Dragon D. Luffy wrote:Golden wrote:Know why you're really bitching, epi?
Because you didn't agree, and wanted sig gone. It's as simple as that really. You don't like that sig survived another day.
It's not because the gleam votes weren't well reasoned.
We lynched gleam because he is bad at the game. By bad I mean, he plays in a way that seems not optimal most of the time. It is possible he may not actually be that bad.
We lynch Sig every time for the same reason. We have also lynched people like Metalmarsh, Scotty, Vompatti and many others.
We look for a standard in towniness and lynch anyone who doesn't follow them. Then after we lynch the same player as a civ over ane over, we finally learn they work that way and move on to the next new player with a weird playstyle that shows up. So we can lynch them over and over.
Meanwhile, scum players who are skilled at following the standard and looking town, like Golden, Ricochet and FZ, own this site and contribute for it to have what might be the highest scum/town win rate of the internet.
That has to stop. We need to stop lynching weird players for being weird, anf learn to read them more. I am guilty of that toi, but I am not the only one.
No, you know what has to stop in this game?
People assuming the lynches aren't coming from reading people.
People painting others motives as uninformed when they are anything but.
I get told I'm arrogant by you, but then this? Come on!
If you think you know how to catch baddies, then catch them. Get on with it! You must be the great baddie catcher!
I don't think any of the four people who have been lynched have been lynched for the same reasons. Nor have any of the reasons been lazy or uninformed. That includes the two people who were lynched that I didn't agree with. All of them were lynched for proper, well-reasoned thought processes. No-one is phoning it in.
Trying to make it look like we are 'doing something wrong' and there is some objective baddie-finding standard we are all, as a community, failing to meet has just one word to it, in my opinion...
Manipulative.
VERY VERY manipulative.
If people weren't really thinking and trying to solve the game, sig would have been lynched unanimously two days ago.
My win rate as town is pretty good. I don't contribute to a 'high scum win rate'. Since I arrived at this site, I've contributed just as crucially to civilian wins.
I don't look for weird play styles. I never wanted to lynch sig because he 'plays weird'. I wanted to lynch him because, in a period of what would have been stress to the baddie team, he came out looking worst in that short period of time. LC wasn't lynched for playing weird. Fuzz wasn't lynched for playing weird. Diiny wasn't lynched for playing weird.
You speak for yourself as to why you voted gleam. I didn't vote HIM because he 'played weird' either.
In truth, if we had caught two out of four cops in the first four lynches, town would be well ahead in this game. We'd be feeling like we were doing really well. Criticising the entire town for playing the game wrong when they've only managed one out of four is, to me, just.... I don't even have a word for it.
I don't like the narrative you and epi are both trying to push. It's
really false.