So to recap you made a silly post blowing what I said entirely out of proportion then you read further and realized I said pretty much the exact opposite of what you think I said but then it doesn't matter because something silly.Golden wrote:Apparently everything else is sarcasm too. Your entire response to my ping has done absolutely nothing to make me feel better about you. You drew on posts that were made later, you made sarcastic remarks at me, but it takes you about ten posts just to address the original ping?
I understand that after the post that pinged me you said other things but:
1) I was reading the thread in order and so it pinged me before I read the things you said later
2) I don't see 'looking into juliets' because of gordon's message in any way as being less suspicious.
As pointed out to you, gordon had no info... but you charge ahead on the basis that you have no better idea of where to look? The whole thing reads so false to me.
And, in my opinion, I can't say I've ever seen juliets look more civ than she has in this game, and I don't need to look at her posts again to come to that opinion.
What feels "false" specifically? That, having focused my attentions on MP and his suspiciousness for the better part of 2 in-game days I'd feel a little bit adrift now that he's been sorted, and seeing what I took to be the advice of the civ gossiper I decided to look into someone to see if I found them suspicious? How is that "false", that's literally what the game is about.