It doesn't matter what I chose and don't particularly feel like sharing in the thread what I chose. I do not think it in the best interest of the civs to do so.Matt wrote:Tell me, what were your two answers? Mine was Star Gem and the Book. I should've answered Obsidian Dagger for the second answer, but it didn't even cross my mind.LoRab wrote:I'm not sharing detailed information, because I think that goes against the spirit of the game.Matt wrote:
Per the underline, SVS is tunneling me right now so I'm not sure she'll believe this, so hey Lorab, can you let SVS know that I did not know what the Obsidian Dagger (or any of the other items) did, all I had was a name to an item? Thank you.
That said, assuming we came across the information in the same way, while you may not know about the Obsidian Dagger, I can't say that it's accurate that you don't know about any of the items on the list. So, what you say is partially accurate, but not entirely truthful.
As for all this "spirit of the game", I'm going by the rules set forth by our lovely hosts. If others wish to keep silent on what they have, fine, but I hardly find it against the "spirit of the game". Also, I happen to know Long Con read a personal PM from me last night not having to do with the game, yet never sent me any reprimands regarding all of this "anti-spirit of the game" stuff I've been doing, so I think it's cool peeps.
Also, that it isn't against the rules does not mean that it is the spirit of the game to share specific info. And, in some ways, I mean the game in general, not this particular game. Info dumping also gets to the point where it makes the game less fun in a lot of ways (I don't think this game has gotten to that point, but I've played many games in which that was the case).
As for your point to SVS, one can use information in the thread to form opinions and as motivation for other aspects of a case on someone without actually sharing the information.