How can it just so happen to be anything else?DharmaHelper wrote:Anything else?Epignosis wrote:I think timmer made a long shot call that just so happened to be right.

Moderator: Community Team
How can it just so happen to be anything else?DharmaHelper wrote:Anything else?Epignosis wrote:I think timmer made a long shot call that just so happened to be right.
I mean do you have anything else to add. Any other thoughts.Epignosis wrote:How can it just so happen to be anything else?DharmaHelper wrote:Anything else?Epignosis wrote:I think timmer made a long shot call that just so happened to be right.
No.DharmaHelper wrote:I mean do you have anything else to add. Any other thoughts.Epignosis wrote:How can it just so happen to be anything else?DharmaHelper wrote:Anything else?Epignosis wrote:I think timmer made a long shot call that just so happened to be right.
Nope.Long Con wrote:Weak.
It's Day 2, its "technically" possible for Blacksmith to have recruited Bass. It is also "technically" possible that without BTSC, SVS intuited that Bass was bad and was trying to keep him alive to recruit..blindfaeth wrote:Interesting result.
DH considering the baddies don't have btsc why are you relentlessly attacking SVS?
Anything BUT "ingenuine."blindfaeth wrote:It feels just as ingenuine as bullz suspecting llama because I defended him. It's so irrelevant because even if she was bass' teammate she didn't know it.
Oh totally this^, I'm not claiming to be anything but lucky on this one. I've had about 100 conspiracy theories, through the various games, that were on about the level of this one, but only about 8/100 were right. I'll take it as a pleasant surprise that I was right!Epignosis wrote:I think timmer made a long shot call that just so happened to be right.
Yeah, I believe you. Still cool though I guess, right?timmer wrote:Oh totally this^, I'm not claiming to be anything but lucky on this one. I've had about 100 conspiracy theories, through the various games, that were on about the level of this one, but only about 8/100 were right. I'll take it as a pleasant surprise that I was right!Epignosis wrote:I think timmer made a long shot call that just so happened to be right.
I didn't mean to imply air quotes, I meant to employ actual quotes.blindfaeth wrote:You're "suspicious". Look I can use air quotes too
Absolutely! BTW, I'm feeling better about you after thinking about the game. In case you were wondering, etc.Epignosis wrote:
Yeah, I believe you. Still cool though I guess, right?
When FZ brings up her case this was his initial case. Unless I am misreading it, it appears as though LC thinks it is heavy handed for Llama. Which would imply that he finds it difficult to swallow. I could be misreading this though....Long Con wrote:So llama is deliberately trying to act in such a way that is like a previous Civ game? Is that supposed to make us think he's Civ in this one? Kind of heavy handed.
Now he starts in on assuming Magenta will use a lynch stop Day 1. The following posts all deal with this:Long Con wrote:My vote is going to Llama, not that it will matter much for now, for playing the "just like Civvie Llama in X-Men" too hard. I also thought that the post about other ways Llama is "acting too Civvie-Llama" was a good read.
Long Con wrote:I don't think anyone will die in this lynch because Magenta is pretty likely to stop the lynch. I might as well stop being coy about it. I'm pretty sure I have her secret figured out.fingersplints wrote:Why do you doubt he 'll die?Long Con wrote: I doubt he'll die even if he gets the most votes anyway.
Magenta – She is a former love interest of Wally West and has magnetic abilities. She can prevent one lynch during the game. If she does, she will gain BTSC with the Detectives.
If I were Magenta, I would stop the Day One lynch and get my BTSC with the Detectives ASAP.
Long Con wrote:Noooo! Now we won't get any more letters! Magenta, why didn't you stop the lynch???![]()
Long Con wrote:Looks good to me. And BF, that is possible, feel free to look for different solutions. I think it's more likely that Magenta either wasn't paying much attention (as I recall there was some latecomers not-caught-up) or just plain didn't agree with wasting a lynch save. I think BTSC is a way more powerful ability than a lynch save.Epignosis wrote:I think I solved Girder's secret, but it was more logical than linguistic.
Girder – A man transformed into pure metal. ~~~~~~ ~~~~~~ ~~ ~~~~~ ~~~~~~.
Girder cannot be night killed.
Frankly, these posts read a lot to me like a lack of taking responsibility for your own vote. It's easy to cast a vote, preface it with, oh he probably won't die anyway, then when he does die, you can shake your fist and blame someone else. I think it is foolishness to expect an Indy whose only goal is to survive to use the lynch save on someone other than themself. I expect more from you LC. Your musings surrounding the roles of the indies so far has been questionable at best, I just don't understand your purposes.Long Con wrote:Oh, and Magenta... good call on not saving him. It seems as though you are choosing to save your lynch save for a rainy day, or whatever... just want to remind you that it could mean the difference between Wally West chatting it up with you and Pied Piper... and Wally West killing you.
It's especially impressive given how swamped I've been.Sophie wrote:Yes! Great result! Thanks spacedaidy and fZ for answering and understanding. I will be popping up here and there but not expecT much of substance buy me until next monday, thanks for understanding and great hunch dh!
I wasn't aggressively defending him. I didn't suspect him. Or Bullz. Or BF. Totally different. You're reading into it. FAR into it.DharmaHelper wrote:There's a big difference between being fooled and actively, aggressively defending someone.S~V~S wrote:Ask me if Bass has fooled me in the past. Ask LC; he saw Bass totally schnocker me in The Island game.
Not night one, but he would be on my short list. Night one I would check you, BR, Rabbit or Roxy, most likely. I would think Rabbit would have a somewhat similar list. FZ I can't guess who she would check.Long Con wrote:Would S~V~S, FZ, or Rabbit check Bass on Night 1, if they were Blacksmith?
Long Con wrote:Ok, that last post was sarcastic, since I brought him up first.But then I reread your last post, and you aren't taking all the credit anymore. So my sarcasm softened.
Same thing happened to me, except it was Rabbit that was trying to discredit the case.DharmaHelper wrote:If it were me, I'd go back and look at SVS and FZ since they both practically jumped down my throat after I voted Bass.
Sure, you weren't cursed, sure. I wonder if that means you were cursed, but you can't tell us. How do you feel about blindfaeth, rabbit?rabbit8 wrote:Long Con wrote:Ok, that last post was sarcastic, since I brought him up first.But then I reread your last post, and you aren't taking all the credit anymore. So my sarcasm softened.
Same thing happened to me, except it was Rabbit that was trying to discredit the case.DharmaHelper wrote:If it were me, I'd go back and look at SVS and FZ since they both practically jumped down my throat after I voted Bass.
Sure I was not cursed during the day, sure.
If I were trying to say something like that, my sentences would have probably contained at least some of those words.Are you actually trying to say because you voted for Bass second to last you are not a baddie with him?
OK.
Um hum.Long Con wrote:Sure, you weren't cursed, sure. I wonder if that means you were cursed, but you can't tell us. How do you feel about blindfaeth, rabbit?rabbit8 wrote:Long Con wrote:Ok, that last post was sarcastic, since I brought him up first.But then I reread your last post, and you aren't taking all the credit anymore. So my sarcasm softened.
Same thing happened to me, except it was Rabbit that was trying to discredit the case.DharmaHelper wrote:If it were me, I'd go back and look at SVS and FZ since they both practically jumped down my throat after I voted Bass.
Sure I was not cursed during the day, sure.
If I were trying to say something like that, my sentences would have probably contained at least some of those words.Are you actually trying to say because you voted for Bass second to last you are not a baddie with him?
OK.
I pointed out several instances wherein you were doing specifically that, so I have to disagree here. Also, nice try but Bullz/BF are irrelevant.S~V~S wrote:I wasn't aggressively defending him. I didn't suspect him. Or Bullz. Or BF. Totally different. You're reading into it. FAR into it.DharmaHelper wrote:There's a big difference between being fooled and actively, aggressively defending someone.S~V~S wrote:Ask me if Bass has fooled me in the past. Ask LC; he saw Bass totally schnocker me in The Island game.
You weren't reading along?Roxy wrote:Bye splints this game is much more boring without ye!
I need to catch up again but I am still very suspicious of Epi and now Timmer bc he was sspicious of my Epi suspicion but then showed how Epi could be bad with bad intentions in his pursuit of an Elo lynch. I do get how he is defending someone who wanted his role dead.
If anyone has anything they would like me to answer post your questions now while I am around.
What the hell are you talking about? I didn't say you were wrong for voting him, I wanted to make sure your vote was legit. All I asked for, was a better explanation than "I don't trust him" and those generic accusations. Like SVS, I was satisfied after that, and even told you I knew you could do better. Not to mention the fact I was the next voter after you.DharmaHelper wrote:If it were me, I'd go back and look at SVS and FZ since they both practically jumped down my throat after I voted Bass.
FZ. wrote:This is a super great result![]()
Way to go Timmer!
What the hell are you talking about? I didn't say you were wrong for voting him, I wanted to make sure your vote was legit. All I asked for, was a better explanation than "I don't trust him" and those generic accusations. Like SVS, I was satisfied after that, and even told you I knew you could do better. Not to mention the fact I was the next voter after you.DharmaHelper wrote:If it were me, I'd go back and look at SVS and FZ since they both practically jumped down my throat after I voted Bass.
On with the catch up
Huh, what?DharmaHelper wrote:FZ. wrote:This is a super great result![]()
Way to go Timmer!
What the hell are you talking about? I didn't say you were wrong for voting him, I wanted to make sure your vote was legit. All I asked for, was a better explanation than "I don't trust him" and those generic accusations. Like SVS, I was satisfied after that, and even told you I knew you could do better. Not to mention the fact I was the next voter after you.DharmaHelper wrote:If it were me, I'd go back and look at SVS and FZ since they both practically jumped down my throat after I voted Bass.
On with the catch up
I'll grant you that you are less suspicious for having voted for Bass. But you did put a lot of pressure on me to answer your questions about my vote.FZ. wrote:Huh, what?DharmaHelper wrote:FZ. wrote:This is a super great result![]()
Way to go Timmer!
What the hell are you talking about? I didn't say you were wrong for voting him, I wanted to make sure your vote was legit. All I asked for, was a better explanation than "I don't trust him" and those generic accusations. Like SVS, I was satisfied after that, and even told you I knew you could do better. Not to mention the fact I was the next voter after you.DharmaHelper wrote:If it were me, I'd go back and look at SVS and FZ since they both practically jumped down my throat after I voted Bass.
On with the catch up
No problem. Hope everything works out.Sophie wrote:Yes! Great result! Thanks spacedaidy and fZ for answering and understanding. I will be popping up here and there but not expecT much of substance buy me until next monday, thanks for understanding and great hunch dh!
The fact that I thought Timmer's idea was a good one, hence wanted to vote for Bass, didn't mean I was sure about it. I wanted to make sure the people voting for him weren't just bandwagoning.DharmaHelper wrote:I'll grant you that you are less suspicious for having voted for Bass. But you did put a lot of pressure on me to answer your questions about my vote.FZ. wrote:Huh, what?DharmaHelper wrote:FZ. wrote:This is a super great result![]()
Way to go Timmer!
What the hell are you talking about? I didn't say you were wrong for voting him, I wanted to make sure your vote was legit. All I asked for, was a better explanation than "I don't trust him" and those generic accusations. Like SVS, I was satisfied after that, and even told you I knew you could do better. Not to mention the fact I was the next voter after you.DharmaHelper wrote:If it were me, I'd go back and look at SVS and FZ since they both practically jumped down my throat after I voted Bass.
On with the catch up
FZ. wrote:If I could curse Epig, he'd have to use 10 adverbs in every post :P
Epignosis wrote:FZ. wrote:If I could curse Epig, he'd have to use 10 adverbs in every post :P
Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Wed Dec 16, 2020 7:33 pm Just how many days of "let's yeet them tomorrow" can a mafioso survive?
The answer: all of them, if you are a marmot.
Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Wed Dec 16, 2020 7:33 pm Just how many days of "let's yeet them tomorrow" can a mafioso survive?
The answer: all of them, if you are a marmot.
Why do people assume I want credit?FZ. wrote:If I could curse Epig, he'd have to use 10 adverbs in every post :P
DH, apart from saying Bass was cursed, did you say he was manipulating it? Because I remember you talking about a curse, but I don't remember anything else, which is why I said props to TImmer. If I missed something and you deserve more credit, then by all means, I'm giving it to you![]()
While TImmer's speculation was a long shot, it was logical enough to convince me it could be true, and if so, I believe there were probably more people who thought it could actually be true. Which is why I think that people not voting for him might have done so to try and save someone who could potentially be in alignment with them, so saying that someone didn't know because baddies don't have BTSC might not be accurate in this instance.
That said, SVS' vote looks too fishy to be true. I'd think she would try a more subtle way then to call his lynch awful, but that's just me.
Since I'm still far from convinced Bullz is bad, I think some of his voters could easily be bad.
Aceofspaces' vote is looking quite bad, to be honest, and BlackRock's as well. Also, she's more absent than any of the recent games I've played with her. What's your opinion of her, LC?
Because.FZ. wrote:Epig, why did you vote for Bullz?
Nope. I have been skypeing and reading along with the Champions game supporting Turnips.DharmaHelper wrote:You weren't reading along?Roxy wrote:Bye splints this game is much more boring without ye!
I need to catch up again but I am still very suspicious of Epi and now Timmer bc he was sspicious of my Epi suspicion but then showed how Epi could be bad with bad intentions in his pursuit of an Elo lynch. I do get how he is defending someone who wanted his role dead.
If anyone has anything they would like me to answer post your questions now while I am around.
Just odd that you would be silenced and not want to keep up with what was going on.Roxy wrote:Nope. I have been skypeing and reading along with the Champions game supporting Turnips.DharmaHelper wrote:You weren't reading along?Roxy wrote:Bye splints this game is much more boring without ye!
I need to catch up again but I am still very suspicious of Epi and now Timmer bc he was sspicious of my Epi suspicion but then showed how Epi could be bad with bad intentions in his pursuit of an Elo lynch. I do get how he is defending someone who wanted his role dead.
If anyone has anything they would like me to answer post your questions now while I am around.
Is that a problem for you?
Hey Rox,Roxy wrote:It may be considered odd but it is true. I have not looked at anything since the last lynch and I changed my vote to Bass as soon as I had caught up.
What do you make of thechoice to kill fingersplints N1?
Thank you.Epignosis wrote:Because.FZ. wrote:Epig, why did you vote for Bullz?
Bc after I caught up and actually read Bass I had a feeling he was bad. Being his mom I am good at telling. I have been reading bullz as a frustrated civ.FZ. wrote:Hey Rox,Roxy wrote:It may be considered odd but it is true. I have not looked at anything since the last lynch and I changed my vote to Bass as soon as I had caught up.
What do you make of thechoice to kill fingersplints N1?
Why did you vote Bass and not Bullz? Do you think Bullz is good? If so, who is most suspicious to you other than Epig on his list of voters?
No, it isn't irrelevant. At one point they were toed, and it was a very tense last hour.DharmaHelper wrote:I pointed out several instances wherein you were doing specifically that, so I have to disagree here. Also, nice try but Bullz/BF are irrelevant.S~V~S wrote:I wasn't aggressively defending him. I didn't suspect him. Or Bullz. Or BF. Totally different. You're reading into it. FAR into it.DharmaHelper wrote:There's a big difference between being fooled and actively, aggressively defending someone.S~V~S wrote:Ask me if Bass has fooled me in the past. Ask LC; he saw Bass totally schnocker me in The Island game.
FZ. wrote:Thank you.Epignosis wrote:Because.FZ. wrote:Epig, why did you vote for Bullz?
You're playing a very different game from DN. You're not as leading as you did. You don't seem to have much to say, and I don't remember you discussing Bullz much before. Did you?
My Bullzeye suspicion was a product of my llama analysis. Surely you remember that, since I questioned you.Epignosis wrote:I have made a conscious effort to do something different (sometimes outrageously different) regardless of alignment to keep things fresh.
It's irrelevant because you weren't blatantly trying to defend BF or Bullz.S~V~S wrote:No, it isn't irrelevant. At one point they were toed, and it was a very tense last hour.DharmaHelper wrote:I pointed out several instances wherein you were doing specifically that, so I have to disagree here. Also, nice try but Bullz/BF are irrelevant.S~V~S wrote:I wasn't aggressively defending him. I didn't suspect him. Or Bullz. Or BF. Totally different. You're reading into it. FAR into it.DharmaHelper wrote:There's a big difference between being fooled and actively, aggressively defending someone.S~V~S wrote:Ask me if Bass has fooled me in the past. Ask LC; he saw Bass totally schnocker me in The Island game.