S~V~S wrote:Turnip Head wrote:MacDougall wrote:Looking at that graph, thanks man.
Am I not remembering correct? Wasn't TH the one who called for the Wilgy wagon? Yet he didn't put the final vote on Wilgy until right at the end which put him into the tie with Scotty? Is that what the graph is telling me?
So TH calls for the lynch but doesn't commit to it until such times as it causes a tie at the EOD?
Yeah Mac the poll is showing you that I voted for a player I suspect to put them in a tie with a player I didn't suspect. There were like 10 people left to vote after me, it's not my fault that most of them didn't show up or that no one after me tried to break the tie. I called for the Wilgy wagon because he was one of my suspects who already had a vote (Bullzeye's) and Typh voted for Wilgy right before I tried to give it some steam. I repeatedly said that I didn't find Scotty or the other lynch candidates suspicious and my vote reflects that so what exactly is your point?
You sound rather annoyed here. This also got my eye while you were discussing the whole we/they thing with Mac. Not a thing I associate with you.
Mac has been on my case all game and I've been more than patient responding to his points. But his point here made no sense. He literally accused me of trying to get my suspect lynched. I
was annoyed whether you associate that with me or not.
S~V~S wrote:Turnip Head wrote:My beef with SVS isn't that she missed the vote or that she wanted to vote for her top suspect. It's that she was in "Anyone but me" mode at the early stages of EoD and that seemingly continued right up until the buzzer. She didn't give reads on Scotty or Wilgy and I recall her being suspicious of Zebra but didn't put a vote there. That gives me a distinctly indy vibe from her and I'd like her to prove that vibe wrong. I plan on giving her some breathing room to operate Day 2 because I know it's easy to lose sight of other things when you're fighting for your own life.
Wilgy and bea are my top suspects. I told Wilgy I'd present him with my history lesson so for anyone curious here's his ISO from
Recruitment IV (unrecruited then civ) and
Pikmin (where he was civ and, in this very thread, claims to have barely played). Let the record show that in Pikmin he had 22 posts in the first 48 hours of the game and attempted to engage multiple players in multiple discussions. In this game he had 8 posts in the first 72 hours, granted this game is of larger scale than Pikmin. In Star Wars he had 5 posts in the first 72 hours. Take from that what you will. But his rate of posting isn't the only reason he's suspicious to me. The only player I see him engaging in meaningful discussion here is Mac who he's agreeing with, I don't see him trying to engage in discussions with others who's opinions do not line up with his own, unless it's to defend himself or toss out a quick read. As I said before Wilgy could go a long way toward changing my mind by proving he's engaged with the game, and I didn't get him lynched Day 1 so he has that chance now.
For bea I feel she is trying to fly under the radar. I said before that her lack of catch up posts makes me think she's reading the thread and reacting to it at different times and that makes me feel like she's trying to be careful. She did say that she wasn't doing her catch-up posts because she gets flak for doing them but I hereby give her permission to do them again because those posts help me get the best feel for her as a player. In addition I've mentioned her a few times now but those mentions seem to have gone unnoticed and I don't know bea to be a player who doesn't respond to posts about her. When bea is civ I can usually feel it and I'm not feeling it this game. She too has a chance to prove her civvieness to me going forward. And you know I love ya bea.
I did not have reads on Wilgy or Scotty, yetanother reason I did not want to vote for either of them. In a game where I could not change my vote, a I was getting pushes from several directions, I was paranoid.
Wilgy had not been online at all, not just in the thread, he had not been anywhere, and it was Day One. Scotty did not seem any different than he usually does tome when he getslynched early often. Not as often as sig, your initial target. But enough.
I have extensive experience with Bea,and I don't think she has BTSC. When her schedule allowed for it, she was doing all of her yay, happy girl stuff in the thread. Plus I think if she had a partner, she DOES check chat on her phone at work, she would be in here posting more if she were being nudged.
I think she is yet another easy target for a lynch. It is possible she is one of those indies, but I don't think she has a partner.
You did not have reads on Wilgy or Scotty, and you say "yet another reason [you] did not want to vote for either of them", but this is the FIRST reason you've given. And I don't think it was so much to ask that you share that
before the lynch, when you were around at EoD, because not sharing your thoughts is what gave me the impression that you weren't interested in who was lynched as long as it wasn't you.
You're throwing a lot of shade at me here, emphasizing that you think my lynch targets are easy as often as you can. I would call this a "carefully crafted" post. In any case, if you think my suspects are easy then fine, but my thoughts are genuine and I've been out here trying to figure the game out since the word go.
S~V~S wrote:Turnip Head wrote:I feel like the answers you're seeking are in the thread.
When someone asks someone a question, and they direct them to the thread instead of just answering, it gets my eye. Pretty much always.
I don't see you (or anyone else) answering spirtyo's pointless question. Maybe I just said what everyone else was thinking. If he wants to know why Scotty and Wilgy received votes he can read the thread. It's not like we all cast silent ballots.
S~V~S wrote:You sound rather annoyed here. This also got my eye while you were discussing the whole we/they thing with Mac. Not a thing I associate with you.
S~V~S wrote:I did not and do not find anything odd about THs word choices. I have seen people lambasted for "trying too hard" by saying "we", and also seen them attacked for saying "they", like, "Oh aren't you a civ, that you talk about 'them' in the third person?". And his reaction was more inline with what I would expect from him as a civ. He would have been smoother & shrugged it off more had he been bad, I think.
Which one is it, SVS?
S~V~S wrote:Another thing that getsmy eye is that you seem to be throwing out a lot of darts, and dropping them if they don't stick in a target. You lobbed one at me, I defended against it, and you dropped it until others picked it back up again.
If by "throwing out a lot of darts" means trying to find baddies, and "dropping them if they don't stick to a target" means I don't pursue someone I no longer suspect, then that's exactly what I'm doing
I genuinely care about the guy a great deal. He's probably the player with whose playstyle I feel most familiar. I've been burnt that many times by him though in these games, I know just what he's capable of... 
