MacDougall wrote:Changed my vote to Llama just now.
Why the change?
MacDougall wrote:Changed my vote to Llama just now.
Yes? Feel free to help clarify though dingus.DharmaHelper wrote:Are you seriously just pulling quotes and saying shit that makes no sense?motel room wrote:Is it this? You dropped names cos you thought we were bussing Lorab?DharmaHelper wrote:I mean moreso those I thought were bussing LoRab.Dom wrote:Not sure why this would change whether you suspect JJJ or not.DharmaHelper wrote:I'm actually quite pleased to have been wrong. Not sure where this leaves me in terms of suspects, but I'll have a look and see what pops outMacDougall wrote:He says while clenching his buttcheeks and a forced grin with teeth bared.DharmaHelper wrote:Yay!
People also seem to want to tie the damn vote. Don't get me wrong, I love me some ties, but that's not going to get us anywhere. Day 3.5 was an obvious exception... But still, I'll switch to a llama vote.JaggedJimmyJay wrote:That's not a reflection of my desire, it's my lack of faith in people to get around a generic lurker. If he's lynched and flips bad, it's dumb luck. At least today he's done something.MacDougall wrote:You said yourself that Tranq will get lynched eventually. When? Lylo? Lynch him now. It's safer.JaggedJimmyJay wrote:I don't give a shit if it's annoying. There are better cases. You agreed with llama/Dom, and you're voting for a generic lurker.MacDougall wrote:Tranq hasn't really given me much of an option to build a case on him. I am lynching him because he has literally put in no effort to assist the civilians other than offer Ricochet his vote which he could just refuse to do if Rico chooses a scum partner. Defending his behaviour is annoying.JaggedJimmyJay wrote:Your vote is weak sauce.MacDougall wrote:I never said I was going to change my vote. Tranq is my vote. I am not changing my vote. Everyone else should also vote for Tranq.
If we lynched llama right now what percentage chance would you assign to his being a baddie?
Because Tranq's lynch is going the way of the dodo and Matt has no votes and Llama is the next highest on my list of suspects.JaggedJimmyJay wrote:MacDougall wrote:Changed my vote to Llama just now.
Why the change?
What I said in the post you quoted was that I was reevaluating my position on some of the people I thought might have been maliciously bussing LoRab. Since she flipped baddie, I now have to concede that some of the suspicion around her was genuine. Literally zero percent relevant in the other post you quoted.motel room wrote:Is it this? You dropped names cos you thought we were bussing Lorab?DharmaHelper wrote:I mean moreso those I thought were bussing LoRab.Dom wrote:Not sure why this would change whether you suspect JJJ or not.DharmaHelper wrote:I'm actually quite pleased to have been wrong. Not sure where this leaves me in terms of suspects, but I'll have a look and see what pops outMacDougall wrote:He says while clenching his buttcheeks and a forced grin with teeth bared.DharmaHelper wrote:Yay!
nice tie you preservedMacDougall wrote:Changed my vote to Llama just now.
It's only made tougher when you happen to join in while the thread is moving so fast at the end of the phase. Thanks for your effort bea.bea wrote:You know what sucks more? My play this cycle. I am sorry. Still dealing with work chaos and my hubby has been on my schedule the last two nights so having my "post work mafia catch up alone time" hasn't happened. This shall change soon.
I said the general vibe of the wagon threw me off at the time. Afterwards, I named you and Tranq as two votes that looked bad in retrospect (i.e moving from the first JJ save to the tie).motel room wrote:I don't respond to "homie" but I am very very much behind. Catch me up, if so.DharmaHelper wrote:Homie you didn't read shit I said did you lolmotel room wrote:your defence of not voting Lorab and pointing out specific names of who's votes on the other wagon "rubbed you the worng way" felt like you'd had it up your sleeve and practiced it. You named me and I know I said I was voting to save jjj so that's not really "flimsy", that's a stance. And like someone else pointed out I voted after you soDharmaHelper wrote:Ricochet wrote:Hiya what sounds unreasonable to you in that quote?motel room wrote:Gonna vote me some DharmaHelperDharmaHelper wrote:My point being I saw the general circumstances behind the LoRab train to be suspect. I pulled the two most suspicious votes as examples in retrospect, but at the time the train as a whole looked sketchy to me due to the quickness with which it formed and the flimsy nature of some of its supporters.
i.e the same point I've made six million times.
Sometimes piles are okay if our LoRab wagons were any indication.FZ. wrote:Now the pile up of votes is scaring me
Fortune teller?DharmaHelper wrote:Wonder if llama flips civ how many people will start to look closer at Tranq.
possibly. Can't promise though :PDharmaHelper wrote:Wonder if llama flips civ how many people will start to look closer at Tranq.
Well, it looks like my vote on Tranq isn't doing much good. It didn't pressure him to come to the thread and talk and now people are dropping off. I thought your theory that Lorab was distancing was pretty good (this is not meant to buddy just to explain why I would change my vote) and so llama has been my other choice anyway so I'll change to him.JaggedJimmyJay wrote:What of yours?juliets wrote:oh you changed it.
JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Sat Aug 21, 2021 3:24 pm Always good to remember that there is no such thing as a Mafia circumstance that is worth real human emotion. Sometimes it will naturally come out, but it can be contained if we just remember that this is a game on a message board forum that 99.99% of the population of the Earth has never heard of before. No matter how successful anyone is, it means just about nothing.
I don't know if anyone has spoken about this right here, but I'm thinking that there's only one baddie team. It seems odd that LoRab would mention a redirect if it wasn't the case. Also, I'm kinda reading it like this: "Yeah there's two teams, so anyone's suspect... most likely...LoRab wrote:So, I may or may not have written this last night and then forgot to hit submit.
Looking at the night post, unless there was a redirect, it seems more than likely that there is more than 1 baddie team (the slight possibility of a redirect or some such allowing for a mafia team to kill its own), which I think warrants noting. Need to go back and read zebra's posts to see if there are any connections there. In all my lack of free time this weekend. I may need to do it Monday.
My sides are hurtingRicochet wrote:...juliets wrote:Did anyone notice MM is not on the poll?
Metalmarsh89 wrote:Hey guys, don't lynch me please. K thanks....Metalmarsh89 wrote:Because you and I are in the same boat today Rico, except I can vote.
goddamn marmot
Because as a wise old JimmyJay once said, "Fuck ties".DrWilgy wrote:Wilgy has caught up, but he hasn't done any deep reading other than reviewing LoRabI don't know if anyone has spoken about this right here, but I'm thinking that there's only one baddie team. It seems odd that LoRab would mention a redirect if it wasn't the case. Also, I'm kinda reading it like this: "Yeah there's two teams, so anyone's suspect... most likely...LoRab wrote:So, I may or may not have written this last night and then forgot to hit submit.
Looking at the night post, unless there was a redirect, it seems more than likely that there is more than 1 baddie team (the slight possibility of a redirect or some such allowing for a mafia team to kill its own), which I think warrants noting. Need to go back and read zebra's posts to see if there are any connections there. In all my lack of free time this weekend. I may need to do it Monday.
I think JJJ is civ, and actually Llama too. Looking at LoRab's 2nd to last post makes me think that they aren't on the same team. I don't think scum would throw their buddies name out like that when they are on the lynching block. Especially since LoRab seems to be the type to defend teammates.
I'm going to place a vote for Dom.
My sides are hurtingRicochet wrote:...juliets wrote:Did anyone notice MM is not on the poll?
Metalmarsh89 wrote:Hey guys, don't lynch me please. K thanks....Metalmarsh89 wrote:Because you and I are in the same boat today Rico, except I can vote.
goddamn marmot
Linki - Mac, why aren't you trying to get me to stop lurking? My signature is your response to my lurking. It's odd. Also, Mac, what did you mean by that knight gif you responded to me with?
Linki - When did Llama get 9 votes?
Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Wed Dec 16, 2020 7:33 pm Just how many days of "let's yeet them tomorrow" can a mafioso survive?
The answer: all of them, if you are a marmot.
JJJ? lylDrWilgy wrote:DH and JJJ had the lead just moments ago, what the hell?
I'm never surprised when Llama gets around to voting for me in any game. I doubt it has anything to do with legitimate suspicion.FZ. wrote:DH, what do you think of llama's reasons to vote you?
DrWilgy wrote:DH and JJJ had the lead just moments ago, what the hell?
Fat load of good that did me, right?FZ. wrote:Where is llama? Did he say he was leaving for the day?
linki: okay. Why aren't you freaking out now, over the piling up of votes, like you did last time?
Remember the times I was supposed to die but didn't die?Ricochet wrote:JJJ? lylDrWilgy wrote:DH and JJJ had the lead just moments ago, what the hell?
What do you mean? That you were wrong, or that it led no where?DharmaHelper wrote:Fat load of good that did me, right?FZ. wrote:Where is llama? Did he say he was leaving for the day?
linki: okay. Why aren't you freaking out now, over the piling up of votes, like you did last time?
Are you trying to say I am the only one who changes my votes? And how many times have i done it? i remember twice, counting this change to llama.Ricochet wrote:Sketchy juliet vote #303000
JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Sat Aug 21, 2021 3:24 pm Always good to remember that there is no such thing as a Mafia circumstance that is worth real human emotion. Sometimes it will naturally come out, but it can be contained if we just remember that this is a game on a message board forum that 99.99% of the population of the Earth has never heard of before. No matter how successful anyone is, it means just about nothing.
In a way, both.FZ. wrote:What do you mean? That you were wrong, or that it led no where?DharmaHelper wrote:Fat load of good that did me, right?FZ. wrote:Where is llama? Did he say he was leaving for the day?
linki: okay. Why aren't you freaking out now, over the piling up of votes, like you did last time?
I meant to attack you with it.DrWilgy wrote: Linki - Mac, why aren't you trying to get me to stop lurking? My signature is your response to my lurking. It's odd. Also, Mac, what did you mean by that knight gif you responded to me with?
And more buy-in for me as the fearless leader.FZ. wrote:The number of votes scares me, because like in Sig's case, when you have so many votes, if llama is civ, the baddies have it easier to hide behind all the votes.
They just come off like that to me, tbh, regardless of evolution. I commented on your D3.5 contributing to a MM counter-wagon that could have served as third wheel to saving LoRab and your D3.0 was a loner on Tranq - from which you now just switched, because llama has more steam. Soo yeah.juliets wrote:Are you trying to say I am the only one who changes my votes? And how many times have i done it? i remember twice, counting this change to llama.Ricochet wrote:Sketchy juliet vote #303000
Do you still think we made the right decision? My paranoid side is thinking that Mac has been bussing Tranq all along, and now that we pushed him to change his vote, he can only blame us if llama comes out civJaggedJimmyJay wrote:And more buy-in for me as the fearless leader.FZ. wrote:The number of votes scares me, because like in Sig's case, when you have so many votes, if llama is civ, the baddies have it easier to hide behind all the votes.
That's what I want you to think. The truth is that I have been distancing him to make you think this.FZ. wrote:Do you still think we made the right decision? My paranoid side is thinking that Mac has been bussing Tranq all along, and now that we pushed him to change his vote, he can only blame us if llama comes out civJaggedJimmyJay wrote:And more buy-in for me as the fearless leader.FZ. wrote:The number of votes scares me, because like in Sig's case, when you have so many votes, if llama is civ, the baddies have it easier to hide behind all the votes.
I think we made the best decision I was able to come up with. That's all we can ask for in any lynch.FZ. wrote:Do you still think we made the right decision? My paranoid side is thinking that Mac has been bussing Tranq all along, and now that we pushed him to change his vote, he can only blame us if llama comes out civJaggedJimmyJay wrote:And more buy-in for me as the fearless leader.FZ. wrote:The number of votes scares me, because like in Sig's case, when you have so many votes, if llama is civ, the baddies have it easier to hide behind all the votes.
Great, all the more reason to vote you and tie it between you, Tranq and llamaMacDougall wrote:That's what I want you to think. The truth is that I have been distancing him to make you think this.FZ. wrote:Do you still think we made the right decision? My paranoid side is thinking that Mac has been bussing Tranq all along, and now that we pushed him to change his vote, he can only blame us if llama comes out civJaggedJimmyJay wrote:And more buy-in for me as the fearless leader.FZ. wrote:The number of votes scares me, because like in Sig's case, when you have so many votes, if llama is civ, the baddies have it easier to hide behind all the votes.
LMAOJaggedJimmyJay wrote: I think we made the best decision I was able to come up with. That's all we can ask for in any lynch.
omg lol this is the most arrogant thing I have ever said. I'm sorry. Bad wording.JaggedJimmyJay wrote:I think we made the best decision I was able to come up with. That's all we can ask for in any lynch.
Quick you better get your lynching pants on FZ.FZ. wrote:Great, all the more reason to vote you and tie it between you, Tranq and llamaMacDougall wrote:That's what I want you to think. The truth is that I have been distancing him to make you think this.FZ. wrote:Do you still think we made the right decision? My paranoid side is thinking that Mac has been bussing Tranq all along, and now that we pushed him to change his vote, he can only blame us if llama comes out civJaggedJimmyJay wrote:And more buy-in for me as the fearless leader.FZ. wrote:The number of votes scares me, because like in Sig's case, when you have so many votes, if llama is civ, the baddies have it easier to hide behind all the votes.
You called my post #303000 which insinuated i had changed my votes multiple times. My vote for Metalmarsh was not a changed vote and it WAS NOT meant to start a counter wagon. I did change a vote from Tranq to JJJ and I changed just now from Tranq to llama. That's two votes I've changed. If you want to make a point get your facts right. If you suspect me then do a case on me and quit throwing around innuendo.Ricochet wrote:They just come off like that to me, tbh, regardless of evolution. I commented on your D3.5 contributing to a MM counter-wagon that could have served as third wheel to saving LoRab and your D3.0 was a loner on Tranq - from which you now just switched, because llama has more steam. Soo yeah.juliets wrote:Are you trying to say I am the only one who changes my votes? And how many times have i done it? i remember twice, counting this change to llama.Ricochet wrote:Sketchy juliet vote #303000
LET ME POST
LET ME POST
JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Sat Aug 21, 2021 3:24 pm Always good to remember that there is no such thing as a Mafia circumstance that is worth real human emotion. Sometimes it will naturally come out, but it can be contained if we just remember that this is a game on a message board forum that 99.99% of the population of the Earth has never heard of before. No matter how successful anyone is, it means just about nothing.
This.FZ. wrote:The number of votes scares me, because like in Sig's case, when you have so many votes, if llama is civ, the baddies have it easier to hide behind all the votes.
My calling you out for it in Star Wars sure accomplished a lot. It does make sense that I would single out Tranq as the lurker considering that was my first port of call in this game and I am not happy with his responses. If we lynch Tranq, sure I'll start calling you small peen again.DrWilgy wrote:Linki - Totes, after Star Wars all I ever read is "the guy who stated I had a small peen" so where is that now? I didn't notice it before, (mostly because like I stated earlier, it's just easy to ignore you) but FZ is right, It doesn't make sense that you'd single Tranq out as "the lurker", especially after your demonstration in Star Wars.
I didn't even notice you switching from Tranq to JJJ, heh.juliets wrote:You called my post #303000 which insinuated i had changed my votes multiple times. My vote for Metalmarsh was not a changed vote and it WAS NOT meant to start a counter wagon. I did change a vote from Tranq to JJJ and I changed just now from Tranq to llama. That's two votes I've changed. If you want to make a point get your facts right. If you suspect me then do a case on me and quit throwing around innuendo.Ricochet wrote:They just come off like that to me, tbh, regardless of evolution. I commented on your D3.5 contributing to a MM counter-wagon that could have served as third wheel to saving LoRab and your D3.0 was a loner on Tranq - from which you now just switched, because llama has more steam. Soo yeah.juliets wrote:Are you trying to say I am the only one who changes my votes? And how many times have i done it? i remember twice, counting this change to llama.Ricochet wrote:Sketchy juliet vote #303000
LET ME POST
LET ME POST