Yup.Zany Dex wrote:So snow dog you still refusing to vote now?

Moderator: Community Team
Yup.Zany Dex wrote:So snow dog you still refusing to vote now?
Even if I vote you and tie you?Snow Dog wrote:Yup.Zany Dex wrote:So snow dog you still refusing to vote now?
Aah.Zany Dex wrote:Even if I vote you and tie you?Snow Dog wrote:Yup.Zany Dex wrote:So snow dog you still refusing to vote now?
You are not nice.Zany Dex wrote:votes snow dog
Calling your bluff.
I'm not sold on anyone tbh amd didn't want my vote wasted.
I am nice, well I can beSnow Dog wrote:You are not nice.Zany Dex wrote:votes snow dog
Calling your bluff.
I'm not sold on anyone tbh amd didn't want my vote wasted.
This is inexcusable.Kate wrote:Voting epig. Lost my post. Cant catch up npw sry.
Epignosis wrote:This is inexcusable.Kate wrote:Voting epig. Lost my post. Cant catch up npw sry.
Epignosis wrote:If llama is good, it means we exist in a universe in which multitasking llama can call out the first of two mafia while simultaneously calling out two civilians.
I don't want to live in that universe.
Epignosis wrote:If llama is good, it means we exist in a universe in which multitasking llama can call out the first of two mafia while simultaneously calling out two civilians.
I don't want to live in that universe.
Epignosis wrote:If llama is good, it means we exist in a universe in which multitasking llama can call out the first of two mafia while simultaneously calling out two civilians.
I don't want to live in that universe.
Should that of been in orange?Snow Dog wrote:RIP Epi. Such a shame.
No I didn't. And if I did why would I reveal that so obviously?Zany Dex wrote:Rip epig.
So snow new he wasn't gonna be lynched yeah?
Why? Is he not a civ (as far as one can tell.....)Zany Dex wrote:Should that of been in orange?Snow Dog wrote:RIP Epi. Such a shame.
I sensed sarcasm, maybe I was mistaken.Snow Dog wrote:Why? Is he not a civ (as far as one can tell.....)Zany Dex wrote:Should that of been in orange?Snow Dog wrote:RIP Epi. Such a shame.
No, no sarcasm. I'm thinking he was civ but if Delbert finds him it might be another matter. Who knows in this game anyway. We do know we want Stephen King lynched though.Zany Dex wrote:I sensed sarcasm, maybe I was mistaken.Snow Dog wrote:Why? Is he not a civ (as far as one can tell.....)Zany Dex wrote:Should that of been in orange?Snow Dog wrote:RIP Epi. Such a shame.
Turnip Head wrote: We need to lynch Pennsylvania Bitch.
We would have been able to get the thoughts of someone confirmed to be trustworthy without having to wonder about their allegiance. But as Epi is just as fallible as the rest of us as far as I can tell, it's not too drastic of a consequence. Unfortunate definitely, but I'm not going to cry too much about it.Hedgeowl wrote:I wonder what advantage having Jack's notes typed up might have given us. Is this the consequence we didn't want that Epi alluded to?
You were the one reading Eliphas Levi's Transcendental Magic, weren't you Vomps? Not surprising then that you should find the attribution of Kubrick films to Qabalah and Hermeticism interesting.Vompatti wrote:This looks relatively interesting.
Epignosis wrote:If llama is good, it means we exist in a universe in which multitasking llama can call out the first of two mafia while simultaneously calling out two civilians.
I don't want to live in that universe.
YES. Totally, Epig reminds me of Golden very much. If Golden comes off of break again, it will be interesting to see them play together.Zany Dex wrote:Is it just me or does anyone see another golden!?
Anyways, as I read, I see a frustrated epig making threats, that'd not cool.
And MP what seems to be enjoying winding him up,
I always saw golden as a baddie so I'm not going to vote epig just yet, give him a chance I think.
But like SVS said, I suppose it's not a total loss. It's just kind of a bummer, I think.Epignosis wrote:
Trust me- you didn't shake my tree. Only my wife does that.
I'll just leave this note here for the rest of the folks:
It's not a good idea to vote for me, so don't do it.
I agree with this! Plus, I love all kinds of games.Nevinera wrote:Let's go to the game room and get a rousing round of mafia started!
turethellama73 wrote:You were the one reading Eliphas Levi's Transcendental Magic, weren't you Vomps? Not surprising then that you should find the attribution of Kubrick films to Qabalah and Hermeticism interesting.Vompatti wrote:This looks relatively interesting.
Turnip Head wrote: We need to lynch Pennsylvania Bitch.
I'm guessing the Gradys and possibly the bartender?MovingPictures07 wrote:So which roles do we believe need to be dead for a civvie win here?
Obviously Stephen King, but other than that, I suppose it's somewhat open to analyzing.
I was thinking that too. There's also the Overlook, which looks like an independent-type role. I realize the win conditions are probably more complex than "civvie, baddie", but I just want to try and wrap my head around this.Vompatti wrote:I'm guessing the Gradys and possibly the bartender?MovingPictures07 wrote:So which roles do we believe need to be dead for a civvie win here?
Obviously Stephen King, but other than that, I suppose it's somewhat open to analyzing.
Anyway, I'm kind of hungry but I feel like taking a look at the game room first.
You were right the first time. "A pair" is singular (as distinct from multiple pairs) so a pair of tight trousers IS like a cheap hotel.Snow Dog wrote:I wish one could edit. Why are....why are...why are!!!!
Epignosis wrote:If llama is good, it means we exist in a universe in which multitasking llama can call out the first of two mafia while simultaneously calling out two civilians.
I don't want to live in that universe.
Oh good.thellama73 wrote:You were right the first time. "A pair" is singular (as distinct from multiple pairs) so a pair of tight trousers IS like a cheap hotel.Snow Dog wrote:I wish one could edit. Why are....why are...why are!!!!
You'd have to be absolutely mental to do that.Snow Dog wrote:^So your posts being backwards was not you physically doing it?