Who Framed Roger Rabbit? [Day 10]

[blindfaeth]

Rip Dom-

Goldens posts read fairly intuitively.

Though, I'm not suspicious of Sophie. Why the change of heart Golden? Towards Eloh/JC I mean. I know you said you still have your suspicions but sounds like you're benching it for the time being.

Not knowing the weasels abilities scares me. I've seen roles that can force you to vote a certain way and you must do so convincingly or face consequences. I'm not sure I trust the words he's saying until he can speak normally again. Only because it seems like he's suddenly changed focus after night ended.

Don't get me wrong, please don't assume I'm trying to discount goldens insight, I'm just wary. I feel odd discussing it, because several people already pointed it out. But as I was reading, I came to feel this way independently of others opinions.

Regardless, I don't keep track of whether she's targeted low posters in the past. I just know to me, this feels like genuinely trying to help the civvie cause Sophie. Very inquisitive and speaks her mind without fear of backlash.

[Golden]

Srry - hldy = vctn! Nt @ hm 4 wknd.

[blindfaeth]

I'm glad you found out Lhcn meant elohcin, because I thought he was going for long con, but it didn't make sense that he put an h in there lol.

[Canucklehead]

Hi, Sophie. I don't think we've met.
I share your general blarginess about low posters. But I also sometimes get busy and can't post. So there you go. It's a little early in the game to be tossing out the "flying under the radar" accusations, don't you think? (And this is coming from someone who can be guaranteed to throw out precisely that accusation at least once a game....I just wait a little longer before doing so). Besides, Being a low poster isn't actually a good strategy for baddies in either the early or the late game, it works best in the middle when lots of pits are stirred up and lots of suspects are on the table. In the early and late game, it stands out too much.

So yeah. I haven't been very involved in the game yet. I have been otherwise occupied, and I haven't really had a chance to get y head around anything at all yet. This is common for me in games where people post a shit tonne early in the game; I end up having to skim just to catch up, and as a result I don't pay close enough attention to really generate thoights or reads on anyone.

That said, i like Golden's efforts to find links to Aces. I don't buy the case on Eloh, but I could potentially get behind a Juliets vote.

[Long Con]

Srry - hldy = vctn! Nt @ hm 4 wknd.

Sorry - holiday means vacation! Not at home for the weekend.

That's fine Golden, get outta here and sleep off this curse!

[Sophie]

Rip Dom-

Goldens posts read fairly intuitively.

Though, I'm not suspicious of Sophie. Why the change of heart Golden? Towards Eloh/JC I mean. I know you said you still have your suspicions but sounds like you're benching it for the time being.

Not knowing the weasels abilities scare ... ght ended.

Don't get me wrong, please don't assume I'm trying to discount goldens insight, I'm just wary. I feel odd discussing it, because several people already pointed it out. But as I was reading, I came to feel this way independently of others opinions.

Regardless, I don't keep track of whether she's targeted low posters in the past. I just know to me, this feels like genuinely trying to help the civvie cause Sophie. Very inquisitive and speaks her mind without fear of backlash.

this. its really weird


also, now that i read the zomba translation, did he say "sophie, your dom thoughts are not important now" ? isnt that weird, i missed that the first time, but dom just died, i wasnt giving my dom thoughts after he died, gave them before, but he went on and said that??

thats weird

[Sophie]

Rip Dom-

Goldens posts read fairly intuitively.

Though, I'm not suspicious of Sophie. Why the change of heart Golden? Towards Eloh/JC I mean. I know you said you still have your suspicions but sounds like you're benching it for the time being.

Not knowing the weasels abilities scares me. I've seen roles that can force you to vote a certain way and you must do so convincingly or face consequences. I'm not sure I trust the words he's saying until he can speak normally again. Only because it seems like he's suddenly changed focus after night ended.

Don't get me wrong, please don't assume I'm trying to discount goldens insight, I'm just wary. I feel odd discussing it, because several people already pointed it out. But as I was reading, I came to feel this way independently of others opinions.

Regardless, I don't keep track of whether she's targeted low posters in the past. I just know to me, this feels like genuinely trying to help the civvie cause Sophie. Very inquisitive and speaks her mind without fear of backlash.

this was bf paragraph i was trying to highlight. it wasnt URL, it was U

[Long Con]

I can respond to things said about me if necessary, tomorrow morning. Time for bed right now. Some people are finding my analysis of MP's posts suspicious, I'm going to have to do a reread to see exactly why.

Oh, and I forget who it was that was asking if the low-posting was usual for Dom. I responded to that person, it was a bit before the night post. I find it somewhat unlikely that that person is a baddie, because I don't think a baddie would bring up Dom like that so close to executing him. Was it Zomb? I'll look back tomorrow, that post ain't going anywhere.

[Sophie]

Hi, Sophie. I don't think we've met.
I share your general blarginess about low posters. But I also sometimes get busy and can't post. So there you go. It's a little early in the game to be tossing out the "flying under the radar" accusations, don't you think? (And this is coming from someone who can be guaranteed to throw out precisely that accusation at least once a game....I just wait a little longer before doing so). Besides, Being a low poster isn't actually a good strategy for baddies in either the early or the late game, it works best in the middle when lots of pits are stirred up and lots of suspects are on the table. In the early and late game, it stands out too much.

So yeah. I haven't been very involved in the game yet. I have been otherwise occupied, and I haven't really had a chance to get y head around anything at all yet. This is common for me in games where people post a shit tonne early in the game; I end up having to skim just to catch up, and as a result I don't pay close enough attention to really generate thoights or reads on anyone.

That said, i like Golden's efforts to find links to Aces. I don't buy the case on Eloh, but I could potentially get behind a Juliets vote.

linki LC: that person was me Yeah, im not a baddie

hi canuck

its ok, i just want people to talk, we need to comunicate in order to have the better chances to kill a baddie, so i was just pointing out people that havent posted much and just want to make you guys talk

what do you think about MP? and LC? i ask you cause i dont have a read on any of those players and it makes me nervous

[Golden]

@bf

Rbbt hppy 2 lynch JC
MP hppy 2 lynch JC
vryn :gldn: sspcs f sms happy 2 lynch JC.

Whr JCs dfndrs? MM - cv.

:gldn: stll sspcts lhcn.

BF cn cmplty trst :gldn: wrds. Nt frcd 2 sy prtclr thngs. Smply svd sm sspcns bcs ddnt wnt 2 ncrs chnc :gldn: wld b klld. Trst bf's Sph vw. Nt sggstng sph lynch 2dy. Smply wntd 2 flg png. :gldn: hps sph = cv. Sph ds hnt lw pstrs. Wht gldn c's wth sph, hrd 2 dscrb. Jst gt flng. Myb wll pss.

Rbbt - hw 2 dscrb. Rbbt thnks gldn gts fcsd twrds ppl tht spk bck 2 :gldn: Rbbt thnks bst wy 2 hd frm :gldn: s 2 nt dsgr wth :gldn:, 2 c thngs smlr 2 :gldn:. Bt :gldn: ds nt trst rbbt's nstncts ths gm r hnst. Dnt lk hs sspcn f JC/LC. Fls wrng.

My vt 2dy = Lhcn, MP, Rbbit. Nt Sph, JC, Zmbs. Cld cnsdr smn ls f smthng hppnd 2 chng :gldn: mnd.

lnk sph - dm thghts mttrd b4 Dm dd, whn pstd. ddnt mttr nymr b/c Dm dd, nt tryng 2 sggst thy ddnt mttr whn sph pstd thm. Thts ll.

[Zombarella]

I can respond to things said about me if necessary, tomorrow morning. Time for bed right now. Some people are finding my analysis of MP's posts suspicious, I'm going to have to do a reread to see exactly why.

Oh, and I forget who it was that was asking if the low-posting was usual for Dom. I responded to that person, it was a bit before the night post. I find it somewhat unlikely that that person is a baddie, because I don't think a baddie would bring up Dom like that so close to executing him. Was it Zomb? I'll look back tomorrow, that post ain't going anywhere.

Sorry, I think you misunderstood. I'm not finding your analysis of MP suspicious. I just won't vote for him based on it because I think I'm biased. I need more to go on. I posted it for him again recently because he kept asking everyone why they suspected him. Also, I didn't ask you about Dom. That must have been someone else.

[Golden]

FCK VLLN WH NSNFD :GLDN: (bt n ncst pssbl wy)

Trnslt ths bt, pls!

[Sophie]

Sorry, I think you misunderstood. I'm not finding your analysis of MP suspicious. I just won't vote for him based on it because I think I'm biased. I need more to go on. I posted it for him again recently because he kept asking everyone why they suspected him. Also, I didn't ask you about Dom. That must have been someone else.

it was me. its all in the previous page or so


translation: FUCK VILLAIN WHO INSANIFIED GOLDEN (but in the nicest possible way) :P

[Golden]

thks sph.

[Marmot]

:gldn: lks plyng wth Dm, bt :gldn: nt srry tht lw pstr Dm drppd dd. Sph, yr Dm thghts r nt mprtnt nw. :gldn: hps Dm ws jdg. Myb thy klld Dm hpng Dm ws judge, kll nghtly.

:gldn: hldy 4 mst f nxt 3 dys, 0 knwldg hw mch ntrnt x-s :gldn: hs (cld b 0).

:gldn: gttng p 4 n mrnng tmrrw (nz tm) - wll hv 2 vt thn. :gldn: thghts n wh s bd kps shftng. :gldn: dfntly NT vt 4 zmbs/JC tdy - :gldn: thnks thy r crcmstntl css & thnks thy shld bth b gvn chnc 2 prv nncnc. Bth sm vry cvv 2 :gldn: xcpt 1 thng tht mks thm lk bd. & :gldn: thks bndwgn 2 cnvnnt 4 JC/zmbs.

:gldn: vt pssblts: MP. Rbbt8 pssbl, b vry crfl f hm. Lhcn, lthgh :gldn: ndrstnds hr dfnc. Bt fr prfr vt 4 Lhcn thn JC/Zmbs. Sph. Sph dsnt rmnd :gldn: f nrml cv sph. What thnk bt sph, bf??

PLS: hlp :gldn: trnslt psts,

FCK VLLN WH NSNFD :GLDN: (bt n ncst pssbl wy)

Golden like play with Dom. But Golden sorry Dom drop dead. Sophie, Dom thoughts not important now. Golden hope Dom was judge (the judge can't be NK'd silly Golden). Maybe weasel kill Dom, hope was judge and kill nightly.

Golden will have to think. Golden definitely NOT vote Zomba/JC today, let Zomba/JC prove they innocent. Both seem very civvie to Golden & blah blah blah.

Golden vote possibilities: MP, Rabbit possible, & Eloh. Golden not vote Zomba/JC today. Sophie. What does peple think Sophie? Sophie not seem like civ Sophie.

PLEASE help Golden translate back to poor caveman speak.

FUCK VILLAIN WHO INSANIFIED GOLDEN (but in incest possible way)

[blindfaeth]

@bf

Rbbt hppy 2 lynch JC
MP hppy 2 lynch JC
vryn :gldn: sspcs f sms happy 2 lynch JC.

Whr JCs dfndrs? MM - cv.

:gldn: stll sspcts lhcn.

BF cn cmplty trst :gldn: wrds. Nt frcd 2 sy prtclr thngs. Smply svd sm sspcns bcs ddnt wnt 2 ncrs chnc :gldn: wld b klld. Trst bf's Sph vw. Nt sggstng sph lynch 2dy. Smply wntd 2 flg png. :gldn: hps sph = cv. Sph ds hnt lw pstrs. Wht gldn c's wth sph, hrd 2 dscrb. Jst gt flng. Myb wll pss.

Rbbt - hw 2 dscrb. Rbbt thnks gldn gts fcsd twrds ppl tht spk bck 2 :gldn: Rbbt thnks bst wy 2 hd frm :gldn: s 2 nt dsgr wth :gldn:, 2 c thngs smlr 2 :gldn:. Bt :gldn: ds nt trst rbbt's nstncts ths gm r hnst. Dnt lk hs sspcn f JC/LC. Fls wrng.

My vt 2dy = Lhcn, MP, Rbbit. Nt Sph, JC, Zmbs. Cld cnsdr smn ls f smthng hppnd 2 chng :gldn: mnd.

lnk sph - dm thghts mttrd b4 Dm dd, whn pstd. ddnt mttr nymr b/c Dm dd, nt tryng 2 sggst thy ddnt mttr whn sph pstd thm. Thts ll.

Ok goldens saying people are happy to lynch Juliet's and no one is coming to defend her.

He also says he still suspects elo and that I can trust his words, he's not being forced to say particular things. He says he saved his suspicions til after night so he wouldn't be night killed. He trusts my view and isn't suggesting a Sophie lynch today but wanted to voice his ping. What he sees with Sophie is hard to describe but hopes she is civ and that the feeling will pass.

I have to go to bed but the rest mostly says he doesn't feel rabbits being genuine. And that he wants to vote elo, mp or rabbit today. But not zombs, Sophie or Juliet's

[Zombarella]

I added my translation in pink.

@bf

Rbbt hppy 2 lynch JC Rabbit is happy to lynch JC
MP hppy 2 lynch JC MP is happy to lynch JC
vryn :gldn: sspcs f sms happy 2 lynch JC. Everyone I'm suspicious of seems happy to lynch JC.

Whr JCs dfndrs? MM - cv. Where are JCs defenders? MM - civ.

:gldn: stll sspcts lhcn. I still suspect Elo

BF cn cmplty trst :gldn: wrds. Nt frcd 2 sy prtclr thngs. Smply svd sm sspcns bcs ddnt wnt 2 ncrs chnc :gldn: wld b klld. Trst bf's Sph vw. Nt sggstng sph lynch 2dy. Smply wntd 2 flg png. :gldn: hps sph = cv. Sph ds hnt lw pstrs. Wht gldn c's wth sph, hrd 2 dscrb. Jst gt flng. Myb wll pss.

BF can completly trust my words. Not forced to say particular things. Simply saved some suspicions because didn't want to increase chance I would be killed. Trust BF's Sophie view. Not suggesting Sophie lynch today. Simply wanted to FLG ping. I hope Sophie is civ. Sophie does hunt low posters. What I see with Sophie is hard to describe. Just get the feeling. Maybe will pass.

Rbbt - hw 2 dscrb. Rbbt thnks gldn gts fcsd twrds ppl tht spk bck 2 :gldn: Rbbt thnks bst wy 2 hd frm :gldn: s 2 nt dsgr wth :gldn:, 2 c thngs smlr 2 :gldn:. Bt :gldn: ds nt trst rbbt's nstncts ths gm r hnst. Dnt lk hs sspcn f JC/LC. Fls wrng.

Rabbit- How to describe? Rabbit thinks I get focused towards people that speak back to me. Rabbit thinks best way to hide from me is to not disagree with me, to see things similar to me. But I do not trust Rabbit's instincts this game R? honest. Don't like his suspicion of JC/LC. Feels wrong.

My vt 2dy = Lhcn, MP, Rbbit. Nt Sph, JC, Zmbs. Cld cnsdr smn ls f smthng hppnd 2 chng :gldn: mnd.

My vote today = Elo, MP, Rabbit. Not Sophie, JC, Zomba. Could consider someone else if something happened to change my mind.

lnk sph - dm thghts mttrd b4 Dm dd, whn pstd. ddnt mttr nymr b/c Dm dd, nt tryng 2 sggst thy ddnt mttr whn sph pstd thm. Thts ll.

linki Sophie - Dom thoughts mattered before Dom died, when posted. Didn't matter anymore because Dom died, not trying to suggest they didn't matter when Sophie posted them. That's all.

P.S. Zomba is the best.

[Golden]

MM

:gldn: thnks MM = hg sst. Gd ctch n jdg cnt b nkd.

[Marmot]

MM

:gldn: thnks MM = hg sst. Gd ctch n jdg cnt b nkd.

I'm really glad we're going with 24 hour days.

[Zombarella]

MM

:gldn: thnks MM = hg sst. Gd ctch n jdg cnt b nkd.

Incest possible way.

[Marmot]

Whr JCs dfndrs? MM - cv.

Lol What? Allow me to provide to you the list I made at the end of Day 1 that still holds true.

Guess I'll make a suspect list while we're at it.

1) juliets
2) Zomba
3) MP
4) Aces replaced now with Elohcin
5) Ricochet (llama is onto something there)

[Golden]

MM whn :gldn: sd JC ws tryng 2 sv smn ystrdy, MM sd JC cldnt b dng sv. Thts wht :gldn: ws rmmbrg.

Bt gs 2 shw, vryn fnds JC sspcs, vn b4 lynch. Th mr :gldn: thnks bt ths, th lss lkly JC sms 2 b bd. Thnk cvvs wld b mstkn 2 vt tht wy. Sm wy :gldn: flt cvvs wld b mstkn 2 vt 4 MM ystrdy.

[Golden]

Rffrng 2 :gldn: n th 3rd prsn mks :gldn: snd lk rrgnt ssht.

[Marmot]

MM whn :gldn: sd JC ws tryng 2 sv smn ystrdy, MM sd JC cldnt b dng sv. Thts wht :gldn: ws rmmbrg.

Bt gs 2 shw, vryn fnds JC sspcs, vn b4 lynch. Th mr :gldn: thnks bt ths, th lss lkly JC sms 2 b bd. Thnk cvvs wld b mstkn 2 vt tht wy. Sm wy :gldn: flt cvvs wld b mstkn 2 vt 4 MM ystrdy.

Ah, I see. I do remember that. I did not factor your playstyle into that argument (which you seem to be doing), and that's not an easy thing to do.

But I made a similar move with my self-vote, to see how people would respond, specifically MP, because I know how he feels about it.

@MP, btw, if you want me to be held accountable for self-voting, why didn't you vote for me?

Linki: You are an arrogant little sshit.

[Golden]

Lnk: Y r n rrgnt lttl ssht.

Ths s wht :gldn: gts 4 cllng MM hg sst

[Dom]

Was having trouble keeping up anyhow! GO GAME!!

[Golden]

@gldn

Lhcn, srry 4 cttng tht pst dwn, bt wntd 2 dmnstrt ths ws rply (wtht rmvng th vwls frm yr whl pst).

Wht lhcn sd srt f mks sns 2 :gldn:. :gldn: cn ndrstnd y my cs sms slly whn lhcn hs nt plyd wth :gldn: Th lngr :gldn: c's JC 2 b cv & gts lss sspcs f hr vt, th lss :gldn:'s Lhcn cs mks sns.

:gldn: nw bck 2 thnkng MP/rbbt wll b vt 2dy. :gldn: mvng frm thry tht sggsts bdds wr stpd, hdndg bdly, 2 thry tht bdds wr smrt, hdng wll, nt dfdng _c_s. Vt pttrns mttr. MP vt 4 bf nd rbbt vt 4 JC bth pntlss, bt bth dfdndbl 4 bng cnsstnt wth thr frst pngs, thrfr hrd 2 crtcs. :gldn: dd crtcs bth fr pntlss vt, & :gldn: stnds by hs ssssmnt tht thy hd 0 chnc f lynchng bf & JC. MP & rbbt wld bth b smrt vllns f thy r vllns. My MP thry f shftng vt fcs s cnstnt wth smrt vlln. MP & rbbt bth though gldn/_c_s cv vs cv 2. Smrt wy 2 sty dscnnctd frm lynch.

:gldn: wll hv bt 20 mns 2 rd & dcd n mrng. Wld b rlly hlpfl f ppl :gldn: trsts cld gv thghts n MP & rbbt 2 hlp :gldn: ndrstnd & dcd whch 1 2 vt 4.

[rabbit8]

I can respond to things said about me if necessary, tomorrow morning. Time for bed right now. Some people are finding my analysis of MP's posts suspicious, I'm going to have to do a reread to see exactly why.

Oh, and I forget who it was that was asking if the low-posting was usual for Dom. I responded to that person, it was a bit before the night post. I find it somewhat unlikely that that person is a baddie, because I don't think a baddie would bring up Dom like that so close to executing him. Was it Zomb? I'll look back tomorrow, that post ain't going anywhere.

If the baddies actually targeted Dom for NK they are idiot. I doubt that happened.

@bf

Rbbt hppy 2 lynch JC
MP hppy 2 lynch JC
vryn :gldn: sspcs f sms happy 2 lynch JC.

Whr JCs dfndrs? MM - cv.

:gldn: stll sspcts lhcn.

BF cn cmplty trst :gldn: wrds. Nt frcd 2 sy prtclr thngs. Smply svd sm sspcns bcs ddnt wnt 2 ncrs chnc :gldn: wld b klld. Trst bf's Sph vw. Nt sggstng sph lynch 2dy. Smply wntd 2 flg png. :gldn: hps sph = cv. Sph ds hnt lw pstrs. Wht gldn c's wth sph, hrd 2 dscrb. Jst gt flng. Myb wll pss.

Rbbt - hw 2 dscrb. Rbbt thnks gldn gts fcsd twrds ppl tht spk bck 2 :gldn: Rbbt thnks bst wy 2 hd frm :gldn: s 2 nt dsgr wth :gldn:, 2 c thngs smlr 2 :gldn:. Bt :gldn: ds nt trst rbbt's nstncts ths gm r hnst. Dnt lk hs sspcn f JC/LC. Fls wrng.

My vt 2dy = Lhcn, MP, Rbbit. Nt Sph, JC, Zmbs. Cld cnsdr smn ls f smthng hppnd 2 chng :gldn: mnd.

lnk sph - dm thghts mttrd b4 Dm dd, whn pstd. ddnt mttr nymr b/c Dm dd, nt tryng 2 sggst thy ddnt mttr whn sph pstd thm. Thts ll.

Yeah, whatever. Who the fuck in their right mind would come to JC's defense now? No one. Don't be a moron. The defense was there on day one though. Now that has all dried up....Why is that?

[rabbit8]

Thanks for cursing Golden, Baddies. He posts more than Christians pray to God for petty shit. Since he’s all of a sudden decided to go after me I now have to read that shit. THANKS A FUCKING LOT!

[Long Con]

@gldn

Lhcn, srry 4 cttng tht pst dwn, bt wntd 2 dmnstrt ths ws rply (wtht rmvng th vwls frm yr whl pst).

Wht lhcn sd srt f mks sns 2 :gldn:. :gldn: cn ndrstnd y my cs sms slly whn lhcn hs nt plyd wth :gldn: Th lngr :gldn: c's JC 2 b cv & gts lss sspcs f hr vt, th lss :gldn:'s Lhcn cs mks sns.

:gldn: nw bck 2 thnkng MP/rbbt wll b vt 2dy. :gldn: mvng frm thry tht sggsts bdds wr stpd, hdndg bdly, 2 thry tht bdds wr smrt, hdng wll, nt dfdng _c_s. Vt pttrns mttr. MP vt 4 bf nd rbbt vt 4 JC bth pntlss, bt bth dfdndbl 4 bng cnsstnt wth thr frst pngs, thrfr hrd 2 crtcs. :gldn: dd crtcs bth fr pntlss vt, & :gldn: stnds by hs ssssmnt tht thy hd 0 chnc f lynchng bf & JC. MP & rbbt wld bth b smrt vllns f thy r vllns. My MP thry f shftng vt fcs s cnstnt wth smrt vlln. MP & rbbt bth though gldn/_c_s cv vs cv 2. Smrt wy 2 sty dscnnctd frm lynch.

:gldn: wll hv bt 20 mns 2 rd & dcd n mrng. Wld b rlly hlpfl f ppl :gldn: trsts cld gv thghts n MP & rbbt 2 hlp :gldn: ndrstnd & dcd whch 1 2 vt 4.

Elohcin, sorry for cutting that post down, but I wanted to demonstrate this was a reply (without removing words from your post).

What Elohcin said sort of makes sense to me. I can understand why my case seems silly when Elohcin has not played with me. The longer I see Juliets to be Civ and gets less suspicious of her vote, the less my Elohcin case makes sense.

I'm now back to thinking MP or Rabbit will be my vote today. I'm moving from my theory that suggests the baddies were stupid, hiding badly, to a theory that baddies were smart, hiding well, not defending Aces. Vote patterns matter. MP's vote for blindfaeth and rabbit's vote for Juliets were both pointless, but both defendable for being consistent with their first pings, therefore hard to criticize. I did criticize both for a pointless vote, and I stand by this assessment that they had zero chance of lynching blindfaeth and Juliets. MP and rabbit would both be smart villains if they are villains. My MP theory of shifting vote focus is consistent with a smart villain. MP and rabbit both thought Golden/Aces were Civ vs Civ too. Smart way to stay disconnected from the lynch.

I will have about twenty minutes to read and decide in the morning. Would be really helpful if people I trust could give thoughts on MP and rabbit to help me understand and decide which one to vote for.

[juliets]

Thank you Zomba and LC.

[rabbit8]

I stand by my last vote. When I voted I could neither save MM or get Aces lynched. So I voted for who I thought was bad. To bad I did not think Aces was bad. I would look a lot more civve. Guess I'm not a very good FEB if Golden actually thinks I would not have voted for Aces in that situation. You know considering if I had BTSC with him I would know he was not a civvie ad my vote was fucking meaningless.



I will likely vote for JC again unless something major changes.

[Long Con]

Wow, rabbit is really not a morning person. So, what, you're saying that you think Dom is a Duck and that Sophie is a likely baddie who tried to kill him? Why would it make the baddies idiots for targeting Dom? Maybe everything is going their way in the thread, so they don't NEED to kill anyone to "shut them up" or whatever... so they went for a non-participator because they don't like non-participators. If he was a Duck then I guess their original target should be a bit safer now, since a lone little Duck isn't really a high priority to take out.

I'm not sold on Juliets being a baddie. Maybe that means I'm not in my right mind.

[rabbit8]

Wow, rabbit is really not a morning person. So, what, you're saying that you think Dom is a Duck and that Sophie is a likely baddie who tried to kill him? Why would it make the baddies idiots for targeting Dom? Maybe everything is going their way in the thread, so they don't NEED to kill anyone to "shut them up" or whatever... so they went for a non-participator because they don't like non-participators. If he was a Duck then I guess their original target should be a bit safer now, since a lone little Duck isn't really a high priority to take out.

I'm not sold on Juliets being a baddie. Maybe that means I'm not in my right mind.

I never once said Sophie was a baddie. Please don't put words in my mouth. Thank you.
No baddie in their right mind would have killed a player who was in fact not playing. Keep pushing it and all your other stupid ideas though. Lets lynch MM over and over, see what happens. Way to contribute with al your nonsense.

lol, my back is hurting.

[Long Con]

I stand by my last vote. When I voted I could neither save MM or get Aces lynched. So I voted for who I thought was bad. To bad I did not think Aces was bad. I would look a lot more civve. Guess I'm not a very good FEB if Golden actually thinks I would not have voted for Aces in that situation. You know considering if I had BTSC with him I would know he was not a civvie ad my vote was fucking meaningless.

Interesting perspective, especially considering BR was getting heat for being a late voter for Aces.

[fingersplints]

LC who are the people you "trust"?

I don't believe juliets is teammates with Aces. I had btsc with her in Monopoly, and she is very team oriented. I don't think she would have voted that early with Aces in danger. She still could be indy. But I doubt I will be voting there today.

I still don't believe Zomba. She is a new player, and I think she slipped up about Aces. Of course someone you have btsc with is an asset to you.

I'm really conflicted about MP. My gut tells me he is bad, but I have been wrong about him several times recently. His day 1 vote bothers me too. MAinly because he was bad in a game on ksite recently and he was bad and he voted off like this then too.

also thanks Benny You aren't wrong in trusting me

[rabbit8]

I stand by my last vote. When I voted I could neither save MM or get Aces lynched. So I voted for who I thought was bad. To bad I did not think Aces was bad. I would look a lot more civve. Guess I'm not a very good FEB if Golden actually thinks I would not have voted for Aces in that situation. You know considering if I had BTSC with him I would know he was not a civvie ad my vote was fucking meaningless.

Interesting perspective, especially considering BR was getting heat for being a late voter for Aces.

Yes, I agree. Her vote was what it was. Come on vote for, please. I just want to total turn around from me accusing you to you voting for me. Please do it, please. I LIKE HOW SHE DEFENDS YOU THEN YOU DEFEND HER EVEN THOUGH I DID NOT BRING UP HER NAME IN MY POST.

[rabbit8]

LC who are the people you "trust"?

I don't believe juliets is teammates with Aces. I had btsc with her in Monopoly, and she is very team oriented. I don't think she would have voted that early with Aces in danger. She still could be indy. But I doubt I will be voting there today.

I still don't believe Zomba. She is a new player, and I think she slipped up about Aces. Of course someone you have btsc with is an asset to you.

I'm really conflicted about MP. My gut tells me he is bad, but I have been wrong about him several times recently. His day 1 vote bothers me too. MAinly because he was bad in a game on ksite recently and he was bad and he voted off like this then too.

also thanks Benny You aren't wrong in trusting me

Aces was NOT in danger when she voted. Tha was HER defense to the accusation the entire time.

[Long Con]

Wow, rabbit is really not a morning person. So, what, you're saying that you think Dom is a Duck and that Sophie is a likely baddie who tried to kill him? Why would it make the baddies idiots for targeting Dom? Maybe everything is going their way in the thread, so they don't NEED to kill anyone to "shut them up" or whatever... so they went for a non-participator because they don't like non-participators. If he was a Duck then I guess their original target should be a bit safer now, since a lone little Duck isn't really a high priority to take out.

I'm not sold on Juliets being a baddie. Maybe that means I'm not in my right mind.

I never once said Sophie was a baddie. Please don't put words in my mouth. Thank you.
No baddie in their right mind would have killed a player who was in fact not playing. Keep pushing it and all your other stupid ideas though. Lets lynch MM over and over, see what happens. Way to contribute with al your nonsense.

lol, my back is hurting.

Hey, when you're stupid like me, that's the only ideas you can come up with. I'm just trying to participate in a game where other minds like yours are so far ahead of mine, I'll try to be smarter from now on. And I'll cut the jokes down to zero, I can see how a joke like the MM thing would get confused with the serious stupidity that my mouth pours forth. I appreciate your honesty, these other jerks just let me keep going like someone's idiot little brother.

[fingersplints]

LC who are the people you "trust"?

I don't believe juliets is teammates with Aces. I had btsc with her in Monopoly, and she is very team oriented. I don't think she would have voted that early with Aces in danger. She still could be indy. But I doubt I will be voting there today.

I still don't believe Zomba. She is a new player, and I think she slipped up about Aces. Of course someone you have btsc with is an asset to you.

I'm really conflicted about MP. My gut tells me he is bad, but I have been wrong about him several times recently. His day 1 vote bothers me too. MAinly because he was bad in a game on ksite recently and he was bad and he voted off like this then too.

also thanks Benny You aren't wrong in trusting me

Aces was NOT in danger when she voted. Tha was HER defense to the accusation the entire time.

He didn't have votes. He was being discussed heavily.

[fingersplints]

Wow, rabbit is really not a morning person. So, what, you're saying that you think Dom is a Duck and that Sophie is a likely baddie who tried to kill him? Why would it make the baddies idiots for targeting Dom? Maybe everything is going their way in the thread, so they don't NEED to kill anyone to "shut them up" or whatever... so they went for a non-participator because they don't like non-participators. If he was a Duck then I guess their original target should be a bit safer now, since a lone little Duck isn't really a high priority to take out.

I'm not sold on Juliets being a baddie. Maybe that means I'm not in my right mind.

I never once said Sophie was a baddie. Please don't put words in my mouth. Thank you.
No baddie in their right mind would have killed a player who was in fact not playing. Keep pushing it and all your other stupid ideas though. Lets lynch MM over and over, see what happens. Way to contribute with al your nonsense.

lol, my back is hurting.

baddies kill low participators all the time. It's a great kill. Harder to trace

[rabbit8]

Wow, rabbit is really not a morning person. So, what, you're saying that you think Dom is a Duck and that Sophie is a likely baddie who tried to kill him? Why would it make the baddies idiots for targeting Dom? Maybe everything is going their way in the thread, so they don't NEED to kill anyone to "shut them up" or whatever... so they went for a non-participator because they don't like non-participators. If he was a Duck then I guess their original target should be a bit safer now, since a lone little Duck isn't really a high priority to take out.

I'm not sold on Juliets being a baddie. Maybe that means I'm not in my right mind.

I never once said Sophie was a baddie. Please don't put words in my mouth. Thank you.
No baddie in their right mind would have killed a player who was in fact not playing. Keep pushing it and all your other stupid ideas though. Lets lynch MM over and over, see what happens. Way to contribute with al your nonsense.

lol, my back is hurting.

Hey, when you're stupid like me, that's the only ideas you can come up with. I'm just trying to participate in a game where other minds like yours are so far ahead of mine, I'll try to be smarter from now on. And I'll cut the jokes down to zero, I can see how a joke like the MM thing would get confused with the serious stupidity that my mouth pours forth. I appreciate your honesty, these other jerks just let me keep going like someone's idiot little brother.

Oh please, my pain killers have not kicked in. We both know you're not stupid. Thus why I can't understand what you're playing at this game. You have yet to actually bring anything to the table.


For FS: Since when is being discussed mean you're in trouble? Never.

As I said if the baddies killed Dom, idiots. It could have happened. I DOUBT IT.

[Long Con]

I stand by my last vote. When I voted I could neither save MM or get Aces lynched. So I voted for who I thought was bad. To bad I did not think Aces was bad. I would look a lot more civve. Guess I'm not a very good FEB if Golden actually thinks I would not have voted for Aces in that situation. You know considering if I had BTSC with him I would know he was not a civvie ad my vote was fucking meaningless.

Interesting perspective, especially considering BR was getting heat for being a late voter for Aces.

Yes, I agree. Her vote was what it was. Come on vote for, please. I just want to total turn around from me accusing you to you voting for me. Please do it, please. I LIKE HOW SHE DEFENDS YOU THEN YOU DEFEND HER EVEN THOUGH I DID NOT BRING UP HER NAME IN MY POST.

Please don't put words in my mouth. That wasn't a defense of BR, that was a rebuttal to the idea that you, as Aces' teammate, would have been smart to cast your late vote for him. BR did it, and it got her some suspicion.

And I'm not entering a 'showdown' by request with you again. You keep using it to act like I'm No U-ing you. You asked for this. You wanted me to come after you, and now you're getting all flustered about it. Now you're trying to create a situation where, if I suspect you, it's all about your opinion of me. Let me tell you, the fact that I suspect you has nothing to do with how you feel about me, it's about the way you act.

[Long Con]

Wow, rabbit is really not a morning person. So, what, you're saying that you think Dom is a Duck and that Sophie is a likely baddie who tried to kill him? Why would it make the baddies idiots for targeting Dom? Maybe everything is going their way in the thread, so they don't NEED to kill anyone to "shut them up" or whatever... so they went for a non-participator because they don't like non-participators. If he was a Duck then I guess their original target should be a bit safer now, since a lone little Duck isn't really a high priority to take out.

I'm not sold on Juliets being a baddie. Maybe that means I'm not in my right mind.

I never once said Sophie was a baddie. Please don't put words in my mouth. Thank you.
No baddie in their right mind would have killed a player who was in fact not playing. Keep pushing it and all your other stupid ideas though. Lets lynch MM over and over, see what happens. Way to contribute with al your nonsense.

lol, my back is hurting.

Hey, when you're stupid like me, that's the only ideas you can come up with. I'm just trying to participate in a game where other minds like yours are so far ahead of mine, I'll try to be smarter from now on. And I'll cut the jokes down to zero, I can see how a joke like the MM thing would get confused with the serious stupidity that my mouth pours forth. I appreciate your honesty, these other jerks just let me keep going like someone's idiot little brother.

Oh please, my pain killers have not kicked in. We both know you're not stupid. Thus why I can't understand what you're playing at this game. You have yet to actually bring anything to the table.


For FS: Since when is being discussed mean you're in trouble? Never.

As I said if the baddies killed Dom, idiots. It could have happened. I DOUBT IT.

No no, I'm quite stupid. But even a stupid like me can see that you're starting to feel the walls closing in on you, and it's making you nervous, painkillers notwithstanding. You weren't feeling it back when I made the case about you on Day One, but you sure are feeling it now that Golden the Certified Baddie Hunter has his sights set on you.

Wait did I make a case on you? Maybe I'm misremembering. I thought I did an analysis of MP as well... maybe that was in another game, because I haven't brought anything to the table in this game.

[rabbit8]

No no. When I asked you that It was a joke. You knew that, I knew that. Then it became a serious accusation later in the game.

But do tell. What makes me bad? Please lay it out for me and don't just change course because Golden did. Really easy for you to now go after me once he has. What is your case, son.

link: No I could care less about Golden, he knows it. I don't get backed into corners. Not during a lynch.

[rabbit8]

You did bring up MP, AFTER you got called out as bad and it was said buy my you OR MP could be bad.

I like that move, classy.

[rabbit8]

You did bring up MP, AFTER you got called out as bad and it was said buy my you OR MP could be bad.

I like that move, classy.

Haha they have kicked in.

You did bring up MP, AFTER you got called out as bad and it was said BY ME you OR MP could be bad.

OK fixed that.

[Long Con]

No no. When I asked you that It was a joke. You knew that, I knew that. Then it became a serious accusation later in the game.

But do tell. What makes me bad? Please lay it out for me and don't just change course because Golden did. Really easy for you to now go after me once he has. What is your case, son.

link: No I could care less about Golden, he knows it. I don't get backed into corners. Not during a lynch.

The original case I made on you still stands as suspicious to me, that had nothing to do with Golden obviously. It's true that I accepted the challenge as a joke, but it's also true that what I found when I forced myself to make a case on you was reasonably convincing.

I don't have a new case to make on you, I suspect you for the reasons I laid out on Day One (if you need me to go back and put them into the thread again fresh, say 'guillotine')... and I think Golden's ideas about you are pretty sound as well. I'm not going to pretend I have a completely separate case on you than Golden. Just because what he says makes sense to me doesn't mean I'm going after you only because he is.

[rabbit8]

Ugh, feels like there is lots of confusing stuff going on.

BR - sorry, what I meant to say was that although I don't particularly suspect you any more (and the only reason I did was pretty lame to begin with - Aces made me feel like you were bad, nothing you did), it's not impossible that someone could have voted aces late, knowing (assuming, at least) he wouldn't be lynched. So although I don't think you look bad right now, I don't feel as though the aces vote clears you either.

Having said that - your post I likey. I actually agree with you on LC, and (ironically) rabbit's tunnel vision is making me worry about him.

Oh please I don't have tunnel vision. I even replied to LC that it could be him or MP.

Because I think he is bad does not mean I think only he is bad, jeez. Pretty sure if MP is bad LC is not.

And Yes in my eyes I thought his vote was what sealed the deal. People usually post what they see, how they see it. Do they not BR? I knew there was no way Aces would get the most votes when I voted. That's what I was accused of by LC, throwing my vote away. That's why I said anything about it at all.

I will likely be voting for JC today again. She's is my top suspect. Sorry I can't have more than 1.

Your very next post:

Just trying to go through MP's posts to see what I can see.

Rabbit, if it helps, Aces played Death Note almost exactly as he has now, and he helped lynch a civilian. He was NKed, so his alignment is unknown.

This is a good example of a statement that defends Aces in a sort of subtle way. It's not "I think he's not bad", but it does say "This is how Aces plays, and maybe it's not his baddie game."

Then he indicates that he doesn't want to vote for Aces or MM, but continues to prefer an MM lynch even as he went for BF. Not defending... but directing his attention elsewhere. Then he gives a suspect list that doesn't include Aces.

That's really all I can see for MP in a search of his posts.

Nice way to grab onto Goldens top suspect after THE LYNCH HAPPENED, AND TRY TO MAKE YOUSELF LOOK BETTER.

[Long Con]

You did bring up MP, AFTER you got called out as bad and it was said buy my you OR MP could be bad.

I like that move, classy.

Haha they have kicked in.

You did bring up MP, AFTER you got called out as bad and it was said BY ME you OR MP could be bad.

OK fixed that.

I'm going to check on the timelines you are putting forth here. Give me some time, I think you are wrong. Also, I have a post responding to Splints that keeps getting pushed aside because you won't shut up at me.