I'm not sure you're understanding my point, so in fairness I will explain it a bit better:Zomberella12 wrote:Hold up. Yes, because it was D0 it does make a difference. It was the ONLY thing we had to go on. I was not on board with the whole "Snow looks bad because he wanted a bandwagon to join" argument that Lllama was selling (is that the thing you are referring to?). In fact I said that it was a WEAK case. Saying that baddies would vote for L/Light was not a bandwagon anyway, it was deductive reasoning.DharmaHelper wrote:Because it was Day 0 its not suspicious? It makes you look good to do the thing you said makes Snow look bad?Zomberella12 wrote:Holy smoke! That was like D0. And I stand by that. I do thunk it benefited the baddies to vote that way. I think that post makes me look good.DharmaHelper wrote:You mean like this?Zomberella12 wrote:Really!? A legitimate accusation? What would that look like? I think now would be a perfect time for Snowman to demonstrate his case building abilities. Or perhaps he would just like to throw that idea out there and let everyone else do all the work? Llama, we need to talk. I might be experiencing a change of heart.Snowman wrote:I do think she's been a straight-shooter so far. The real test would be how she reacts to a legitimate accusation.bea wrote: @ Snowman, in all fairness - what do you think of how Zombra's been playing so far? Is she reading on the up and up to you? Besides llama, who else will you be looking at going into the next lynch?
Zomberella12 wrote:
Your assessment is astute. I wonder if those you are arguing against understand your logic, agree with it, and are fine with it because they are in fact mafia...
Also, don't give the baddies good ideas.
You accused Snowman of throwing something out into the thread in the hopes that someone else would take it and run with it. I highlighted that part of your post. This is obviously suspicious to you because you express a desire to hash out your Snowman thoughts with llama.
In a direct comparison, I pulled the quote of yours I found suspicious from D0, wherein you (in my view) float the idea out there that baddies understand boos logic and are fine with voting for the L/Light option given the alleged risk of doing so. You put the idea out there, very surgically so. It read to me, as I expressed, as an attempt to get other people to do the leg work of accusing specific L/Light voters so that you didn't have to.
To recap:
You and Snow did the exact same thing. You think Snow is suspect for doing it, but when you did it, it was with good intentions. Whether you did it on D0 or D10 is irrelevant.
Linki -
@Zomberella - I don't care if you are behind in reading. I am behind myself. What I said was your defense was "I'm new, cut me some slack." Which is, as I said, irrelevant.
@Marsh hopefully this explanation post helps you then.