Long Con wrote: ↑Wed Jan 22, 2025 7:24 pm
Scotty wrote: ↑Wed Jan 22, 2025 7:19 pm
Syn wrote: ↑Tue Jan 21, 2025 6:51 pm
through careful science, I have deduced scotty is a wolf
Wrongo, syn
Deduction denied
No, you have to refute his scientific proofs.
Proof: Scotty is not a wolf
Given Facts:
1. Syn’s Accusation: Syn has accused Scotty of being a wolf.
2. Scotty’s Behavior (Point A): Scotty has made no pertinent claims or stances prior to Day 1.
3. Point B is Undefined: There is no connection between Point A and Point B.
4. Scotty’s Biology: Scotty is bipedal and does not have a tail.
5. Syn’s Knowledge (or Lack Thereof): Syn is using the word “deduction” without sufficient information.
6. The Apple Analogy: A person cannot accurately deduce which apple is rotten in a box of 200 apples when they can only see 20.
7. The Cleveland Browns: The Cleveland Browns will never win a Super Bowl.
Proof:
Step 1: Identify Known Facts
From the given facts, we know that Scotty is bipedal (i.e., two legs) and lacks a tail, which is atypical of wolves. This immediately raises a strong point against the accusation. In fact, a wolf would typically have four legs and a tail, but Scotty only has two legs and no tail. Conclusion: Scotty is not a wolf based on basic zoology.
Step 2: Apply Syn’s Deduction (or Lack Thereof)
Syn claims to be using “deduction,” but let’s recall the apple analogy: one cannot deduce which apple is rotten in a box of 200 apples when only 20 are visible. Similarly, Syn doesn’t have enough information to accurately deduce Scotty’s status as a wolf. Just like picking a random apple and guessing it’s rotten (without looking at all the apples), Syn’s deduction is flawed. Conclusion: Syn’s deduction lacks the necessary data to be valid.
Step 3: The Cleveland Browns
The Cleveland Browns will never win a Super Bowl. This fact, while not directly related to Scotty’s wolf status, serves as an important reminder: just because something seems possible doesn’t make it likely. In the same way, just because Syn accuses Scotty of being a wolf, doesn’t make it true. Conclusion: Accusations, like Super Bowl victories for the Browns, are often wishful thinking.
Step 4: Final Conclusion
Given the biological facts, the logical flaws in Syn’s “deduction,” and the general lack of relevant data, it is clear that Scotty is not a wolf.
Q.E.D.