

Moderator: Community Team
He obviously does, but it's "because reasons".DharmaHelper wrote:Hey aapje do you think Rico was rezzcruited?![]()
Well that worked out for him last game so I can see why he'd want to try that againRicochet wrote:He obviously does, but it's "because reasons".DharmaHelper wrote:Hey aapje do you think Rico was rezzcruited?![]()
We should lynch you for realzies today Survivor Man.DharmaHelper wrote:We should lynch you tbqh
Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Wed Dec 16, 2020 7:33 pm Just how many days of "let's yeet them tomorrow" can a mafioso survive?
The answer: all of them, if you are a marmot.
What does Rey's falling off the earth tell you? What does his case against Golden tell you, maybe together with his falling off the earth, afterwards?Turnip Head wrote:I could see the LoRab and Rey being recruited to the same team angle but I don't feel strongly about it; Rey fell off the face of the earth. But I'm sure you've noticed Rico that LoRab's opinion of you and me is completely static: nothing I say ever changes her opinion one way or the other, there's never anything new. "My thoughts haven't changed", she says... Since Day 3. I get the feeling that nothing I say will change LoRab's thoughts for better or worse. LoRab isn't accounting for my posts anymore, she's just paying lip service to her suspicion of me.Ricochet wrote:No. I should have rather put it "after [suspecting them] the early Days".Metalmarsh89 wrote:Isn't Jay dead? Should we still be suspecting him?Ricochet wrote:What happened to your suspicions of JJJ and rey from the early Days?
Read my re-read of her. That's what I'm referencing. For a player never letting up on suspicions, she suspected them and then the suspicions vanished.
Now she could just be a lazy neutral, or she could be a coasting baddie, but either way I think she's full of bullsuit.
---Ricochet wrote:She's tunnelling on her major cases, but what else is new. She can keep doing that all the way through the game, as an unrecruited. She can keep doing that all the way through the game as a recruited civ. Can she be doing that all the way through as a recruited baddie? That is perhaps a question worth thinking about.
Ah, so it's "muh empirical evidence".DharmaHelper wrote:Well that worked out for him last game so I can see why he'd want to try that againRicochet wrote:He obviously does, but it's "because reasons".DharmaHelper wrote:Hey aapje do you think Rico was rezzcruited?![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
He was bad, someone got lynched, and rezzed, and he came up with a really dumb case that made no sense that suggested that person was recruited as well as being rezzed. It was dumb, and he should feel bad about it because it was bad.Ricochet wrote:Ah, so it's "muh empirical evidence".DharmaHelper wrote:Well that worked out for him last game so I can see why he'd want to try that againRicochet wrote:He obviously does, but it's "because reasons".DharmaHelper wrote:Hey aapje do you think Rico was rezzcruited?![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Was he bad or rezzcruited bad that game?
Sounds like the present, lol.DharmaHelper wrote:He was bad, someone got lynched, and rezzed, and he came up with a really dumb case that made no sense that suggested that person was recruited as well as being rezzed. It was dumb, and he should feel bad about it because it was bad.Ricochet wrote:Ah, so it's "muh empirical evidence".DharmaHelper wrote:Well that worked out for him last game so I can see why he'd want to try that againRicochet wrote:He obviously does, but it's "because reasons".DharmaHelper wrote:Hey aapje do you think Rico was rezzcruited?![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Was he bad or rezzcruited bad that game?
I agree with this interpretation of his words. I thought I had implied that in my response to him. And my only reversal in attitude was that I was trying to undersatand what he was saying.Metalmarsh89 wrote:I believe Scotty is saying something along the lines of "You have not cared at all about what I've said all game long LoRab, and suddenly you are interesting in reading and transcribing my insanified text. I don't understand this sudden reversal in attitude, but I suspect you for it. Ha ha ha ha ha."
I think insanifying is neutral. I've seen it as a good role and a bad role. I find it entertaining more than anything.Ricochet wrote:Understood. You were also cheerfully exclamatory at an insanifying taking place. Do you think insanifying is a good thing or sign?LoRab wrote:Uhhhh...ok.Metalmarsh89 wrote:Then I will vote for you too.LoRab wrote:I'm at peace with you voting for me because I'm not really saying much yet this round. It's a fair and true criticism. And havenot excuse other than real life (and, for ther record, I'm in the middle of the equivalent of the superbowl, the world series, and the
nba dinals, while running the boston marathon). Just to give context of my sechedule.
@Rico: A lot of the LP/Piano players also have experience with the insanifier. I don't remember off hand who is good at reading it. Since LC bumped up the percentage of words that get changed, it became harder to understand.
BWT's self vote, and lack of denial of being bad makes me consider moving my vote in that direction. aaple voting Rico makes me consider a Rico vote, also (no, my suspicion of him hasn't let up).
As for voting me, you haven't let up, I have nothing to add since the previous time you voted (or intended to vote) for me, so I'll use this instead:![]()
What happened to your suspicions of JJJ and rey from the early Days?
I wouldn't quite say lazy neutral, but neutral that doesn't have a whole lot of time to post. I'm not full of bullsuit at all--but really nothing you've said has made me change my thoughts about you (or Rico for that matter), so I haven't added to my reasons. I don't see a point in repeating myself. I'm accounting for your posts--they are just not changing my thoughts on you.Turnip Head wrote:I could see the LoRab and Rey being recruited to the same team angle but I don't feel strongly about it; Rey fell off the face of the earth. But I'm sure you've noticed Rico that LoRab's opinion of you and me is completely static: nothing I say ever changes her opinion one way or the other, there's never anything new. "My thoughts haven't changed", she says... Since Day 3. I get the feeling that nothing I say will change LoRab's thoughts for better or worse. LoRab isn't accounting for my posts anymore, she's just paying lip service to her suspicion of me.Ricochet wrote:No. I should have rather put it "after [suspecting them] the early Days".Metalmarsh89 wrote:Isn't Jay dead? Should we still be suspecting him?Ricochet wrote:What happened to your suspicions of JJJ and rey from the early Days?
Read my re-read of her. That's what I'm referencing. For a player never letting up on suspicions, she suspected them and then the suspicions vanished.
Now she could just be a lazy neutral, or she could be a coasting baddie, but either way I think she's full of bullsuit.
Who was on the top of your list on D2, if JJJ and Rey never rose there?LoRab wrote:JJJ is dead, so I haven't much thought of him. Rey hasn't done much and I kind of keep forgetting he's playing. Neither of them were major, huge suspicions in the first place. Both pinged me, but they never rose to the top of my list.
I wanted to respond, regardless.Ricochet wrote:Who was on the top of your list on D2, if JJJ and Rey never rose there?LoRab wrote:JJJ is dead, so I haven't much thought of him. Rey hasn't done much and I kind of keep forgetting he's playing. Neither of them were major, huge suspicions in the first place. Both pinged me, but they never rose to the top of my list.
Anyway, I labeled your drop of their suspicions as potential moodswings, not suspicious behaviour. As far as I know, any partnership developed with them could have still inspired you to drop any word on them. Furthermore, as I've told nutella, I still believe you set a double standard with rey. You suss him on a statement and aren't satisfied with his rebuttal, but it's not major, huge and you drop it. You suss me for a statement and aren't satisfied with my rebuttal, and I rose to your top o' the list.
Really - you should re-read Rey - I think his posting has changed a lot since his about face when he went after Golden. I have him on the back burner but I shouldn't if he is bad - a quiet baddie is a scary baddie.LoRab wrote:I wanted to respond, regardless.Ricochet wrote:Who was on the top of your list on D2, if JJJ and Rey never rose there?LoRab wrote:JJJ is dead, so I haven't much thought of him. Rey hasn't done much and I kind of keep forgetting he's playing. Neither of them were major, huge suspicions in the first place. Both pinged me, but they never rose to the top of my list.
Anyway, I labeled your drop of their suspicions as potential moodswings, not suspicious behaviour. As far as I know, any partnership developed with them could have still inspired you to drop any word on them. Furthermore, as I've told nutella, I still believe you set a double standard with rey. You suss him on a statement and aren't satisfied with his rebuttal, but it's not major, huge and you drop it. You suss me for a statement and aren't satisfied with my rebuttal, and I rose to your top o' the list.
And I don't think it's a double standard--your responses have felt more suspicious. His response was just unsatisfying. He didn't really explain himself, in my mind, but it didn't feel like a necessarily suspish response to me.
And I had forgotten that I was suspish of BWT earlier, so thanks for giving me reason to go back to my older posts. He was probably my top suspect day 2, although that was a while ago, so hard to remember where my brain was. Hmmm....may move my vote there, even though he seems to be likely to have the most votes regardless.
I'll fillow the fuck out of you man.aapje wrote:Wtf checking in drunk but whatever. I think rico is straiht up bad, no rez recruit involved at all. I think he's full of shit and bad to the bone. I just wish more people would fillow mmmy vote.
What do you mean by the underlined part?Roxy wrote:Really - you should re-read Rey - I think his posting has changed a lot since his about face when he went after Golden. I have him on the back burner but I shouldn't if he is bad - a quiet baddie is a scary baddie.LoRab wrote:I wanted to respond, regardless.Ricochet wrote:Who was on the top of your list on D2, if JJJ and Rey never rose there?LoRab wrote:JJJ is dead, so I haven't much thought of him. Rey hasn't done much and I kind of keep forgetting he's playing. Neither of them were major, huge suspicions in the first place. Both pinged me, but they never rose to the top of my list.
Anyway, I labeled your drop of their suspicions as potential moodswings, not suspicious behaviour. As far as I know, any partnership developed with them could have still inspired you to drop any word on them. Furthermore, as I've told nutella, I still believe you set a double standard with rey. You suss him on a statement and aren't satisfied with his rebuttal, but it's not major, huge and you drop it. You suss me for a statement and aren't satisfied with my rebuttal, and I rose to your top o' the list.
And I don't think it's a double standard--your responses have felt more suspicious. His response was just unsatisfying. He didn't really explain himself, in my mind, but it didn't feel like a necessarily suspish response to me.
And I had forgotten that I was suspish of BWT earlier, so thanks for giving me reason to go back to my older posts. He was probably my top suspect day 2, although that was a while ago, so hard to remember where my brain was. Hmmm....may move my vote there, even though he seems to be likely to have the most votes regardless.
Epignosis wrote:Bitch, my identity is my identity theft protection!
Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Wed Dec 16, 2020 7:33 pm Just how many days of "let's yeet them tomorrow" can a mafioso survive?
The answer: all of them, if you are a marmot.
You the fillower of my sails dide?DharmaHelper wrote:I'll fillow the fuck out of you man.aapje wrote:Wtf checking in drunk but whatever. I think rico is straiht up bad, no rez recruit involved at all. I think he's full of shit and bad to the bone. I just wish more people would fillow mmmy vote.
Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Wed Dec 16, 2020 7:33 pm Just how many days of "let's yeet them tomorrow" can a mafioso survive?
The answer: all of them, if you are a marmot.
Oh? I re-read everyone and BWT's candidacy stood out to me, through what I believed where compelling signs.nutella wrote:
Rico, you have some explaining to do.
nutella on Day 1 wrote:Now this is a compelling observation, and a vote I could maybe get behind.Turnip Head wrote:I'm probably voting for BWT today. He's not playing like I think he would if he were still neutral. Feels like something is already on the line for him.
nutella on Day 1 wrote:I'm still considering voting BWT, though his recent posts are looking better to me...
nutella on Day 2 wrote:I'm still not understanding the BWT votes. On Day 1 I think several people voted for him for several different reasons, rather than a single case that gained any kind of momentum.
nutella on Day 8 wrote:Along with BWT -- I liked Rico's case and could definitely see BWT being Ubzimbabwe.
nutella on Day 8 wrote:Bea -- I think the idea behind voting BWT is to see whether he survives to test the theory that he's Ubz. It certainly runs the risk of lynching a neutral (or even a civvie but I doubt that), but I think it would provide more info than a Syn lynch. I'm voting for BWT. Sorry if you die an innocent death but I think this is the slightly more productive way to go.
So you like and agree with my case, you vote him the previous Day to test the theory and you vote him toDay without a comment.nutella wrote:
Let's lynch bwt today.
nutella wrote:...Goddamn. WTF.
Now I'm hoping even more that DH was right about SVS.
Rico, you have some explaining to do.
Metalmarsh89 wrote:You the fillower of my sails dide?DharmaHelper wrote:I'll fillow the fuck out of you man.aapje wrote:Wtf checking in drunk but whatever. I think rico is straiht up bad, no rez recruit involved at all. I think he's full of shit and bad to the bone. I just wish more people would fillow mmmy vote.
Why?Metalmarsh89 wrote:We should lynch llama tomorrow, not Rico. He is ther real baddie mcbadderson.
reywaS wrote:What do you mean by the underlined part?Roxy wrote:Really - you should re-read Rey - I think his posting has changed a lot since his about face when he went after Golden. I have him on the back burner but I shouldn't if he is bad - a quiet baddie is a scary baddie.LoRab wrote:I wanted to respond, regardless.Ricochet wrote:Who was on the top of your list on D2, if JJJ and Rey never rose there?LoRab wrote:JJJ is dead, so I haven't much thought of him. Rey hasn't done much and I kind of keep forgetting he's playing. Neither of them were major, huge suspicions in the first place. Both pinged me, but they never rose to the top of my list.
Anyway, I labeled your drop of their suspicions as potential moodswings, not suspicious behaviour. As far as I know, any partnership developed with them could have still inspired you to drop any word on them. Furthermore, as I've told nutella, I still believe you set a double standard with rey. You suss him on a statement and aren't satisfied with his rebuttal, but it's not major, huge and you drop it. You suss me for a statement and aren't satisfied with my rebuttal, and I rose to your top o' the list.
And I don't think it's a double standard--your responses have felt more suspicious. His response was just unsatisfying. He didn't really explain himself, in my mind, but it didn't feel like a necessarily suspish response to me.
And I had forgotten that I was suspish of BWT earlier, so thanks for giving me reason to go back to my older posts. He was probably my top suspect day 2, although that was a while ago, so hard to remember where my brain was. Hmmm....may move my vote there, even though he seems to be likely to have the most votes regardless.
The thing with Golden really took the wind out of my sails. I've thought about asking to be replaced, but I don't want to do that because of how excited I was to be playing in the beginning. I figured if I stuck it out, eventually the game would be small enough to where I'd finally find my old school type footing. I'm trying to get back into it. I'm embarassed that I lost track of this day phase...I was thinking it ended tomorrow night.
I'm voting BWT (admittedly a lame vote)
nutella wrote:My comment at Rico was because he had me totally convinced that we'd be lynching Ubbadubba. He pushed the case so hard and acted like he was certain about it, so I believed it, but it turned out he was wrong. I voted for BWT because of Rico's case. I blame Rico for the lynch.