Been reading DH this morning -
You first help lead the lynch against llama. (which in a sense llama brought on himself but that's just one girls opinion). You thought llama should have been pointing out fallacies you thought existed Day 0 and llama did not bc he was too busy putting down The Flash and talking about monkeys.
DharmaHelper wrote:I don't think he's a civvie. I don't like his whole Day 0 schtick, it got annoying very quickly. Also, I noticed he didn't berate anyone for any logical fallacies throughout the entire duration of Day 0. People were jumping to conclusions all over the place and Llama did not voice any opposition to it.
DharmaHelper wrote:Mostly the speculation on the meaning of the letters, like the above. I expected llama to jump in and beat the shit out of the speculation like it owed him money. He didn't. That's suspect.
If you thought there were fallacies then why didn't YOU jump in and "beat the shit out of the speculation"?
When fingersplints tried to tell you this was normal for him you shut her down post haste.
DharmaHelper wrote:fingersplints wrote:DharmaHelper wrote:llama seems crazy even for him. My only thoughts about that is he would probably be less likely to be this out there if he had bts and someone else to consider.
What's your point here? As far as I'm aware BTSC is not in full swing across the board quite yet.
I thought my point was pretty clear. He seems to be drawing a lot of attention to himself. I think he would be less likely to do so if he had btsc or potential btsc partners to worry about. Because it isn't in full swing yet doesn't mean that all those with the potential to gain btsc won't worry about their partners.
I suppose I disagree.
Now she is dead.
It was after this that he went after SVS putting the blame of the llama lynch directly at her feet (which I disagree with 100%)
DharmaHelper wrote:Metalmarsh89 wrote:@ Long Con. Well then let's hope there is a rezz for him this time around too.
I do recall the situation in that game. Actually, I don't think anyone would have drawn any comparisons if llama hadn't specifically said that he wanted to be King of the Morlocks again. In hindsight, it seems clear that he was just being funny.
IIRC SVS lead the "Hey this looks awfully like Llamas civvie game from this one time" train.
DharmaHelper wrote:S~V~S wrote:S~V~S wrote:Was Llama good or bad in the Morlock game? I can't recall, I think I have to go look.
Turnip Head wrote:S~V~S wrote:Was Llama good or bad in the Morlock game? I can't recall, I think I have to go look.
He was Professor X, a civilian.
thellama73 wrote:S~V~S wrote:Was Llama good or bad in the Morlock game? I can't recall, I think I have to go look.
For some reason, people thought my not being interested in anything besides being King of the Morlocks was somehow sinister and they lynched me for it.
History shows again and again how nature points out the folly of man.

This was how the Llama/X Men thing started, DH. Not exactly "leading a train". YOU started that train, iirc. After this I made two posts where I was wishy washy. Like how Llama does this to amuse himself when he has no BTS, which does not mean much in this game. Personally he looked exactly like he did in that game to me. But it is possible as well that he was doing it on purpose as some thought, which is pretty much all I said about the situation.
Don;t be blaming me for this one, the five people who voted him at the end, when Epi was clearly in the lead, are where the fingers should be pointing (not even at you, tbh). If finger pointing needs to be done.
If there doesn't need to be finger pointing, why did you just point the finger back at me rather defensively, if I don't deserve it, according to you?
You did deserve this finger-pointing imho
I think SVS is right to have pointed the finger at you.
You voted Bass - latching on to a pre-built case. and adding that Bass reminded you of the Death Note game where Bass was bad.
Then you try to take full claim of the Bass lynch - it seemed important to you that people thought it was your doing:
Huh. Guess that hunch of mine paid off.
If it were me, I'd go back and look at SVS and FZ since they both practically jumped down my throat after I voted Bass.
Still trying to get SVS lynched.
To be fair, I'm hardly responsible for the Bass lynch being a success. I was just personally correct, which is an achievement for myself. Several others seemed to think he was bad.
Oh so Timmer can brag and take all the credit but I can't I see how it is.
Tbf you do say that several others seen Bass was bad but you still point out - AGAIN - that your were right.
Now you go back to pressing SVS for lynch bc she "jumped down your throat" for your Bass vote - which she did not btw.
I find it odd that when you could not get one case to stick to SVS you went ahead and made another case against her - why do you need SVS dead this game?
Now you mention you would vote for Made out of the clear blue sky just bc he has not been around - why? You have been making cases on SVS now you move on to someone who is not even been playing or posting or even voting - do you think it will be easier to lynch a non player than to lynch SVS?
You are suspicious of me for not coming out sooner about Aces but I notice you did not say anything to help him either. Don't play that song to me DH.