
You know what I mean. Re-read the post you quoted boogs

Moderator: Community Team
I am 99% certain that there is no way that MP is a baddie or a recruited baddie. Same with BF, trying to pull the same sort of theory. My eye is on both of you for being the last two.Boogs wrote:FH I know my theory sounds crazy but I just feel like we were onto something.... It does not seem logical he is Herobrine. I will admit i may not be accurate there, but a recruit? yes, largely largely possible. We all still have no idea what the secret part of Hero's role is, which COULD be just that. Also, his constant flip flopping and wishy washy feelings on everyone throw me a HUGEFlyin' High wrote:I don't think you were talking me out of Boogs.Roxy wrote:If you felt more strongly about boogs I would have followed you FH. <3
I really hope we are right today!
Well all this does not make me feel better tbs. Porcu![]()
I swear I will just flip out if I am wrong.
Oh no more talk of recruits!! My hed can't handle it tonight.
Boogs, can you please explain how MP can both be Herobrine and have been dead Night 1? When you can explain that, I might start believing you. Otherwise I don't understand how it's possible. A recruit at this point makes more sense to me than Herobrine killing from beyond the grave.. He most caught me he wanted to tie the poll and I felt that if he were Civ, why would he ever even suggest a thing?
FH you do make me think, again Hero was dead so it must be a recruit so I am wrong on him being the actual Hero. But someone else must be. MP targeting Llama and BWT was odd like he was trying to throw us off getting them. Is he pretending to cover up suspicions? I want to kill Hero as bad as the rest of the good guys, but we have to lynch right. Hopefully we got one right tonight.
Linksy:I was right bout one of the 2! Heck yes! It is getting down to the wire. Great job guys!
You've asked that a few times, and I keep saying that I don't see how she can be bad, given her voting record.MovingPictures07 wrote:I know it seems SE and Boogs are the obvious last two, but what do people think of Rox?
Epignosis wrote:If llama is good, it means we exist in a universe in which multitasking llama can call out the first of two mafia while simultaneously calling out two civilians.
I don't want to live in that universe.
I agree the voting record looks good, I'm just trying to keep open to all possibilities just in case here. I know I've been involved in games where baddies throw their teammates under the bus (I am notorious for such occasional behavior). Thanks for your input though.thellama73 wrote:You've asked that a few times, and I keep saying that I don't see how she can be bad, given her voting record.MovingPictures07 wrote:I know it seems SE and Boogs are the obvious last two, but what do people think of Rox?
Well, apart from her voting record, I am reading her posts as civvie as well, for what that's worth.MovingPictures07 wrote:I agree the voting record looks good, I'm just trying to keep open to all possibilities just in case here. I know I've been involved in games where baddies throw their teammates under the bus (I am notorious for such occasional behavior). Thanks for your input though.thellama73 wrote:You've asked that a few times, and I keep saying that I don't see how she can be bad, given her voting record.MovingPictures07 wrote:I know it seems SE and Boogs are the obvious last two, but what do people think of Rox?
Epignosis wrote:If llama is good, it means we exist in a universe in which multitasking llama can call out the first of two mafia while simultaneously calling out two civilians.
I don't want to live in that universe.
Let's just say that perhaps there's a reason I'm asking.thellama73 wrote:Well, apart from her voting record, I am reading her posts as civvie as well, for what that's worth.MovingPictures07 wrote:I agree the voting record looks good, I'm just trying to keep open to all possibilities just in case here. I know I've been involved in games where baddies throw their teammates under the bus (I am notorious for such occasional behavior). Thanks for your input though.thellama73 wrote:You've asked that a few times, and I keep saying that I don't see how she can be bad, given her voting record.MovingPictures07 wrote:I know it seems SE and Boogs are the obvious last two, but what do people think of Rox?
Epignosis wrote:If llama is good, it means we exist in a universe in which multitasking llama can call out the first of two mafia while simultaneously calling out two civilians.
I don't want to live in that universe.
Are you saying you think there's a possibility he's been recruited then?thellama73 wrote:If MP really is the role he flipped as, I don't see how he can have all this specific information. It really concerns me.
I am starting to warm to the idea, I admit. His behavior has been very strange of late. I'm certainly not confident enough to lynch him, but I find it odd that he keeps trying to sow distrust about people I really think are civvies.birdwithteeth11 wrote:Are you saying you think there's a possibility he's been recruited then?thellama73 wrote:If MP really is the role he flipped as, I don't see how he can have all this specific information. It really concerns me.
Epignosis wrote:If llama is good, it means we exist in a universe in which multitasking llama can call out the first of two mafia while simultaneously calling out two civilians.
I don't want to live in that universe.
same goes for my "losing his crackers" comment. <3birdwithteeth11 wrote:And Alex, that's not necessarily a bad thing. I know you've been fairly mentally stressed lately what with the second part of the CPA and all, so I'm not blaming you for your thoughts being scrambled too much.
And from your re-read, you have determined that there is something very fishy going on with him, and/or that he could have possibly been recruited. I'm inclined to agree with you there, but I just want the opportunity to read back on him myself so I can form a stronger opinion on him. Because right now, I'm still leaning more strongly towards Boogs and SE.Roxy wrote:same goes for my "losing his crackers" comment. <3birdwithteeth11 wrote:And Alex, that's not necessarily a bad thing. I know you've been fairly mentally stressed lately what with the second part of the CPA and all, so I'm not blaming you for your thoughts being scrambled too much.
I have read back on MP already Teeth. I have read back on each player that is left.
Epignosis wrote:If llama is good, it means we exist in a universe in which multitasking llama can call out the first of two mafia while simultaneously calling out two civilians.
I don't want to live in that universe.
I feel good about Roxy. She not only helped lynch DP, but she was also part of the Epignosis voting crew on Day 1 of this game. So while she may have thrown a teammate under the bus once in the past, her doing it twice in one game seems OTT and I don't think she's done that because I don't think she's bad.MovingPictures07 wrote:I know it seems SE and Boogs are the obvious last two, but what do people think of Rox?
While I agree that Ambray being civvie is certainly not definitive, I think she was and I worry that the Villager made a mistake in killing her. For Ambray to be bad, she had to have been Herobrine since the only way for the Villager to have gotten a kill was to target the Creeper which would have protected the Creeper but prevented them from using their kill (at least that's my understanding of how the Villager's role works).Roxy wrote:Why is it when there is random info in a game I am never party to it?
Looking forward to hearing what you have to say after your read Teeth.
Llama - its weird thought that MP was the only one sure about Ambray - even another civ ( the Villager) obv thought she was bad as they used a kill on her. So to me it is not something definitive we can point to and say oh ok I understand - b/c I don't.
Yes, I'm worried too. I hope Stevie is still alive and can make the best decision on who to kill and/or that Ambray was magically somehow Herobrine and we won't have a Herobrine kill. Or maybe Creeper can do us a favor and try to block Herobrine.Roxy wrote:FH - I am worried about tonight tbh. If there are 2 civ kills I think its likely its game over for the civs.
I wish SVS was alive to but unfortunately Hero NK'd her and I would still have a player who believed and knew who I was here to stop this nonsense.Flyin' High wrote:Yes, I'm worried too. I hope Stevie is still alive and can make the best decision on who to kill and/or that Ambray was magically somehow Herobrine and we won't have a Herobrine kill. Or maybe Creeper can do us a favor and try to block Herobrine.Roxy wrote:FH - I am worried about tonight tbh. If there are 2 civ kills I think its likely its game over for the civs.
My entire suspicion of you was certainly not solely that you've been blendy. I actually laid out a pretty detailed case on why I think you might be bad. Yes, I could be wrong, but to act like all I did was accuse you of being blendy just isn't true.>SpaghettiEverywhere wrote:And your suspicions of me were just that I was being blendy, which I already addressed. And what more do you want me to say? I think Boogs and BF are the last two bad people in the game. Boogs has had an awful voting record the entire game and all of this stuff about MP being bad is ridiculous to me. I agree that he's been a bit wishy washy and peculiar at times, but I cant argue the fact that he was killed instead of a baddie and turned up civ. While they would be on separate teams, I think BF is bad as well. He was agreeing with Boogs for most of the game and I can't help but think that he is bad too. You accused BF of the same things that you accused me of. Why the change of mind in thinking he is good? And if not them, then I am 100% certain that somebody you trust is pulling the wool over your eyes. How are you so certain that you trust these people? I can't trust anybody in this game. Not even MP even though I highly doubt he is bad. I'll take what people say into account, but never trust. Especially the people who dominate the thread (Right now its MP, FH, and Roxy I suppose), because it just leads to bandwagons happening and if a baddie becomes one of those people who start dominating the thread and has a good track record, the game is over and baddies win unless some freak accident happens. Take MOTU for example, where I think alex was pretty well accepted by everyone until it became brutally obvious that he was bad when he defended snow dog.
Let's just say I'm playing a WIFOM game with the baddies in terms of kills and I've been losing spectacularly, for the most part, so I was trying to fix that. Thanks for helping, everyone. I believe it is after the deadline now so it is OK for me to say this, not that they can predict who I've been protecting by this anyway.Roxy wrote:MP - what possible motive can you have?
My voting record is better than yours tbs!
I know we have never had the pleasure of btsc but those that have can and will attest I would never throw someone under the bus just so I could win. I would, however, let them throw me under the bus - though that has only happened twice in the 100's of games I have played.
I'm NOT losing my marbles. I told you I had to vote for you yesterday, it was because of paranoia. I can't say more than that! It's just what it is.birdwithteeth11 wrote:Roxy, I'm willing to give him the BOTD for now, but the fact he did a complete 180 on me (while insanified) does not sit well with me at all. I could see that being a plan that is worked out among baddie teammates. Until I re-read him though, I won't have a definitive answer. But it reeks of high heaven to me right now.
I suggest others read up on him as well. I would be curious to hear other people's thoughts on this as well. But for now, I agree that MP is just losing his marbles.
Because people keep targeting me at night with random crap! Good and bad, let me tell you.Flyin' High wrote:I feel good about Roxy. She not only helped lynch DP, but she was also part of the Epignosis voting crew on Day 1 of this game. So while she may have thrown a teammate under the bus once in the past, her doing it twice in one game seems OTT and I don't think she's done that because I don't think she's bad.MovingPictures07 wrote:I know it seems SE and Boogs are the obvious last two, but what do people think of Rox?
I also wonder how you keep getting all sorts of info about random players (or at least implying you have info). Because I know I sure as heck haven't gotten any special info about other players this game.
I was moreso talking to Roxy when I said all I was being accused of was being blendy.Flyin' High wrote:My entire suspicion of you was certainly not solely that you've been blendy. I actually laid out a pretty detailed case on why I think you might be bad. Yes, I could be wrong, but to act like all I did was accuse you of being blendy just isn't true.>SpaghettiEverywhere wrote:And your suspicions of me were just that I was being blendy, which I already addressed. And what more do you want me to say? I think Boogs and BF are the last two bad people in the game. Boogs has had an awful voting record the entire game and all of this stuff about MP being bad is ridiculous to me. I agree that he's been a bit wishy washy and peculiar at times, but I cant argue the fact that he was killed instead of a baddie and turned up civ. While they would be on separate teams, I think BF is bad as well. He was agreeing with Boogs for most of the game and I can't help but think that he is bad too. You accused BF of the same things that you accused me of. Why the change of mind in thinking he is good? And if not them, then I am 100% certain that somebody you trust is pulling the wool over your eyes. How are you so certain that you trust these people? I can't trust anybody in this game. Not even MP even though I highly doubt he is bad. I'll take what people say into account, but never trust. Especially the people who dominate the thread (Right now its MP, FH, and Roxy I suppose), because it just leads to bandwagons happening and if a baddie becomes one of those people who start dominating the thread and has a good track record, the game is over and baddies win unless some freak accident happens. Take MOTU for example, where I think alex was pretty well accepted by everyone until it became brutally obvious that he was bad when he defended snow dog.
The reason I have changed my tune on blindfaeth is because he helped us lynch DP yesterday and DP was mafia. Maybe BF is Herobrine, it's not outside the realm of possibility. But BF's behavior all game has read more civvie than Boogs' has.
Boogs is currently making me nervous with his pleas, but then so did DP and DP did turn out to be bad.
I think the chances of the civvies being able to pull off a win is slim, but we've gotta at least try!
Ha, yep. Big ol lie from me. Of course. And just because FH makes an analysis of you two doesnt mean I automatically have to believe it. Thats the problem with this game, everybody is way too trusting of each other and it just leads to bad things happening. People like FH and MP say things and you guys follow like sheep because you just trust them instantly.blindfaeth wrote:Omg u r so bad se, that is a flat out lie. Boogs and I have not agreed all game and if you disagree you can look at fhs vote analysi.ds of us yesterday. The extent of our connection is that I believe him to be good and our agreement mp is bad. Besides its very likely theres only one baddie on the team left so its unlikely were working together, youre grasping at straws. Fhs analysis of u from yesterday paints a perfect picture and you are definitely getting my vote tomorrow, I can wait on mp.