Mafia: A World Reborn Game Thread - Game Over

#1851

sig wrote:but I'm underage and you might just all be old perverts wanting me to get shirtless

Ain't nothin dirty about friendly bonding, and I did offer marshmallows as a booze replacement didnt I? *winks*

#1852

Voted 'yes'. At the moment, most of my suspects are low posters, and there are some high posters (I'm thinking mostly of sig) that I'd like to see out of the lynch conversation for a day.

#1853

DrWilgy wrote:
sig wrote:but I'm underage and you might just all be old perverts wanting me to get shirtless
Ain't nothin dirty about friendly bonding, and I did offer marshmallows as a booze replacement didnt I? *winks*

Marshmallows suck.

#1854

Eff you Dr Von Drezenbitch. That was painful.

#1855

Epignosis wrote:
DrWilgy wrote:
sig wrote:but I'm underage and you might just all be old perverts wanting me to get shirtless
Ain't nothin dirty about friendly bonding, and I did offer marshmallows as a booze replacement didnt I? *winks*
Marshmallows suck.

I didn't say he had to take the replacement...

#1856

I voted No.

As Epig said, the lynch is a civvie's best weapon. How does it help us to eliminate half the town from that process?

#1857

Nooooooooooooo

#1858

Matt F wrote:I voted No.

As Epig said, the lynch is a civvie's best weapon. How does it help us to eliminate half the town from that process?

Half the town?

#1859

MacDougall wrote:
Matt F wrote:I voted No.

As Epig said, the lynch is a civvie's best weapon. How does it help us to eliminate half the town from that process?
Half the town?

Does it not say LC would eliminate the bottom half of the town?

#1860

Derp. I'm not wording shit right. Sorry Epig.

What I meant was, the poll suggests that the bottom half of the town, low posting wise, wo....

I don't even know how to word this. Epig, help me out here even if you don't agree. Haha

#1861

Matt F wrote:I voted No.

As Epig said, the lynch is a civvie's best weapon. How does it help us to eliminate half the town from that process?

And I voted yes.

#1862

Epignosis wrote:
Matt F wrote:I voted No.

As Epig said, the lynch is a civvie's best weapon. How does it help us to eliminate half the town from that process?
And I voted yes.

Why would you vote yes when that eliminates half of the players from the lynch discussion? Do you think that helps the town?

Back atcha

#1863

High posters will be off the poll tomorrow, only the low posters will be on the poll.

I voted Yes

#1864

Matt F wrote:
Epignosis wrote:
Matt F wrote:I voted No.

As Epig said, the lynch is a civvie's best weapon. How does it help us to eliminate half the town from that process?
And I voted yes.
Why would you vote yes when that eliminates half of the players from the lynch discussion? Do you think that helps the town?

Back atcha

I do. I think it helps the town enormously. It takes out of the discussion a lot of people who are currently taking a lot of heat but I'm fairly confident are civilian.

If I list you who I think my top suspects are, probably every one of them is in the bottom half of posters. And that is very frequently where the baddies are. It also forces people to start taking stands on some of the lower posters, generating reads. I think it's a great idea for the town.

#1865

Matt F wrote:
Epignosis wrote:
Matt F wrote:I voted No.

As Epig said, the lynch is a civvie's best weapon. How does it help us to eliminate half the town from that process?
And I voted yes.
Why would you vote yes when that eliminates half of the players from the lynch discussion? Do you think that helps the town?

Back atcha

I doesn't eliminate them from discussion. It eliminates them from being lynched. I'm in that boat. That's number 1.

Number 2 is that I have two or three suspects who don't post as often. I would like some attention on them.

And, in case you need a number 3, fuck you for asking about what helps the town when you don't vote Mafia. Vote some Mafia. Get 'em out. Then talk.

#1866

Am I a high or low poster? I didn't see what I was left with.

If I'm a low poster, this is illegitimate children!! #JohnCena2016

#1867

Excellent!!

Bass-- what do you think about this whole lynch thing now?

#1868

Hey Lorab,

What do you think of Luke?

HE'S DEAD.

#1869

Just a quick little thing

Matt F wrote:
Epignosis wrote:I'm voting Luke.
Just yesterday you were surprised at the "mob" on Luke and now you vote for him?

Some soft defense of Luke here

Matt F wrote:Are we really lynching another new guy?

[/quote

In light of Luke's lynch this looks bad for you Matt. Are you usually opposed to lynched new players or just new players who are teammates?

Matt F wrote:I don't have any sort of read on Lorab. If anything, I was thinking of joining the sig train to stop this new guy massacre.

Or we can all vote for Metalmarsh
Avoids LoRab and is going to vote me to save a new player and for that reason alone you'd vote for me?

Matt F wrote:Could be, sig. Tell me, would you pull the same exact move you did in the other game and attempt to NK your accusers?

Then tries to make a connection that I killed Zebra. Which fails seeing how I was one of the players who said Luke was mafia and Luke's team killed Zebra.

#1870

Epignosis wrote:
Matt F wrote:
Epignosis wrote:
Matt F wrote:I voted No.

As Epig said, the lynch is a civvie's best weapon. How does it help us to eliminate half the town from that process?
And I voted yes.
Why would you vote yes when that eliminates half of the players from the lynch discussion? Do you think that helps the town?

Back atcha
I doesn't eliminate them from discussion. It eliminates them from being lynched. I'm in that boat. That's number 1.

Number 2 is that I have two or three suspects who don't post as often. I would like some attention on them.

And, in case you need a number 3, fuck you for asking about what helps the town when you don't vote Mafia. Vote some Mafia. Get 'em out. Then talk.

1. I'm also in that boat, I believe.

2. Just because you and Golden have suspects in the low poster range doesn't mean you are correct.

3. Funny from the guy who convinced everyone to move their vote OFF of Luke yesterday.

#1871

If I am a low voter then sure.

#1872

sig - With the exception of Floyd and his multiple slips in Talking Heads, I am typically opposed to lynching new players and I was opposed to the idea of lynching two new people in the first four days. But we got a bad guy, so it's all good.

Also, if Luke was my teammate, here's a big fat WIFOM for ya - I wouldn't have said shit about it.

As for suspecting you, your team did NK people who suspected you in that other game, so why wouldn't you do it in this one?

#1873

Your argument revolves around my team killing someone who is suspicious of me which would've been Zebra, however Luke is on the same team which makes it much less practical. Right know I could lynch Matt tomorrow if he is on the poll.

#1874

Matt F wrote:As for suspecting you, your team did NK people who suspected you in that other game, so why wouldn't you do it in this one?

I don't think we can presume to talk about other games when we don't know the behind the scenes of what happened. So lets not.

#1875

Matt F wrote:
Epignosis wrote:
Matt F wrote:
Epignosis wrote:
Matt F wrote:I voted No.

As Epig said, the lynch is a civvie's best weapon. How does it help us to eliminate half the town from that process?
And I voted yes.
Why would you vote yes when that eliminates half of the players from the lynch discussion? Do you think that helps the town?

Back atcha
I doesn't eliminate them from discussion. It eliminates them from being lynched. I'm in that boat. That's number 1.

Number 2 is that I have two or three suspects who don't post as often. I would like some attention on them.

And, in case you need a number 3, fuck you for asking about what helps the town when you don't vote Mafia. Vote some Mafia. Get 'em out. Then talk.
1. I'm also in that boat, I believe.

2. Just because you and Golden have suspects in the low poster range doesn't mean you are correct.

3. Funny from the guy who convinced everyone to move their vote OFF of Luke yesterday.

Please don't make me roll up my sleeves. It's late.

"Just because you have suspects doesn't make them right."

You worked out how Mafia works. Congratulations! You may get a consolation prize: My vote.

So I convinced everyone to move their votes off Luke.

Mmm...

Yep. I'm so good, I got EVERYONE(-5) to move their votes off Luke.

Instead I bitch-slapped The Darkness.

THEN helped take down Luke.

Yeah, I'm having a bad day in Mafia.

#1876

sig wrote:Your argument revolves around my team killing someone who is suspicious of me which would've been Zebra, however Luke is on the same team which makes it much less practical. Right know I could lynch Matt tomorrow if he is on the poll.

Dude, no offense, but you have barely registered on my radar. In the last few minutes of the poll, though, I did remember you NKing people who accused you elsewhere so I asked you if you would do it again. I realize you never answered me btw.

Linki - Golden, really? Am I not allowed to reference another player's meta now when those were my thoughts on the matter? Okey dokey

Linki - Epignosis, when did you vote for Luke? Was it before or after he already received a gazillion votes? I'll have to check the poll.

#1877

Oh, and Epig, take a good look at that Darkness poll and see who bitch slapped 'em first.

#1878

Matt F wrote:Linki - Epignosis, when did you vote for Luke? Was it before or after he already received a gazillion votes? I'll have to check the poll.

I'm careful with my wording. I said I "helped take down Luke." I didn't say I started anything. I'm saying I helped.

What have you done?

#1879

Matt F wrote:Oh, and Epig, take a good look at that Darkness poll and see who bitch slapped 'em first.

Darkness poll? Where's that?

#1880

Epignosis wrote:
Matt F wrote:Linki - Epignosis, when did you vote for Luke? Was it before or after he already received a gazillion votes? I'll have to check the poll.
I'm careful with my wording. I said I "helped take down Luke." I didn't say I started anything. I'm saying I helped.

What have you done?

I never said you started the Luke vote. In fact, I was pretty sure you didn't and only voted for him after he was already running away with the poll. Which was my point.

#1881

[quote="sig"]That wasn't my idea and I had a different strategy behind those kills./quote]

I did answer Matt and I'm surprised I haven't registered on your radar since I was the main topic of conversation Day 2, a good portion on Day 3, and again to a lesser extent today.

#1882

Matt F wrote:
Epignosis wrote:
Matt F wrote:Linki - Epignosis, when did you vote for Luke? Was it before or after he already received a gazillion votes? I'll have to check the poll.
I'm careful with my wording. I said I "helped take down Luke." I didn't say I started anything. I'm saying I helped.

What have you done?
I never said you started the Luke vote. In fact, I was pretty sure you didn't and only voted for him after he was already running away with the poll. Which was my point.

That's not a point then.

That's either a fact or it isn't.

Am I his teammate? Go.

#1883

@Matt, yes, really. We don't know what has happened in that game behind the scenes, we don't know if your statement is actually correct so your meta comment could be off base (you are making assumptions), and the host of THIS game has already declared discussion of the other game a no go zone. It's not fair to make a statement like that when it cannot necessarily be defended against.

But also, I really think you are wrong about sig and I'm not sure why he keeps taking votes. Once again, I would think that you might even be voting 'no' just so you can vote sig again tomorrow - can't you see how this is just day after day replay?

And let me be clear. I will do whatever I can to prevent sig's lynch again, as I have been for days.

#1884

Matt r cum

#1885

sig wrote:
sig wrote:That wasn't my idea and I had a different strategy behind those kills./quote]

I did answer Matt and I'm surprised I haven't registered on your radar since I was the main topic of conversation Day 2, a good portion on Day 3, and again to a lesser extent today.

M'bad. Didn't see you respond.

Why are you surprised? Bullz accuses you of being mafia because you worded shit weird and you think I'm going to accuse you over that? Especially after the other games we've played together, people keep saying that's how you roll?

Are you saying that you should be on my radar?

Linki - Golden, I'm sorry but these two games have been intertwined since the words "policy lynch". But if you insist on me not being able to defend my thoughts re: sig, then I will refrain.

Also, when did I vote for sig??? I voted Metalmarsh this round, yo.

Linki - Epig - Right now, G2H - No. I'll have to take a look at the poll first.

#1886

G2H Matt r cum

Gun down Matt r cum

#1887

MacDougall wrote:G2H Matt r cum

Gun down Matt r cum

You think everything's cum, perv.

#1888

I apologise I missed the second vote, I went to a Tame Impala concert last night.
RIP Luke

#1889

I frankly couldn't care less about who has to vote, but I voted yes anyway.

#1890

Alright! A successful double lynch!!
Now to finish my nap.

Oh and I'm breaking the current tie with a no. Cus I think I'm still a low poster. Lol.

#1891

TheFloyd73 wrote:I apologise I missed the second vote, I went to a Tame Impala concert last night.
RIP Luke

#1892

Matt F wrote:
MacDougall wrote:G2H Matt r cum

Gun down Matt r cum
You think everything's cum, perv.

U r cum. Juliets is cum. Also LoRab is cum. If I was civ I would vote to lynch u guise but I am not so I won't.

#1893

As the only member of anti-civ with the bawsz to post itt I suggest we band together to take down Van Helgnosis. Who with me?

#1894

MacDougall wrote:As the only member of anti-civ with the bawsz to post itt I suggest we band together to take down Van Helgnosis. Who with me?

You don't have the numbers. Or the nuts.

#1895

Epignosis wrote:
MacDougall wrote:As the only member of anti-civ with the bawsz to post itt I suggest we band together to take down Van Helgnosis. Who with me?
You don't have the numbers. Or the nuts.

I have the nuts. Probs not numbers though you are right about dat.

#1896

MacDougall wrote:
Epignosis wrote:
MacDougall wrote:As the only member of anti-civ with the bawsz to post itt I suggest we band together to take down Van Helgnosis. Who with me?
You don't have the numbers. Or the nuts.
I have the nuts. Probs not numbers though you are right about dat.

You won't have the dogs though.

#1897

Nah don't have dogs either sadly. I do have the good will of our lord and savior Jesus Christ though.

#1898

You seem quite eccentric and excited that Luke is dead. Why's that?

#1899

Me? No I am quite sad that all these beautiful and interesting creations keep dying.

#1900

I am a secret role. The Messiah. If I get lynched and there are only civs on my wagon then the game ends and everyone wins and an age of peace is brought upon the world.

Who to lynch? 24 hour day!