Last Woman Standing 3 [Day 10]

[Dana]

Ah ah ah. I don't give a shit about Made.

Notice how I picked you out of everybody? Notice how you didn't have any votes or attention at the time? I'm not trying to save Made. I'm trying to lynch you.

Okay nevermind now I'm just completely confused.

It's okay- I wasn't going to answer your question about tells anyway. I never do.

Then how do you expect people to believe you? Without any explanations or evidence you're just making empty claims.

[Dana]

I'm going to go back to my original-ish plan and vote for Boo. Yay alliance loyalty I guess?

[Elohcin]

There. I did it.

[Bullzeye]

Ah ah ah. I don't give a shit about Made.

Notice how I picked you out of everybody? Notice how you didn't have any votes or attention at the time? I'm not trying to save Made. I'm trying to lynch you.

So why say you'd owe people favours for not voting Made? You explicitly addressed anyone who said they might vote for him. If you really thought I had btsc, you'd have just said that on its own without bringing Made into the equation at all. You want Made saving. I want to know why. To find out why, I propose lynching him. Honestly though, I'd have no problem with you being lynched. To reply more properly to Dana's comment, my vote was sort of a knee-jerk reaction to Epi. My point stands though. He blatantly wants Made saved.

Here's the deal: Some people think I'm shifty and devious and it's a risk to trust me (admirable qualities, I'm told) but I'm still a damn good ally and am big into playing fair. Keep me around and I will pay my debts. Epi is more likely to screw people over than I am. Successfully, anyway.

[Elohcin]

Ah ah ah. I don't give a shit about Made.

Notice how I picked you out of everybody? Notice how you didn't have any votes or attention at the time? I'm not trying to save Made. I'm trying to lynch you.

Okay nevermind now I'm just completely confused.

It's okay- I wasn't going to answer your question about tells anyway. I never do.

Then how do you expect people to believe you? Without any explanations or evidence you're just making empty claims.

Wait. Don't you know Made IRL? Do you happen to know what is keeping him away? And, the fact that you are not wanting to vote Bullz (for a favor from Epi no less) over Made concerns me. I will be looking at you as teh BTSC partner is it turns out Bulls is who Epi thinks he is.

[Epignosis]

Ah ah ah. I don't give a shit about Made.

Notice how I picked you out of everybody? Notice how you didn't have any votes or attention at the time? I'm not trying to save Made. I'm trying to lynch you.

Okay nevermind now I'm just completely confused.

It's okay- I wasn't going to answer your question about tells anyway. I never do.

Then how do you expect people to believe you? Without any explanations or evidence you're just making empty claims.

I don't expect people to believe me. It's Day 1. Made has a few votes, so he'll die, because that's how stuff on this site goes: Dick around until a few hours before the deadline, and pick whoever has the most votes because it ain't you. If it works like that in a regular game, how much more will it work in Last Man Standing?

I'm not going to pull evidence from previous games to satisfy you on Day 1, sorry. If you don't want to take my word for it, fine. Not a problem. But are they "empty claims" as you think? I don't think so.

The fact that you voted boo just now with likewise no evidence (he's making sense) says volumes about you though.

[Epignosis]

Ah ah ah. I don't give a shit about Made.

Notice how I picked you out of everybody? Notice how you didn't have any votes or attention at the time? I'm not trying to save Made. I'm trying to lynch you.

So why say you'd owe people favours for not voting Made? You explicitly addressed anyone who said they might vote for him. If you really thought I had btsc, you'd have just said that on its own without bringing Made into the equation at all. You want Made saving. I want to know why. To find out why, I propose lynching him. Honestly though, I'd have no problem with you being lynched. To reply more properly to Dana's comment, my vote was sort of a knee-jerk reaction to Epi. My point stands though. He blatantly wants Made saved.

Here's the deal: Some people think I'm shifty and devious and it's a risk to trust me (admirable qualities, I'm told) but I'm still a damn good ally and am big into playing fair. Keep me around and I will pay my debts. Epi is more likely to screw people over than I am. Successfully, anyway.

Great question.

I did not want to open my invitation to everyone, and the Made suspecting people fit the range of people I wanted to open up to.

Don't tell me what I'd "have just said." I don't operate like that. And I certainly don't operate like that in LMS.

Can you tell me why I would want Made saved? I said why I would theoretically want Made saved in an earlier post, but you want to paint me as a Made savior instead of a Bullzeye lyncher. That's not what this is about at all. I want you dead. Right now. If people want to lynch Made on Day 2, very well.

You have BTSC.

[Dana]

Ah ah ah. I don't give a shit about Made.

Notice how I picked you out of everybody? Notice how you didn't have any votes or attention at the time? I'm not trying to save Made. I'm trying to lynch you.

Okay nevermind now I'm just completely confused.

It's okay- I wasn't going to answer your question about tells anyway. I never do.

Then how do you expect people to believe you? Without any explanations or evidence you're just making empty claims.

Wait. Don't you know Made IRL? Do you happen to know what is keeping him away? And, the fact that you are not wanting to vote Bullz (for a favor from Epi no less) over Made concerns me. I will be looking at you as teh BTSC partner is it turns out Bulls is who Epi thinks he is.

I sort of know him IRL? I know him from elsewhere on the internet and we've met a few times but I don't like see him every day or anything. I can try and get him in here. I chose to vote someone other than Bullz because Epi hasn't given a single piece of objective evidence for him having BTSC, and I'm not just going to blindly follow/trust what he says. This whole favor business bothers me a bit too, and I'm not sure how involved I want to get in that. I'm not trying to protect Bullz, I just don't see a reason for him to be bad, and the person that does see a reason won't explain it, and I don't want to unfairly lynch someone who, in my view, hasn't done anything wrong at all.

[Epignosis]

Epi is more likely to screw people over than I am. Successfully, anyway.

Based on what? One game in distant memory in which I had little choice?

How about the GoC 2014, in which Dom recruited me and I still remained loyal to Eloh, juliets and Kate?
How about INH's Sherlock where I tried to stay loyal and got screwed?
How about Breaking Bad, where I tried to throw Lorab under the bus and was persuaded that such a thing wasn't the best idea for us?

Please. I'm loyal.

[Bullzeye]

Great question.

I did not want to open my invitation to everyone, and the Made suspecting people fit the range of people I wanted to open up to.

Don't tell me what I'd "have just said." I don't operate like that. And I certainly don't operate like that in LMS.

Can you tell me why I would want Made saved? I said why I would theoretically want Made saved in an earlier post, but you want to paint me as a Made savior instead of a Bullzeye lyncher. That's not what this is about at all. I want you dead. Right now. If people want to lynch Made on Day 2, very well.

You have BTSC.

I'm assuming it is in fact you who have BTSC. I would even narrow that statement down to say Made is a teammate of yours. Hence why you specifically asked people to vote me instead of him. Let's face it, I'll probably die tonight anyway since you've painted a target on me by claiming to know I have BTSC, but you're just plain wrong. You act so sure, but you haven't got a clue.

Linki - I wasn't referring to Bioshock at all. More our respective success rates in games in general.

[Epignosis]

Epi is more likely to screw people over than I am. Successfully, anyway.

Based on what? One game in distant memory in which I had little choice?

How about the GoC 2014, in which Dom recruited me and I still remained loyal to Eloh, juliets and Kate?
How about INH's Sherlock where I tried to stay loyal and got screwed?
How about Breaking Bad, where I tried to throw Lorab under the bus and was persuaded that such a thing wasn't the best idea for us?

Please. I'm loyal.

Unfortunately, the way I have worded one of these items makes me look not loyal, but there's a context I didn't include. Lorab wasn't in chat hardly ever, so Sorsha and I thought it best to lynch her when she took heavy suspicion.

[S~V~S]

I don't suspect Made. I think he is a low poster, and in this set up, better him than me, boo yah. Unless I have a good reason to vote for someone, not just "becasue Epi said so", I am likely to vote low poster tomorrow, too.

Linki, that is not how she looks at it. But OK

[Epignosis]

Great question.

I did not want to open my invitation to everyone, and the Made suspecting people fit the range of people I wanted to open up to.

Don't tell me what I'd "have just said." I don't operate like that. And I certainly don't operate like that in LMS.

Can you tell me why I would want Made saved? I said why I would theoretically want Made saved in an earlier post, but you want to paint me as a Made savior instead of a Bullzeye lyncher. That's not what this is about at all. I want you dead. Right now. If people want to lynch Made on Day 2, very well.

You have BTSC.

I'm assuming it is in fact you who have BTSC. I would even narrow that statement down to say Made is a teammate of yours. Hence why you specifically asked people to vote me instead of him. Let's face it, I'll probably die tonight anyway since you've painted a target on me by claiming to know I have BTSC, but you're just plain wrong. You act so sure, but you haven't got a clue.

Linki - I wasn't referring to Bioshock at all. More our respective success rates in games in general.

I know I'm right about you by your responses to me.

Let's up the ante.

If Bullzeye is lynched Day 1, and does not have BTSC, then please lynch me Day 2.

[S~V~S]

Can we lynch you Day Two anyway?

[Dana]

Epi is more likely to screw people over than I am. Successfully, anyway.

Based on what? One game in distant memory in which I had little choice?

How about the GoC 2014, in which Dom recruited me and I still remained loyal to Eloh, juliets and Kate?
How about INH's Sherlock where I tried to stay loyal and got screwed?
How about Breaking Bad, where I tried to throw Lorab under the bus and was persuaded that such a thing wasn't the best idea for us?

Please. I'm loyal.

You'll give evidence like this to help yourself but not to help your case against Bullz?

I'm assuming it is in fact you who have BTSC. I would even narrow that statement down to say Made is a teammate of yours. Hence why you specifically asked people to vote me instead of him. Let's face it, I'll probably die tonight anyway since you've painted a target on me by claiming to know I have BTSC, but you're just plain wrong. You act so sure, but you haven't got a clue.

I'm not so sure about that. Would someone with BTSC just outright bribe people to not vote for their partner? It would basically out themselves and their teammate immediately. It's too simple and I think Epig is a lot smarter than that.

[Epignosis]

I don't suspect Made. I think he is a low poster, and in this set up, better him than me, boo yah. Unless I have a good reason to vote for someone, not just "becasue Epi said so", I am likely to vote low poster tomorrow, too.

You voted for someone for an arbitrary reason. I figured you'd rather take me up on a deal. You didn't. Your loss.

[Epignosis]

Can we lynch you Day Two anyway?

No ma'am.

[Dana]

Can we lynch you Day Two anyway?

I think I could maybe get behind this.

[Epignosis]

Epi is more likely to screw people over than I am. Successfully, anyway.

Based on what? One game in distant memory in which I had little choice?

How about the GoC 2014, in which Dom recruited me and I still remained loyal to Eloh, juliets and Kate?
How about INH's Sherlock where I tried to stay loyal and got screwed?
How about Breaking Bad, where I tried to throw Lorab under the bus and was persuaded that such a thing wasn't the best idea for us?

Please. I'm loyal.

You'll give evidence like this to help yourself but not to help your case against Bullz?

The evidence to defend my honor required two minutes of my time.
The evidence I have against Bullz required two years to take in.

[Bullzeye]

Great question.

I did not want to open my invitation to everyone, and the Made suspecting people fit the range of people I wanted to open up to.

Don't tell me what I'd "have just said." I don't operate like that. And I certainly don't operate like that in LMS.

Can you tell me why I would want Made saved? I said why I would theoretically want Made saved in an earlier post, but you want to paint me as a Made savior instead of a Bullzeye lyncher. That's not what this is about at all. I want you dead. Right now. If people want to lynch Made on Day 2, very well.

You have BTSC.

I'm assuming it is in fact you who have BTSC. I would even narrow that statement down to say Made is a teammate of yours. Hence why you specifically asked people to vote me instead of him. Let's face it, I'll probably die tonight anyway since you've painted a target on me by claiming to know I have BTSC, but you're just plain wrong. You act so sure, but you haven't got a clue.

Linki - I wasn't referring to Bioshock at all. More our respective success rates in games in general.

I know I'm right about you by your responses to me.

Let's up the ante.

If Bullzeye is lynched Day 1, and does not have BTSC, then please lynch me Day 2.

Yawn.

I cannot think of how else to express to you that you are simply wrong. You may think you are correct, for whatever reason you won't completely disclose (you say you've picked up on tells but don't mention what they are) but I'm fairly sure you just pulled my name out of thin air. Since I'll probably be gone by day 2 now, I don't care what they do with you. It'd probably be wise to lynch you regardless. I do think you have BTSC with Made and I think there's actual solid reasons to believe that.

Linki - 2 years to take in? The hell does that even mean? Share your working out properly if you want to get top marks here Epi.

[fingersplints]

Ok here is what I think now that I am properly caught up.

I love our group name rabbit.

I like the alliance building. It's fun bullz and rabbit will eventually turn on me, but for now it's in all our best interests to have buds.

I have a problem voting Nisani because he is new. But I still find his posts a bit odd. I get that there are ways he could know some secret info, but that much and this early? I don't buy it, but I also don't know if it makes him any more likely to have a dangerous role. boo is pretty convincing though For some reason him being teamed up with LC makes it more scary

I do not operate on a bullshit system of alliance in settings like this one. I operate like a true Don: By favors.

I am extending this invitation to anyone thus far who has expressed an interest in voting Made.

If you vote for Bullzeye instead of Made, I will owe you a favor.

Do we have a deal?

I am voting for Bullzeye now.

I'm so happy with my choice to vote Made now.
Epi gives one example of having had btsc with bullz and knows in a couple posts he has btsc. Someone with btsc in this game would be more likely to aggressively try to save his teammate since he can hide behind the alliances. Kinda like how Epi is doing

[S~V~S]

I don't suspect Made. I think he is a low poster, and in this set up, better him than me, boo yah. Unless I have a good reason to vote for someone, not just "becasue Epi said so", I am likely to vote low poster tomorrow, too.

You voted for someone for an arbitrary reason. I figured you'd rather take me up on a deal. You didn't. Your loss.

It isn't arbitrary. In this kind of game, low posters hold the rest of us back. I said in my first post I would vote a low poster, and I said why. You can call it arbitrary all you like, but it isn't arbitrary. I would rather have Bullz, who is fighting back, than someone who isn't even defending himself.

[Epignosis]

Can we lynch you Day Two anyway?

I think I could maybe get behind this.

Why do you want to lynch me?

Am I making you uncomfortable?

[Dana]

Epi is more likely to screw people over than I am. Successfully, anyway.

Based on what? One game in distant memory in which I had little choice?

How about the GoC 2014, in which Dom recruited me and I still remained loyal to Eloh, juliets and Kate?
How about INH's Sherlock where I tried to stay loyal and got screwed?
How about Breaking Bad, where I tried to throw Lorab under the bus and was persuaded that such a thing wasn't the best idea for us?

Please. I'm loyal.

You'll give evidence like this to help yourself but not to help your case against Bullz?

The evidence to defend my honor required two minutes of my time.
The evidence I have against Bullz required two years to take in.

Can we at least get like a synopsis or something? Literally any tiny thing other than just saying that you know. Any sort of proof at all would be better than nothing, otherwise it definitely seems like you're making this up.

[Dana]

Can we lynch you Day Two anyway?

I think I could maybe get behind this.

Why do you want to lynch me?

Am I making you uncomfortable?

Yes, quite. I like to understand things. When people back up their claims it makes for less confusion all around, and the way this game is set up is already confusing enough. I don't necessarily want to lynch you right now but I do want to know exactly why you think Bullz has BTSC, and if you can't explain that then I can't believe you.

[Roxy]

Voting Made - why wait for someone to play a game? If he were playing he would do the same.

also -
Epi - I do not "suspect" Made. He is not playing. It's not a regular set up. No reason to try and save low posters. No reason to save a non player. I do not think you can tell this quickly if Bullz has btsc. You are a good player but you have your limits.

[Epignosis]

I don't suspect Made. I think he is a low poster, and in this set up, better him than me, boo yah. Unless I have a good reason to vote for someone, not just "becasue Epi said so", I am likely to vote low poster tomorrow, too.

You voted for someone for an arbitrary reason. I figured you'd rather take me up on a deal. You didn't. Your loss.

It isn't arbitrary. In this kind of game, low posters hold the rest of us back. I said in my first post I would vote a low poster, and I said why. You can call it arbitrary all you like, but it isn't arbitrary. I would rather have Bullz, who is fighting back, than someone who isn't even defending himself.

Low posters hold everyone back in every context. So your decision is by definition "arbitrary," but if I give you a definition, you'll get mad at me and tell me I'm not your student.

You've given me some advice over the years, so I'd like to offer you some: When you stop defending people who DO defend themselves, you'll do better.

[Long Con]

...LC, who I never trust he always has a dark cloud going around...

Unfurl, what is up with this slander? I am nothing but upstanding in all my dealings. I am very trustworthy.

[Epignosis]

Epi is more likely to screw people over than I am. Successfully, anyway.

Based on what? One game in distant memory in which I had little choice?

How about the GoC 2014, in which Dom recruited me and I still remained loyal to Eloh, juliets and Kate?
How about INH's Sherlock where I tried to stay loyal and got screwed?
How about Breaking Bad, where I tried to throw Lorab under the bus and was persuaded that such a thing wasn't the best idea for us?

Please. I'm loyal.

You'll give evidence like this to help yourself but not to help your case against Bullz?

The evidence to defend my honor required two minutes of my time.
The evidence I have against Bullz required two years to take in.

Can we at least get like a synopsis or something? Literally any tiny thing other than just saying that you know. Any sort of proof at all would be better than nothing, otherwise it definitely seems like you're making this up.

No.

I don't share things I've learned. And I damn sure don't do it in LMS.

[Bullzeye]

No.

I don't share things I've learned. And I damn sure don't do it in LMS.

Translation: I'm totally making this up.

[Epignosis]

Can we lynch you Day Two anyway?

I think I could maybe get behind this.

Why do you want to lynch me?

Am I making you uncomfortable?

Yes, quite. I like to understand things. When people back up their claims it makes for less confusion all around, and the way this game is set up is already confusing enough. I don't necessarily want to lynch you right now but I do want to know exactly why you think Bullz has BTSC, and if you can't explain that then I can't believe you.

It's Last Man Standing.

Dana needs Bullzeye dead to win.

Instead, she's pushing me to prove that Bullzeye has BTSC.

Think about that right there.

[fingersplints]

I don't suspect Made. I think he is a low poster, and in this set up, better him than me, boo yah. Unless I have a good reason to vote for someone, not just "becasue Epi said so", I am likely to vote low poster tomorrow, too.

You voted for someone for an arbitrary reason. I figured you'd rather take me up on a deal. You didn't. Your loss.

It isn't arbitrary. In this kind of game, low posters hold the rest of us back. I said in my first post I would vote a low poster, and I said why. You can call it arbitrary all you like, but it isn't arbitrary. I would rather have Bullz, who is fighting back, than someone who isn't even defending himself.

Low posters hold everyone back in every context. So your decision is by definition "arbitrary," but if I give you a definition, you'll get mad at me and tell me I'm not your student.

You've given me some advice over the years, so I'd like to offer you some: When you stop defending people who DO defend themselves, you'll do better.

SVS has played two of Enrique's LMS games and has made it til about the end in both. How many have you played in?

[S~V~S]

Bullz is very awesome at hiding his allegiances, and his BTS connections. I know this for a fact. Bullz has been playing a looong time, and often gets underestimated. Which is his strength, imo. But I DON'T think he gives away his BTS as easily as all that.

Linki @ Epi, no, dude. this is a different set up. And I defend people becasue I want to. If it keeps me from being perfect, so be it

Linki @ Splints, lol

[Epignosis]

I don't suspect Made. I think he is a low poster, and in this set up, better him than me, boo yah. Unless I have a good reason to vote for someone, not just "becasue Epi said so", I am likely to vote low poster tomorrow, too.

You voted for someone for an arbitrary reason. I figured you'd rather take me up on a deal. You didn't. Your loss.

It isn't arbitrary. In this kind of game, low posters hold the rest of us back. I said in my first post I would vote a low poster, and I said why. You can call it arbitrary all you like, but it isn't arbitrary. I would rather have Bullz, who is fighting back, than someone who isn't even defending himself.

Low posters hold everyone back in every context. So your decision is by definition "arbitrary," but if I give you a definition, you'll get mad at me and tell me I'm not your student.

You've given me some advice over the years, so I'd like to offer you some: When you stop defending people who DO defend themselves, you'll do better.

SVS has played two of Enrique's LMS games and has made it til about the end in both. How many have you played in?

I wasn't giving her advice for LMS. I know I won't win this. I don't plan to.

[Bullzeye]

Can we lynch you Day Two anyway?

I think I could maybe get behind this.

Why do you want to lynch me?

Am I making you uncomfortable?

Yes, quite. I like to understand things. When people back up their claims it makes for less confusion all around, and the way this game is set up is already confusing enough. I don't necessarily want to lynch you right now but I do want to know exactly why you think Bullz has BTSC, and if you can't explain that then I can't believe you.

It's Last Man Standing.

Dana needs Bullzeye dead to win.

Instead, she's pushing me to prove that Bullzeye has BTSC.

Think about that right there.

Why shouldn't you prove it? If you want to go around making claims like that, you'd best support your arguments.

[Epignosis]

Can we lynch you Day Two anyway?

I think I could maybe get behind this.

Why do you want to lynch me?

Am I making you uncomfortable?

Yes, quite. I like to understand things. When people back up their claims it makes for less confusion all around, and the way this game is set up is already confusing enough. I don't necessarily want to lynch you right now but I do want to know exactly why you think Bullz has BTSC, and if you can't explain that then I can't believe you.

It's Last Man Standing.

Dana needs Bullzeye dead to win.

Instead, she's pushing me to prove that Bullzeye has BTSC.

Think about that right there.

Why shouldn't you prove it? If you want to go around making claims like that, you'd best support your arguments.

Nah.

[Dana]

Can we lynch you Day Two anyway?

I think I could maybe get behind this.

Why do you want to lynch me?

Am I making you uncomfortable?

Yes, quite. I like to understand things. When people back up their claims it makes for less confusion all around, and the way this game is set up is already confusing enough. I don't necessarily want to lynch you right now but I do want to know exactly why you think Bullz has BTSC, and if you can't explain that then I can't believe you.

It's Last Man Standing.

Dana needs Bullzeye dead to win.

Instead, she's pushing me to prove that Bullzeye has BTSC.

Think about that right there.

I'm pushing you to back up your claims, I don't care what those claims are. I don't know if Bullz has BTSC or not, and since you apparently do, I want to know why. Everyone needs everyone else dead to win in the end. I'm more concerned with getting rid of the teams and killers first. Even though it's everyone for themselves I do feel like there are still sort of "good" and "bad" roles.

[Bullzeye]

Can we lynch you Day Two anyway?

I think I could maybe get behind this.

Why do you want to lynch me?

Am I making you uncomfortable?

Yes, quite. I like to understand things. When people back up their claims it makes for less confusion all around, and the way this game is set up is already confusing enough. I don't necessarily want to lynch you right now but I do want to know exactly why you think Bullz has BTSC, and if you can't explain that then I can't believe you.

It's Last Man Standing.

Dana needs Bullzeye dead to win.

Instead, she's pushing me to prove that Bullzeye has BTSC.

Think about that right there.

Why shouldn't you prove it? If you want to go around making claims like that, you'd best support your arguments.

Nah.

Well then in that case I'm going to say you've clearly got a very powerful role people definitely want out of the way. I picked up on your tells. Everyone who hasn't voted yet should definitely get this dangerous killer out of our midst before it's too late.

[Epignosis]

All right. Nobody believes me about Bullzeye.

I did not come into this game with the illusion that I would win. I rarely ever make it to the end of any game, let alone LMS.

But when Bullzeye is shown at endgame to have BTSC on Day 1, you all can look silly.

[Epignosis]

Well then in that case I'm going to say you've clearly got a very powerful role people definitely want out of the way. I picked up on your tells. Everyone who hasn't voted yet should definitely get this dangerous killer out of our midst before it's too late.

What?

You've picked up on my tells?

What are those tells?

Can you cite evidence?

Now I'm a dangerous killer?



Come on folks.

This is textbook shit.

Bullzeye has BTSC, and now he's nervous.

[S~V~S]

Actually, I thought he was making fun of you.

[nutella]

OK, back and caught up. Sorry I haven't been around the thread much. (Really though, don't just vote for low posters, that's really mean. I'm not TRYING to be too busy to be here every 15 goddamn minutes. I post when I have something to say, ok?)

Not sure how I feel about any of the alliances; I'm not sure if I would be significantly safer if I joined one. I think I might just stay solo for now.

Epig is being mysterious and I don't see any reason to be particularly wary of Bullz. I think at this point I am most likely to avoid that debacle and vote for Nisani instead, because if he knows things as he claims he could be a threat.

[Epignosis]

Ask yourselves this:

Why would I gun for someone on Day 1 if all I'm supposed to do is survive?

[Epignosis]

Epig is being mysterious

Is "mysterious" nutellese for "very clear?"

[unfurl]

This last pages, have surely been intersting to read

...LC, who I never trust he always has a dark cloud going around...

Unfurl, what is up with this slander? I am nothing but upstanding in all my dealings. I am very trustworthy.

I said I never trust you, does not equally means others can or can not, Im not asking anyone to do not trust you because I dont
But you sir, your posting style always smell like evil, until proven you are not (in a regular game, it takes me a while to trust yous, but I dont exactly go after you early on, cause I do have that pre-conception),

and in this set up, I think eveyone at the end is evil, it is a Last Man Standing Game
eventually is very likely alliances will faills, is just a matter of time, too early to tell which ones

going offline now, see you all tomorrow, and it loks like I will have a lot to read

[nutella]

Ask yourselves this:

Why would I gun for someone on Day 1 if all I'm supposed to do is survive?

That's a good question. Why do you even care who gets lynched? It's LMS. Do you have something to gain from Bullz getting lynched?

[Epignosis]

Ask yourselves this:

Why would I gun for someone on Day 1 if all I'm supposed to do is survive?

That's a good question. Why do you even care who gets lynched? It's LMS. Do you have something to gain from Bullz getting lynched?

Yes. Don't you?

[Dana]

You've picked up on my tells?

What are those tells?

Can you cite evidence?

Was this sarcasm or...?

[S~V~S]

Ask yourselves this:

Why would I gun for someone on Day 1 if all I'm supposed to do is survive?

Because in this context, lying low will get you lynched. Becasue you enjoy being the puppeteer rather than the puppet, so you ALWAYS try to control threads.

I never understood that mindset; just having to survive means winning > playing. And I don't play that way, and I don't think you do, either. So that question is a null, imo.

[Epignosis]

You've picked up on my tells?

What are those tells?

Can you cite evidence?

Was this sarcasm or...?

I was laughing at him because I know he's full of shit.