or
c) at best, it would be unproductive busy-talk, at worst, the 'predatory' gotcha behaviour that falcon is all about

[Long Con]

Wilgy feels town.

I don't know about anyone else, not enough inputs

What would Maf Wilgy feel like w/ 4 posts?

Mafia Wilgy doesn't make me smile

I'd be willing to bet a great deal of money that this isn't entirely true.

[Long Con]

What's everyone's opinions on yeeting a no-show for Day 1?

Sub-optimal play IMO

Agreed

[Long Con]

Everyone's soooo cool, out partying on Saturday night!

[Syn]

I just thunk that typing words to convey your thoughts would be more proactive, in a game as quiet as this, than an emoji implying the existence of thoughts.

but I'm shy

[Syn]

okay not that specifically but I was going to interrogate the intuition thing and what the alternative is in a low-content D1

Did you decide not to because:
a) falcon did it
b) I called him out negatively about it, or
c) at best, it would be unproductive busy-talk, at worst, the 'predatory' gotcha behaviour that falcon is all about

mostly didn't because my first post to Simon was promptly ignored while he was in-thread, and his reply to falcon during that did not seem like it would lead anywhere useful if I repeated myself

[Syn]

Everyone's soooo cool, out partying on Saturday night!

I promise I'm not having a single good time tonight

[Syn]

I don't really have a lot of experience with LC but he was more agreeable in the game I do remember where he was wolfing. weak gut read says being antagonistic is a good sign?

[Syn]

it at least gets the people going

[Long Con]

It's provocative!

[leetic]

What's everyone's opinions on yeeting a no-show for Day 1?

No thanks. Far better to vote someone who can actually respond.

[leetic]

Thread is still way too quiet. I'll give minor townleans to Michelle and falcon for now, but that's about all.

[Porscha]

No, I shouldn't got Porscha like that. Porscha is a delight of a person.

its okay I had a good laugh lol

[Porscha]

Wilgy feels town.

I don't know about anyone else, not enough inputs

What would Maf Wilgy feel like w/ 4 posts?

Mafia Wilgy doesn't make me smile

wow he makes me smile regardless of alignment

[Lime Coke]

By "a lot", do you mean the twice?




IIRC TonyPrime brought up the gamblers fallacy, and I brought up intuition...what other mentions of these terms did you see?

I asked Tony what his intuition told him, and he gave a couple of answers to that. I took "a lot" to mean "general attitudes of which those things were an example".

This soft interrogation of Simon looks both pointless and predatory. [VOTE: falcon] aubergine

You did so once, and only after I brought up intuition...and predatory of Simon eh?





Why is Simon Town?

What do you mean?

You said I'm being predatory of Simon...which shouldn't matter if he's Maf, right?






So why is he town?

So, this limp-noodle "gotcha" is supposed to direct attantion away from you? Is that the idea here?

No






My favorite part is how you characterize my question as a limp-noodle gotcha instead of just answering it

He should've asked you about your limp noodle instead.

[Lime Coke]

Michelle, maybe Syn, mayyyybe Falcon can go into towns.

[Lime Coke]

Anyone else getting internal server errors?

[Lime Coke]

Townread:
Porschaaaaaaa
Michelle
Falcon

Townlean:
Leetic
Syn

[Lime Coke]

[VOTE: DrWilgy] aubergine

[Porscha]

Anyone else getting internal server errors?

have you noticed the like 35-50 "guests" in this thread at any given moment lmao something aint right

[Porscha]

also I think falcon is town, I feel pretty good about that