Who Framed Roger Rabbit? [Day 10]

#1851

Hum maybe I'm off on BR, I just skimmed the last few pages and missed her, I reread (skimming again) them and I see more from her than I remember, just woke up, trying to get on track again.

#1852

Elohcin wrote:
fingersplints wrote:
juliets wrote:That has been done in some games Elo but i believe they were all Rev games.
Moobyworld!
That would be cool...just for the civs as the baddies of course still would have their BTSC. I am going to do that for Guess Who Mafia

you'd need to have a game where rez isn't possible if you split the deadies up by civ/mafia... unless you specifically wanted to provide an advantage to being dead.

Moobyworld and other games like that were really fun. Some people participated. Some people didn't. Up to them.

#1853

You baddies! How could you?? Not Elohcin!

RIP Eloh, it breaks my heart that they did this.

rabbit8 wrote:Plus the fact the Judge kill will not go to the weasels makes me think we have to lynch LC. No reason to keep a NK around, it does not help civvies in the least. He's a good sport though.

Even if I were The Judge, I would use my kill to target a baddie. The baddies are the ones who set me up and secured my name as a lynch target. I absolutely have no affiliation with those guys, and I want to see them lose.

#1854

RIP Elo.

How did you come to those conclusions, BR, can you elaborate on what you're currently thinking re: those people you named at all?

#1855

I think a teammate of Bass' came out against him because they knew that The Judge had exposed him through the fingersplints vote, as Canuck hypothesized. I think that it was a preemptive move, anticipating that Bass would be going down.

blindfaeth brought up Bass first, in a brief way, and then Canuck came in very strong, making a case, and then adding in the next post that he had a weird vote for Splints that could be caused by The Judge. I really don't know which one is involved, but they're high on my suspect list.

#1856

RIP Elohchin. I'm really sorry to see you go.

@ BR - What the...? Where is this coming from? Does this have something to do with how I used (or didn't use) my power last night? I told you that I wanted to help the civs, not hurt them. I want to defend myself because I am not lying but I honestly have no idea why you suddenly think that I'm bad.

#1857

Black Rock wrote:Zombie girl is a liar. She is not the role she is hinting at. I would not trust her at all. I don't know why people have put trust in her so easily, but you shouldn't.

I have a very short list on who could be bad.
Zomba
Ninjablooper
Bea
Llama
Sophie
Rabbit8
Blindfaeth

There are three toons left.
Zomberella is one as far as I am concerned and I feel like the other two hide in that list as well.

That's actually a pretty long list. I agree with the top three suspects very much. I don't know if that list is in order ro who you suspect the most though. If LC was set up his last post is very interesting to me.

OK, say Zomba is bad. Do you think she is actually lying about LC?
Why was Nij not Lynched last day?

#1858

I believe bea is not a baddie. Her playstyle this game has been very consistent with her Civvie game as I recall it.

rabbit8 wrote:If LC was set up his last post is very interesting to me.

I was truly set up. I understand that, although some people believe that already, it will take my lynch for the rest to believe it. My lynch will reveal that I'm not Bass' teammate. It would be easier if you would just believe that now, rather than doubt that now and find out after my lynch. I say this because I can speak now, and I cannot after my death.

Please just read my posts with the understanding that I was set up. Worst case scenario, you lynch me and I'm lying and you can come back and see my lies, or something. But that's not going to happen.

Trust that I was set up, and give me an honest chance to try and take down those that I believe set me up. Not only would I appreciate it, but I think it will really help find the baddies, so that's Civvie advantage right there. And as I said, you'll know if I was lying soon enough, and it's easy enough to disregard every word I've said after that. But I'm not lying.

I don't know everything, maybe I don't know anything - as you said, there could be baddies emulating Civvie powers, or just baddies that have an array of powers to use. Maybe there's a baddie that can dead rolecheck, and use their powers once. If secret powers were in play, all my suspicions are harder to be sure of. It's just... going through events and how they went down, I come to certain conclusions that I can't shake. The timing of everything.

Why can't Nijuu just be RK Maroon, saving herself from the lynch? Or maybe RK Maroon is long dead, and Canuck is a baddie who used the power to save herself, and then to save Nijuu for more lynch chaos? More lynches that don't lynch baddies means more baddie kill opportunities. That's just a regular theory I have, unrelated to my own setup and suspicions surrounding that (beyond the suspicion that Canuck was involved with it). Everyone seems very sure of Nijuu's badness, to the point that you're just going to lynch her again. I'm not convinced, myself.

#1859

Your last paragraph is not acceptable to me. This is the first time all game I have seen you hunt baddies. It's refreshing. I will tell you this. I have some reasons, pretty concrete ones to believe Nij is NOT Maroon. I can not prove it, and you can not believe it if you wish. But if you would indulge me, explain what you can taking that into consideration on BF and Canuck. TBH I've seen them as civ for a while now. Start of the game I was getting baddie vibes from BF, but no for a while.

Who is devious enough to set you up like this? Canuck, BF, Nij, Me? Who? I want your take. I'm 95% sure you're the judge, and if you want to live you have to convince players to not lynch you knowing at some point you will have to be lynched at some point. You are not going to win this game it would seem. Though you pretty tricky. Look at you trying to get out of this.

#1860

LC, I know you're desperate, and I applaud your verve in attempting to stay alive, but I'm disappointed that I'm the one you've chosen to hang your hopes on by trying to take me down.

I am not bad. Ninja is not Maroon. I am not Maroon, nor did I "steal" Maroon's powers, nor have I ever claimed or implied that I am Maroon. I have worked really hard this game to find baddies, and I've found and spearheaded lynches against two of them (the fact that the second one didn't take is a huge annoyance to me, but eventually the baddies will run out of powers and she will be lynched and revealed). I am pleased with the game I've played, I know I've contributed to the civ cause (which is not something I can usually say, even in games where I last deep into the game), so if you succeed in turning my friends against me I will be disappointed, but secure in the knowledge that I was actually useful. I've done good civ work this game. I've made good cases against baddies. Turn your desperation straw-grasping against someone else, please.

#1861

FYI folks I have to run errands today and will be spending some time with Spacedaisy, then I have to study, then I'll be going over to Zomba and Snowman's house to celebrate Pi Day (eating pie and playing strategy games FTW), so I won't be around much today.

Thankfully, I already know who I'm voting, lol, so I might as well do that now.

#1862

Votes LC :P

#1863

MovingPictures07 wrote:Votes LC :P

MP, we are supposed to keep our votes together. It was Eloh's dying wish. Now you have squandered yours.

#1864

thellama73 wrote:
MovingPictures07 wrote:Votes LC :P
MP, we are supposed to keep our votes together. It was Eloh's dying wish. Now you have squandered yours.

Real funny, Llama.

#1865

rabbit8 wrote:Look at you trying to get out of this.

Canucklehead wrote:Turn your desperation straw-grasping against someone else, please.

I'm not sure what part of my last post gave you the impression that I was trying to avoid getting lynched. I'm trying to take down baddies.

* * * * *

You guys have much stronger opinions on Nijuu than I do, so I'll defer to your opinions on this one. That last part of my last post was just my perspective, and with my suspicion that Canuck is on Bass' baddie team, it gave me a more sympathetic view on Nijuu's situation. I wish that I had done that five-asterisk separator line between the rest of my post and the Nijuu paragraph, because it was a completely separate thought and it looks like I'm making the Nijuu part logically follow the rest.

* * * * *

rabbit8 wrote:This is the first time all game I have seen you hunt baddies. It's refreshing.

Long Con wrote:Rabbit has shown his true colours very early in this game. From what I recall about his playstyle, he tends to be more aggressive as a baddie. Throwing out accusations, trying to see what will stick. For example:

rabbit8 wrote:
Black Rock wrote:Not a chance in the world, not without good reason. I have been waiting years to play with the evil bastard again.
If memory serves me, which it never does, that kind of post would make me very suspicious of you, for some reason. It used to be a sign of....something. I'm sure it will all come back in due time. Maybe another beer or ten.
This kind of suspicion-splashing with no attempt or intention of backing it up. It's a way of "planting seeds" that he can come back to later if need be. I've even seen this kind of behaviour as a distancing tactic from a teammate, and I don't think any further explanation of how that works is needed.

Between that comment, and the playful and unserious non-accusations he has tossed around, and the sudden "let's make something happen" aggression spike toward me... I have a feeling that we're seeing the baddie rabbit8 game.

Long Con wrote:
Metalmarsh89 wrote:I self-voted because I don't see anything suspicicious
Maybe I'll follow you on that vote. I've made it clear how I feel about this kind of thing in other games:

Long Con wrote:
Turnip Head wrote:... you've named Marsh your biggest suspect. Can you explain your suspicion of him a bit?
Looking back over his posts, the self-vote gives me a bad feeling. Remember Jason Maher on LP? He always self-voted on Day One, and I realized it was giving him a pass, free from adding any real content whether bad or Civ, and making him not likely to be lynched Day One. I got tired of it, and pushed for his Day One lynch because of it. He was lynched, and was a baddie. And I was like "Yessss!" So, since then, the Day One self-vote always gets my eye. But that's not why I was suspecting MM, that's just something I thought of in the reread.
That's from the Film Director's game, a game I am currently still playing.

Metalmarsh was lynched as a baddie in that game.

MM is now my most likely vote.

Long Con wrote:Just trying to go through MP's posts to see what I can see.

MovingPictures07 wrote:Rabbit, if it helps, Aces played Death Note almost exactly as he has now, and he helped lynch a civilian. He was NKed, so his alignment is unknown.
This is a good example of a statement that defends Aces in a sort of subtle way. It's not "I think he's not bad", but it does say "This is how Aces plays, and maybe it's not his baddie game."

Then he indicates that he doesn't want to vote for Aces or MM, but continues to prefer an MM lynch even as he went for BF. Not defending... but directing his attention elsewhere. Then he gives a suspect list that doesn't include Aces.

That's really all I can see for MP in a search of his posts.

Long Con wrote:Voting from work bathroom, I don't agree with people who think rabbit is being genuine. I think he's being overly dramatic in his posts in order to sway people. Also I trust MM, don't understand the votes for him.

Be back soon.

Long Con wrote:Ok, I chose Elohcin because she was the last poster (at the time I started writing this - 3:14pm EST). I have seen Elohcin's name come up a few times, but I'm a bit vague on the suspicion that crops up here and there around here. It's connected to juliets I think, and a vague suspicion around her. I'm going to go through her game and see what I can see.

Golden initially suspected Elohcin for her vote for Thurston the Porter, [urlhttp://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/viewtopic.php ... 80#p121380]here[/url] is the post where he lays out the mild case based on the Day 0 poll. Here's Golden explaining his suspicion:

Golden wrote:I mean, like, I guess what I expect is people read the thread and think about what others are saying. I had publicly shed doubt on it being the porter. Aces voted before even posting once. Elo earlier said her instinct was the porter based on a first read but would hold her vote... then later on said 'i read the post again and i still think its the porter'. What about what everyone else is saying about the post? Just the post itself? To me just putting a vote on the thing that is already in the lead with no explanation just looks dodgy, it's the kind of thing you do to avoid heat or standing out. Baddie tactics generally, in other words.
Golden also suggests that Elo is a good target for the low-poster vote, and she counters with the idea of voting for low-contributors, which may be different from low-posters. She has no suspicions at that time.

5 hours later, she agrees with juliets' 'maybe-maybe not' suspicion of Llama for his early Zomb vote, and casts a vote for him on the grounds that he's suspicious for the Z vote. Looks to me like a pretty reasonable Day One vote. Golden presses her about the Day 0 vote again, which I think is a bit odd... and Elo's story seems to check out.

She says the "case" against juliets is silly, and those after her are most likely bad. Defends juliets, maybe defends Zomb from Aces links. Names Llama, MM, and Golden as her top 3 suspects. Reiterates that clinging to the juliets case is something that a baddie would do.

Elohcin wrote:by the way....we really need to understand the difference between defending someone and saying that another player's case against a player is silly.
Oops, sorry Elohcin, but when I was going through the posts, I called what you did "defending". You straight-up said you thought she's Civ, and you called the case against her "silly", and "something only baddies would do". I'd like to know what you call defending, if that's not it.

After a catchup, she selects the cases against myself and MP07 as the strongest, though she was reading one or the other of us as Civ. She's reading pretty Civvie to me.

She thinks rabbit is Civ. She thinks I could be bad. Then she casts doubt on Metalmarsh, saying his name maybe shouldn't be cleared just because of how the lynch went. And I agree with that notion, if the lynches are being affected by non-player forces of some sort. She ramps the MM suspicion by accusing his lack of contribution, jokey-posts, and self-vote. Votes MM. Golden gets lynched. MM gets Doomed.

Elo, why is Zomberella not Doom?

All in all, I don't really feel a lot of suspicion about Elohcin after this reread. I think Golden's case on her was not all that reasonable. Llama voted for Elohcin, I'd like to know why as well.

Long Con wrote:Sophie:

Voted for Aces in the last minute of the first day's vote. By the poll, there was no way that Aces was going to get the most votes. That's a primo place for a baddie teammate to put a vote on their buddy for some delectable distancing.

Sophie wrote:thatts amazing! bye aces, rih psycho

still reading the last few pages, what struck me as odd while i was side eyeing the thread earlier while i was in the in laws, what how after golden case on aces, votes on MM started to pile up fast. A lot of those votes seemed easy ones, they started coming fast, like when mafia tries to save a teammate, that made aces look bad, that and a kind of overeaction to golden post, one that golden pointed out in his case. will keeep reading, find myself agreeing with rabbit too, specially on juliets.
"Like when Mafia tries to save a teammate." Is that what happens on Day One when a baddie is in distress? The baddie teammates rally and all vote quickly on someone else?

Agrees with rabbit, about suspecting juliets... but I have been going through the thread and I didn't see a solid time when rabbit said he suspects juliets and why. There's a baby here, and some distractions, but I didn't see it. If it's there and I missed it, so be it. If it's not, then that pings me. What is she agreeing with about juliets?

I'll do more on the Sophie thing, but I have to go away from the computer right now, so I'll post this start and get back to it later.

Long Con wrote:Llama, are you saying it's suspicious that Elohcin said role-hinting isn't allowed when it's not actually a rule?

I also agree with Elohcin's assessment of Aces' play in games Zomba has played. It was Donner or Death Note where Aces came out with a big case and some dynamic play, and I was impressed considering I had the impression that he was almost always a so-quiet-is-he-really-playing kind of guy. That's the impression Zomb has of him, and so her "huge asset" comment doesn't ping me at all. Consequently, Elohcin's "apologizing" for Zomba's comment doesn't ping me either. And I also wouldn't call it apologizing, I would call it understanding.

Long Con wrote:
blindfaeth wrote:Interesting how some people are defending LC more than he's defending himself
I'm following the thread. I'm more interested to see the reactions to Bass' setup than I am in trying to argue against it.

Zomberella12 wrote:
blindfaeth wrote:Interesting how some people are defending LC more than he's defending himself
Hey yeah! Elo, I really do think that Bass messed up for real. Mostly because of the way that LC responded without realizing that the post wasn't right. I think they were probably chatting and just messed up. If not, and Bass planned it (less likely option), then I'd think that Bass would name LC thinking that he was the judge for some reason. There is a small chance that LC is civ, but I think it's the best lead we have at this point. It's not perfect, but we really don't have anything that strong on anyone else.
So, I'm bad if Bass did slip up, and I'm bad if it's a setup. I can think of a more likely third option, Z. There isn't a "small chance" I'm Civ. I'm am Civ. And some people know that. You need to open your perspective to more possibilities, not just the ones where I'm a baddie.

Long Con wrote:I disagree that I haven't been trying in the thread, and I really don't see how it compares negatively to past games. You've played lots of games with me, MP, and I don't know what you expect. I mean, look at Film Directors. That's my Civ game, how does it compare to my playstyle now?

I've been looking back on Zomberella some more since her Judge accusation of me, and though I thought I had her down for a role, I think she has intentionally deceived. Look at this lynch.

Who's the baddie, Zomberella or Llama? Unless The Judge predicted that Bass would get ALL the votes, and stuck a baddie there with solid prescience.

Zomb is a baddie, and she's just trying to continue the setup that Bass started.

So yeah... you can stop misrepresenting my game now. I'm already getting lynched, and it has nothing to do with this bullshit accusation against me.

* * * * *

Who is devious enough to set you up like this?

Questions like this are ridiculous to me. Why don't you ask "Who do you think lacks the mental capacity to set you up like this?" 'Cause that's the implication that would be on the ones I exclude from the list you asked for. I think anyone is "devious enough", especially when there's three or four minds all working it out together. Don't ask me questions like that, I don't feel like stroking anyone's ego, or insulting anyone by exclusion. Do you understand what I mean?

With that out of the way, I do believe that Llama set me up. Not because he's high on my "deviousness list", but because I believe he set me up, or more accurately, he made the setup possible. Bass literally set me up, and that is quite clear, or will be after my lynch.

#1866

^^So no real hunting until you where cornered. Like I said. At least you admit it by the posts of yourself you chose to highlight. You claim bullshit, I claim hiding on your part.

Which since I think you're the judge, makes even more sense.

And I will ask any damn question I like, however I like. Lama huh, so again you are going with the person who has been brought up recently buy others. Never gets old with you. You just latch on to whoever others suspect. Nice. :P

What happened to Canuck and BF, Huh?

#1867

rabbit8 wrote:^^So no real hunting until you where cornered. Like I said. At least you admit it by the posts of yourself you chose to highlight. You claim bullshit, I claim hiding on your part. Which since I think you're the judge, makes even more sense.

And I will ask any damn question I like, however I like. Lama huh, so again you are going with the person who has been brought up recently buy others. Never gets old with you. You just latch on to whoever others suspect. Nice. :P

What happened to Canuck and BF, Huh?

You insult me and you insult my playstyle.

#1868

Why am I getting blamed for this? I don't even want to vote Long Con. I want to vote Sophie.

#1869

Long Con wrote:
rabbit8 wrote:^^So no real hunting until you where cornered. Like I said. At least you admit it by the posts of yourself you chose to highlight. You claim bullshit, I claim hiding on your part. Which since I think you're the judge, makes even more sense.

And I will ask any damn question I like, however I like. Lama huh, so again you are going with the person who has been brought up recently buy others. Never gets old with you. You just latch on to whoever others suspect. Nice. :P

What happened to Canuck and BF, Huh?
You insult me and you insult my playstyle.

Don't go the sympathy rout, please.

You know I respect your game.

#1870

Personally, I like how LC is taking and addressing the accusations, and still baddie hunting to the end. Or possible end. Well done, sir. Well done.

I am curious about the bea suspicions - why exactly is her name being brought up on people's suspect lists? The only thing I can think of (and tend to see) is "I have no read of her." I know how that goes

Can those that suspect her explain a little better?

fingersplints wrote: nijuu - I feel kinda bad about the last lynch. I'm still very convinced she is bad but I hate voting for someone without giving a chance to respond. FWIW you handled yourself very well given the circumstance

Why, thank you! I was rather irritated by the circumstances at the time, so I'm glad it didn't come off in my posts too much.

Where is this magical colorizer? I want to play with it so

#1871

I will be making pies and writing a research paper today so I will be busy and no amount of discussion will change my vote for LC. *votes LC*

#1872

nijuukyugou wrote:Personally, I like how LC is taking and addressing the accusations, and still baddie hunting to the end. Or possible end. Well done, sir. Well done.

I am curious about the bea suspicions - why exactly is her name being brought up on people's suspect lists? The only thing I can think of (and tend to see) is "I have no read of her." I know how that goes Can those that suspect her explain a little better?

fingersplints wrote: nijuu - I feel kinda bad about the last lynch. I'm still very convinced she is bad but I hate voting for someone without giving a chance to respond. FWIW you handled yourself very well given the circumstance
Why, thank you! I was rather irritated by the circumstances at the time, so I'm glad it didn't come off in my posts too much.

Where is this magical colorizer? I want to play with it so

Explain his sudden switch from Canuck and Bf to lama, Please?

#1873

rabbit8 wrote:
Long Con wrote:
rabbit8 wrote:^^So no real hunting until you where cornered. Like I said. At least you admit it by the posts of yourself you chose to highlight. You claim bullshit, I claim hiding on your part. Which since I think you're the judge, makes even more sense.

And I will ask any damn question I like, however I like. Lama huh, so again you are going with the person who has been brought up recently buy others. Never gets old with you. You just latch on to whoever others suspect. Nice. :P

What happened to Canuck and BF, Huh?
You insult me and you insult my playstyle.
Don't go the sympathy rout, please.
You know I respect your game.

You do not respect my game, and I'm not trying for any sympathy. What sympathy? Am I trying to get out of this lynch? Is that what you think I've been doing in my last few posts? If that's the case, then you not only don't respect my game, you have so little respect for my posts that you truly only see what you want to rather than reading them.

You are not required to respect my game, and you are perfectly free to insult me if you think it furthers your chances of winning and/or enjoying the game. I have been trying to catch baddies all game. Even if I were The Judge, I'd want to catch baddies just as much as if I were Civvie. If you really believe that my attempts to do so were so crappy that they can be categorized as not trying, then you need to reevaluate your so-called respect for my game, because my game clearly is not up to your standards of respectability.

#1874

rabbit8 wrote:
nijuukyugou wrote:Personally, I like how LC is taking and addressing the accusations, and still baddie hunting to the end. Or possible end. Well done, sir. Well done.

I am curious about the bea suspicions - why exactly is her name being brought up on people's suspect lists? The only thing I can think of (and tend to see) is "I have no read of her." I know how that goes Can those that suspect her explain a little better?

fingersplints wrote: nijuu - I feel kinda bad about the last lynch. I'm still very convinced she is bad but I hate voting for someone without giving a chance to respond. FWIW you handled yourself very well given the circumstance
Why, thank you! I was rather irritated by the circumstances at the time, so I'm glad it didn't come off in my posts too much.

Where is this magical colorizer? I want to play with it so

Explain his sudden switch from Canuck and Bf to lama, Please?

Nah, forget it. I really wanted to take down the baddies for setting me up, but I'd almost rather see them beat you now. Unless of course you are a baddie, then I'm just a completely crappy piece of stupid and I will get no satisfaction from here on in at all.

#1875

nijuukyugou wrote:Where is this magical colorizer? I want to play with it so

http://www.mikesteffler.com/Colourizer.html

#1876

rabbit8 wrote:
nijuukyugou wrote:Personally, I like how LC is taking and addressing the accusations, and still baddie hunting to the end. Or possible end. Well done, sir. Well done.

I am curious about the bea suspicions - why exactly is her name being brought up on people's suspect lists? The only thing I can think of (and tend to see) is "I have no read of her." I know how that goes Can those that suspect her explain a little better?

fingersplints wrote: nijuu - I feel kinda bad about the last lynch. I'm still very convinced she is bad but I hate voting for someone without giving a chance to respond. FWIW you handled yourself very well given the circumstance
Why, thank you! I was rather irritated by the circumstances at the time, so I'm glad it didn't come off in my posts too much.

Where is this magical colorizer? I want to play with it so

Explain his sudden switch from Canuck and Bf to lama, Please?

It's a little early for a beer, but thank you! And I'm no mind reader, so I will not attempt to explain the mind of LC. I merely commented that he's goin' down swingin' and I likes it.

Linki - This is how y'all normally are with each other, right? Right?

Linki again - Yay thank you! Although it's not showing up in preview, but I will keep trying.
Colorsssssss

#1877

Hey Blooper, who are you planning to voet for today. I don't think LC is bad and would prefer an alternate.

#1878

Turns out I am going to be even less fun today then yesterday. The world lost one of the greatest cats to ever live today.

;(
I'll try and be around some today to discuss but I'm probably voting LC

#1879

Lc practically afmied being the judge, so voting lc

#1880

*Admitted

#1881

@ Splints - Oh my dear! I am so sorry. We lost our dog of 7 years last Fall and I wouldn't wish the sorrow I felt on anyone. We have a new puppy so things are a little better. Bless you.

#1882

I want to celebrate pie day with Zomb, MP, and Daisy.

#1883

haha..I mean, I want to celebrate Pi Day with pie.

#1884

rabbit8 wrote:
Black Rock wrote:Zombie girl is a liar. She is not the role she is hinting at. I would not trust her at all. I don't know why people have put trust in her so easily, but you shouldn't.

I have a very short list on who could be bad.
Zomba
Ninjablooper
Bea
Llama
Sophie
Rabbit8
Blindfaeth

There are three toons left.
Zomberella is one as far as I am concerned and I feel like the other two hide in that list as well.

That's actually a pretty long list. I agree with the top three suspects very much. I don't know if that list is in order ro who you suspect the most though. If LC was set up his last post is very interesting to me.
OK, say Zomba is bad. Do you think she is actually lying about LC?
Why was Nij not Lynched last day?

No, but I don't think she is good just because LC is bad.

#1885

I'm still up for a Zomba lynch if people want to go that way

#1886

LC, fwiw, I agree with you that llama is a baddie.

#1887

thellama73 wrote:Hey Blooper, who are you planning to voet for today. I don't think LC is bad and would prefer an alternate.

Might jump on the LC wagon. Might vote Sophie again; you make good points that I don't think have been proven wrong. Might vote Zomba; she's a zombie and wants to eat my brains, and she has some strange behavior. Might vote bea; I could see her flying under the radar with her in-and-outness, but I'm still curious if there's anything else others see.

I'm feeling dangerous.

#1888

nijuukyugou wrote:
thellama73 wrote:Hey Blooper, who are you planning to voet for today. I don't think LC is bad and would prefer an alternate.
Might jump on the LC wagon. Might vote Sophie again; you make good points that I don't think have been proven wrong. Might vote Zomba; she's a zombie and wants to eat my brains, and she has some strange behavior. Might vote bea; I could see her flying under the radar with her in-and-outness, but I'm still curious if there's anything else others see.

I'm feeling dangerous.

I like your style.

#1889

nijuukyugou wrote:Personally, I like how LC is taking and addressing the accusations, and still baddie hunting to the end. Or possible end. Well done, sir. Well done.

I am curious about the bea suspicions - why exactly is her name being brought up on people's suspect lists? The only thing I can think of (and tend to see) is "I have no read of her." I know how that goes Can those that suspect her explain a little better?

I've been coasting all game. My votes are blendy and I'm not contributing much. Tbh - if someone not me was playinng this way I would suspect them too. My head hasn't been in this game and I am having trouble finding my footing this time around.

I have suspected and not suspected every single person playing this game currently. Of Tue reason I haven't posted as much is because I can't wrap my head around who is suspecting who for what. Case in point today:

After the bass Lynch I was ready to vote lc. Today - I have reservations. I think he reads very honest and genuine in his desire to find baddies and I don't EVER trust lc. If he is doom - I.do. think he would try to seal revenge for being framed.

#1890

I'm also confused about the zombra suspish.

#1891

Good, so Bea, myself, and nijuu at least are open to not murdering Long Con (who has done nothing wrong.)

I could be persuaded to vote for Zomba or Sophie, or maybe someone else if it was the right someone.

Bea, who are you thinking of? I will dig up my old reasons for suspecting Zomba, becuase I honestly don't remember what they are anymore.

#1892

I'm nesting these quotes for ease of reading. I hope no one will accuse me of tampering with the record. I think this exchange is particularly damning for Zomba.

thellama73 wrote:
Zomberella12 wrote:
thellama73 wrote:
Zomberella12 wrote:
thellama73 wrote:
Zomberella12 wrote: @ Llama - Since I have been gunning for you for several days, I don't think it's a no U to say, "let's all talk about Llama." Early votes, doesn't post, votes without reasons, could easily be masterminding the lynch hyjinks.
And since I have been suspecting you since Day 1, I don't think it's a No U to ask people to look at you.

Real Life obligations prevented me from contributing much over the weekend. You can see that I did the same thing in Death Note, so that is not a meaningful accusation. I also do have reasons for all of my votes.
So you say. But having reasons doesn't mean you aren't bad.

^^ Sorry - I messed up the quote earlier.
YOu said you suspect me because I vote without reasons. I said I don't vote without reasons, and now you're saying that's irrelevant? Talk about moving the goalposts...

Sorry. You are right that wasn't fair. You vote without posting your reasons. I didn't say having reasons was irrelevant. I said that having reasons doesn't make you good....and I think you know that...
I could refute every point of suspicion you bring up against me and you could say "that doesn't make you good." That's a meaningless comment. Nothing makes me good except the role Epignosis assigned to me.

You are trying to have it both ways. You want to be able to point to behavior you think makes me suspicious, then when I demonstrate I haven't behaved that way, you say it doesn't make me good.

"You did X. You must be bad."
"I didn't do X."
"Not doing X doesn't make you good! "

It's a nice try to paint me into an unwinnable corner, but it won't work because it's too transparently manipulative.

Zomba tried to trap me, and it ended up backfiring. I think that is quite plain.

Additionally, I suspected her because after nearly two days of complete silence, she popped up to post just after I voted for her, as if she had been alerted by a team. And then she called Aces a "huge asset" which he obviously wasn't, before he flipped baddie.

#1893

Day 1 Lynch poll
Day 2 Lynch poll
Day 3 Lynch poll
Day 4 Lynch poll
Day 5 Lynch poll

Day 1: Llama votes for his teammate, Zombarella. Votes off the main stream to start establishing a pattern of being the only voter for someone.

Day 2: Llama is the only one to vote for Elohcin

Day 3: Llama is the only one to vote for Elohcin (poll was reset after his early vote, but it still counted)

Day 4: Llama is the only vote for Zombarella

Day 5: Llama votes off the main stretch again, for Zombarella

Llama is casting these votes because he's a baddie, and he doesn't want Judge Doom's effect to cause a disruption in his voting pattern.

He's voting Zombarella for distancing, because she is his teammate.

This will probably be my last living post, unless RK Maroon is alive and wants to save me.

Watch the voting patterns, people. They tell all. Lynch Rabbit too, that's just fine. Thanks for the giggles.

#1894

LC who are you going to vote for. Would you consider Zombrella?

#1895

thellama73 wrote:LC who are you going to vote for. Would you consider Zombrella?

Oh yeah... Voting z. Thanks for the reminder.

#1896

Long Con wrote:
thellama73 wrote:LC who are you going to vote for. Would you consider Zombrella?
Oh yeah... Voting z. Thanks for the reminder.

Cool, I'll join you, old chum.

#1897

Lc - you think zombra and llama are doing the.distancing dance then? - do you thin wabvit is bad as well or just blindsided by his view.of you?

#1898

I don't like distancing with my teammates. Except for in American Gods.

#1899

Ok llama. Tbh - I don't.remember -

As far as Sophie.goes, I don't see the.suspish on her

She reminds me of her.regular civ.passionate.self. I've had.baddie.bts.with her before a couple of times. We suck it as baddies together LOL. She's not playing the same. She could be faking but I don't think she is.
Speaking of the distancing dance has anyone concidered the idea that bff and MP are doing the distancing dance? MP has himself admitted he does like the hard distancing and after a couple days they've kissed and made up and fell back into the shadows a bit.l

#1900

I do not think that they are distancing. I think they are both civvies.

How About Now?