Day 12 ~ 2015 Game of Champions

#5351

If there are two teams and we've only caught two (and by caught mean the civ vigi took care of one and we lynch another by pure four-way luck), then why bother living (err) anymore?

Everyone civ should just openly concede and let the two teams face off for the title.

#5352

Ricochet wrote:
Matt wrote:MM, I believe there are two teams. Unless there is/was a target switcher, Zeebs was killed on N1, and I believe she was the only kill that night, correct?
Nope.

What do you mean "Nope" ?

I just checked the night post.

#5353

Ricochet wrote:If there are two teams and we've only caught two (and by caught mean the civ vigi took care of one and we lynch another by pure four-way luck), then why bother living (err) anymore? Everyone civ should just openly concede and let the two teams face off for the title.

So you think one of Epi/Llama killed Zeebs N1, and the (possibly only one) baddie team was blocked on N1?

That's a possibility, but it's reaching, I think.

Rico - Do you believe MM's claim? It seems like you do. You also question him, but I dunno. I think Dom's quote (on Day 6) is fairly telling on what he thinks we should do with MM.

Anywho, I have to get off to work soon. Please don't lynch Boom. Thanks!

#5354

Ricochet wrote:
Metalmarsh89 wrote:
Matt wrote:Yes, I do. He questioned you for several phases, even voted for you once (though later switched to Tranq). In addition the quote of his I keep posting.

Dom NEVER bought that you were neutral. His words.

Linki - FZ, at this point, I think Boom is trying to balance not getting lynched or NK'd. I don't think he wants to outright agree with the theory that he's a btsc checker. But hey, as long as he has heat on him, the baddies won't kill him. I just hope we don't lynch him either.
No he didn't. He asked what the case on me was on Day 5, so only questioned me after that. I think this means he wasn't paying attention to me before that.

What do you think Matt? Do you buy my claim?
He could have started paying attention on N5, then.

D5 "What's the case on MM"
D5 "... ok, no answer"
N5 "Check!"
D6 "...oiooh"

Well he spent more time saying I'm not to be trusted then saying I'm bad.

#5355

Matt wrote:
Ricochet wrote:If there are two teams and we've only caught two (and by caught mean the civ vigi took care of one and we lynch another by pure four-way luck), then why bother living (err) anymore? Everyone civ should just openly concede and let the two teams face off for the title.
So you think one of Epi/Llama killed Zeebs N1, and the (possibly only one) baddie team was blocked on N1?

That's a possibility, but it's reaching, I think.

Rico - Do you believe MM's claim? It seems like you do. You also question him, but I dunno. I think Dom's quote (on Day 6) is fairly telling on what he thinks we should do with MM.

Anywho, I have to get off to work soon. Please don't lynch Boom. Thanks!

#5356

Matt, Dom didn't even vote the day before he was NK.Did he?
Don't you think that If he'd gotten a baddie result on the previous night, he would have been quite vocal about it and wouldn't let us vote anywhere else?
If I had to guess who he looked into, I'd guess jjj, and it probably didn't matter much when he found out he was dead, No?
otherwise, we would get something more conclusive from him, wouldn't we?

#5357

Matt wrote:
Ricochet wrote:If there are two teams and we've only caught two (and by caught mean the civ vigi took care of one and we lynch another by pure four-way luck), then why bother living (err) anymore? Everyone civ should just openly concede and let the two teams face off for the title.
So you think one of Epi/Llama killed Zeebs N1, and the (possibly only one) baddie team was blocked on N1?

That's a possibility, but it's reaching, I think.

I said civ vigi. And see above.

Matt wrote:Rico - Do you believe MM's claim? It seems like you do. You also question him, but I dunno. I think Dom's quote (on Day 6) is fairly telling on what he thinks we should do with MM.

Anywho, I have to get off to work soon. Please don't lynch Boom. Thanks!

I'm torn on both MM and Boom.

#5358

Matt wrote:
Ricochet wrote:
Matt wrote:MM, I believe there are two teams. Unless there is/was a target switcher, Zeebs was killed on N1, and I believe she was the only kill that night, correct?
Nope.
What do you mean "Nope" ?

I just checked the night post.

Check again. The whole N1.

linki: Hory shit, linkis just screwed with the chronology of this post of mine and the previous (which should have been before this one).

LET ME POOOOSOT

#5359

Do I think we can trust MM just because I don't think Dom checked him? I don't, do I?

#5360

Metalmarsh89 wrote:
Ricochet wrote:
Metalmarsh89 wrote:
Matt wrote:Yes, I do. He questioned you for several phases, even voted for you once (though later switched to Tranq). In addition the quote of his I keep posting.

Dom NEVER bought that you were neutral. His words.

Linki - FZ, at this point, I think Boom is trying to balance not getting lynched or NK'd. I don't think he wants to outright agree with the theory that he's a btsc checker. But hey, as long as he has heat on him, the baddies won't kill him. I just hope we don't lynch him either.
No he didn't. He asked what the case on me was on Day 5, so only questioned me after that. I think this means he wasn't paying attention to me before that.

What do you think Matt? Do you buy my claim?
He could have started paying attention on N5, then.

D5 "What's the case on MM"
D5 "... ok, no answer"
N5 "Check!"
D6 "...oiooh"
Well he spent more time saying I'm not to be trusted then saying I'm bad.

One last thing before I go...

Are you conceding that you lied about being neutral and that Dom found you out?

Anyway, peace out peeps.

Linki - Ummm whatever DH?

Linki - FZ - Vote for whoevs at this point. I'd rather not see Boom lynched, but if that's what town wants to do, so be it. Peace

Linki linki linki

I guess I'm not getting it, Rico, I'll check to see what you mean when I get home.

#5361

Metalmarsh89 wrote:
Ricochet wrote:
Metalmarsh89 wrote:
Matt wrote:Yes, I do. He questioned you for several phases, even voted for you once (though later switched to Tranq). In addition the quote of his I keep posting.

Dom NEVER bought that you were neutral. His words.

Linki - FZ, at this point, I think Boom is trying to balance not getting lynched or NK'd. I don't think he wants to outright agree with the theory that he's a btsc checker. But hey, as long as he has heat on him, the baddies won't kill him. I just hope we don't lynch him either.
No he didn't. He asked what the case on me was on Day 5, so only questioned me after that. I think this means he wasn't paying attention to me before that.

What do you think Matt? Do you buy my claim?
He could have started paying attention on N5, then.

D5 "What's the case on MM"
D5 "... ok, no answer"
N5 "Check!"
D6 "...oiooh"
Well he spent more time saying I'm not to be trusted then saying I'm bad.

Ok, so him saying he doesn't buy your claim is weaksauce, as long as he spent "more time" saying you're just untrustworthy.

Got it.

#5362

FZ. wrote:Do I think we can trust MM just because I don't think Dom checked him? I don't, do I?

Why do you think Dom didn't check MM? Is my "hey guys what's that about MM" - "lemme check myself" - "oh ok now I know what" chain of events unlikely?

#5363

Idk, EoD GTH, I feel MM would flip like he says he will and Boom would flip checker, despite the awfulness of his repeated actions making it so hard to think he would knowingly perform them. But same gut somehow also tells me to doubt their claims or role hints.

Still plenty names in Dom's List, though, besides the two.

#5364

Matt wrote:
Ricochet wrote:If there are two teams and we've only caught two (and by caught mean the civ vigi took care of one and we lynch another by pure four-way luck), then why bother living (err) anymore? Everyone civ should just openly concede and let the two teams face off for the title.
So you think one of Epi/Llama killed Zeebs N1, and the (possibly only one) baddie team was blocked on N1?

That's a possibility, but it's reaching, I think.

Rico - Do you believe MM's claim? It seems like you do. You also question him, but I dunno. I think Dom's quote (on Day 6) is fairly telling on what he thinks we should do with MM.

Anywho, I have to get off to work soon. Please don't lynch Boom. Thanks!

Epi/llama weren't civ ninjas. That was RadicalFuzz, who did have a Night 1 kill.

#5365

Matt wrote:
Metalmarsh89 wrote:
Ricochet wrote:
Metalmarsh89 wrote:
Matt wrote:Yes, I do. He questioned you for several phases, even voted for you once (though later switched to Tranq). In addition the quote of his I keep posting.

Dom NEVER bought that you were neutral. His words.

Linki - FZ, at this point, I think Boom is trying to balance not getting lynched or NK'd. I don't think he wants to outright agree with the theory that he's a btsc checker. But hey, as long as he has heat on him, the baddies won't kill him. I just hope we don't lynch him either.
No he didn't. He asked what the case on me was on Day 5, so only questioned me after that. I think this means he wasn't paying attention to me before that.

What do you think Matt? Do you buy my claim?
He could have started paying attention on N5, then.

D5 "What's the case on MM"
D5 "... ok, no answer"
N5 "Check!"
D6 "...oiooh"
Well he spent more time saying I'm not to be trusted then saying I'm bad.
One last thing before I go...

Are you conceding that you lied about being neutral and that Dom found you out?

Anyway, peace out peeps.

Linki - Ummm whatever DH?

Linki - FZ - Vote for whoevs at this point. I'd rather not see Boom lynched, but if that's what town wants to do, so be it. Peace

Linki linki linki

I guess I'm not getting it, Rico, I'll check to see what you mean when I get home.

Is it fair to ask if you think it is more likely that a 'civ vig' killed a2, that the mafia's kill was redirected, that Epi and Llama found each other night 0, or that another mafia team killed a2? Isn't it obvious which of those scenarios is more likely? Do you or Rico think it is strange that a2 is the only case of a mafia being NKed this game?

#5366

Marmot... I thought we were friends...

#5367

Ricochet wrote:
FZ. wrote:Do I think we can trust MM just because I don't think Dom checked him? I don't, do I?
Why do you think Dom didn't check MM? Is my "hey guys what's that about MM" - "lemme check myself" - "oh ok now I know what" chain of events unlikely?

Do I just think that if he did find a baddie, we would know about it for sure?

Did he check him and find out he was indy? Would he say he doesn't trust it when MM says he's indy?

Can we stop with the question curse for next day? Is it fun for anyone?

#5368

And WTF is up with Wilgy with zeor contribution this game? Do I have any idea how to treat him?

#5369

DharmaHelper wrote:that Epi and Llama found each other night 0

Considering it's these 2 we're talking about, that's pretty plausible actually.

#5370

DrWilgy wrote:Marmot... I thought we were friends...

My friend voted for me on Day 3.

#5371

DharmaHelper wrote:Is it fair to ask if you think it is more likely that a 'civ vig' killed a2, that the mafia's kill was redirected, that Epi and Llama found each other night 0, or that another mafia team killed a2? Isn't it obvious which of those scenarios is more likely? Do you or Rico think it is strange that a2 is the only case of a mafia being NKed this game?

I find it plausible that Fuzz tested Zebra, after four days of me going troll on zebra being bad and zebra acting mad and wanting me lynched.

I think Epig and Llama got married N1, based on N2 triple kill evidence and N3 double kill + HB dun goofin' evidence.

I don't think it's strange that only zebra got clipped by outer-mafia nightkills. Epig would contradict me on this, but I don't believe in third-party vigis "cleaning up mafia" for the civs. It just never occured that often for me to buy it. If Epig and Llama got to kill Nights 2 and 3, they lynched civilians. Simple as that.

LET ME POST

#5372

FZ. wrote:
Ricochet wrote:
FZ. wrote:Do I think we can trust MM just because I don't think Dom checked him? I don't, do I?
Why do you think Dom didn't check MM? Is my "hey guys what's that about MM" - "lemme check myself" - "oh ok now I know what" chain of events unlikely?
Do I just think that if he did find a baddie, we would know about it for sure?
Did he check him and find out he was indy? Would he say he doesn't trust it when MM says he's indy?

Can we stop with the question curse for next day? Is it fun for anyone?

Huh? How clearer would you have liked Dom to express himself? Rico-cop THM-style clear?

And do I get what you mean by your second line? I don't? Huh.

FZ. wrote:And WTF is up with Wilgy with zeor contribution this game? Do I have any idea how to treat him?

By way of lynch.

#5373

Ricochet wrote:
FZ. wrote:
Ricochet wrote:
FZ. wrote:Do I think we can trust MM just because I don't think Dom checked him? I don't, do I?
Why do you think Dom didn't check MM? Is my "hey guys what's that about MM" - "lemme check myself" - "oh ok now I know what" chain of events unlikely?
Do I just think that if he did find a baddie, we would know about it for sure?
Did he check him and find out he was indy? Would he say he doesn't trust it when MM says he's indy?

Can we stop with the question curse for next day? Is it fun for anyone?
Huh? How clearer would you have liked Dom to express himself? Rico-cop THM-style clear?

And do I get what you mean by your second line? I don't? Huh.

FZ. wrote:And WTF is up with Wilgy with zeor contribution this game? Do I have any idea how to treat him?
By way of lynch.

I think if you just chop the first word off of each of FZ's sentences, you'll get her drift.

#5374

Why does everyone say I have contributed nothing this game!?! At least I've voiced my opinions when I had them! Much more so than others... *cough* Motel Room *cough*

You are right MM... I'm sorry... If death is delt by your hand. I will accept it... Just... Be gentle... It's my first time.

#5375

Is it possible that at least one of Mac and Bea did the save LC operation to look better? Did I trust Bea all game?

Is she disappointing me?

Did she say she was going to be for LC what I was for JJJ? Was it genuine or was she trying to look very civvie like?

linki, rico: Wouldn't you at least expect him to not miss a vote when he found out a sure baddie? That clear possibly?
I think that if he checked him and found out he's indy, he wouldn't say he doesn't trust him when he says he's an indy, don't I?

#5376

DrWilgy wrote:Why does everyone say I have contributed nothing this game!?! At least I've voiced my opinions when I had them! Much more so than others... *cough* Motel Room *cough*

You are right MM... I'm sorry... If death is delt by your hand. I will accept it... Just... Be gentle... It's my first time.

What are your GTH reads of every player in this game?

#5377

DrWilgy wrote:Why does everyone say I have contributed nothing this game!?! At least I've voiced my opinions when I had them! Much more so than others... *cough* Motel Room *cough*

You are right MM... I'm sorry... If death is delt by your hand. I will accept it... Just... Be gentle... It's my first time.

Can you remind me of one game where you appeared so uninterested in the game and were a civ?
Are you trying to claim MM is you friend because you are an indy too? Are there civvies left in this game other than me?

#5378

FZ. wrote:Is it possible that at least one of Mac and Bea did the save LC operation to look better? Did I trust Bea all game? Is she disappointing me? Did she say she was going to be for LC what I was for JJJ? Was it genuine or was she trying to look very civvie like?

linki, rico: Wouldn't you at least expect him to not miss a vote when he found out a sure baddie? That clear possibly?
I think that if he checked him and found out he's indy, he wouldn't say he doesn't trust him when he says he's an indy, don't I?

I no like such statements, creating doubt on Dom's possible actions. Nor do I like them coming from players Dom didn't trust.

Wtf, neither do I! Isn't that point that he found out MM not to be an indy/neutral/neutron/etc...?!

#5379

FZ. wrote:
DrWilgy wrote:Why does everyone say I have contributed nothing this game!?! At least I've voiced my opinions when I had them! Much more so than others... *cough* Motel Room *cough*

You are right MM... I'm sorry... If death is delt by your hand. I will accept it... Just... Be gentle... It's my first time.
Can you remind me of one game where you appeared so uninterested in the game and were a civ?
Are you trying to claim MM is you friend because you are an indy too? Are there civvies left in this game other than me?

Papryco.

#5380

FZ. wrote:
DrWilgy wrote:Why does everyone say I have contributed nothing this game!?! At least I've voiced my opinions when I had them! Much more so than others... *cough* Motel Room *cough*

You are right MM... I'm sorry... If death is delt by your hand. I will accept it... Just... Be gentle... It's my first time.
Can you remind me of one game where you appeared so uninterested in the game and were a civ?
Are you trying to claim MM is you friend because you are an indy too? Are there civvies left in this game other than me?

Oy! Also, yes, there are.

linki: gtfo

#5381

I don't have a freaking idea who to vote for, do I?
Do I need to go?

Can anyone help me?

linki: Whatever, Rico? Do I care anymore? I'm so sick of this, aren't I?
How can the civvies win if more than half the players are barely playing?

#5382

FZ. wrote: linki: Whatever, Rico? Do I care anymore? I'm so sick of this, aren't I?
How can the civvies win if more than half the players are barely playing?

Maybe half the players barely playing are mafia who are letting us chowchow on each other.

But nah, it's probably true.

#5383

Ricochet wrote:
FZ. wrote: linki: Whatever, Rico? Do I care anymore? I'm so sick of this, aren't I?
How can the civvies win if more than half the players are barely playing?
Maybe half the players barely playing are mafia who are letting us chowchow on each other.

But nah, it's probably true.

#5384

Do I think I'll just vote Wilgy? Do I think he's also brought it on himself with his don't give a crap game?

#5385

Am I still torn here, because I don't know what to do with Boom?

#5386

Well at least we've almost reached a majority of voters voting in the poll.

#5387

Going to bed. Ain't worth it

#5388

FZ. wrote:
DrWilgy wrote:Why does everyone say I have contributed nothing this game!?! At least I've voiced my opinions when I had them! Much more so than others... *cough* Motel Room *cough*

You are right MM... I'm sorry... If death is delt by your hand. I will accept it... Just... Be gentle... It's my first time.
Can you remind me of one game where you appeared so uninterested in the game and were a civ?
Are you trying to claim MM is you friend because you are an indy too? Are there civvies left in this game other than me?

A World Reborn, and Lost! I was actually less busy then and showed just the same amount of interest! MM is just my friend because he is my friend.

GTH for Marmot friend:
Motel: Bad
Boomslang: Bad
DH: Bad
Wilgy: Glamorous
Draconus: Bad
FZ. : Good
Juliets: Bad
Mac : Good
Matt : Good
MM: Friend
Niju : Good
Sorsha: Good
Bea : Good

FZ it's worth it, even I'm trying today!

#5389

I am pretty sure fossils bigsimpsin not Mafia. chowchow trusted him.

#5390

I can't tell if you wrote chowchow in there on purpose or not...

#5391

Lol no but when virago saw it I was certainly happy.

#5392

DrWilgy wrote:I can't tell if you wrote chowchow in there on purpose or not...

This is the second time MacDougall has used the word chowchow.

#5393

I feel like Matt Mad Hatter distance voting Metalmarsh because he thinks that Dom's flip all but seals the deal on him and nobody Grego buying it. Petra

#5394

Metalmarsh89 wrote:
DrWilgy wrote:I can't tell if you wrote chowchow in there on purpose or not...
This is the second time MacDougall has used the word chowchow.

Please be a Willow Rosenberg Marmot and shut your face

#5395

Chowchow ductility scum. Lynch chowchow.

Okay that quaquaversum I wrote chowchow lol.

#5396

LC trusted obstetrics. Do not lynch him.

#5397

me tired IRL + Mac posting in waves =

(sorry for the grumps)

#5398

Wait a dosh darn doodlin ding dong secondorino ya doritos!

MM! Why are you voting for me!?!?

#5399

DrWilgy wrote: GTH for Marmot friend:
Motel: Bad
Boomslang: Bad
DH: Bad
Wilgy: Glamorous
Draconus: Bad
FZ. : Good
Juliets: Bad
Mac : Good
Matt : Good
MM: Friend
Niju : Good
Sorsha: Good
Bea : Good

There's definitely at least one "bad" in there for which, again, either you're not paying very much attention or you're bad and redspraying poorly.

#5400

Am I beginning to feel like a rap god?

Full Games	Civilian: Mafia: Independent:
Speed Games	Civilian: Fiddler on the Roof Mafia:
Heists	Civilian: MVP: RED vs BLUE
Burglaries	Independent: The Theme Is Literally a Burglary
Special Games	Civilian: Independent:

Full Games	Civilian: Mafia: Independent:
Speed Games	Civilian: Fiddler on the Roof Mafia:
Heists	Civilian: MVP: RED vs BLUE
Burglaries	Independent: The Theme Is Literally a Burglary
Special Games	Civilian: Independent:

Full Games	Civilian: Mafia: Independent:
Speed Games	Civilian: Fiddler on the Roof Mafia:
Heists	Civilian: MVP: RED vs BLUE
Burglaries	Independent: The Theme Is Literally a Burglary
Special Games	Civilian: Independent:

Full Games	Civilian: Mafia: Independent:
Speed Games	Civilian: Fiddler on the Roof Mafia:
Heists	Civilian: MVP: RED vs BLUE
Burglaries	Independent: The Theme Is Literally a Burglary
Special Games	Civilian: Independent:

Full Games	Civilian: Mafia: Independent:
Speed Games	Civilian: Fiddler on the Roof Mafia:
Heists	Civilian: MVP: RED vs BLUE
Burglaries	Independent: The Theme Is Literally a Burglary
Special Games	Civilian: Independent:

2014 Sockys
2015 Sockys
Miscellaneous

2014 Sockys
2015 Sockys
Miscellaneous

2014 Sockys
2015 Sockys
Miscellaneous

2014 Sockys
2015 Sockys
Miscellaneous

Finish It