Devin the Omniscient wrote:bcornett24 wrote:I know nothing of the syndicate players , so I'm going to vote for Devin the omniscient because his name sounds like somebody who is of authority and rundontwalk because it would be chaotic.
He doesn't know me very well, does he?
Operation ketchup is a go! We have a 90% chance of failure as we have less than an hour to execute. Go!
Don't ask.
This was my second poll in the game after asking what a day 0 poll is. I casted my vote for Devin as the assistant CEO seemed to be nothing on consequence.
Devin the Omniscient wrote:RIP Birdman.
Quit being so suspicious this early on, okay? 
Sarcastic tone on an apology after BWT was lynched? Perhaps a taunt?
Devin the Omniscient wrote:rundontwalk wrote:Devin the Omniscient
Very nice cop out here! What did you like about LC's initial points? IDK...I think this speaks for itself.
you should have seen this coming
Yours is possibly the first vote on me to every make me a little upset. How could I have possibly seen your vote coming? I don't know you and I don't know why you're voting for me. Explain now, please.
This is the first post that really struck a chord with me. His being a little upset over a random vote gave me a bad vibe.
Devin the Omniscient wrote:rundontwalk wrote:on RYM the scum sometimes make the classic ''oh gee look at all the dead townies, how sad'' posts right after the nightkill. llama's post reminded me of that.
Yeah, I've made that mistake here. Many others have, too. It is something to think about, I guess.
Linkie Choutas: Don't feel bad. I'm not holding your vote against you. I just felt it was fair to let everyone unfamiliar with me know about my work situation.
speaking of which...
This is everything that I thought to be of any real importance from days 0-2
Day three Devin posts a few times, none of the posts are of any signifgance, this is the part that people were complaining at me for:
http://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/search ... =154&ch=-1
Feel free to look through his day three content before you accuse me of voting for him without a reason. Find some posts with actual content other than off hand/general comments. It is not there, not during day three.
Day 4 Devin takes a stances on Sorsha being scum saying this:
Devin the Omniscient wrote:Well, I'm certainly feeling better about Golden. Sorry for the previous Day's vote. But you were asking for it

Anything I can clear up for you? I see I'm in your top 3
I'm going back to
voting for Sorsha. Because, reasons.
Reasons huh? Scum like reasons...
Devin the Omniscient wrote:Choutas wrote:Devin the Omniscient wrote:Well, I'm certainly feeling better about Golden. Sorry for the previous Day's vote. But you were asking for it

Anything I can clear up for you? I see I'm in your top 3
I'm going back to
voting for Sorsha. Because, reasons.
After you voting for her I'm feeling much less secure about my vote. My scum sensor is tingling. If you're scum you wouldn't be so gung ho in joining a forming lynch of sorsha if she was scum. Of course she can be scum and you town but you both look suss to me.
I still don't understand why I'm being painted red. I'm not bad. I think Sorsha's bad. That's why I'm voting there. I'm hoping to see that your last sentence is 100% correct. Right now I can only confirm 50%.... Well 66% of it, if you include that we both look suss to you.
You say you don't like my reasoning, you are entitled to think that, but at least I provided reasons when I voted for you saying that I felt your first three days of content was nothing but filler. Your reason for voting sorsha is "i think sorsha's bad" no evidence, nothing? Seems sort of hypocritical.
If you didn't like my evidence before you are gonna have a super fun time defending against this.
Devin the Omniscient wrote:Choutas wrote:Devin the Omniscient wrote:Choutas wrote:Devin the Omniscient wrote:Well, I'm certainly feeling better about Golden. Sorry for the previous Day's vote. But you were asking for it

Anything I can clear up for you? I see I'm in your top 3
I'm going back to
voting for Sorsha. Because, reasons.
After you voting for her I'm feeling much less secure about my vote. My scum sensor is tingling. If you're scum you wouldn't be so gung ho in joining a forming lynch of sorsha if she was scum. Of course she can be scum and you town but you both look suss to me.
I still don't understand why I'm being painted red. I'm not bad. I think Sorsha's bad. That's why I'm voting there. I'm hoping to see that your last sentence is 100% correct. Right now I can only confirm 50%.... Well 66% of it, if you include that we both look suss to you.
Maybe Devin. I find Mac one of the towniest guys in the game. Having strong ties with seaside I'm a good judge of his and he looks incredibly townie to me. So the first three votes are a townie wagon to me. You happened to be the fourth vote and you don't look good to me for reasons outlined by JJJ(no buddying intended), it fits in my brain. Suspicious player jumps fourth in a townie wagon of a townie lynch. At least it doesn't look that both of you are scum, it's way too early to vote for a scummate so tacticwise to me you can't be both scum. The worst scenario of you two both being townies is completely disastrous to me reads and Iwon't even consider it that's how confident I am.
Btw if you're townie don't be overwhelmed by me. I'm a bully in mafia. In case you haven't figured it out already. Usually I post much more and occasionally make reads. This game is humongous however and I didn't expect it to be this way.
Btw Vito must be a big Devin Townsend fan. If you're looking for players mods you can try inviting him over. You can also try Crat or MMB
Suspicious player who has voted for Sorsha before I might add. Yes, I switched my vote to Golden that same day, but a lot of votes were switched before the end of the day. Some from Sorsha, as well. I did say that it doesn't mean I feel better about Sorsha and that I didn't care which one was lynched that day. The unspoken meaning of this statement is that I'd be more than happy to vote for her again.
WIFOM. Sure. But I don't know what to say to convince you that I'm not bad. I could bring in meta bullsuit and say that I have never once won as a civ or a civ-aligned indi. I somehow always get looks pretty quickly as a civ. But feel free to ignore this last bit

Both votes you have bandwagon-ed onto have been town lynches saying you did it and it is okay because everybody else did it?
Devin the Omniscient wrote:JaggedJimmyJay wrote:Hey Devin, let's fight.
JaggedJimmyJay wrote:Relationship between
Devin the Omniscient and Long Con:
Devin the Omniscient wrote:Choutas wrote:My first vote for the day goes to Devin. His style is similar to mine and I hate myself so make the math.
Me too
As long as it's not for being a "lurker." I'm not even being that this game. For RYMers: I am a Staff Accountant who experiences extreme business for at least 2 weeks out of the month, every single month. It begins on the 1st of each month and runs for 2 weeks after that (pending any unexpected delays). I'm stating this, btw, because I saw some discussion of lynching lurkers or low posters. Just wanted to explain my position those unfamiliar with me.
I will go ahead and put a placeholder on
Diiny again.
Though, I did like the points LC was making about MacDougall. Will go back and read that more carefully if I get a chance to.
Devin the Omniscient wrote:Welcome BR!!
Just popping in to say I'm going to keep my vote where it is today. I skimmed through MacDougal's posts like I said I would, and I'm just not seeing what LC is seeing atm. I'm marking him down as neutral for the time being.
Linki: Having been his teammate in The Flash, I completely agree with that, Golden.
The content highlighted in yellow is relevant to LC in that Devin was discussing some points made by LC about MacDougall.
Devin is highly vague on both counts. Initially he said he "liked" the points made by LC and that'd be review further. Then, upon "skimming" further, he determined that he's "just not seeing what LC is seeing atm". This bears the appearance of fake involvement to me, and the fact that it's directly related to LC is a problem. I don't struggle to view this scenario as Devin using his team mate's contributions as a springboard into discussion (specifically about Mac), before arbitrarily siding
against his team mate for the sake of creating distance.
This would be less troubling if I had any idea why Devin initially liked LC's points and later discarded them, but I do not. I have absolutely no idea what Devin's thought process was with regards to Mac and I am unconvinced he had one. Bad look.
Everything else Devin said about LC came
after LC's lynch.
Long Con never made any mention of Devin.
~~~
I think Devin looks bad here.
But, I don't want to fight you. I have no reason to. I will respond to this, though.
Responding to the bolded: LC has a way with words. He is amazing at creating convincing cases out of absolutely nothing. In reading his case against Mac, I thought he was onto something. He sounded like he knew what he was talking about and had an air of confidence about his post. I SKIMMED because I am always short on time. But none-the-less I took the initiative to look into MacDougal myself. What I saw in Mac's post didn't ping me or give me pause in the slightest, so I saw no reason to vote for him.
No idea why LC never mentioned me. Very few people ever do early on
Gotta finish printing reports. Be back to respond to more stuffs.
What is this, your reaction to jay is very strange, it honestly bothers me perhaps even more than all of the other posts so far. What are you actually saying here? Jay is casing you, saying you look bad and your response is LC is good at talking and you bought what he was saying and because he said something about Mac you looked into it because you chose to look into it? You then proceed to say you you have no idea why LC mentioned you. This does not satisfy the questions Jay brought up, in fact it doesn't come close to it.
Devin the Omniscient wrote:JaggedJimmyJay wrote:Devin the Omniscient wrote:But, I don't want to fight you. I have no reason to. I will respond to this, though.
Responding to the bolded: LC has a way with words. He is amazing at creating convincing cases out of absolutely nothing. In reading his case against Mac, I thought he was onto something. He sounded like he knew what he was talking about and had an air of confidence about his post. I SKIMMED because I am always short on time. But none-the-less I took the initiative to look into MacDougal myself. What I saw in Mac's post didn't ping me or give me pause in the slightest, so I saw no reason to vote for him.
No idea why LC never mentioned me. Very few people ever do early on
Gotta finish printing reports. Be back to respond to more stuffs.
What did you initially see in LC's case against Mac that you liked which was negated by your own investigations of Mac?
I can't remember. Don't really feel like going back to look. I'll take your vote that you so eagerly have given me when it wasn't even for the response I gave you. I can see I'm not going to win your favor, so I don't care to try for it anymore. I hope others form their own opinions of me instead of blindly following you.
I think you should explain this.
Devin the Omniscient wrote:Matt F wrote:Devin the Omniscient wrote:JaggedJimmyJay wrote:Devin the Omniscient wrote:But, I don't want to fight you. I have no reason to. I will respond to this, though.
Responding to the bolded: LC has a way with words. He is amazing at creating convincing cases out of absolutely nothing. In reading his case against Mac, I thought he was onto something. He sounded like he knew what he was talking about and had an air of confidence about his post. I SKIMMED because I am always short on time. But none-the-less I took the initiative to look into MacDougal myself. What I saw in Mac's post didn't ping me or give me pause in the slightest, so I saw no reason to vote for him.
No idea why LC never mentioned me. Very few people ever do early on
Gotta finish printing reports. Be back to respond to more stuffs.
What did you initially see in LC's case against Mac that you liked which was negated by your own investigations of Mac?
I can't remember.
Don't really feel like going back to look. I'll take your vote that you so eagerly have given me when it wasn't even for the response I gave you. I can see I'm not going to win your favor, so I don't care to try for it anymore. I hope others form their own opinions of me instead of blindly following you.
This post, in addition to your apparent refusal to give actual reads on the Doctor and MM, seriously makes me think about switching up my vote from Sorsha today.
Refusal to give reads? Don't make it look worse than it is. I answered your question, which was why did I vote for them on Day zero. At least that's how I read your question.
As for my reads on them, I don't have a read on either of them. I've been focused on the whole Sorsha, Golden, and JJJ thing that I haven't given much (if any) thought to those 2.
I'm not sure you can make yourself look much worse at this point.
Devin the Omniscient wrote:JaggedJimmyJay wrote:I have to vote now. My phone is about to die and I'll have no way to charge it until I get home.
DEVIN THE OMNISCIENT
I do appreciate your effort to defend yourself Devin, but this is my decision.
Luv you too

Effort to defend himself, he gave no effort, that is bullshit, and then sorsha get lynched because people don't read this stuff? This looks 10x worse than anything sorsha ever said.
@JJJ Your comment here is too kind, but your vote speaks for itself.
Devin the Omniscient wrote:You're the first vote on my bandwagon, bcornett. Why did you think I was bad before?
If you thought my first reasoning was inadequate because it was done with skimming, how about this?
With this you deserve without a shadow of a doubt to be lynched. I think this is enough to point you out as scum, on the case that you could be town you are a liability. Nothing you have done has served any benefit to the town which makes me thing it has to have some benefit to somebody. Since I cannot see that somebody I will have to include that you are scum.
Devin the Omniscient