Elohcin wrote:MovingPictures07 wrote:Are we seriously contemplating letting LC not be lynched tomorrow? I don't understand that.
Of course not. I am just trying to make him feel better since I found out who he really is and he did such a fine job of convincing he was someone else before. But LC is going down. Sorry LC.
Then I clearly misunderstood what you were saying entirely. Lol.
Zomberella12 wrote:I resent the implication that I have played anything but a proper game. I did not infodump on LC. I was very careful about what I said. You guys were smart and figured out what I figured out but that doesn't mean that I'm not playing fair. (Go ahead and re-read my posts. You will see.)
@MP - What would you expect me to do? I think that LC is the judge and then I just keep it to myself? Why would I do that? I caught him fair and square and he doesn't deserve any sympathy.
I'm not saying you broke the rules or anything, but I do think it's bad form to say over and over again that you KNOW LC is Judge. Last I checked, that's infodumping, whether true or not. What you should have done is said I "very strongly believe" LC is Judge and here's why. Or something else. Just avoid saying you know something is true.
It'd be like if there was a straight up role checker this game and that person checked LC and said "Everyone, I know LC is Judge, wink wink."
It's unfair to the person you crusaded against. You shouldn't avoid saying anything, but don't just dump the information in thread, that ruins the game. Instead, just gun hard after LC. We all would have lynched him anyway if you hadn't said anything.
I'm not trying to get on you, those are just my thoughts on the matter, and they're for future reference. You're not the only player that has unnecessarily bluntly infodumped too strongly, IMO, and in addition to being bad form, it tells the baddies who has which civilian roles, and does the work for them. There's a way to communicate valuable information without using the phrase "I know".
Zomberella12 wrote:MovingPictures07 wrote:fingersplints wrote:If you don't think LC is the judge, wouldn't it make most sense to want to lynch who you think is the judge? I'm not sure I really understand your position on this MP. We want to eliminate the kill
I've said this, but apparently I haven't been clear.
I personally believe LC is Toon Patrol based on how everything went down, but it's clear as day what Zomba is claiming, and if that is true, LC is the Judge. If I'm to believe my own personal evaluation of what happened, ignoring evidence to the contrary, I think he's bad. If I take the evidence that Zomba is pushing at face value, he 100% has to be Judge.
Either way, we don't have a better candidate for Judge, so it seems obvious to me that we should lynch LC tomorrow.
Because if Zomba is telling the truth in her blatant infodumping, then yes, he has the kill, and we want to eliminate it. On the off chance she's bluffing and LC really is bad, then it's still a win-win, and the Judge is roaming around like he would otherwise be.
@ MP - I literally do not understand what you are trying to say in the last sentence.
I'm saying that:
1) If you're telling the truth about what you've been heavily implying, then LC is Judge. He has a kill and would use it if we don't lynch him tomorrow. Therefore, it's good to lynch him tomorrow.
2) If you're lying and LC really is a Toon Patrol member, then it's still good because we get rid of a baddie.
, but I feel more likely this is her civvie game and reading these makes me feel good about that.
Is this really how we want to play Mafia, shutting our eyes to the most likely possibility?
Damned if you do, damned if you don't. Now to remember all of the horrible movies I've pushed into the recesses of my memory and choose the best-worst one.
)
rip eloh. 
