Ok, so im catched up now.
Gotta say something, i DO NOT believe neither svs or timmer. Its hard cause they are both up for the lynch, and both are players i ve seen as suspicion for a while (so i may be biased to interpret whatever they say as baddies, cause i just think they are), and apparently they arent both in the same team?? In any case, could both of them could be bad??
Let me see if i understand whats going on here: timmer got conveinently silenced after th lynched, that made him look bad. since timmer was silenced, some people are assuming it was all to make him look bad. th defending him, him being silenced. too obvious, right? And, also, timmer is claiming to be mirror, and some players think that isnt possible (the reasons escapes me, though, so i went to first page and read the roles and couldnt figure mirror secrets. MM was doing all the secret powers...can someone tell me what are mirror secret powers and why timmer cant be him?). Also, timmer is asking svs questions and saying her answer will determine if she is lying or not.
This all seems so fishy that, even if timmer turns out to be civvie in the end, this would be one weird game he played. he was sketchy and out of character all game.
And then theres SVS, let me say that, im sorry svs i really like you as a person

and you are awesome, but i dont believe anything you say in this game. I dont believe you were sending you night action every night without noticing at any point in the game that you shouldnt. that doesnt seem like you at all, svs, you are such a smart, crafty person, that i cant see you doing this AT ALL. And you are playing the innocent game, the write-a-sentence-and-then-add-a-lol rethoric and i dont buy it coming from you AT ALL svs, sorry. plus, svs actions lately in the game didnt seem civvie friendly at all, like the no vote for th (and voting me instead), voting mm (instead of timmer), flip flopping on timmer, not noticing llama defending me and trying to install me as a suspect when everyone had already seen the obvious, etc. If anything, this is SO out of character for svs, that i dont have other option than to think she is faking it. All the naiffness, cluelessness: that is not svs.
so, in any case, i think they both might be bad if this is possible. if i had to vote now, ill vote svs. but i see MM, who i really trust, voted timmer. and devin, who imo has been acting pretty civvie, too. fz, who i tend to think is an amicable indie, too. And svs is voted by timmer, who i dont trust, and LC, who i generally trust but can be a crafty crafty baddie. so this give me pause: fz, devin, mm: why trust svs?
im ok with lynching timmer, but my GUT tells me svs is definetely a baddie (while timmer almost definetely), though i also distrust timmer. so i will vote svs now, just to follow my hunch, but will change it to timmer if the people i trust tells me why timmer is the better candidate.