How so? Also, calling a single point on a case "specific in nature" is odd. The only reason why it was specific is because you specified it out from the rest of my interaction with Chou. Also, referring to the question as a basic one is also flawed. Even Matt F noticed the question and pointed out that it was scummy.JaggedJimmyJay wrote:It was extremely specific in nature. It took one basic question and turned it into a nuanced mafia strategy to identify the protective role.DrWilgy wrote:I did not.
Why do you see it as bogus?
Could be anyone. My focus has been on mafia. I wouldn't expect it to be someone who has taken a severe stance against confirmed mafia like Rico, because that begs for a nightkill (assuming the *secrets* portion of the SK role doesn't include bulletproof or something OP like that).DrWilgy wrote:Thought it would help you + I'm here currently. Who is your top pick for sk?
What do you think then of the theory I have proposed as being the motivator for those questions he's asked?DrWilgy wrote:Fuzz never lives this long so idk.
Would you be willing to vote for Rico then?
As far as I'm concerned his question style is the same as always. Whenever Fuzz is alive, his questions are similar to as they are now.