S~V~S wrote: ↑Tue May 28, 2024 5:29 am
OK, first this.
S~V~S wrote: ↑Sat May 25, 2024 3:37 pm
Scotty wrote: ↑Sat May 25, 2024 1:32 pm
Michelle wrote: ↑Sat May 25, 2024 11:00 am
Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Sat May 25, 2024 10:49 am
Michelle wrote: ↑Sat May 25, 2024 10:38 am
I would be the corpse if she is a vig, what are you talking about?
Read the posts, please. A bunch of people didn't understand the host post.
Also dramatic much? Why are you so sure a vig Svs would have taken you down?
Because she said so?
Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Sat May 25, 2024 10:49 am
Michelle wrote: ↑Sat May 25, 2024 10:39 am
He didn't say that though
It's called paraphrasing.
So what he said is translated in what you said?
Scotty wrote: ↑Sat May 25, 2024 9:09 am
Michelle wrote: ↑Sat May 25, 2024 6:48 am
I wanted to stay away from the game at one moment.
The feeling of 'fuck it, why should I cry for it?' vanished after a while and I was curious to see what everyone says, since I stayed counting sheeps on the ceiling (imaginary, of course) and I still have that joy to solve the game that made me play it for more than 5 years, and I didn't want to vote Jack because of dead air dead villager state of game.
Now explain me why flip flopping is bad/wolfy
It can go both ways for sure
I don’t know if I would consider this flip flopping in context. It’s revisionist in the same paragraph. But both can exist, I suppose
Not quite
It's like Scotty said, feels like you are throwing every excuse on the wall at once to see what sticks.
Yeah I think DDL is misconstruing my takeaway
I’m actively playing a behavioral psychologist to determine motivations for your reasoning and while I can see how you could be using multiple reasoning, I can also see how your meaning could also be better described as ‘I was self pressing AND of the people that I could have voted for, falcon was the one I found less settling’
I don’t know that I even suspect Michelle based on this
But I do see SVS and DDL do find it suspicious which I am noting
Dude, you made that post like an hour after I left, I haven't posted since before you made it. Like I said, I don't find self pres AI, and when I self pres I try to find a rationale for it so as not to feel like a jerk, so I'm not calling people out for the same thing.
So you can un-note me agreeing with it. I do think I agreed with something else you said, but it was about me
You went into some esoteric point that DDL misconstrued nefariously to your POV, and then lumped me in with him as doing the same, and I wasn't even in the thread at the time. I did not agree with his take away since I never saw it. I had my own reason for sussing Michelle, which I said more than once.
I replied to you about this, ^^^ but you never replied back. Now you're saying I have a history of agreeing with DDL about smalll nuances someone else (who happens to be you) made. And I don't.
Scotty wrote: ↑Mon May 27, 2024 6:16 pm
S~V~S wrote: ↑Mon May 27, 2024 6:11 pm
Scotty, You keep saying I validated or agreed with things I didn’t. Yuck.
You said earlier I agreed with something DDL said when I didn’t.
I’m on phone at a BBQ right now so I’ll pull the posts later, but I wish you would stop bundling me with DDL like this.
Now imma go eat some corn.
Mm, this is based on my reread yesterday in the night, so I reread it again:
S~V~S wrote: ↑Sun May 26, 2024 7:10 am
Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Sat May 25, 2024 5:12 pm
Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Sat May 25, 2024 2:36 pm
One thing that may be important.
This is either matrix 3 or 5.
If it's 5, and mafia didn't holster their kill (which I think I'll stop bringing up because it's incredibly unlikely), then mafia now knows who the SK is.
If we catch a mafia, we need to ISO their posts for who they might know the SK is.
For instance, if I'm mafia and I know the SK, I'll likely leave them alone, maybe even protect them, because mafia can win with the SK.
I mean real talk, I’m almost certain mafia shot Scotty and Scotty is the serial killer.
He’s the most obviously townread player D1 and somebody said something about him caring more about appearing townie than who was actually yeeted and that tracks.
If it was a jailkeeper, they’d just say something, right?
Idk if we have to yeet the sk to win tho.
On one level, it makes sense. No one is gonna yeet Scotty this game.
But on the other level, the best survival scenario for SK is being towny enough not to get yeeted but not so towny they get NKed.
So I would ask; Has Scotty had any very strong opinions? He tends to really focus on his suspects. I'm not sure I'm seeing that, though. He didn't seem to have a very strong single suspect. A few hours before he actually voted for you, he made this post with the "Maybe Jack" kinda vibe, and he only made one post inbetween. If you search his posts for "Jack" its kinda meh.
Scotty wrote: ↑Thu May 23, 2024 12:27 pm
Roxy wrote: ↑Thu May 23, 2024 10:22 am
Scotty wrote: ↑Thu May 23, 2024 9:45 am
I’m trying so hard not to use meta this game, but on the flip side…
I find that the scummier sig is, the townier he is lol
While I can understand the suspicion on him, I also know he is like the easiest mid-elim fodder on D1. Especially for wolves to latch onto.
Not to say I think you’re a wolf, but I don’t see him as being incredibly fruitful of a choice today if he were to flip good.
hahahahahahahah - It's good to be right

Meta will always make its way into everyone's game one way or the other.
Also we were cross posting right now yet you completely ignored me
why?
lol we weren’t crossposting. You came in after I left for work. Now I’m at work.
But ftr I don’t have any alarm bells going off for you.
I could still vote jack. Idk.
What do you think of DDL?
Being the loudest voice in the thread is not a great idea for an SK in general, more so here, and i know Scotty knows how to fade back in a towny looking way. Be a memorable thread presence without being a thread leader, I saw him do it in Lasso.
So even if he is the loudest voice in the thread, he's also not tunnelling anyone. Not even you, who he's voted for twice now. I don't see why the baddies would be targeting him, unless they were YOU, and I seriously doubt you would be that obvious. Also if you were the baddie who tried to kill him I doubt you would float this ^^ either. So this post bumps you up for me.
So yeah, this is possible, but it isn't a foregone conclusion. I won't be voting on him based on it. Every night just post the most innocuous message, "No one died" "Everyone died" etc. Everyone claim Vanilla. I plan to worry about SSK when and if they manage to kill someone, and who that someone is. Until then, I'm hunting baddies.
And I would expect Scotty to continue doing the same.
You right, I think I construed ‘this is possible’ with ‘I agree’, when it’s pretty clear you’re pushing back to this theory. My bad.
Although, the bit in this post that stands out to me now is your conclusion: ‘Jack, you making this post and being this obvious is too obvious, therefore I bump you up’
Why?
Did you also see this, Scotty?
S~V~S wrote: ↑Sun May 26, 2024 2:01 pm
@Jackofhearts2005 Yeah, I know that, I talked myself in and out of it with that post
But like I said, Scotty knows how to fade back and he didn't even try here. So I'm more inclined to think he's just town, and we move on and see what happens.
But agreed, it's an interesting discussion but it isn't really getting us anywhere on Day 2.
I thought it was an interesting theory, so i engaged with it. Which is kinda how we play this game. Ultimately, I disagreed with it, based on being your teammate in Lasso. You know how to be a strong presence without being the lead player, and you didn't even try to do that here. You went from zero to sixty in patented towny Scotty behavior.
The way we play this game is theorize that other players are bad roles, and we discuss it. Sometimes we're right, sometimes we're not (sorry MichellE

). This is what I did, and decided I didn't believe it. You're acting as if it is some kind of personal betrayal. I "bumped him up" becasue I have no fucking idea who you are, and I didn't know that engaging with it was some kind of crime.
Then you keep trying to lump me in with DDL.
I initially thought Michelle and DDl were the bad team. Then when he got into it with Porscha about Michelle EOD, I unpaired them. I figured he was temp voting her then he would switch at EOD like he did Day 1 (and he did), but that discussion kind of unpaired them to me, then Michelle flipped town. So that leaves me with I'm not understanding why DDL has such strong opinions, yet is unable to commit to a vote.
So I'm not really sure where i stand on DDL, I don't agree with much of what he says, and tbh, I don't understand why he's saying it. Early my day 1 "No Vote" category was you and DDL, since he has been in my waffly null category.
As for Jack, I liked his theory, it was interesting, but I ultimately disagreed with it. And I was waffly on him much of the game, but that theory DID nudge him into my townier category since the baddies prolly know who SSK is and I find it very unlikely that one of them would touch the SSk with a ten foot pole, or even start a discussion of it since it could come back to bith them in the ass.
The only plus I see for Jack making that theory if he were bad is that if he managed to yeet you based on it, and you flip town, that pretty much townlocks him. But he needs to yeet you, and that's easier said than done.
Another reason to stop pretending this theory doesn't exist and to address it and ultimately decide it doesn't work, which is kinda what I did.