Thanks for the context. I read a little bit of that game thread and I understand your perspective a bit more. I haven't played a game with Canuck in a looooooooong ass time, so maybe I'm getting fooled by her charm here too. (Though in the game you linked, I can't help but notice that you were the only one who was fooled by her :P )Made wrote:Ok context. The reason I felt I had to commit to a Canuck vote is because this(from misfits): http://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/viewto ... 214#p77214 Canuck( as well as svs, bloops, and dh) are players who i've been grossly wrong about, so i'm hesitant to release a theory i have just because their pathos is on point.Turnip Head wrote: Made, can you explain the thought process behind your vote for Canuck yesterday? I'm still a bit confused about what you were trying to convey there.
But the MM connection feels too obvious to me. You rarely ever see baddies openly defending each other in the thread anymore, it's just not considered a smart tactic. The minute one of you gets lynched, the other becomes Prime Suspect #1. Which means that when it DOES happen it's somewhat of a blind spot for me. For example, Lent completely fooled me in Recruitment Mafia because she defended her super suspicious teammate Aapje, and I thought there was no way in hell she would ever do that, so I defended her, and I was wrong. So it happens.
But one thing I want to point out is how the MM lynch went down. Canuck was the last person to vote before the thread lockdown, and she voted for MM's opposition. So... what's the exit strategy there? If Canuck was with MM, she should have either voted for him or waited for the lockdown so she wouldn't have to vote, right? The way it went down, I don't see the benefit. So I'm more inclined to believe the theory that MM's teammates just weren't very active, or maybe intentionally missed the vote, or they were able to sneak their votes onto MM before the lockdown.