Golden wrote:As a townie, I always try to be exactly honest about how confident I am. There is a reason I'm fighting for sig to stay and nutella to go... it's because I'm confident. I'm not sure how this does not remind you of, say, my insistence about sanmateo and aether in 87? I was very measured and careful about my suspicion, but also consistent and correct. What part of my baddie game analogue is this? In my baddie game (the only one I had on RYM)... I tried to get brian lynched over and over for days, same with seaside. I don't think this is an honest analysis of what you remember from RYM at all. If I had any 'eh' game, it was 88 where I was civ.
But you weren't confident just a little while ago. You don't remind me anything of yourself going after sanmateo, where I was all "Well I think it's just his meta" and you impress us all with your "Don't care, he looks like scum to me" and knock down mafia a peg on day 1. Does this look confident?
Golden wrote:Civvie sig's defenses rarely make 'sense', as such, he ties himself into knots. I don't think, however, that as a baddie he would come out and say that the baddies are 'currently' doing x, it doesn't make sense to me as being a scumslip. Plus, the bandwagon has been too easy.
Who else do you suspect? What do you think of the points that have been made on nutella? Are there other people I should be looking at? I don't really have a good idea of who people should vote for, but I think I've had a decent idea of who we shouldn't vote for. I'm not putting my vote anywhere in the dom/svs/epi triangle.
@Sorsha - there are not specific players in there that I'm suspicious of, as such, but it wouldn't surprise me if the existing votes include one or two mafia. I think Bullzeye was sincere in making his case.
You're not insistent, you did mention a couple very minor things early in the game so I can call you
consistent, but insistent no.
When I say "Eh" game, I don't mean off-game or anything. I mean lacking a specific kind of conviction. The bcornett point is interesting actually; sticking with one mild candidate would be much more in line with what I'm seeing here.