Dom wrote:#1) Your suspicion of me is based on a case Epi made on meta-analysis. Not only would I say his case is wrong, but you have zero bearing for my meta-game. Why would you follow that? How does that indicate I am bad? You say you don't want to follow people, but you do here. You have since evolved this into a standalone suspicion based on???? What? I don't even know what. If it's the meta-analysis you have no grounds for it, and that is suspect to me. In fact, you called Epig's case "the best case of the game" when you should have zero ability to judge that.
#2) You consistently condemn "silly" players, but when in need of a distraction, completely derail the thread and act just as silly-- or exceedingly silly--to dismiss allegations against you. You see, what you've been doing is attacking me personally to make people less likely to want to comment.
#3) You alleged that I was disinterested until I took votes. That is simply not true and a mischaracterization.
#4) You attempted to lure me into voting you over Banana Day 1. This, I believe, was an attempt to make sure I died that day.
#5) You have named 9+ people to be "scum" with a high degree of certainty, however, there is a maximum of 8 baddies in the game... who are your suspects? Why are you inconsistent?
#6) Starting in day two, you seemed to drop the talk of SVS and I. You pulled up several new suspicions out of nowhere. I believe this was an attempt to get me off your ass.
#7) You posted a list of people you suspect, one of which was me and one of which was Bea. You claim that this was confusing because you're playing two games, but I am not playing Dune and Bea is not playing here. Who are your real suspicions?
#8) You assume that the Banana lynch was a save on me rather than a save on Bug. You have refused to entertain the thought-- it's almost like you might know.
#9) You claimed my disinterest is a reason to suspect me because I only became interested when I took votes. To be honest, that's hypocrisy on a whole new level. You literally phoned in for a day only because "you didn't have the energy" and "were on a road trip". But I'm totally disinterested by a lower than above average post count on Day 1??????? OKKK!?!??!
In short, your behavior would have gotten you lynched if you were from this site.
I asked you to quote your posts. Your argument has been about how I have ignored your posts. I didn't ask you to make another, I asked you to quote your posts.
1.
I've already explained this. Ignoring my explanations and suggesting I have ignored you isn't a really good way to catch scum. Good way to get me mislynched though if that's your agenda. I never said I had a read on you independently of Epignosis's read before the other wagons started to feel wrong to me. I had a town read of Epignosis and I hated the other two lynch wagons enough to push you over them. Epi's case wasn't huge and elaborate at all, but it was assured and it was better than the cases I saw on Bug and Banana. Yes, I was entirely deferring to Epignosis. As the day progressed I became quite sure of there being a mislynch counterwagon being built. Maybe I'm wrong. I'm not infallible. When did I say that I never follow people or don't want to follow people?
2. Do you really take personally the words of an anonymous internet forums poster who doesn't know you? If so, I apologise for offending you. My insults were out of line. No, my intention was not to make it too awkward for others to comment at all. Quite the opposite in fact. I would love nothing more than to see a million votes pile onto me.
I was genuinely annoyed at your tone. Your tone from the word go in reaction to me was rude, dismissive and belittling to me. I've already been asked to stop provoking you and I will and I apologise for any personal insult you feel, but you need to know that I was actually annoyed too. I don't take this stuff half as seriously as you and that's fine, but it doesn't make me scum.
3. I am not going to bother quoting the entirety of page 1 of your ISO but your posts before you started to gain lynch attention were low content, non provocative and came across like you weren't interested in the game to me. It's not intentional mischaracterisation (why do you guys use words like this?!), it's how I read your posts. You and anyone who is interested can look and see them and if you think that my post on the subject is non genuine then good for you. It wasn't.
4. It wasn't. It was an attempt to get you to vote for me because I was your scum read and I wanted to see how seriously you believed your scum read.
5. Really? Okay show me the high degree of certainty with which I have given reads on 9 players?
I also already responded to this.
6. You believe wrong. I don't care that you are "on my ass". Our feelings about one another are well documented. I don't tunnel people. You do though. I don't need to continue harping on about it. Nobody was interested in a day 2 Dom lynch so why would I bother bashing on about it? I'm here trying to hunt other scum to build out my reads some more. You're putting all your eggs in one mislynch basket.
7. On the other game at the time I had a scum read on Bea and Floyd in a team. Here at the time I had a scum read on you, S-V-S and Floyd. And I had been following the game on my phone with one hand while driving down the highway. You can choose to see that as scummy, but why would I be that careless as scum? What would be the benefit of anything I have done as scum?
8. Did you just accuse me of knowing that you are scum? Like, really? How could I possibly know you are scum? I think in combination with the fact that I had taken up Dom wagon over Bug and Banana on day 1 and that there was a counterwagon in play on Banana that it's fair that I would assume that it was a counterwagon designed to spare you? That would just be me being consistent in my reads? So I am scummy for being consistent in my reads? It's not that I'm not entertaining the idea that it was to spare Bug, but with all respect to Bug if he was close to getting lynched on day 1 I would have bussed the fuck out of him if I were the scum team. If there was a counterwagon I believe it was to spare you. There may not have been a counterwagon anyway. Maybe you're all civilian and the scum didn't have to bother?
9. Read it again, I didn't say your disinterest was a scum tell. I was saying you were showing just as little disinterest as another player in a conversation you weren't even a part of.
So tl;dr
You are harping on about me ignoring you and dismissing your cases and what not but the fact is the only telling parts of your case are things that actually probably make me look more like disinterested town than scum and/or are things I have replied to.
You accuse me of dismissing your case. I have actively chosen to ignore you at times because when I explain you just tunnel harder and dismiss my responses. There's no point engaging discussion with you because it takes up too much thread space and content and is making it less pleasant for the rest of the players and harder to scum hunt.
I actually have changed my mind. I don't think you are scum. I think this is a case of civilian tunneling, and you're angry at me for being rude to you, so it's influencing it even more.
So what's the play now, are you going to continue to tunnel me or are you going to just vote for me when the day starts if we're both alive and then look at other players?