Golden wrote:Funny. My recollection of dom is quiet dom, dom you forget is playing. If I had to say my perception of him in this game, it's that he is less blendy and more talkative than usual. I haven't forgotten he is playing.
A Person, though...
Interesting you brought him up earlier in the day and then Zomba decides to place her vote there.Zombarella wrote:I don't want to vote for SVS. I want to vote for A Person.
So what's your perception?Golden wrote:Liz, you are seeing basically what I saw about epi on day one. I haven't cleared epi completely from my suspect list, although he is by no means my biggest suspect right now. I think what ends up happening with today's lynch and reveal could potentially have a significant bearing on how I perceive Epi afterwards.
If you feel I didn't answer something can you link me back to it? I still feel like you were trying to help steer a lynch my direction and it wasn't working out so you've backed off.juliets wrote:@Liz I'm just going to give up on getting you to answer those cases. If Epi or Golden want to push it they can. Their posts are easy to find if you just look at their posts.
This is frustrating no matter your affiliation.Vompatti wrote:I didn't know he was silenced because I didn't read the thread. I only voted for him because I had a feeling MM had hard evidence that he's bad.fingersplints wrote:Did Vomps give a reason for his TH vote? I'm used to Vomps being kind of out there as a player, but I'm just a little surprised he would vote a silenced player without giving a reason. (Unless I missed the vote. There has been a lot going on)
Wasn't Zelda a speed game? And didn't you say the same thing? I'll have to go look to be sure.Elohcin wrote:If you vote me, you will be voting a civ. It takes me longer to have much of an opinion in full games as opposed to speed games, that's all. As the game gets smaller, I have an easier time wrapping my head around things. I am reading, following along, an absorbing all that is going on though.Golden wrote:I think there is real merit to the possibility that the baddies might be laughing at us as all the louder people cut each other down. I would certainly be willing to consider a vote against:
A person, or
Vompatti, or
possibly canuck, or
maybe even Elo, who seems a lot quieter in content here than in RR.
If the criteria is who could be hiding.
That's um..a disturbing image.Epignosis wrote:Metalmarsh89 wrote:"I'd rather trust a country man than a town man."Epignosis wrote:"I'd rather trust a man who doesn't shout what he's found."
I was listening to that album, and I just now realized what you were quoting.
What if Vomps had died and had flipped civvie? I think it would have sounded more civvie to say you felt better about a Vomps vote than a Zomba and you hope you're right.Golden wrote:So I voted vomps. I hope that, in the end, vomps dies and zombs is saved. Thats my goal today. I am not 100% sure zombs is good, but I do think she could be given more time to prove herself.
You suspect she won't be the millionaire yet you thought my vote might mean she's the millionaire?Golden wrote:
Oh well, if I fail, I fail, and hopefully Zombs flips millionaire. I just suspect she won't.
rabbit8 wrote:
Feelings can change ..........
These two things apply very much to me.S~V~S wrote:Changing ones mind does not make one bad.
Yes, interesting that.Epignosis wrote:And I'm the one who tied it up.
Just...why?Epignosis wrote:No...I was tying it up. I would have voted the other way around had it been 7-6 Vompatti.
That reminds of Survivor when one team decides to throw a challenge so they can get rid of a teammate they don't like. I always think that's a dumb move.fingersplints wrote:Well I think that makes more sense then assuming all of Zomba's teammates voted to save her after she threw her vote away early on APerson. I doubt her teammates bothered to save her at all.Bullzeye wrote:14 people voted for one or the other. I would be very surprised to find out that Vomp was also bad. I'm still not even sure how he got 7 votes.S~V~S wrote:Also, how is Zomba being bad mean that Vomps might not also be bad?
You sad a mafia died?Vompatti wrote:
Theories aren't necessarily bad, but this isn't one.Golden wrote:I haven't tried to twist anything.
What is this if not a theory? And, why is it bad for you to have theories, anyway? Why would I need to twist your words?LizKeen wrote:Transfer and traded are two different things. So I would say it could be possible for a teammate to give an item to put in the safe.
I haven't cleared Vomps, but IF he's civvie then you could be bad.Golden wrote:There is lots that is quite odd about your game, LK...
Like, for instance, the fact that you, yourself, kept saying you were suspicious of Vomps, yet you are now quick to jump on someone who actually went after him.
Golden wrote:I was bothered by your zomb vote on day 1 after you spent the whole day saying you were looking at three other people (low posters), followed by another early zomb vote last night. Last nights one made the least sense of all... with virtually no-one voted yet, you decide to do this:
LizKeen wrote:I'm in a royal quandary as to what to do because I know there's very few people who are going to get votes and I feel like it's going to be me or you Zomb, but I don't feel good enough to put a vote on you either. And I'm most definitely not self-voting. I have no problem going after a low poster but I don't think that's going to get any traction today either.
Golden wrote:@LK - I think we can get traction for someone other than you or zombs. I think it can be done.I found this whole thing last night pretty odd. It nearly turned me back to thinking zombs was the millionaire, actually, and you thought you could get a sneaky vote in while I led the lynch in another direction. Obviously zombs wasn't the millionaire, but it's a great strategy eh?LizKeen wrote:I do have to attempt to get some sleep though and I'm going to have to vote now or miss the vote again. I wish I could feel confident I'm not going to get lynched but I just don't and I won't be here before the vote to defend myself anymore. So I feel I don't have much choice but to vote Zomberella. If you're civvie I hope you understand, but I hope you're not so this isn't a total mistake.
If you thought this possible why not just vote Zombs? I never asked you to lead the vote a new direction, I was glad not to get lynched obviously, but that was your decision. I didn't think it would actually happen.
Llama said items couldn't be transferred. And to me a possibility is something that might or might not happen. A theory is something someone thinks did happen.Golden wrote:
Well, if your possibility is correct, maybe Dom didn't get a stock certificate, right? Maybe he got nothing. Because, maybe the baddies knew zombs would be lynched and transferred everything away from her so she wouldn't have anything on her.
I don't know why you are so defensive about this? And, I don't know the difference you see between a possiblity and a theory. To me they are the same.