Death Note Mafia [END]

#1951

thellama73 wrote:Made, you really think if I had info I would be so blatant about it?

No, that's the issue. I don't think you have info, which makes your vote even more problematic.

#1952

I've only got 10 minutes left to vote. I had to skip pages 36-46. I'm starting to wonder if Llama is holding so tenaciously to his Snowman theory in an effort to save himself - I see that they are neck and neck. I don't see a good case against Snowman. I do see that Llama voted early and I'm wondering if he just jumped the gun before thinking the vote through. He says that he wanted to vote early to get the conversation going - but that isn't really very detective like and not something that a seasoned player would do if he were hunting baddies (rather than just hunting). I like Boo's idea of voting for low posters but I see a situation where my vote would be "wasted" if I voted for anyone other than Snowman or Llama. Between the two - I'm gonna have to vote Llama. You took a chance and it backfired.

so much linki

#1953

The poll right now is hilarious.

#1954

Ok so I voted BWT
I think out of all the people that had votes he stuck out as the most odd. I really don't get his vote for Russ and voting him without really talking about anything else.

#1955

Three lynches ending at the same hour.

I am going to vote for S~V~S. Her vote for me was unexplained, as were the three that preceded hers, and I intend to NO-U the hell out of that. Also, she said she wouldn't vote for boo unless there was a "smoking gun." She gives me no such allowance. She has also ignored two of my posts so far.

#1956

Wow this poll

#1957

A three-way tie?!

#1958

Zomberella12 wrote:I've only got 10 minutes left to vote. I had to skip pages 36-46. I'm starting to wonder if Llama is holding so tenaciously to his Snowman theory in an effort to save himself - I see that they are neck and neck. I don't see a good case against Snowman. I do see that Llama voted early and I'm wondering if he just jumped the gun before thinking the vote through. He says that he wanted to vote early to get the conversation going - but that isn't really very detective like and not something that a seasoned player would do if he were hunting baddies (rather than just hunting). I like Boo's idea of voting for low posters but I see a situation where my vote would be "wasted" if I voted for anyone other than Snowman or Llama. Between the two - I'm gonna have to vote Llama. You took a chance and it backfired.

so much linki

What do you mean by " You took a chance and it backfired."?

#1959

#1960

Um, no, Epi, I said I was looking at you. I think you're hella bad. Really seriously hella bad.

And yeah, I did not think he was bad, lol. There would have to be a smoking gun for me to vote for hum, You, I did think was bad.

#1961

I noticed Epi hasn't actually placed his vote. Epi, are you thinking about breaking this thing?

#1962

S~V~S wrote:
Elohcin wrote:
Turnip Head wrote:
zeek wrote:Nobody reads my posts

I read your post and it pinged the hell out of me what do you mean there's no civ team?
I've been saying this for a while now. Someone else, DH, Ace, can't remember said that 58% of us don't want to kiss non-detectives. This game seems to be less of a civvie/baddie/independant type game. Even as a viewer of the show, (as I said before) it's difficult to decide who to go for....Light or the Detectives. Both feel they are doing what is good and right.

I honestly think it might be best that we stop referring to each other as civ or bad and instead as kira or detectives.
SPOILERS~ ~ don't read this OT if you want to watch the show

I am 20 minutes into the first episode, and Light strikes me as a total Psycho. Clearly a baddie. He is killing people based on his opinions, and he could be wrong. When Ryuk showed up, he had like 2 pages of names, and from what it looked like, some of them were High School bullies or Gossips. He reminds me of ISIS, putting people to death based on his beliefs. Sometimes he is right, but sometimes he is just judgmental.

I find him a bit odd, but not psycho. He is intriguing.

Epi, is your vote in any way to steer clear of lynching a detective? or perhaps a non-detective?

#1963

S~V~S wrote:Um, no, Epi, I said I was looking at you. I think you're hella bad. Really seriously hella bad.

And yeah, I did not think he was bad, lol. There would have to be a smoking gun for me to vote for hum, You, I did think was bad.

No you don't. You are acting fake as hell.

#1964

Bass_the_Clever wrote:
Zomberella12 wrote:I've only got 10 minutes left to vote. I had to skip pages 36-46. I'm starting to wonder if Llama is holding so tenaciously to his Snowman theory in an effort to save himself - I see that they are neck and neck. I don't see a good case against Snowman. I do see that Llama voted early and I'm wondering if he just jumped the gun before thinking the vote through. He says that he wanted to vote early to get the conversation going - but that isn't really very detective like and not something that a seasoned player would do if he were hunting baddies (rather than just hunting). I like Boo's idea of voting for low posters but I see a situation where my vote would be "wasted" if I voted for anyone other than Snowman or Llama. Between the two - I'm gonna have to vote Llama. You took a chance and it backfired.

so much linki
What do you mean by " You took a chance and it backfired."?

He voted early with a weak case and tried to drum up support. I just don't think that it ended the way he wanted it to.

#1965

Elohcin wrote:Epi, is your vote in any way to steer clear of lynching a detective? or perhaps a non-detective?

I actually haven't voted for anyone. I might try to save someone just to make people mad.

#1966

I don't think I have ever seen a three way tie.

Linki @ Epi, no I'm not, I just stopped being afraid of you.

#1967

Turnip Head wrote:I noticed Epi hasn't actually placed his vote. Epi, are you thinking about breaking this thing?

I JUST SAID THAT SHINIGAMI. Go back to hell.

#1968

Elohcin wrote:
S~V~S wrote:
Elohcin wrote:
Turnip Head wrote:
zeek wrote:Nobody reads my posts

I read your post and it pinged the hell out of me what do you mean there's no civ team?
I've been saying this for a while now. Someone else, DH, Ace, can't remember said that 58% of us don't want to kiss non-detectives. This game seems to be less of a civvie/baddie/independant type game. Even as a viewer of the show, (as I said before) it's difficult to decide who to go for....Light or the Detectives. Both feel they are doing what is good and right.

I honestly think it might be best that we stop referring to each other as civ or bad and instead as kira or detectives.
SPOILERS~ ~ don't read this OT if you want to watch the show

I am 20 minutes into the first episode, and Light strikes me as a total Psycho. Clearly a baddie. He is killing people based on his opinions, and he could be wrong. When Ryuk showed up, he had like 2 pages of names, and from what it looked like, some of them were High School bullies or Gossips. He reminds me of ISIS, putting people to death based on his beliefs. Sometimes he is right, but sometimes he is just judgmental.
I find him a bit odd, but not psycho. He is intriguing.

Epi, is your vote in any way to steer clear of lynching a detective? or perhaps a non-detective?

Breaking the tie is a big responsibility. Maybe he didn't want to shoulder that.

#1969

Gonna have to go BWT, He's opportunistic af. Not feeling good about llama tho.

#1970

S~V~S wrote:I don't think I have ever seen a three way tie.

Linki @ Epi, no I'm not, I just stopped being afraid of you.

You told me last game you weren't afraid of me. I think you are because you keep voting for me. Think about that.

#1971

I voted BWT. I think I already explained my reason. Whoa this is an intense lynch! I will be back later tonight to catch up and post again.

#1972

The USS BWTward has set sail, all abooooooooooooard

#1973

Oh it's still going! I was thinking it was over at 6:20.

#1974

Zomberella12 wrote:
Bass_the_Clever wrote:
Zomberella12 wrote:I've only got 10 minutes left to vote. I had to skip pages 36-46. I'm starting to wonder if Llama is holding so tenaciously to his Snowman theory in an effort to save himself - I see that they are neck and neck. I don't see a good case against Snowman. I do see that Llama voted early and I'm wondering if he just jumped the gun before thinking the vote through. He says that he wanted to vote early to get the conversation going - but that isn't really very detective like and not something that a seasoned player would do if he were hunting baddies (rather than just hunting). I like Boo's idea of voting for low posters but I see a situation where my vote would be "wasted" if I voted for anyone other than Snowman or Llama. Between the two - I'm gonna have to vote Llama. You took a chance and it backfired.

so much linki
What do you mean by " You took a chance and it backfired."?
He voted early with a weak case and tried to drum up support. I just don't think that it ended the way he wanted it to.

So do you think the other people who voted snowman gave weak reason to vote him?

#1975

Turnip Head wrote:The USS BWTward has set sail, all abooooooooooooard

Choo choo!

#1976

Epi, why did you not vote SVS?

#1977

I voted Snowman. S~V~S is now my top suspect.

#1978

Epignosis wrote:
S~V~S wrote:I don't think I have ever seen a three way tie.

Linki @ Epi, no I'm not, I just stopped being afraid of you.
You told me last game you weren't afraid of me. I think you are because you keep voting for me. Think about that.

Yeah, and I killed you night one alot, too, when i was bad. But I now have Typo Power, and i learned how to laugh at you; that happened during Donner.

Linki, Same reason he did not vote Russti?

#1979

Bass_the_Clever wrote:
Zomberella12 wrote:
Bass_the_Clever wrote:
Zomberella12 wrote:I've only got 10 minutes left to vote. I had to skip pages 36-46. I'm starting to wonder if Llama is holding so tenaciously to his Snowman theory in an effort to save himself - I see that they are neck and neck. I don't see a good case against Snowman. I do see that Llama voted early and I'm wondering if he just jumped the gun before thinking the vote through. He says that he wanted to vote early to get the conversation going - but that isn't really very detective like and not something that a seasoned player would do if he were hunting baddies (rather than just hunting). I like Boo's idea of voting for low posters but I see a situation where my vote would be "wasted" if I voted for anyone other than Snowman or Llama. Between the two - I'm gonna have to vote Llama. You took a chance and it backfired.

so much linki
What do you mean by " You took a chance and it backfired."?
He voted early with a weak case and tried to drum up support. I just don't think that it ended the way he wanted it to.
So do you think the other people who voted snowman gave weak reason to vote him?

I had to skip so many pages that I can't really comment on others' reasons. I did read all of Snowman's posts and many of Llamas. I think Llama's case was made too early and not based on strong evidence. However, Llama's actions against Snowman are what made me vote for Llama.

#1980

Wow, guys.

I must say I am incredibly thankful. Not only was this one of the most intriguing and intense lynches I've ever been a part of, as a player or a host, but every single one of you voted.

Not a single missed vote.

I commend all of you. Thank you for PLAYING this game.

Now I have to finish developing the post and such because it was difficult to plan it ahead of time, so it'll take me a bit, but it shouldn't be too long.

#1981

S~V~S wrote:
Epignosis wrote:
S~V~S wrote:I don't think I have ever seen a three way tie.

Linki @ Epi, no I'm not, I just stopped being afraid of you.
You told me last game you weren't afraid of me. I think you are because you keep voting for me. Think about that.
Yeah, and I killed you night one alot, too, when i was bad. But I now have Typo Power, and i learned how to laugh at you; that happened during Donner.

Linki, Same reason he did not vote Russti?

And what reason is that, detective?

#1982

In case I don't make it, I really think we are seeing svs' baddie game.

#1983

MovingPictures07 wrote:Wow, guys.

I must say I am incredibly thankful. Not only was this one of the most intriguing and intense lynches I've ever been a part of, as a player or a host, but every single one of you voted.

Not a single missed vote.

I commend all of you. Thank you for PLAYING this game.

Now I have to finish developing the post and such because it was difficult to plan it ahead of time, so it'll take me a bit, but it shouldn't be too long.

Fuck you asshole and make with the post.

#1984

Epignosis wrote:I voted Snowman. S~V~S is now my top suspect.

Serious!? Snowman! Now SVS? This is the first time I've played with you but do you ever give reasons for anything that you do? Epi being Epi or not....

#1985

Bass_the_Clever wrote:
Zomberella12 wrote:
Bass_the_Clever wrote:
Zomberella12 wrote:I've only got 10 minutes left to vote. I had to skip pages 36-46. I'm starting to wonder if Llama is holding so tenaciously to his Snowman theory in an effort to save himself - I see that they are neck and neck. I don't see a good case against Snowman. I do see that Llama voted early and I'm wondering if he just jumped the gun before thinking the vote through. He says that he wanted to vote early to get the conversation going - but that isn't really very detective like and not something that a seasoned player would do if he were hunting baddies (rather than just hunting). I like Boo's idea of voting for low posters but I see a situation where my vote would be "wasted" if I voted for anyone other than Snowman or Llama. Between the two - I'm gonna have to vote Llama. You took a chance and it backfired.

so much linki
What do you mean by " You took a chance and it backfired."?
He voted early with a weak case and tried to drum up support. I just don't think that it ended the way he wanted it to.
So do you think the other people who voted snowman gave weak reason to vote him?

I do. even tho you were not asking me :P

linki, I really think epig and llama have something going on, game-wise I mean. I think someone doesn't want llama's identity revealed

#1986

thellama73 wrote:In case I don't make it, I really think we are seeing svs' baddie game.

What makes you say that?

#1987

DAY 2

Who is Kira?

Poll ended at Sat Feb 21, 2015 6:30:13 pm

AceofSpaces
0
No votes
Bass_the_Clever
0
No votes
bea
0
No votes
birdwithteeth11
8
Boomslang (15), FZ. (17), bea (19), Matahari (21), juliets (24), Bass_the_Clever (25), Spacedaisy (27), Made (28) 28%
Black Rock
0
No votes
boo
1
Black Rock (16) 3%
Boomslang
0
No votes
DharmaHelper
0
No votes
DisgruntledPorcupine
0
No votes
Elohcin
0
No votes
Epignosis
3
Metalmarsh89 (7), Russtifinko (20), S~V~S (22) 10%
FZ.
0
No votes
juliets
0
No votes
Long Con
0
No votes
Made
0
No votes
Matahari
0
No votes
Metalmarsh89
0
No votes
Ricochet
0
No votes
Russtifinko
1
birdwithteeth11 (8) 3%
S~V~S
0
No votes
Snowman
7
thellama73 (3), Elohcin (9), DharmaHelper (10), AceofSpaces (12), zeek (13), Ricochet (14), Epignosis (29) 24%
Spacedaisy
0
No votes
thellama73
6
Turnip Head (2), boo (6), Long Con (11), Snowman (18), DisgruntledPorcupine (23), Zomberella12 (26) 21%
Turnip Head
0
No votes
Zomberella12
0
No votes
No one????? (host, nons, deadies)
3
MovingPictures07 (1), Golden (4), nijuukyugou (5) 10%
Total votes : 29

NO MISSED VOTES!!!!

#1988

I was totally enjoying this game as I have not had to get defensive yet~ it was fun being light hearted.

But bring it on, Epi. I'm a detective for sure.

Linki @ Epi, no clue, it was a guess. Cause you want to be mysterious?

Linki @ Llama, um, no. It was my, "It was nice to have two days without having to field baseless accusations, but I knew it had to come to an end" SVS.

#1989

Turnip Head wrote:
thellama73 wrote:In case I don't make it, I really think we are seeing svs' baddie game.
What makes you say that?

Becasue I tried to give him serious advice?

#1990

thellama73 wrote:In case I don't make it, I really think we are seeing svs' baddie game.

So Snowman didn't get lynched so "Who's Snowman? Let's get SVS!" To you I say: What's your deal?

#1991

S~V~S wrote:
Turnip Head wrote:
thellama73 wrote:In case I don't make it, I really think we are seeing svs' baddie game.
What makes you say that?
Becasue I tried to give him serious advice?

Let the llama answer for himself

#1992

Turnip Head wrote:
S~V~S wrote:
Turnip Head wrote:
thellama73 wrote:In case I don't make it, I really think we are seeing svs' baddie game.
What makes you say that?
Becasue I tried to give him serious advice?
Let the llama answer for himself

It was ironic, but OK :P

#1993

Wow, wasn't expecting the BWT train to gather that much steam. Obviously I'm ok with it, as I cast the first stone, but I'm surprised that the vote caught up to and then surpassed the vote for Snowman. I hope I didn't inadvertently contribute to a save job for that guy...

#1994

Matahari wrote:
Bass_the_Clever wrote:
Zomberella12 wrote:
Bass_the_Clever wrote:
Zomberella12 wrote:I've only got 10 minutes left to vote. I had to skip pages 36-46. I'm starting to wonder if Llama is holding so tenaciously to his Snowman theory in an effort to save himself - I see that they are neck and neck. I don't see a good case against Snowman. I do see that Llama voted early and I'm wondering if he just jumped the gun before thinking the vote through. He says that he wanted to vote early to get the conversation going - but that isn't really very detective like and not something that a seasoned player would do if he were hunting baddies (rather than just hunting). I like Boo's idea of voting for low posters but I see a situation where my vote would be "wasted" if I voted for anyone other than Snowman or Llama. Between the two - I'm gonna have to vote Llama. You took a chance and it backfired.

so much linki
What do you mean by " You took a chance and it backfired."?
He voted early with a weak case and tried to drum up support. I just don't think that it ended the way he wanted it to.
So do you think the other people who voted snowman gave weak reason to vote him?
I do. even tho you were not asking me :P

linki, I really think epig and llama have something going on, game-wise I mean. I think someone doesn't want llama's identity revealed

I'm glad you are back. lol

#1995

I have two clues about S~V~S. Neither are info. It's based on thread and my experience. There is a chance she is a detective but I have to think it over.

#1996

Sometimes you just try to get things out before death's cold embrace

#1997

Epignosis wrote:I have two clues about S~V~S. Neither are info. It's based on thread and my experience. There is a chance she is a detective but I have to think it over.

you should do that

Linki @Llama, and since death has not embraced you yet, can you tell me why you think that?

#1998

I think today we learned that you sheep need a strong shephard, and it was a mistake of me to deny you your glorious leader for 48 hours.

#1999

Later

#2000

DharmaHelper wrote:I think today we learned that you sheep need a strong shephard, and it was a mistake of me to deny you your glorious leader for 48 hours.

I haven't deleted the other avatar I've ever used on thi-

oh wait we voted the same way didn't we