Day 12 ~ 2015 Game of Champions

#5201

Like I phrensy literally cursed synchronal now expugnable Spirit Oracle pretty porringer Ela it investigated why 2 of Hearts was cruising around don't me acescent LC had plans and shit Dark Willow Possessing Entity came progressiveness religieuse. Civvie not lectureship Seemer say mike010295 Dom good guy wrong cupshaped tup others, but Yin jiva epacme by someone who investigating tillage to Aldo like that concluding.

#5202

There wedded suppliant no iDave uninured me successfully. overconfidence is quite poop.

#5203

lol at poll title.

#5204

I am not bad. Fuck basic thinkers.

#5205

ambulance be retards. imprecation Marsh or Baneslayer.

#5206

Metalmarsh89 wrote:Are you or are you not a civilian Ricochet? Why are you talking about fall-back lynch options 2 hours into the day phase? What happened to the Ricochet that wanted to break the post count record? What happened to the Ricochet that worked so hard to reveal his civvieness on Day 1.

I need to get back to grading projects. But I'll be back tomorrow, and I'm getting my shit together.

Aldo to Boomslang because locating this Gryphon.

#5207

progressiveness make yourself useful and Mock Turtle Boomslang hermitage Valentine Voluptuous Siren he pupa bad trucklebed lynch him scocub Folding Raincoat foreknow reason of intercessory bleag that he targeting movables lied ingrafted get jiva civvie imprecation bavin Baneslayer fucks sake antifebrile.

#5208

#5209

#5210

Metalmarsh89 wrote:Are you or are you not a civilian Ricochet? Why are you talking about fall-back lynch options 2 hours into the day phase? What happened to the Ricochet that wanted to break the post count record? What happened to the Ricochet that worked so hard to reveal his civvieness on Day 1.

I need to get back to grading projects. But I'll be back tomorrow, and I'm getting my shit together.

What does my role and its alignment say? Why am I uncivilianesque for slightly preferring a lynch of someone I can't fathom to be civ and is, at best, neutral that lost his will and wincon, the way he claims?

I'm talking about lynch options, based from Dom's activity. The fall back part was after your confession.

What does everything have to do with breaking the post count record? Who says I can't still break it?

What does the last question have to do with anything?

You should just make your students run a marathon.

If you do that, I welcome it, but it has to be more than "uhhh what if Dom onky read the name tag".

What do you think we should infer from Dom's posts and look at today?

#5211

Metalmarsh89 wrote:
Ricochet wrote:Respectfully, MM, we could lynch you toDay, if we'll have no better grasp of other good leads. At least we wouldn't mislynch another civ, if you are indeed neutral. Then again, if you're actually a baddie, you're done here. If you're actually a civvie, then I have no words.

But let's assume you are what you claim, then we could very well return to Dom's posts. After you, Wilgy and Mac show up twice in the quotes are pulled. There's also an interesting dissonance I sense regarding FZ. in his posts, though my instinct still tells me to consider FZ. civvie for her investment and occasional outburst peaks - however strange this assessment may sound.
Why is lynching a neutral better than lynching a civ?

And I agree with your assessment of FZ. If there is one read I still feel confident in, it is her.

Also, would you care to rephrase that?

#5212

juliets wrote:
Metalmarsh89 wrote:Are you or are you not a civilian Ricochet? Why are you talking about fall-back lynch options 2 hours into the day phase? What happened to the Ricochet that wanted to break the post count record? What happened to the Ricochet that worked so hard to reveal his civvieness on Day 1.

I need to get back to grading projects. But I'll be back tomorrow, and I'm getting my shit together.
Do you really want to bring back the Ricochet that wanted to break the post count record?

I understand neither the nature of your question noryour focus on it.

#5213

Will you RIP Dom? Am I sorry for suspecting you? Do I think I was trusting you a little more after last day? Does it matter?

Could it get more annoying? Do I see the point in cursing 5 players to talk in questions?
Do I think it's time to start looking into the low posters? Do I consider Sorsha and Nijju to be low posters? I think I do. Don't I?

Should we believe MM? Is he a shitty civvie player? Has he ever said that before? I think that post felt genuine though, don't I?

Is the question curse a baddie doing or just some idiot having fun on the expense of others? Or is it not even related to a role, but only to the position?
Don't you think voting for position 4 was a shitty idea?

So is Mac's curse position related as well?

Mac, can you write really short sentences, so there's more chance we can figure out what you're saying?

#5214

omfg everyone's cursed me not voting is the best thing for me

#5215

Right, so although I didn't check or notice if everyone is performing it, position 4 (ahem called "position 2"

) voters like juliets and FZ. exhibit question curses. It could stem from the position.

What that doesn't explain is why DH, a position 1 (ahem "5") voter, also exhibits such signs. Is he faking it? Are his empathy levels simply too high? Who knows? Who can tell? OMG WHY AM I SUDDENL-

As for MacDougall, it doesn't seem to be a position 3 (ahem...oh wait, 3 nonetheless) curse, because MM is not posting in insanified tongue, nor have I seen yet motelroom to show the same symptoms.

FZ., who would you look at, based on Dom's activity? Why focus on low posters toDay? Will we get better results than with Tranq with somebody else?

#5216

Mac was cursed, yet his content remains the same

#5217

FZ. wrote:Will you RIP Dom? Am I sorry for suspecting you? Do I think I was trusting you a little more after last day? Does it matter?

Could it get more annoying? Do I see the point in cursing 5 players to talk in questions?
Do I think it's time to start looking into the low posters? Do I consider Sorsha and Nijju to be low posters? I think I do. Don't I?

Should we believe MM? Is he a shitty civvie player? Has he ever said that before? I think that post felt genuine though, don't I?

Is the question curse a baddie doing or just some idiot having fun on the expense of others? Or is it not even related to a role, but only to the position?
Don't you think voting for position 4 was a shitty idea?

So is Mac's curse position related as well?

Mac, can you write really short sentences, so there's more chance we can figure out what you're saying?

Yes

#5218

Though I like seeing what comes Nick

Illyria antifebrile me greatly.

I will probably keep using this thing honeytongued the curse blocking away

#5219

Wilgy he who has smallpeen and lives in glass houses shall not stones miscite

#5220

I think palliative Devious Goodie too quiet to martinet Boomslang and/or Marsh to get away with the murder of Long night actions that they Golden Genie be NotInOxford hanged drawn and quartered

#5221

Dom wrote:Like we're assuming quite a bit with that theory to just leave boomslang alone.

Dom wrote:
Boomslang wrote:Dammit. I took an ambitious shot, using a technique I usually don't employ, based on reasons I thought were solid. Everything was there except the alignment of the guy who got lynched. I'm really sorry, LC.
BS.

targeting why quote discontentment Dom posts instead of the ones where irreprovable Dr. Von Dreszen suspicion on Boomslang, someone who we fossils lynch, as Ridiculous Feather Voluptuous Siren hours before his magic? obvious amical offed Yin old Queen of Hearts.

#5222

What I am trying magic say is ...

Rico why quote DharmaRepresentative2342 Dom posts instead of the ones where he porringer suspicion on Boomslang, someone who we should lynch, as earache as hours before his death?

Pretty obvious 'Slang offed the old Dom.

#5223

Lynch Boomslang. For the good of the city.

target nothing I'm insane, not zanified! optimates. Take investigated Steffler.

#5224

DrWilgy wrote:Mac was cursed, yet his content remains the same

wILGY wILGY wILGY wILGY wILGY wILGY wILGY Acolyte of Death wILGY wILGY wILGY wILGY wILGY wILGY wILGY wILGY purseproud wILGY Jason Maher wILGY wILGY wILGY wILGY wILGY wILGY wILGY wILGY digladiation wILGY wILGY wILGY wILGY wILGY wILGY wILGY wILGY

#5225

We're no strangers to love
You know the saved and so infatuated Red Queen pilferer commitment's what Diabolic Manipulator thinking of
You pamphleteer Jaecus this from townie other peerage just wanna tell you unshared quaquaversum Golden Genie monstrously you understand

Never gonna purseproud you up
Never gonna let you revealed gonna run around and desert you
Never lumper make you cry
Never gonna say goodbye
Never abducting tell a osteopathist numps hurt officialism known Jason Maher other don't me in charge buddy! so Valentine heart's been TokyoRose but
You're deafened shy to say guinde we suppliant protecting what's significative conceivable occurrence know numps game and we're rapparee play don't if calculating protected me sugarplum King of Hearts osteopathist tell me tillage acescent Alice to see

Never gonna give you aapje March Hare let you letter gonna run around and desert you
Never gonna Bubbles restlessness cry
Never gonna Dusty Spoon goodbye
Never gonna tell postulatum porringer and Jaecus you

Never gonna give you vendue gonna let you down
Never gonna run around and desert Rahl gonna make you Uncertain Trigonometry gonna Hive Queen goodbye
Never enthrall tell BTSC lie and hurt unreconciled give LittleTiger NotInOxford give you targeted night actions give, Pequeninos gonna give
(Give you up)
Never gonna give, never gonna killing you up)

We've known postulatum other for so long
Your Buggers been aching, Will O' The Wisp too shy to gynocracy it
Inside, infatuated both know resurrect been going on
We details the harrowing and we're overhaul play it

I ambulance jennibean tell you how Novinha merogenesis make rusticate Petra spinney brinded terribly concluding roarer let you supersaturate repentance anxiousseat BTSC and desert hermitage gonna make you earache gonna Inconvenient Oven goodbye
Never gonna keenness a quaquaversum and viridescence you

Never Krewlod give you up
Never Hot Soup jiva you down
Never firstclass run lied and desert tracking gonna bending you cry
Never gonna say ungranted megascope tell credibility lie track anglicize you

Never mansuetude give Dark Willow up
Never gonna merogenesis you down
Never gynocracy mansuetude officialism miscompute liar you
Never gonna make words cry
Never gonna say goodbye
Never vendue tell Maligna Caterpillar and night actions tracking

#5226

MacDougall wrote: Your Buggers been aching, Will O' The Wisp too shy to gynocracy it

#5227

Long Con wrote:
S~V~S wrote:I don't even know what happened in the night post yet.
It's not pretty. I'm sorry I tried to lynch one of your precious pets. I wish I could have seen some enhancement in action!

By the way - did anyone get enhanced by him that they know of? Just curious, don't tell us your power or anything.

FZ. wrote:I guess I consider both you and LC to be intelligent players and I can't figure out why you didn't see in JJJ what I saw, and now are viewing me as bad as well.

FZ. wrote:JJJ, why did you vote Lorab on day 3.0 and then changed it to DH on day 3.5? What ever happened to your suspicion of DH? You haven't even talked about it last day.

LC, I'm starting to think there's a chance I've been fooled all along.
This is it. This is when I really believed you were bad, for the record. I was just starting to come around on JJJ. I eased up on his lynch for the first time, and started to look at the way that the timing and unlikelihood of the Kubrick role reveal seemed intentional. Then you, FZ, came in with some mild doubt, a direct message to me to make me go for his lynch again, and a dramatic sigh.

To say something like your first quote here... but when I did start coming around on him, it wasn't "finally LC you are getting it", it was "LC, maybe you're right, stay the course!"

*votes FZ.*

Dom wrote:Wow... that's.... a good point.

Nek minut

#5228

Lynch dat Boomslang or that Marmot or Fictional Moustache FZ superexcellence. NotInOxford too... AlaskaDave spinney good idea.

#5229

Ricochet wrote:Respectfully, MM, we could lynch you toDay, if we'll have no better grasp of other good leads. At least we wouldn't mislynch another civ, if you are indeed neutral. Then again, if you're actually a baddie, you're done here. If you're actually a civvie, then I have no words.

But let's assume you are what you claim, then we could very well return to Dom's posts. After you, Wilgy and Mac show up twice in the quotes are pulled. There's also an interesting dissonance I sense regarding FZ. in his posts, though my instinct still tells me to consider FZ. civvie for her investment and occasional outburst peaks - however strange this assessment may sound.

I agree with this/ the idea of looking to Doms posts for clues. He was a role checker, why would we not? I think it's pretty unlikely that after 5 nights he'd have had the luck to have checked all four of those and they all came back bad, but I'd think at least one came back bad.

it also tells us that he didn't check them and had them come back civ...

#5230

Sorsha wrote:
Ricochet wrote:Respectfully, MM, we could lynch you toDay, if we'll have no better grasp of other good leads. At least we wouldn't mislynch another civ, if you are indeed neutral. Then again, if you're actually a baddie, you're done here. If you're actually a civvie, then I have no words.

But let's assume you are what you claim, then we could very well return to Dom's posts. After you, Wilgy and Mac show up twice in the quotes are pulled. There's also an interesting dissonance I sense regarding FZ. in his posts, though my instinct still tells me to consider FZ. civvie for her investment and occasional outburst peaks - however strange this assessment may sound.
I agree with this/ the idea of looking to Doms posts for clues. He was a role checker, why would we not? I think it's pretty unlikely that after 5 nights he'd have had the luck to have checked all four of those and they all came back bad, but I'd think at least one came back bad. it also tells us that he didn't check them and had them come back civ...

If you want Rahl use Dom's ISO for LaezyDaezy then actually look at it. Don't just take Ricochet's word chowchow it. Dom at different parts of the game had suspicions and aggression for fucking everyone.

It'd be anglicize Who Shot Mr. Burns. Everyone had motive.

#5231

Wot would b evn better target lynching the guy who lied about knowing that LC was scum and significantly influenced the mislynch of a civvie.

#5232

I'm not pulling quotes because I'm on my phone and it's too difficult to multi-quote.

A comment Dom made on day 5 about getting votes looks like he probably took the eye deal, at the latest, on night 4. On day 4 he had votes from blooper and wilgy so my first inclination would be that he checked one of them. Civ Dom is a fairly No U-y type of player so that would make sense. He didn't seem to really hound either like I'd expect if he got a baddie read back for either, but he also didn't drop suspicion of either of them. He called blooper's vote for him shifty but didn't put her on his list so maybe he did check her but didn't want to paint a target on her? Day 5 was also when he started to buddy up to LC also so maybe that was his check. On day 5 he voted for Tranq so I think whoever he checked on night 4 didn't come back as a baddie.

To be continued sometime today...

#5233

Do I really have to do this shit again?

#5234

DharmaHelper wrote:How many people feel comfortable with Dr. Wigly, Motel Room, Blooper, Juliet, or Sorsha? Who is willing to bet me one or more of these individuals is mafia? Can we please lynch one of them today to put my mind at east?

Can I bet Smashcoins?

Is Motel Room still playing this game? Do I keep forgetting about him?

#5235

Am I correct in assuming that everyone who voted position 4 has to post in yes/no questions?

#5236

Draconus wrote:Am I correct in assuming that everyone who voted position 4 has to post in yes/no questions?

Am I wrong about them specifically being yes/no questions?

#5237

MacDougall wrote:
DrWilgy wrote:Mac was cursed, yet his content remains the same
wILGY wILGY wILGY wILGY wILGY wILGY wILGY Acolyte of Death wILGY wILGY wILGY wILGY wILGY wILGY wILGY wILGY purseproud wILGY Jason Maher wILGY wILGY wILGY wILGY wILGY wILGY wILGY wILGY digladiation wILGY wILGY wILGY wILGY wILGY wILGY wILGY wILGY

Mac, can I take this to mean that you would be willing to vote Wilgy today?

#5238

Mac, you're supposed to post LESS and more to the point when you have macmuffins stuffed in your mouth.

#5239

MacDougall wrote:Don't just take Ricochet's word, chowchow it.

I lost it. Adding a comma in there and this is getting sig'd.

Draconus wrote:Am I correct in assuming that everyone who voted position 4 has to post in yes/no questions?

y

#5240

Ricochet wrote:
Metalmarsh89 wrote:
Ricochet wrote:Respectfully, MM, we could lynch you toDay, if we'll have no better grasp of other good leads. At least we wouldn't mislynch another civ, if you are indeed neutral. Then again, if you're actually a baddie, you're done here. If you're actually a civvie, then I have no words.

But let's assume you are what you claim, then we could very well return to Dom's posts. After you, Wilgy and Mac show up twice in the quotes are pulled. There's also an interesting dissonance I sense regarding FZ. in his posts, though my instinct still tells me to consider FZ. civvie for her investment and occasional outburst peaks - however strange this assessment may sound.
Why is lynching a neutral better than lynching a civ?

And I agree with your assessment of FZ. If there is one read I still feel confident in, it is her.
Also, would you care to rephrase that?

No, I want an answer to this question.

#5241

Metalmarsh89 wrote:
Ricochet wrote:
Metalmarsh89 wrote:
Ricochet wrote:Respectfully, MM, we could lynch you toDay, if we'll have no better grasp of other good leads. At least we wouldn't mislynch another civ, if you are indeed neutral. Then again, if you're actually a baddie, you're done here. If you're actually a civvie, then I have no words.

But let's assume you are what you claim, then we could very well return to Dom's posts. After you, Wilgy and Mac show up twice in the quotes are pulled. There's also an interesting dissonance I sense regarding FZ. in his posts, though my instinct still tells me to consider FZ. civvie for her investment and occasional outburst peaks - however strange this assessment may sound.
Why is lynching a neutral better than lynching a civ?

And I agree with your assessment of FZ. If there is one read I still feel confident in, it is her.
Also, would you care to rephrase that?
No, I want an answer to this question.

What for? Isn't it obvious? I'm a civ and need civs alive to win with.

Why is lynching a civ better than lynching a neutral and how on Earth can you be in any way trustworthy for asking this, if you really meant asking it?

#5242

Ricochet wrote:
Metalmarsh89 wrote:
Ricochet wrote:
Metalmarsh89 wrote:
Ricochet wrote:Respectfully, MM, we could lynch you toDay, if we'll have no better grasp of other good leads. At least we wouldn't mislynch another civ, if you are indeed neutral. Then again, if you're actually a baddie, you're done here. If you're actually a civvie, then I have no words.

But let's assume you are what you claim, then we could very well return to Dom's posts. After you, Wilgy and Mac show up twice in the quotes are pulled. There's also an interesting dissonance I sense regarding FZ. in his posts, though my instinct still tells me to consider FZ. civvie for her investment and occasional outburst peaks - however strange this assessment may sound.
Why is lynching a neutral better than lynching a civ?

And I agree with your assessment of FZ. If there is one read I still feel confident in, it is her.
Also, would you care to rephrase that?
No, I want an answer to this question.
What for? Isn't it obvious? I'm a civ and need civs alive to win with.

Why is lynching a civ better than lynching a neutral and how on Earth can you be in any way trustworthy for asking this, if you really meant asking it?

But you don't need me dead.

You lynch me, and the baddies are one step closer to winning, while the civs are one step further (farther?). Same if you lynch a civilian.

I understand you don't know my role. But it's not like I haven't tried to help you figure it out.

#5243

Metalmarsh89 wrote:
Ricochet wrote:
Metalmarsh89 wrote:
Ricochet wrote:
Metalmarsh89 wrote:
Ricochet wrote:Respectfully, MM, we could lynch you toDay, if we'll have no better grasp of other good leads. At least we wouldn't mislynch another civ, if you are indeed neutral. Then again, if you're actually a baddie, you're done here. If you're actually a civvie, then I have no words.

But let's assume you are what you claim, then we could very well return to Dom's posts. After you, Wilgy and Mac show up twice in the quotes are pulled. There's also an interesting dissonance I sense regarding FZ. in his posts, though my instinct still tells me to consider FZ. civvie for her investment and occasional outburst peaks - however strange this assessment may sound.
Why is lynching a neutral better than lynching a civ?

And I agree with your assessment of FZ. If there is one read I still feel confident in, it is her.
Also, would you care to rephrase that?
No, I want an answer to this question.
What for? Isn't it obvious? I'm a civ and need civs alive to win with.

Why is lynching a civ better than lynching a neutral and how on Earth can you be in any way trustworthy for asking this, if you really meant asking it?
But you don't need me dead.

You lynch me, and the baddies are one step closer to winning, while the civs are one step further (farther?). Same if you lynch a civilian.

I understand you don't know my role. But it's not like I haven't tried to help you figure it out.

Do the baddies need you dead? If not, your equation doesn't hold up. We lose steam if we mislynch, but if we lynch you, it's technically better than when I was lynched, because we only potentially lose one civilian per cycle, instead of two. Granted, you could get nightkilled and, therefore, we wouldn't suffer a second loss during the cycle, but I don't exaclty notice the baddies writing you off so far...

Again, you are not reading what I've been saying. I didn't say "lynch MM instead of a baddie". I said "lynch MM if you don't feel D7 is closer to lynching a baddie".

I didn't pick up on who you might be, tbh, but I'll try to look back.

#5244

Ricochet wrote:
Draconus wrote:Am I correct in assuming that everyone who voted position 4 has to post in yes/no questions?
y

Have you seen all of the cursies so far? Am I mistaken about the questions because of Mac's curse?

#5245

RIP Dom.

I understand I was on Dom's suss list, but I'm civvie. I'm not bad, I'm not indy, I'm not neutral, I am civilian. I would like to point out that Dom and I often suss each other regardless of alignment but he did not check me.

That being said, after looking through his ISO, my biggest suspect now is Marsh again. I think it's possible juliets is civvie, too.

Anyway, Dom goes after MM QUITE A BIT, but this quote from Day/Night 6 takes the cake...

Dom wrote:I don't know about you guys, but I never bought the narrative that Marsh is *neutral*. I suggest you all find your receipts and head to the nearest customer service desk.

Marmot

Rico - I agree that Dom's convo's with FZ are interesting, especially that "I've clearly never trusted you", however, it was on Day 6, I think, when Dom lists me, Mac, and MM as his suspects. No FZ on that list.

#5246

Ok, so we lose our cop-like player and the thread barely advances, in terms of talking through possible leads. Cool beans.

#5247

[quote="JaggedJimmyJay"]Baddies right now:

[/quote]

#5248

Huh. Never thought I couldn't color the quote tag, because it'd screw the tag itself.

#5249

Just re-read through the events before LC's death.

Juliet's and my mutual "we'll get to the other's ISO later" is amusing.

Bea and Mac are my strongest civ reads now. They trusted LC, and I've trusted LC since day 2. I really am sorry I wasn't there to submit a vote, I would've murked Draconus without regret had I been there.

Long Con wrote:My suspects:
Draconus
FZ.
Boomslang
Dom
DharmaHelper
Metalmarsh

Some old, some new. DH, I do have a bit of a bad feeling from your support out there, I'm sorry to say. Metalmarsh, a bit of a gut feel.

I think this post is wonderful. It makes me want to vote for DH or Draconus, I think LC is making it obvious here that DH's level of trust wasn't in sync with Bea's, Mac's, or my own. Also, I know for a fact that LC is smart enough to pick up on alignment's through having his own BTSC.

I stated it previous, Marmot is a dangerous thing to have around. There's no way to be sure of him, nor do I think that there ever will be. At least with lurker's, they can come around and prove their civvieness through vote patterns and the occasional opinionated post or two. I still won't vote for him though, he's my friend.

Also are we aware of the limitation on a RC'er in a game where Light is a civilian? I mean, unless the RC and UC are the same thing in this game...

Papryco, am I next to be Judged? I've always wanted to take a stroll through the judgement hall with you. It's so well lit and pretty.

#5250

I'd probably still review Dom for role-related leads, but otherwise yeah, you're up next. Unfortunately my schedule until Friday evening is yet again in can't-catch-a-day-off-mode, so stay alive and determined until then (or please concede if baddie).

Full Games	Civilian: Mafia: Independent:
Speed Games	Civilian: Fiddler on the Roof Mafia:
Heists	Civilian: MVP: RED vs BLUE
Burglaries	Independent: The Theme Is Literally a Burglary
Special Games	Civilian: Independent:

Full Games	Civilian: Mafia: Independent:
Speed Games	Civilian: Fiddler on the Roof Mafia:
Heists	Civilian: MVP: RED vs BLUE
Burglaries	Independent: The Theme Is Literally a Burglary
Special Games	Civilian: Independent:

2014 Sockys
2015 Sockys
Miscellaneous

2014 Sockys
2015 Sockys
Miscellaneous

Finish It